Sign Languages for Linguistics 1 (Stanford)
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Sign Languages for Linguistics 1 (Stanford)

on

  • 2,472 views

This introduction to ideas about sign languages was prepared for Stanford University's Linguistics 1 course in November 2008. It emphasizes the 4 myths, shows some authentic ASL vlogs and websites ...

This introduction to ideas about sign languages was prepared for Stanford University's Linguistics 1 course in November 2008. It emphasizes the 4 myths, shows some authentic ASL vlogs and websites that use ASL as one of the modes of communication. (Links have not been verified again.)

Statistics

Views

Total Views
2,472
Views on SlideShare
2,452
Embed Views
20

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
52
Comments
0

6 Embeds 20

http://www.slideshare.net 9
http://www.linkedin.com 6
http://coatbridge.blackboard.com 2
http://ig.gmodules.com 1
http://wildfire.gigya.com 1
https://www.linkedin.com 1

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Sign Languages for Linguistics 1 (Stanford) Sign Languages for Linguistics 1 (Stanford) Presentation Transcript

  • Sign Language: At least 4 myths, a few true facts, and fun stuff from the web Nancy Frishberg, Ph.D. nancyf@fishbird.com 12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 1
  • Always start with a joke 12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 2
  • Goals for Today •  Let’s share assumptions and questions about sign language •  Let’s correct some misunderstandings and decide how to reconcile some incompatible ideas •  Let’s agree on how to decide whether sign language fits in the scheme of human language behavior •  Let’s learn a few fun facts about signing 12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 3
  • My contact with deafness •  Hard of Hearing mother •  Toddler friend also “Hard of Hearing” •  Junior High School friend had deaf grandparents –  We spelled; I learned a dozen signs •  Grad school entry (in linguistics) coincided with Bellugi’s first NIH grant 12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 4
  • Your experiences with Deafness? Signing? •  School? •  Informal contact? •  Scouts? •  Formal instruction? •  Sesame Street? •  Language Files •  Other TV? Movies? readings? This is where you get to ask stupid questions -- but, there are no stupid questions -- and reveal your assumptions and preconceptions 12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 5
  • Some of the student questions •  Genetics of deafness? •  When did signing start? •  Differences between •  How does sign express ASL and other sign ideas like “sarcasm”? languages •  Shouldn’t there be one •  Expressive capacity? sign language – •  How does ASL create universal? new words •  Regional differences •  Is ASL grammar •  “Music” equivalent? equivalent to English grammar 12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 6
  • A Couple of Examples of Fluent Signing •  Jane Norman’s blog and vlog http://thedeaflens.com/?cat=24 •  Hatrak Sisters Enterprises http://www.hatraksisters.com/ 12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 7
  • 4 Myths - 2x2 •  Signing is Pantomime •  Signing is Universal •  Signing is a coded form of speech •  Signing is fingerspelling 12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 8
  • Myth! Signing is Pantomime •  Is pantomime conventional? standardized? –  Or can it change from one person to another? From one occasion to another? –  How about signing? •  Does pantomime fit the temporal requirements or habits of a human language? •  How culturally bound is pantomime? How about signing? •  Does pantomime imply “concrete” or “simple”? How about signing? 12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 9
  • Myth! Signing is Universal •  If signing were a universal language, then –  You would understand what we’ve seen on these vlogs and websites without transcripts or interpretation –  You would not need any help understanding what any deaf person signs –  People from around the world would be able to communicate with each other successfully and effortlessly in gesture –  There would not be many sign languages, nor regional variation within each sign language 12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 10
  • Signing is Myth! a coded form of speech •  If signs are coded speech, then there is a 1:1 relationship between signs and spoken language –  At what level would this coding happen? •  Sounds? Cf. Cued speech •  Words? Parts of words? Cf. SEE, etc. •  Spelling? (see next slide) 12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 11
  • Myth! Signing is fingerspelling Fingerspelling is a method of representing (English) words using a series of manual gestures that correspond to the alphabet •  No difference between capital and lowercase, limited use of punctuation –  i.e., it’s not writing •  One-handed vs. two-handed spelling –  Quick aside on history of ASL and BSL, Rochester Method •  How does it function in the stream of signs? 12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 12
  • Signing is •  A mode of producing and perceiving specific primary human languages –  ASL ≠ BSL; ASL ≠ LSF –  Different sign languages are not mutually intelligible to native signers –  Not transparent to non-signers, but possible more obviously iconic than (most) spoken languages •  Capable of all expression available to other modes of human language –  Meets the duality of patterning criterion for human languages 12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 13
  • Modalities of Production Speech Signing One articulator Two articulators, plus face/body Invisible to speaker Generally visible to signer Invisible to addressee Visible to addressee Asymmetric Mirror-image symmetric Breathing, vocalization, pitch, Gesture area, size of space, timbre, pausing, silence rhythmic structures, pausing, silence Other? Other? 12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 14
  • Modalities of Perception Speech Signing Ears - auditory Eyes - visual (& tactile?) Omni-directional Subscribed visual angle Speech concentrated in certain Foveal vs. peripheral vision; frequencies of human hearing cones and rods Distance limits? Barriers? Distance limits? Barriers? Noise? Darkness? Noise? Darkness? Speaker’s voice competes with Signer and addressee can addressee’s voice overlap without apparent conflict Other? Other? 12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 15
  • Questions •  From the reading •  From our discussion so far •  If time permits, we’ll continue to … 12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 16
  • 2 Articulators + Face 12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 17
  • One- & Two-handed signs Teuber, et al. (1980) computer tally of 1628 non-compounds 1-handed signs 38% N = 585 2-handed signs 62% N = 1230 Drawn from Stokoe, Casterline & Croneberg’s Dictionary of American Sign Language (1965). Not based on usage frequency, but on dictionary entries. 12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 18
  • Constraints on 2-handed signs Two hands have the same shape? Yes No Type 1 Type 4 Two Yes hands both Type 2 Type 3 moving? No 12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 19
  • Type 1 •  Two hands same shape •  Both hands both move 12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 20
  • Type 2 •  Two hands same shape •  One hand moves 12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 21
  • Type 3 •  Two hands different shapes •  One hand moves 12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 22
  • Type 4 •  Two hands different ? shapes •  Both hands move 12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 23
  • Constraints on 2-handed signs Two hands have the same shape? Yes No Symmetry *
 (ill-formed in Yes Condition Two ASL) 32% hands 1% both Symmetry Dominance moving? No (shape) & Condition Dominance 19% (relations) 11% 12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 24
  • (at least) 5 Functions of the Face in ASL 1.  Affective •  speaker attitude toward utterance 2.  Intensifier; other adverbials •  RECENTLY •  THHH, tongue flap 3.  Lexical •  LATE vs NOT YET; PAH! 4.  Sentential intonation markings •  Q, REL… 5.  Backchannel •  one nostril twitch vs. two nostril twitch 12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 25
  • Beyond Marlee Matlin 12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 26
  • Beyond Marlee Matlin •  Marketing materials from companies who know they have culturally Deaf customers –  http://www.goamerica.com/10digit/ (25 Sept 08) –  http://www.deafmd.org/ •  Deaf Folklore turns into mainstream ad “Bob’s House” (Pepsi Ad, SuperBowl08) –  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ffrq6cUoE5A 12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 27
  • Research about New Technologies & Signing •  Recognizing ASL for dictionary lookup –  http://www.thoughtware.tv/videos/show/2870 •  Signs webcast from home –  http://uts.cc.utexas.edu/~ekeating/Publications/ ASLVirtSpace.pdf 12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 28
  • Mobile ASL (U Washington) •  What is required to carry ASL conversations over US cell phones? –  SW: Appropriate frame rate, compression –  Machine vision: Skin detection, activity detection –  HW: Camera on same surface as screen http://mobileasl.cs.washington.edu/ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FaE1PvJwI8E 12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 29
  • Online “Dictionaries” of ASL http://gupress.gallaudet.edu/bookpage/ GDASLbookpage.html (this is where I took the 2-handed examples from) http://www.lifeprint.com/index.htm (this is the one that Language Files uses) http://www.handspeak.com/tour/index.php (yet another dictionary that shows examples from ASL and a few other sign languages) Bibliography of Sign Language http://www.sign-lang.uni-hamburg.de/BibWeb/ 12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 30