This document discusses informal organization within companies. It describes how informal organization includes social relationships, unofficial communication channels, behavioral norms, and informal power structures. While informal organization can foster cooperation and knowledge sharing, it can also spread misinformation and allow work practices to circumvent formal safety and quality procedures. The document also notes how individuals may conform or counter-conform to informal group norms under different circumstances.
3. Informal Organisation
Social relationships and groupings.
The ‘grapevine’, ‘bush telegraph’, or informal communication which by-passes the
formal reporting channels and routes.
Behavioural norms and ways of doing things, both social and work-related, which
may circumvent formal procedures and systems. New members must ‘learn the
ropes’ and get used to ‘the way we do things here’.
Power/influence structures, irrespective of organizational authority: informal
leaders are those who are trusted and looked to for advice.
5. Managerial problems of informal organization
Social groupings may act collectively against organizational interest,
strengthened by collective power and information networks.
The grapevine is notoriously inaccurate and can carry morale-damaging rumours.
Can become too important in fulfilling employees’ needs.
Informal work practices may ‘cut corners’, violating safety or quality assurance
measures.
6. • compliance
• Internalisation
• Counter-conformity
Individuals may react to
group norms in a variety
of ways.
• The issue is not clear-cut
• The individual lacks support for his own attitude
• The individuals is exposed to other members of the group
Some circumference
which put strong pressure
on the individual.
• Identification
• Sanctions
Norms may be reinforced
in various ways.
9. Ensures the organization follows its missionSTRATEGICAPEX
• Direct supervision-there’s one person issue instruction
People directly involved in the process of obtaining inputs and converting them into
outputs
OPERATINGCORE
• Standardisation of skills-in which different work is coordinated by virtue of related training the workers have received
Converts the desires of the strategic apex into the work done by the operating coreMIDDLE LINE
• Standardisation of outputs-achieves coordination by specifying results of different work
Analysers, Planners, Personnel analystsTECHNOSTRUCTURE
• Standardisation of work processes-achieves coordination by specifying the work process of people carrying out interrelated tasks
Ancillary services, do not plan/standardize productionSUPPORT STAFF
• Mutual adjustment-achieves coordination by the simple process of informal communication
11. FUNCTIONAL
Involves grouping together people who do similar tasks
ADVANTAGES
- Expertise is pooled thanks to the division of work into specialist areas.
- Its avoid duplication and enables economies of scale
- Its facilitates the recruitment, management and development of functional
specialists
- It suits centralised business
DISADVANTAGES
- Focuses on internal processes and inputs
- Communication problems may arise between different function
- Poor co-ordination
- Create vertical barriers to information and work flow
12. ADVANTAGES
- There is local decision-making at the point of contact
between the organisation and its customers e.t.c
- It may be cheaper to establish area factories/offices
than to service markets from one location
DISADVANTAGES
- Duplication and possible loss of economies if scale
might arise
- Inconsistency in methods/ standards may develop
across different areas
13. P
R
O
D
U
C
T
Every product is handled by separate
management team and the problems faced
in the development of a product are carried
out by single group of employees working
in that unit
ADVANTAGES
- Accountability
- Specialisation
- Co-ordination
DISADVANTAGES
- It increases the overhead costs and
managerial complexity of the organisation
- Different product divisions may fail to share
resources and customers
14. C
U
S
T
O
M
E
R
An organization
may organise its
activities on the
basis of types of
customer, or
market segment
Departmentation by
customer is commonly
associated with sales
department and selling
effort, but it might also
be used by a jobbing or
contraction firm where a
team of managers may
be given the
responsibility of liasing
with major customers
15. DIVISIONALISATION
DEFINITION : division of a
business into autonomous
regions or product businesses
, each with own revenue ,
expenditures and asset
purchase programmes , and
therefore each with its own
profit and loss responsibility
Divisional structure :
• Some activities are decentralized to
business units or regions
A subsidiary
company under
the holding
company
A strategic
business unit (SBU)
within the larger
company, with its
own objectives
Aprofit centre
or investment
centre withi a
single
company
DIVISION
17. ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES
ADVANTAGES
• Attention below ‘top level’
• Reduce unprofitable products and
activities
• Greater attention to efficiency , lower
costs and higher profit
• More authority to junior managers
• Reduce number of levels of management
DISADVANTAGES
• Impossible to identify completely
independent products / market
• Limited discretion can be used
• More resource problem
18. HYBRID STRUCTURE
Involve a mix of functional departmentation , ensuring specialized attention to key
functions , example of elements :
• Product organization
• Customer organization
• Territorial organization
19. THE SIMPLE STRUCTURE /
ENTREPRENEURAL STRUCTURE
• The strategic apex exerts a pull to centralize , leading to the simple structure.
• The strategic apex wishes to retain control over decision-making.
• Characteristics :-
1. Wide span of control
2. No middle line
3. Minimal hierarchy
4. No technostructure
5. Imply little formalization / standardization of behaviour
20. MATRIXAND PROJECT ORGANISATION
ADVANTAGES
• Greater flexibility of people , workflow
and decision making , tasks and structure
• Inter-disciplinary co-operation
• Motivation and employee development
• Market awareness
• Horizontal workflow
DISADVANTAGES
• Dual authority
• Conflicting demands / ambiguous roles
• Cost increases
• Slower decision-making
23. SPANOF CONTROL
Number of subordinates responsible to a superior
Factors influence:
Managers capabilities
Nature of the manager’s workload
More non-supervisory work:
Narrow the span of control
Greater the delegation of authority to
subordinates
24. TALL AND FLAT ORGANISATION
TALL
FOR:
Narrow control spans
Small groups enable team members
to participate in decision
Assist management training and
career planning
FLAT
FOR:
More opportunity for delegation
Relatively cheap
Speed up communication
25. DELAYERING
Reduction of number of management
levels from bottom to top
Why:
Information technology
Empowerment
Economy
fashion
OUTSOURCING AND
OFFSHORING
Outsourcing:
Contracting out of specified
operation or services to an external
vendor
Sending work to an external
organization
Offshoring:
Involve sending work overseas
To make cheaper labour in overseas
markets
28. CORPORATE STRATEGIES
Definition of CORPORATE : the general direction of the whole organization
CHARACTERISTICS
SCOPEOF
ACTIVITIES
ENVIRONMENT
RESOURCES
VALUES
TIMESCALE
COMPLEXITY
30. BUSINESS STRATEGY
Definition of BUSINESS : how the organization or its SBUs tackle
particular markets
Definition of BUSINESS STRATEGY : how an organization
approaches a particular product market area
31. FUNCTIONAL / OPERATIONAL STRATEGIES
FUNCTIONAL AREA
PRODUCTION
FINANCE
HUMAN RESOURCES
MANAGEMENT
INFORMATION
SYSTEMS
R & D
MARKETING
35. ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF CENTRALISATION
PRO CENTRALISATION
• EASIER TO CO-ORDINATE
• WIDER VIEW OF PROBLEMS
• BALANCE INTERESTS OF DIFFERENT
FUNCTIONS
• HIGH QUALITY OF DECISIONS
• CHEAPER
• QUICKER CRISIS DECISIONS
• STANDARDISED ORGANISATION-WIDE
( policies , procedures , documentation )
PRO DECENTRALISATION
• AVOIDS OVERBURDENING
• IMPROVES MOTIVATION
• GREATER AWARENESS OF LOCAL
PROBLEMS
• FASTER DECISION MAKING AND
RESPONSE
• DEVELOP SKILLS
• SEPARATE SPHERES OF RESPONSIBILITY
• COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY