David Horky<br />Country Manager – Central & Eastern Europe<br />david.horky@thomsonreuters.com<br />Solutions for Researc...
Agenda<br />Web of Science – Life Demonstration<br />EndNote Web – Life Demonstration<br />ResearcherID<br />Questions<br ...
Web of Science® : STANDARD for Research Evaluation<br />“Multidisciplinary” coverage<br />enable to analyze the whole cont...
Citation Linking<br />2004<br />2006<br />2003<br />Times Cited<br />2007<br />2000<br />Cited References<br />2000<br />R...
References<br />Cite While You Write™<br />While writing a paper in MS Word, utilize an EndNote Web toolbar to:<br />Searc...
WEB OF SCIENCE JOURNAL SELECTION POLICY<br />Why do we select journals?<br />
THOMSON REUTERSJOURNAL CITATION REPORTS<br />40% of the journals: <br /><ul><li>  80% of the publications
  92% of cited papers</li></ul>4% of the journals: <br /><ul><li>  30% of the publications
  51% of cited papers</li></li></ul><li>COMPARE LIKE WITH LIKEWHAT IS THE VALUE OF A CITATION?<br />Why do people cite?<br...
WEB OF SCIENCE JOURNAL SELECTION POLICY<br />Approx. 2000 journals evaluated annually<br />10-12% accepted<br />Thomson Re...
THOMSON REUTERSJOURNAL SELECTION POLICY<br />Publishing Standards<br />Peer review, Editorial conventions<br />Editorial c...
GLOBAL RESEARCH REPRESENTATION<br />WEB OF SCIENCE COVERAGE<br />
EVALUATING COUNTRIES<br />
CHANGING NATURE OF HUNGARIAN RESEARCH<br />13<br />Hungary averaged just over 3,000 papers a year in the 70s – 90s.<br />N...
CHANGING NATURE OF HUNGARIAN RESEARCHINTERNATIONAL COLLABORATION<br />14<br />Between 1970 and 1999, 30% of Hungarian pape...
SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY IN CENTRAL EUROPE<br />15<br />Thomson Reuters InCites<br />
SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IMPACT IN CENTRAL EUROPE<br />16<br />Thomson Reuters InCites<br />
EVALUATING INSTITUTIONS (1)EXTERNAL COMPARISONS<br />
EVALUATING INSTITUTIONS<br />Number of citations to North American scientific papers<br />Source: Thomson Reuters         ...
INSTITUTIONAL COMPARISONSCOMPARING IMPACT IN BIOLOGY?<br />19<br />Cambridge<br />Oxford<br />Stirling<br />Thomson Reuter...
INSTITUTIONAL COMPARISONSIN SPECIFIC FIELDS<br />20<br />Thomson Reuters InCites<br />
INSTITUTIONAL COMPARISONSBIOLOGY PERFORMANCE<br />21<br />Thomson Reuters InCites<br />
EVALUATING INSTITUTIONS (2)INTERNAL ANALYSIS<br />
WHAT IS OUR RESEARCH OUTPUT?<br />23<br />Thomson Reuters InCites<br />
HOW DID THIS PAPER PERFORM WITHIN ITS JOURNAL / FIELD?<br />24<br />This highly cited article is in the 0.006th percentile...
WHICH ARE OUR CENTERS OF EXCELLENCE?<br />25<br />Physical Chemistry<br />Computer Science<br />41% below average<br />220...
WITH WHOM DOES OUR FACULTY COLLABORATE?<br />26<br />Thomson Reuters InCites<br />
WHICH OF THOSE COLLABORATIONS ARE THE MOST VALUABLE?<br />27<br />Thomson Reuters InCites<br />
INCITESCITING ARTICLES LISTING<br />Thomson Reuters InCites<br />
CITING PAPERSIN THE FIELD OF PHYSICS<br />29<br />Thomson Reuters InCites<br />
EVALUATING INDIVIDUALS<br />
WHO ARE OUR MOST PRODUCTIVE AUTHORS?<br />31<br />Thomson Reuters InCites<br />
WHO ARE OURMOST INFLUENTIAL RESEARCHERS?<br />32<br />Thomson Reuters InCites<br />
WHICH AUTHORS HAVE MOST IMPACT?<br />33<br />Thomson Reuters InCites<br />
WHICH AUTHORS’ PAPERS HAVE PERFORMED BEST IN THEIR FIELD?<br />34<br />Thomson Reuters InCites<br />
HOW CAN WE COMPARE RESEARCHERS?<br />35<br />Author A: 60 papers<br />Author B: 117 papers<br />Thomson Reuters InCites<br />
ResearcherID.com<br />
RESEARCHERIDSCHOLARLY RESEARCH COMMUNITY<br />Accurate Identification<br />Organize and Manage<br />Increase Visibility an...
INDIVIDUAL LEVELRESEARCH EVALUATION<br />See personalized metrics using Web of Science citation data<br />View accurate pu...
RESEARCHER IDANALYZE COLLABORATION NETWORK<br />Seek global collaboration opportunities by author, field, institution or c...
RESEARCHER IDVISUALIZE CITING ARTICLES NETWORK<br />
RESEARCHER IDELECTRONIC CV RESOURCE<br />ResearcherID Profile: http://www.researcherid.com/rid/A-9180-2008<br />
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Tr georgia 05 2010

1,053 views
976 views

Published on

Published in: Technology, Education
0 Comments
2 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total views
1,053
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
11
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
4
Comments
0
Likes
2
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • For each paper, InCites calculates two numbers: the actual citations received and the expected citations. The expected citations are defined as the mean number of citations received by all Web of Science papers published in the same subject field, the same year and are the same document type, e.g. Review or Article. Then for each author, we calculate the total number of actual citations received and divide it by the total number of expected citations. This is what we term the Category Actual versus Expected Cites, or CXC for short.Now we really can make a valid comparison between the biologists and the economists.
  • Tr georgia 05 2010

    1. 1. David Horky<br />Country Manager – Central & Eastern Europe<br />david.horky@thomsonreuters.com<br />Solutions for Research Evaluation from Thomson Reuters<br />
    2. 2. Agenda<br />Web of Science – Life Demonstration<br />EndNote Web – Life Demonstration<br />ResearcherID<br />Questions<br />2<br />
    3. 3. Web of Science® : STANDARD for Research Evaluation<br />“Multidisciplinary” coverage<br />enable to analyze the whole context of scientific research<br />“Multiyear” coverage<br />enable to analyze the history and development of sciences<br />“Cover to Cover” policy<br />enable to follow the flow of a topic regardless of communication type <br />“ALL Authors, ALL Addresses”<br />enable to analyze by author name, by institution<br />“ALL Cited References”<br />enable to perform analyses on literature that is not indexed<br />The CONSISTENCY enables large-scale counting and reliable analyses<br />
    4. 4. Citation Linking<br />2004<br />2006<br />2003<br />Times Cited<br />2007<br />2000<br />Cited References<br />2000<br />Related Records<br />1974<br />1998<br />2004<br />1993<br />1999<br />2002<br />1994<br />
    5. 5. References<br />Cite While You Write™<br />While writing a paper in MS Word, utilize an EndNote Web toolbar to:<br />Search and “Find Citations” within one’s End Note Web Folders and… <br /> -- insert the appropriate reference within the text and…<br /> -- automatically insert the complete cited reference in the bibliography of the paper…<br /> -- in the format that you choose.<br />
    6. 6. WEB OF SCIENCE JOURNAL SELECTION POLICY<br />Why do we select journals?<br />
    7. 7. THOMSON REUTERSJOURNAL CITATION REPORTS<br />40% of the journals: <br /><ul><li> 80% of the publications
    8. 8. 92% of cited papers</li></ul>4% of the journals: <br /><ul><li> 30% of the publications
    9. 9. 51% of cited papers</li></li></ul><li>COMPARE LIKE WITH LIKEWHAT IS THE VALUE OF A CITATION?<br />Why do people cite?<br />Pay homage / give credit to pioneer<br />Identifying a methodology<br />Provide background reading<br />Quotations<br />Authenticating data, reproducing work etc<br />Corrections<br />Criticizing/Disclaiming someone's work/opinions<br />Citations are an indicator of an article’s impact and usefulness to the research community; they are the mode by which peers acknowledge each other’s research.<br />The value of a citation is only as important as its source. <br />Clearly a citation from a prestigious peer review journal has more value than a citation from non-scholarly material. <br />How can you be sure that the citing source is reputable?<br />“When to Cite”, E. Garfield, Library Quarterly, v66, p449-458, 1996<br />
    10. 10. WEB OF SCIENCE JOURNAL SELECTION POLICY<br />Approx. 2000 journals evaluated annually<br />10-12% accepted<br />Thomson Reuters editors<br />Information professionals <br />Librarians <br />Experts in the literature of their subject area<br />Journal ‘quality’<br />Web of Science <br />Journals under evaluation<br />
    11. 11. THOMSON REUTERSJOURNAL SELECTION POLICY<br />Publishing Standards<br />Peer review, Editorial conventions<br />Editorial content<br />Addition to knowledge in specific subject field<br />Diversity<br />International, regional influence of authors, editors, advisors<br />Citation analysis<br />Editors and authors’ prior work<br />Thomson Reuters journal selection process:<br />http://thomsonreuters.com/products_services/science/free/essays/journal_selection_process/<br />
    12. 12. GLOBAL RESEARCH REPRESENTATION<br />WEB OF SCIENCE COVERAGE<br />
    13. 13. EVALUATING COUNTRIES<br />
    14. 14. CHANGING NATURE OF HUNGARIAN RESEARCH<br />13<br />Hungary averaged just over 3,000 papers a year in the 70s – 90s.<br />Now well over 7,000 papers per year<br />
    15. 15. CHANGING NATURE OF HUNGARIAN RESEARCHINTERNATIONAL COLLABORATION<br />14<br />Between 1970 and 1999, 30% of Hungarian papers had at least one international author. In the last decade, 2000 – 2010, this figure has risen to 69%<br />
    16. 16. SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY IN CENTRAL EUROPE<br />15<br />Thomson Reuters InCites<br />
    17. 17. SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IMPACT IN CENTRAL EUROPE<br />16<br />Thomson Reuters InCites<br />
    18. 18. EVALUATING INSTITUTIONS (1)EXTERNAL COMPARISONS<br />
    19. 19. EVALUATING INSTITUTIONS<br />Number of citations to North American scientific papers<br />Source: Thomson Reuters <br />North America University Science Indicators<br />
    20. 20. INSTITUTIONAL COMPARISONSCOMPARING IMPACT IN BIOLOGY?<br />19<br />Cambridge<br />Oxford<br />Stirling<br />Thomson Reuters InCites<br />
    21. 21. INSTITUTIONAL COMPARISONSIN SPECIFIC FIELDS<br />20<br />Thomson Reuters InCites<br />
    22. 22. INSTITUTIONAL COMPARISONSBIOLOGY PERFORMANCE<br />21<br />Thomson Reuters InCites<br />
    23. 23. EVALUATING INSTITUTIONS (2)INTERNAL ANALYSIS<br />
    24. 24. WHAT IS OUR RESEARCH OUTPUT?<br />23<br />Thomson Reuters InCites<br />
    25. 25. HOW DID THIS PAPER PERFORM WITHIN ITS JOURNAL / FIELD?<br />24<br />This highly cited article is in the 0.006th percentile in its field<br />Nature articles from this year have been cited 135.52 times<br />Biochemistry and Molecular Biology articles from this year have been cited 23.98 times<br />Thomson Reuters InCites<br />
    26. 26. WHICH ARE OUR CENTERS OF EXCELLENCE?<br />25<br />Physical Chemistry<br />Computer Science<br />41% below average<br />220% above average<br />Thomson Reuters InCites<br />
    27. 27. WITH WHOM DOES OUR FACULTY COLLABORATE?<br />26<br />Thomson Reuters InCites<br />
    28. 28. WHICH OF THOSE COLLABORATIONS ARE THE MOST VALUABLE?<br />27<br />Thomson Reuters InCites<br />
    29. 29. INCITESCITING ARTICLES LISTING<br />Thomson Reuters InCites<br />
    30. 30. CITING PAPERSIN THE FIELD OF PHYSICS<br />29<br />Thomson Reuters InCites<br />
    31. 31. EVALUATING INDIVIDUALS<br />
    32. 32. WHO ARE OUR MOST PRODUCTIVE AUTHORS?<br />31<br />Thomson Reuters InCites<br />
    33. 33. WHO ARE OURMOST INFLUENTIAL RESEARCHERS?<br />32<br />Thomson Reuters InCites<br />
    34. 34. WHICH AUTHORS HAVE MOST IMPACT?<br />33<br />Thomson Reuters InCites<br />
    35. 35. WHICH AUTHORS’ PAPERS HAVE PERFORMED BEST IN THEIR FIELD?<br />34<br />Thomson Reuters InCites<br />
    36. 36. HOW CAN WE COMPARE RESEARCHERS?<br />35<br />Author A: 60 papers<br />Author B: 117 papers<br />Thomson Reuters InCites<br />
    37. 37. ResearcherID.com<br />
    38. 38. RESEARCHERIDSCHOLARLY RESEARCH COMMUNITY<br />Accurate Identification<br />Organize and Manage<br />Increase Visibility and Recognition<br />Measure Performance<br />Collaboration<br />Security<br />Science, March 2009<br />
    39. 39. INDIVIDUAL LEVELRESEARCH EVALUATION<br />See personalized metrics using Web of Science citation data<br />View accurate publication list due to unique author identification<br />
    40. 40. RESEARCHER IDANALYZE COLLABORATION NETWORK<br />Seek global collaboration opportunities by author, field, institution or country<br />
    41. 41. RESEARCHER IDVISUALIZE CITING ARTICLES NETWORK<br />
    42. 42. RESEARCHER IDELECTRONIC CV RESOURCE<br />ResearcherID Profile: http://www.researcherid.com/rid/A-9180-2008<br />
    43. 43. Thank you!science.thomsonreuters.com/trainingresearchanalytics.thomsonreuters.com/incites<br />David Horky<br />Country Manager – Central & Eastern Europe<br />david.horky@thomsonreuters.com<br />

    ×