Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
4.4 Creating a Homelessness Prevention System (Homeless Solutions Policy Board)
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

4.4 Creating a Homelessness Prevention System (Homeless Solutions Policy Board)

2,301
views

Published on

HPRP can be combined with other resources to create a set of prevention initiatives that is coordinated and strategically designed to stop high risk groups from becoming homeless. This workshop will …

HPRP can be combined with other resources to create a set of prevention initiatives that is coordinated and strategically designed to stop high risk groups from becoming homeless. This workshop will examine how communities with a coordinated prevention strategy target resources, identify and address service gaps, avoid duplication, and measure outcomes.

Published in: Education

0 Comments
2 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
2,301
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
28
Comments
0
Likes
2
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide
  • The statistics concerning people who did not make it into the program lead us to believe that these were the risk factors that showed the biggest difference for becoming homeless in our community.If a family:Had a prior shelter stayWas headed by a young parent (meaning the Head of Household was younger than 24 years old)Had children under the age of 6Was largerThis information is taken from the Ohio Department Of Development Interim Report 2, which was released in April 2009:Families who were not enrolled in the program were more likely to have:a history with child protective services a criminal history no incomecompared to families who were enrolled.  The number of prior evictions were pretty much the same between the two groups.
  • Transcript

    • 1. Homeless Solutions Policy Board
      Dayton-Montgomery County, OHJuly 2010
      Homelessness Prevention System Evolution
    • 2. Homeless Solutions Community 10-Year Plan
      Adopted June 2006
      Prevention one of four key principles in Plan. Two types of Prevention recommendations:
      Affordable Housing Assistance
      Development of 1,800 units of affordable housing
      Preserve existing affordable housing
      Create county-wide rental rehab program
      Create rental subsidy program for LIHTC projects
      Explore affordable housing set-aside program
    • 3. Homeless Solutions Community 10-Year Plan (cont.)
      Emergency Assistance
      Implement eviction prevention program modeled on Louisville, KY program for public housing and Section 8 tenants
      Consolidate existing emergency financial assistance into shared system of fund-raising, management and dispersal, with appropriate case management follow-up
      Develop eviction early warning system
      Identify and resolve discharge planning policies and practices that lead to homelessness
    • 4. Definition of Prevention
      To keep something that would have happened from happening.
      Who will it happen to? How do you reach them?
      How likely is it to happen?
      What intervention will prevent it from happening?
      Not enough to show that most people who get the intervention do not become homeless – they might not have become homeless without the intervention or their homelessness may have only been delayed.
    • 5. Prevention Committee Framing Questions
      How can emergency assistance be more efficient (targeted at those who are most at risk of homelessness)?
      How can emergency assistance be more effective (prevent homelessness for those most at risk)?
      Difference between preventing homelessness and creating self-sufficiency – need to be clear about goal.
    • 6. Emergency Assistance
      Existing emergency assistance programs help low-income people with a financial emergency but often are not able to prevent homelessness:
      Limited assistance - $500 maximum or less
      Once a year
      Help recover from a one-time event
      Households must show that they will be able to pay the rent after the assistance ends
      Households have to have the lease or utility bill in their name
      Require eviction or utility shut-off notice
    • 7. Emergency Assistance Client Analysis
      Sunrise Center – county agency that screens for several emergency assistance programs
      Compared Sunrise Center client list to HMIS
      Over two years Sunrise Center provided 2,559 households with emergency assistance
      6% entered homeless system after receiving the financial assistance
      Either fairly effective or clients were not at risk of homelessness
    • 8. Other Prevention Issues
      Do not want to replace the safety net of church, family and friends with public programs
      Some emergency assistance providers can not or will not exclusively focus on homelessness prevention
      Concern about low income households who rely on financial assistance programs but who will never become homeless
    • 9. Ohio Family Homelessness Prevention Pilot Project
      Case management and up to $1,000 in financial assistance
      Focused on preventing eviction of families from subsidized housing
      Intensive home-based case management for 3-6 months
      All households who are referred for services are entered into HMIS
    • 10. Family Homelessness PreventionScreening Matrix
      • Based on existing research on family homelessness developed risk factor screening matrix:
      • 11. Prior stay in emergency shelter
      • 12. Young parent (under 24 years old)
      • 13. Young children (under 6)
      • 14. Infant or pregnant
      • 15. Extremely low-income (less than 67% of poverty)
      • 16. Loss of benefits or employment
      • 17. Paying over 40% of income for rent
      • 18. Unable to secure other housing due to financial issues
      • 19. Prior eviction, pattern to housing instability
      • 20. No temporary housing options with family or friends
      • 21. Significant personal barriers
    • Family Homelessness PreventionEvaluation
      Conducted analysis of families who were referred for the program but not enrolled to help with HPRP planning and development of front door assessment process
      Analysis of families who were not enrolled in the program to see who become homeless:
      • 365 families referred to program
      • 22. 109 families assessed
      • 23. 92 families enrolled
      Through May 2009
    • 24. Family Homelessness Prevention Referred But Not Enrolled
      HMIS information was not available on all 273 families who were referred but not enrolled.
      HMIS information was not available for all 273 families who were referred but not enrolled.
      *Information on young children was not available for all households in this category
    • 25. Homelessness Prevention & Rapid Rehousing Program
      City & County HPRP allocation $4 million
      Coordinated planning and implementation
      Local Outcomes
      Reduce entry to homelessness through effective targeting and services
      Reduce length of time in shelter
      Spending financial assistance at double the original estimate – project 2 year program, have restructured contracts
    • 26. HPRP Targeting
      • Restricted program to households under 30% of area median income
      • 27. Clients who have been homeless before in HMIS automatically determined to be at-risk if meet all other requirements
      • 28. Clients must have 2 or more of the following risk factors to qualify:
      • 29. Monthly income below 15%
      • 30. Severely overcrowded housing
      • 31. Severe rent cost burden (more than 50% for rent)
      • 32. Homeless in last 12 months (in HMIS)
      • 33. Pending foreclosure
      • 34. Numerous previous evictions (3 or more)
      • 35. Criminal record
      • 36. Discharged from mental institution
      • 37. Young adult (18-24) with past or present involvement with foster care system
      • 38. Young adult (18-24) that have dropped out of high school or lack credits
      • 39. Young adult (18-24) with numerous previous moves
    • HPRP Households Served
      • 1,064 households received full HPRP assessment
      • 40. 876 (82%) determined to be eligible and received HPRP assistance
      • 41. 188 (18%) determined to be ineligible (mostly because not at risk of homelessness)
      • 42. 5 had shelter stays after being denied HPRP assistance
      • 43. Of the 876 households that received assistance
      • 44. 776 (89%) prevention – 41% singles, 59% families
      • 45. Highest risk factors severe rent burden and income under 15% AMI
      • 46. 223 households (29%) had entry in HMIS before HPRP assessment
      • 47. 5 households had shelter stay after HPRP assistance
      • 48. 100 (11%) rapid rehousing – 59% singles, 41% families
      • 49. 3 households had shelter stay after HPRP assistance
      Through June 30, 2010
    • 50. HPRP Outcomes
      • Number of people in shelter very high
      • 51. Ohio has been in recession for 3 to 4 years
      • 52. May 2010 unemployment rate – 11.1%
      • 53. Families in shelter or transitional housing declined from 2008 to 2009
      • 54. In winter 2010 families entering shelter had higher needs than HPRP could serve
      • 55. Will do January-June analysis for 2009 and 2010
    • ESG Prevention Funding
      Current Emergency Shelter Grant funding for City & County $358,000 – presently all committed to shelter
      Emergency Solutions Grant requirement of 40% for prevention and rehousing - $143,200 under current ESG funding (21 households/month at 1 bedroom FMR) could double with HEARTH
    • 56. Possible ESG Prevention Program
      Narrow targeting for prevention
      Previously homeless
      Young mothers with young children
      Strong emphasis on rapid rehousing particularly for single adults
      Completely different structure than HPRP
    • 57. What do we need?
      Research on preventing homelessness
      Screening tools with predictive value
      Technical assistance on effective outreach programs
      Permanent housing subsidies for low income people
      Increased benefits for people with disabilities
    • 58. Joyce Probst MacAlpine
      Manager Housing & Homeless Solutions
      Montgomery County
      937-225-4218
      macalpinej@mcohio.org

    ×