Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
  • Like
Computational stylistics (2)[1]
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×

Now you can save presentations on your phone or tablet

Available for both IPhone and Android

Text the download link to your phone

Standard text messaging rates apply

Computational stylistics (2)[1]

  • 818 views
Published

 

Published in Education , Technology
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
818
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
3

Actions

Shares
Downloads
21
Comments
0
Likes
0

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. COMPUTATIONAL STYLISTICS
    Nurul Hanna Hussein Shah 0710596
    Nurul Nadia Abdul Rahman 0710540
    Nor FadzilaAdenan 0718572
    NurNadiah Abdul Latiff 0625740
  • 2. Introduction
    Most traditional research in natural language processing and information retrieval has focused on analysing the topic of a text (what it says), but there is also much important and useful information carried in the style of a text (how it says it).
  • 3. Computational Stylistic
    Study of patterns formed in particular texts, authors, genres, periods via computational methods.
    Through the use of computers, it should be possible to achieve more accurate detection and explanation of such linguistic patterns.
  • 4. Scope of Computational Stylistic
    Count the frequency of common words, and rare words, to detect writing style, producing distinct and unmistakable “literary fingerprint” that can be used to determine if and when there have been collaborations with other text. 
    Detection of idiosyncratic uses of language which distinguish one author from another. An author's style is his signature.
    Determining the sentiment (positive or negative) of a text.
    Analyzing variation in rhetorical style among scientific articles.
  • 5. Examples of Corpus used for Computational Stylistic
    Literary texts
    Shakespeare’s works.
    Websites
    Personal Blogs
  • 6. Corpus
    A Midsummer's Nights Dream
    http://absoluteshakespeare.com/plays/a_midsummer_nights_dream/a_midsummer_nights_dream.htm
    http://www.william-shakespeare.info/shakespeare-play-a-midsummer-nights-dream.htm
    Romeo and Juliet
    http://www.shakespeare-literature.com/Romeo_and_Juliet/index.html
    http://absoluteshakespeare.com/guides/romeo_and_juliet/romeo_and_juliet.htm
  • 7. Relevance to Language Learning Or Language Research
    Concept of writer/ author ‘s style
    Shakespeare – his own authorship.
    The language research; literary language
    Improvise research – in terms of methodology
    Language used in a special way; never reflects everyday speech and may depart from the grammatical and other norms of speech
    Literary language; quite unconscious, direct, sensitive, requires no reference to non-literary usage.
  • 8. Empirical Study I
    Topic:
    “Now I am alone: A corpus stylistic approach to Shakespearian soliloquies” by Sean Murphy, Lancaster University
    Purpose:
    Aims to show what a corpus stylistic analysis can reveal about the linguistic nature of soliloquies as opposed to dialogue in Shakespeare's plays, and to what extent this methodological approach can highlight distinctions between comedies, histories and tragedies, and early plays as opposed to mid-career works.
    Methodology:
    The researcher chose 12 Shakespeare’s plays and created a soliloquies/aside document and interactional language document for each play and calculated the percentage of self talk. The documents then uploaded to Wmatrix to detect regularize words. Next, using a Multilingual Corpus Toolkit to uncover further layers of meaning. Lastly, using WordSmith Tools to carry out concordances on selected findings to determine frequent collocations.
    Tool:
    Corpora of soliloquies and aside, Shakespeare's plays, WordHoard, Multilingual Corpus Toolkit, Wmatrix and WordSmith Tools
    Findings:
    1) Differences between self-talk and interactional language - the overuse of interjections like O, and the
    expression of doubt with and yet.
    2) Soliloquiesers - they give implicit stage directions, reveal future intentions, and they generalize.
    3) In terms of topics, soliloquies appear to talk at great length about anatomy and physiology, thoughts,
    colours, love and deception.
  • 9. Empirical Study II
    Topic
    Gender in Shakespeare: Automatic Stylistic Gender Character Classification Using Syntactic, Lexical, and Lemma Features.
    Purpose
    To examine and determine the gender of literary characters of different genders; how Shakespeare used language differently for his male and female characters and discriminate the features from characters of both genders.
    Methodology
    Extracted the speeches by cleaning the stage directions.
    Considers characters with 200 or more words for both female and male characters.
    Use syntactic (PoS), lexical and lemma features in order to understand the gender a bit deeper as a stylistic approach to solve this classification approach.
    Tool
    Nameless Shakespeare, Sequential Minimal Optimization (SMO), Extensible Markup Language (XML)
    Findings
    - male and female language in Shakespeare’s characteristics is similar to that found in modern texts by male and female authors.
  • 10. THE END
    THANK YOU