KM in Higher Education by Anne S. & Robert M.
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5

KM in Higher Education by Anne S. & Robert M.



A class activity to review a KM article in education field.

A class activity to review a KM article in education field.



Total Views
Views on SlideShare
Embed Views



1 Embed 38 38



Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    KM in Higher Education by Anne S. & Robert M. KM in Higher Education by Anne S. & Robert M. Presentation Transcript

    • Knowledge Management in Higher Education A case study in a Large Modern UK University As part of class activity for WMGA6316 Knowledge Management: Tools and Techniques University Malaya Prepared by: Jennifer L. 2010 Review from article by Anne Slater and Robert Moreton
    • Objectives of Review
      • Find article related to Knowledge Management (KM) implementation in fields/areas other than IT and Computer Science
      • Review on the following:
        • How it was prior to KM implementation and after implementation
        • Methodology used
        • Problems encountered in implementation
    • Background Study
      • University is considered centers of knowledge, inevitably display a “significant level of knowledge management activities” – however it does not necessarily provide cohesive and integrated model
      • Analysis of current structure and practices in IT Services Department at University of Wolverhampton – by interviewing key staff and by reviewing published strategic priorities
      • Feb 2002: the department introduced a long-term framework of strategic and operational priorities for IT services – acknowledge that priorities of the University changes over time
      • Using a generic approach, practices and beliefs are identified to develop a cohesive and effective KM strategy
      • A set of guidelines for developing KM in IT services is presented – a product of the current strategic priorities and indicate how KM practices improve current performance and inform future initiatives/ideas
    • KM Approach
      • Identify business goal/objective
        • Create awareness that KM principles influence initiatives that had been implemented in the department
        • Experience showed most successful when the aim is to improve specific process
      • Identify existing knowledge
        • Projects initiated to develop the quality of skills and services within department
      • Create new knowledge
        • Nominate an Information Coordinator to manage information within department
        • Encourage staff to provide information/resources to be published in the intranet
    • KM Approach (cont.)
      • Share knowledge
        • Project to identify lines of communication within department by mapping links between teams, identify failed communication and proposed recommendations
        • Positive feedback from staff regarding the information provided on the intranet
        • Encourage staff to collaborate and share knowledge and experience to provide a seamless and effective service
      • Utilize and retain knowledge
        • Technology is essential for KM strategy in term of storage, distribution and access
        • Challenge: coordinate and integrate various systems to reduce time spent on maintenance and support and to create a central knowledge repository
        • Identification and documentation of Best Practice – key for retain and reuse knowledge
        • Produce Guidance Notes: common practices by individual staff with acknowledged expertise
      • Measure knowledge
        • RMS Inventory Project initiated to improve reporting functions for Service Desk – to identify trends and requirements to establish flexible and proactive service
    • Implementation Issues
      • Only a brief period of relevancy of guidelines due to rapid changes within the department and University
      • Audit of KM capabilities – 3 KM analysis modules were evaluated – provide useful focus
      • Lack of formal guidelines, organization is compelled to spend a lot of time and resources for research or employ consultancy services which are expensive – can lead to ultimate failure for implementing successful and practical KM solutions
      • IT Services Director is committed to pursuing recommendations in the guidelines – their entirety as a means of improving KM within department
    • Key Success Factors
      • Creating a trusting and open environment that encourages sharing of knowledge with appropriate rewards and recognition
      • Realize potential knowledge and expertise that already resides with their employees
      • Implement methods to retain knowledge for the benefit of organization
      • Technology plays a critical role in facilitating solutions to knowledge requirements, enabling employees to access required information efficiently
    • The End
      • Disclaimer:
      • These slides represent my personal understanding of the article and may not be entire accurate as this is only a part of a class activity for learning purpose.
      • Acknowledgement is given to the original authors as most of the words presented here are quoted directly from the article.
      • Thank you