• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Commercial Building Cogen In Australia
 

Commercial Building Cogen In Australia

on

  • 1,260 views

Article from Cogeneration & Onsite Power Production magazine on commercial building cogen in Australia

Article from Cogeneration & Onsite Power Production magazine on commercial building cogen in Australia

Statistics

Views

Total Views
1,260
Views on SlideShare
1,234
Embed Views
26

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
4
Comments
0

2 Embeds 26

http://www.lmodules.com 17
http://www.linkedin.com 9

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Commercial Building Cogen In Australia Commercial Building Cogen In Australia Document Transcript

    • Australian cogen challenges feature Commercial buildings in Australia have not formed an active market for cogeneration technology – until last year, when one company started to use a particular business model (against a background of growing demand for ‘greener’ building operation and rising electricity prices) to change this. Nalin Wickramasinghe writes on progress and the challenges still to be faced. Cogen comes to Australian offices changing conditions make the technology right for eastern states C ogeneration in general, and commercial building cogen- cooling. This means the overall efficiency of cogeneration is eration specifically, has had extremely low penetration in much lower as heat needs to be dumped. Whilst there has been the Australian market. There is approximately 307 MW minor deployment of absorption chillers in the past, issues of of installed capacity in the state of New South Wales1, most of reliability and very low coefficients of performance (COP) of which is accounted for by industrial applications, and almost no around 0.5, have made this an unattractive option. installed capacity in commercial buildings and offices. There are several reasons for this situation: High capital costs Australia is a relatively small market for cogeneration equipment and also a very distant market for equipment manufactured Energy costs Historically Australia – eastern states in particular – has had mostly in Europe. This results in a quite high capital cost very low electricity prices relative to the rest of the world. An of cogeneration plant and equipment as well as ongoing abundance of cheap coal-fired generation sources in the eastern replacement components. states of Australia have supported the low pricing levels for For the above reasons, on-site cogeneration as an alternative decades. As a result, switching to an alternative energy source, energy source has not been cost effective locally. such as on-site cogeneration, usually means paying a higher rate for electricity. WHAT HAS CHANGED? Over the past two to three years, there has been a remarkable increase in the acceptance of cogeneration in the Sydney Low cost of environmental compliance Whilst the Mandatory Renewable Energy Target (MRET – commercial building market. The reasons for this are several – a Federal) and New South Wales Greenhouse Abatement (NGAC combination of regulatory and market changes as well as Cogent – State) schemes levy environmental charges on electricity, they Energy’s business model. still have not raised compliance costs to a level where switching to a cogeneration supply is cost effective. Australia also lagged Rising electricity prices behind the rest of the world (excluding the USA) in not ratifying New South Wales base contract prices for electricity have the Kyoto Protocol. increased approximately 20% over the past two years2. The prolonged drought conditions experienced by the state have significantly contributed to this increase – water shortages Climate Cogeneration has traditionally been well-suited to northern have compelled generators to reduce generation output at hemisphere climates with long, cold winters and buildings with times. In addition, there is also an impending shortage of a high heating demand. In Sydney, most commercial buildings generating capacity. In New South Wales the majority of gener- have insignificant heating demands – most have only a minor ation capacity is state-owned and uncertainty of the sector’s preheating requirement at the start of the day in midwinter. ownership – potential privatization – has served as a disin- In general, Sydney commercial buildings require year round centive to investment in new plants. Cogeneration and On-Site Power Production may–june 2009 | 31
    • Australian cogen challenges feature Cogeneration Plant Room Building air M Absorption chillers Chilled Water conditioning system Metering equipment Building space M Cogeneration plant Hot Water & hot water system Power grid MCS control Building electrical Cogen switch boards M equipment distribution system Electricity Building main switch boards M Substation Electricity Control and Figure 1. Schematic of a typical plant billing centre The Australian Government ratified the Kyoto Business model Cogent Energy uses a business model based on majority Protocol in late 2007 and has announced the financing of the cogeneration plant. As Cogent is also a licensed electricity retailer, the building owner is invoiced monthly for introduction of a carbon emission trading metered energy consumed – both electrical and thermal. The key benefits of this approach are: scheme commencing July 2010 n minimal up-front capital outlay for the building owner n Cogent can achieve economies of scale in equipment Increasing focus on environmental ratings Most commercial building owners have found that blue-chip sourcing corporate tenants increasingly look for premises with high n aggregated natural gas procurement across all projects. environmental credentials. In particular, major multinationals who have global corporate objectives in relation to sustainability COGENT ENERGY BUSINESS MODEL are driven to seek high-rated buildings. This is also the case Cogent is a licensed electricity retailer and owns, operates and with Government tenants. maintains the plant. The capital cost of the plant is majority Of particular relevance are the National Australian Built financed by Cogent’s financier, with the contribution from the Environment Rating System (NABERS, administered by client minimal – usually around 10% for a standard installation. Department of Environment and Climate Change) and the Cogent invoices monthly for metered energy consumption, both Green Star rating (administered by the Green Building Council electrical and thermal. The base building (house services) usage of Australia). Cogeneration systems with integrated absorption is charged to building owner whilst the tenancy usage is charged chilling (trigeneration) can achieve an increase of up to to individual tenants. 1.5 NABERS stars and almost 1 Green Star. Most blue-chip tenants look for buildings with 4.5 NABERS stars and 4 or 5 Pricing and contracting Green Stars. Cogent’s pricing value proposition is ‘competitive energy pricing The Australian Government ratified the Kyoto Protocol compared to 50% green-blend energy from the grid.’ In New in late 2007 and has announced the introduction of a carbon South Wales coal-fired grid electricity emits approximately emission trading scheme commencing July 2010. These moves 1060 kg/MWh while the comparative figure for an on-site have also created strong expectations of electricity price gas-fired cogeneration plant is 550 kg/MWh. A building owner increases in the future and cogeneration is seen as an effective would need to purchase 50% green-blend electricity to achieve way of reducing the liability of emissions associated costs. the latter figure. In addition, there are further benefits resulting from the displacement of on-site boilers and electric chillers. Hence Cogent’s offer is very competitive. Absorption chiller technology Packaging the cogeneration system with an absorption chiller The supply agreement with the building owner is usually has significant benefit locally, due to the climate. In the past low a 12-year term, with pricing fixed for the first year. In subse- reliability and efficiency of absorption chillers have precluded quent years pricing is reviewed using the Wholesale Electricity their use. More recently COP greater than 1.3 and improved Pricing Index as a reference. At the end of the 12-year term the absorption chiller technology has resulted in a better package. options available to the client include renewing for a further 32 | may–june 2009 Cogeneration and On-Site Power Production
    • us at Come see , EN Europe POWER-G Booth D17
    • Australian cogen challenges feature Mirvac Miller Street – flagship project Cogent plant at Mirvac Miller Street Specifications of the Miller Street trigeneration plant: In 2008 Mirvac Funds Management embarked on a com- plete refurbishment of its commercial tower at 101 Miller TECHNICAL OvERvIEW: • wo 1200 kWe MTU series 4000 gas fired engines T Street, North Sydney. A key objective of the refurbishment with 415V AC alternators was to achieve a significant uplift in the environmental • wo 750 kWr Thermax exhaust fired absorption T credentials of this 39,000 m2 building. Mirvac wanted to chillers to convert engine exhaust energy to chilled achieve both a NABERS and Green Star rating of 5 – an water energy ambitious target for a circa 1990 building. • ne MDE control system to monitor and control O Being a retrofit project, Cogent had to fit its plant in to trigeneration plant the existing basement plant room – which in itself pre- • Plant can operate in grid parallel and island mode. sented a significant engineering challenge. Considerable modifications to the existing electrical switchboards were SUSTAINABILITY ACHIEvEMENT: • 5 Green Star building rating also necessary due to their age. The client’s objectives, • 5 star NABERS energy rating in terms of environmental ratings, are well on track and • 80% (max) energy efficiency the cogeneration plant is expected to save approximately • 6000 tonnes of CO2 abated per annum. 6000 tonnes per annum of carbon dioxide. period or buying out the plant at its depreciated value. Separate chiller capacity ranges from 292–1245 kWt. Engine jacket heat supply agreements are negotiated with individual tenants. recovery from these engines range from 231–1018 kWt. Control systems from MDE are used on all the plants. Plants are configured in parallel import mode with the grid, Scope of works In a typical installation, Cogent designs, configures and maintains and are currently sized at approximately 60% of the building’s plant. The company is responsible for negotiating the natural maximum demand. Energy from the grid is used as top-up. gas supply contract as well as managing the electricity network Cogent operates the plant during peak periods (typically 15 connection agreement and approvals with network operators. hours per day, Monday to Friday). Client’s scope includes the provision of suitable plant During the off-peak period the plant switches off and supply room with ventilation and sound attenuation. The client is also is purely from the grid. Currently, this mode of operation is responsible for bringing the electrical and thermal distribution the most cost effective. As there is no commercial benefit from systems and natural gas pipeline to the plant. exporting electricity, it is necessary that plants are sized below Ownership and responsibility for maintenance of assets the building’s peak so that they can operate at constant duty is delineated by the plant room – Cogent generally owns and cycle through the day. maintains what is within the plant room and the client is respon- The plants can also be configured to operate in standby sible for everything external. This also provides clarity in a (island) mode which provides the building better security of contractual sense. supply during a grid outage. As gas engines can only cope with much smaller load steps in comparison to a diesel generator, correct set up of load PLANT COMPONENTS Currently Cogent uses gas reciprocating engines from MTU, with shedding steps on the building’s main switchboard (usually capacity ranging from 386 kWe to 2 MWe. The corresponding through motorized circuit breakers), is critical in ensuring the (and matching) Thermax exhaust-fired double-effect absorption standby function works effectively. 34 | may–june 2009 Cogeneration and On-Site Power Production
    • A “SHOVEL - READY” CLEAN COAL TECHNOLOGY A Circulating Fluidized Bed power plant utilizing carbon-neutral biomass is a great solution for the environment. Adding in the right amount of coal makes it a great solution for reliable and affordable electricity. For more information on our exciting CFB technology and our other earth- friendly technologies, visit us at www.fwc.com. Visit us at Power Gen Europe, Hall 8/Booth R60
    • Australian cogen challenges feature Figure 2. Cogent’s Backoffice system – a typical plant status screen collating consumption data to support reporting for NABERS REMOTE MONITORING AND CONTROL and Green Star ratings. As the major motivation for commercial The cogeneration plant is fully monitored and maintained building owners in choosing cogeneration is achieving high by Cogent Energy, which remotely monitors the plant for environmental ratings, this is a significant feature of the monthly billing and in-depth performance analysis. The remote Backoffice system. monitoring facility is able to monitor numerous parameters of the engine such as temperatures, pressures, voltages, etc. This data can be used for live performance monitoring and historical CURRENT PROJECTS analysis, as well as predictive fault prevention. It is also possible Since formation in late 2006, Cogent Energy has made significant to remotely start and stop the engine and tweak parameters to progress in developing a distributed network of cogeneration plants. The company now employs 15 professional staff and has its head Each site is modelled within the system and office located in Melbourne. The company currently focuses on the eastern states of Australia, in particular Sydney and Melbourne. To configured according to the plant installed and date, it has quoted a potential capacity of almost 100 MW across Sydney, Melbourne, Adelaide and Brisbane. The commercial the level of monitoring required building market in Sydney was the most responsive and Cogent has installed its first four plants there. increase the performance of the unit. The Cogent Energy Backoffice system is intended to allow CHALLENGES AND RISKS management, engineering and operations staff access to monitor Whilst Cogent’s business model and approach have yielded very all plants installed on-site. The system consists of a central good progress in developing a network of cogeneration plants, server and software. Each site is modelled within the system there are many challenges yet to be overcome and risks that and configured according to the plant installed and the level of need to be managed. monitoring required. Staff access the Backoffice system on their laptops and alarm ‘flags’ can be received on PDAs. Grid/network connection Through the Backoffice system a range of dynamic screens Currently the local electricity network operators have no specific displaying plant status, single-line diagrams, process and instru- commercial terms applicable to cogeneration plant’s operator in mentation (P&I) diagrams, etc. can be accessed, allowing the ability terms of demand/capacity charges. Their assessment is based on to drill down to check plant operating data and characteristics. a site-by-site approach and this misses the overall benefit that Core functionality in the system also includes gathering and a network of distributed plants brings. Electricity grid operators Client Building m2 Engines Absorption chillers Commencement 14,000 2 x 0.386 MW 2 x 0.290 MW September 08 Blackmores 39,000 2 x 1.17 MW 2 x 0.75 MW October 08 Mirvac Miller St 40,000 1 x 0.39 MW Nil December 08 Australand 29,000 1 x 0.78 MW 1 x 0.48 MW March 09 Stockland 14,000 1 x 0.78 MW Nil – (heat 0.4 MW) October 09 University of NSW 8,500 1 x 0.39 MW 1 x 0.29 MW July 09 victoria St vIC Table 1. Projects carried out by Cogent Energy 36 | may–june 2009 Cogeneration and On-Site Power Production
    • Australian cogen challenges feature need to take a big-picture view of a cogeneration operation and appreciate the synergies available – the management of grid hot spots and overall peak demand reduction. Gas networks The monopoly owners of gas networks often don’t take a commercial view of connecting greenfield cogeneration sites, and they tend to pass on total network expansion and augmentation costs, making projects unfeasible at times. With greenfield site developments on the outskirts of the city, there can be a substantial augmentation cost to connect gas. The gas network owner may often not factor in the future value of network expansion, thereby allocating all of the costs to the cogeneration project. Environmental protection Currently there is a lack of clarity and consistency in relation to NOx emissions standards, and the authorities take a rigid view of cogeneration plants – which tends to frame projects purely in terms of NOx emission levels with no weighting attached to the carbon dioxide emissions reductions. The requirement for selective catalytic reduction could potentially render a project commercially unfeasible. Plant sizing There is risk of over sizing a plant based on projected energy loads, particularly with a new development. This is compounded by the parallel import/no-export mode of operation. If a plant is oversized then there is a risk it may not run efficiently. Currently there is no commercial value in exporting, as cogenerated energy does not fetch a premium once exported off site. Supply of tenancies Again, there is risk of over sizing a plant if some of the tenants decide not to take supply from it. Tenants have legal entitlement to choice of energy supplier and if there is inadequate take up of cogenerated supply by tenants, it could lead to a scenario where plant is oversized. SUMMARY There has been a great opportunity presented by the move to reduce commercial building carbon emissions in Australia – and Cogent Energy has seized this. The company has made progress with over 5 MW committed in Sydney in the past two years. Many other opportunities are also currently being developed. There are still many challenges to be overcome. Nalin Wickramasinghe is general manager for New South Wales with Cogent Energy, St Leonards, NSW, Australia. e-mail: nalin@cogentenergy.com.au References 1 Cogeneration in NSW – Review & Analysis of Opportunities, Institute of Sustainable Futures, Sydney, January 2008 2 http://www.d-cyphatrade.com.au This article is available on-line. Please visit www.cospp.com Cogeneration and On-Site Power Production may–june 2009 | 37