SKOS for an Integrated Vocabulary Structure (poster)

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    SKOS for an Integrated Vocabulary Structure (poster) - Presentation Transcript

    1. SKOS for Integrated Vocabulary Structure an Marcia L Zeng Wei Fan Xia Lin Kent State University, USA | Chinese Academy of Sciences, China | Drexel University, USA SKOS for [enumerative] Introducing CCT SKOS for Mapped VocabularIes Classification Systems Chinese Classified Thesaurus Option 2. CCT as a new vocabulary Option 1. CCT as a mapping result Beyond thesauri, there are issues: 1. CCT Vocabulary Treat newly coordinated terms and notations as labels of Advantages: 1.! The order of main classes/ schedules concepts. (They did not exist in the original source •! a collected effort led by the National Library of China Semantic relationships are clear vocabulary.) Avoids semantic conflicts in applications •! Use skos:OrderedCollection to include main classes •! an integration of the national standards Chinese Library Disadvantages: and used skos:memberList to show the member in an Classification (CLC) and Chinese Thesaurus (CT) Complicated order. •! a manually created mapping product, providing for each of the Time-consuming 2. Alternative classification notations classes the corresponding thesaurus terms, and vice versa Two kinds of possible situations e.g., [Q89] environmental biology Preferred class: X17 One presentation for both Other issues: •! synthesized numbers (and terms) 2. CCT Format a combination of …! •! the add or divide like numbers 3. Top Concept types…for auxiliary tables, etc. •!i.e., classification number constructed by adding Sub-issue 1. numbers from other parts of the schedule, from a Many-to-one table, or by basing it on a pattern defined in •! Add local attributes? mapping e.g., “hasTopTableConcept” another part of the schedule. •! parallel schedules multiple terms 3. Current CCT Online Interface for one class e.g., the ‘law’ class has two parallel schedules. 4. Notations are constructed in various ways… •!faceted scheme features < -- browsing From CCT Format -- field 260: •!e.g., the ‘bridges’ class has three facets; Sub-issue 2: One–to subgroups are listed under node labels. -many mapping •! full, abridged, and extended (+) numbers Sub-issue 3: Degree of mapping Acknowledgements skos:notation doesn't record how a classification notation is built. This research is the result of collaboration with the Editorial Office Searching ! of Chinese Library Classification at the National Library of China, especially Dongbo Wang and Shuqing Bu. www.metadataetc.org/wiki
    SlideShare Zeitgeist 2009

    + Marcia ZengMarcia Zeng Nominate

    custom

    244 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    A pilot study in which a variety of selected CCT cl more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 244
      • 244 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 9
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories