Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Lentz es nonohwheat12
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Lentz es nonohwheat12


Published on

Published in: Education
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total Views
On Slideshare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

No notes for slide


  • 1. Edwin M. Lentz, Agriculture and Natural Resources Educator, OSU Extension-Hancock County, 7868 CR 140, Findlay OH 45840Abstract Methods Test weight, head number, and flag leaf NESN is a relatively new controlled-release N product for Ohio • Medium maturity variety – Hopewell concentration means in response to 80 lb N/acrewheat production. It is a polymer coated urea that the nitrogen • Nitrogen applied prior to planting – 25 lb/acrerelease is dependent upon temperature and moisture. The • Plot dimension – 10 x 70 ft from various N sourcesobjective of this study was to evaluate ESN as a nitrogen source • Seeded at 1.6 million seeds per acre into soybean stubble - Test Weight Heads Flag leaf N Sourcefor wheat production in northwest Ohio. In Fall 2009, medium- no-till, seeded within 7 days of fly-free date lb/bu /ft row N%maturity variety ‘Hopewell’ was established into soybean stubble • Leaf analysis at heading - 50 flag leaves collected per ploton the OARDC Northwest Research Station near Custar, Ohio. • Five treatments broadcast applied at early green-up, 80 lb Urea 58.9c 52.0 3.8Treatments included Urea, ESN, 75:25 urea:ESN blend, 50:50 N/acreurea:ESN blend, and a 25:75 urea:ESN blend. A nitrogen rate of o Urea 46-0-0 75 Urea: 25 ESN 58.8c 52.0 3.780 pounds per acre was applied at greenup for each treatment. o ESN 44-0-0Experimental design was a completely randomized block o 75:25 Blend – 75% Urea, 25% ESNreplicated four times. Analysis was a simple ANOVA. Grain yield, o 50:50 Blend – 50% Urea, 50% ESN 50 Urea: 50 ESN 59.5ab 52.0 3.8test weight, spike number, and N uptake were measured for each o 25:75 Blend – 25% Urea, 75% ESNtreatment. Significant differences were observed among • Experimental design - randomized block replicated four times 25 Urea: 75 ESN 59.2bc 44.0 3.7treatments for yield. ESN yields were significantly less than urea • Statistical analysis – simple ANOVAand the 75:25 and 50:50 urea:ESN blends. The 75:25 urea:ESNand 50:50 urea:ESN blends were similar to urea. Yields of the Results ESN 59.9a 44.0 3.525:75 urea:ESN blend was similar to ESN. ESN alone would not bean adequate N source for wheat production in northwest Ohio. Grain yield for ESN, Urea and lsd0.05 0.5 ns nsIt may be a viable product when blended with urea as long as theblend contains more than 50% urea. 78 Urea-ESN blend Treatments cv 0.5 11.1 5.1Introduction 76 77.1 means with different letters are significantly differentEnvironmentally Smart Nitrogen (ESN®) is a relatively new ns - no significance difference among means (p<0.05) 74 75.4technology fertilizer for the wheat industry in Ohio. It is a lsd0.05 = 3.9 bushels per acrepolymer-coated urea product developed to perform as a 74.0controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer. Limited University research 72has been completed in Ohio that compares ESN to urea. Since ConclusionsESN is more expensive to manufacture than urea, industry would 70 • Lower yields may occur when ESN is applied as the only springlike to blend ESN with urea to lower the cost per acre; 70.0 N source compared to ureainformation is lacking on the potential benefits or problems with 68 68.3 • Yields may be similar between urea-ESN blends and ureaurea:ESN blends. 66 provided that urea contributes 50% or more of the total N requirementsObjective 64 • Limited N released early in the spring growing season may haveEvaluate ESN as a nitrogen source for Ohio 62 lowered yields from ESN alone as suggested by the decrease in number of heads compared to ureawheat production Urea 75 Urea: 50 Urea: 25 Urea: ESN 25 ESN 50 ESN 75 ESN • ESN may provide more N later in the growing season than urea as suggested by the increase in test weights N Source Result Highlights Outreach and Impact • ESN alone yielded less than urea • Data has been presented at 10 county and regional meetings to • Urea-ESN blends were similar to urea when blends approximately 700 producers, consultants, and retailers contained ≤50% ESN • Test weights were larger for ESN alone than urea • As a result of this and other research, industry now blends ESN • Heads for ESN < urea at p< 0.10, but similar at p<0.05 with urea or ammonium sulfate to minimize risk of yield loss • Leaf nitrogen concentration was similar among all N that may occur from some environments in Ohio ESN Urea sources at heading Acknowledgement ESN and urea:ESN blends were provided by Crop Production Services, Attica, OH