• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Lecture 5: Primal Light

Lecture 5: Primal Light



Plotinus and the One

Plotinus and the One



Total Views
Views on SlideShare
Embed Views



1 Embed 3

http://mysteryreligions.wikispaces.com 3



Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Lecture 5: Primal Light Lecture 5: Primal Light Presentation Transcript

    • Primal Light: Plotinus and the One Lecture 5: The Legacy of Mystery Religions
    • Thesis Thesis: Plotinus gives us insight into two of the three phases of religious experience: the early Christian phase and the consolidation phase. Plotinus (204–270) deepened the idea of ecstasy in the Mystery Religions and his work inspired generations of pagan, Christian, Jewish, Islamic and Gnostic writers. His ideas influenced the consolidation of the Nicene creed by bishops in the Roman Empire and influenced later writings like those of the 6th century medieval mystic Pseudo-Dionysius.
    • Thesis The Plotinus developed the Platonic language that was used by early Christian discussion groups such as those gathered around the Gospel of John and the Gospel of Thomas. His writings also fed into the later consolidation by Christian bishops, such as their doctrine of the Trinity. Two centuries after consolidation, Christian thinkers like Pseudo-Dionysius revived Plotinus’s idea of creatures emanating from a single Source like cascading waves from a fountain or like radiation emitting from the One primal light.
    • The Three Primal Hypostases • Essay in your green book (pages 90-104) • formal title = Enneads V, 1 (Greek ennead = 9) • Hypo-stases = under-standings • "Three Basic Assumptions about Reality“ • Why “assumption,” supposition, under-standing? Because they cannot be proven or spoken, but are always assumed • This little treatise shows how to liberate the spirit through insight (gnosis). Later Christian thinkers relied heavily on this treatise when they developed the doctrine of the Trinity (tri-une, three-in-one)
    • Three Hypostases
    • Three Hypostases Soul, life, aliveness, movement, senses Intellect, patterns Oneness, the Good
    • Three Hypostases Soul Intellect One
    • Three Hypostases Spirit Son Father
    • Early Christian Gospels Groups gathered around their favorite Jesus stories, shared gospels (“good news”) and had different answers to the question: Who is Jesus? Some gospels show compatible views of Jesus (great king, messiah, divinely appointed) while some gospels challenge others. The gospels of John and Thomas both describe Jesus as “primal light of creation” (Genesis) but the John gospel challenges the Thomas gospel about where that light shines.
    • Early Gospel Christians • Johannine (John gospel) Christians • Peter Christians • Matthew, Mark, and Luke Christians (synoptic) • Thomas Christians • Mary Magdalene Christians • James Christians • Andrew Christians • (Gospel of) Judas Christians
    • Gospel of Judas (review) From inside the One, there are no boundaries, only infinite openness (child-like Jesus) From this viewpoint, all finite forms are cramping and laughable (“laughing Jesus”) Forms of morality (betrayal, loyalty) are limited and may be suspended by God as Oneness Limited definitions of good-guy / bad-guy do not exist at the heart of God (forgiveness)
    • Irenaeus of Lyons (died 202 AD) defined an orthodox doctrine (teaching) of four gospels in opposition to early Christian groups who embraced a diversity of Jesus stories. He attacked other Christians as "Gnostics" and "spawn of Satan" because they encouraged personal imagination (vision, prophecy, ecstasy) and self-reliance (Christ consciousness, inner light). Irenaeus prepared the way for later consolidation by Emperor Constantine in 325.
    • John vs Thomas The Gospel of John, favored by “Gnostics,” attacks the Gospel of Thomas. Both gospels use Neo-Platonic language but they use it differently: The Gospel of Thomas champions the inner light (Christ as Child of the Father) born in humans while the Gospel of John envisions Christ as a singular light descending from heaven and then rejected by human darkness (evil).
    • While the gospels of Mark, Matthew, and Luke portrayed Jesus as a messiah, prophet, or new king of the Jews, John's Christ has a divine singularity that becomes a final judgment on humanity and its shortcomings. Later consolidation places John's Gospel in a formative role among the three synoptic gospels and gives a special meaning to "Son of God.” John uses Platonic language (light, logos, first-born) to elevate the cosmic significance of Jesus. The primal light image is also used by the Thomas gospel.
    • John & Thomas: Primal Light The synoptic gospels proclaim Jesus as a human agent of God; both John & Thomas gospels declare Jesus to be the light of God (Genesis). The divine light that dawns on the universe as it comes into being radiates from the primal One. Following Jesus is the way humanity can re-connect with the divine light before the Fall. The Thomas gospel proclaims the primal light within every human “made in the image and likeness of God” The John gospel declares Jesus to be God’s light that contrasts with humanity’s darkness
    • John’s Gospel ranks John at the top • John is “Beloved Disciple” • Jesus loves John more than Peter • Thomas is “the Doubting Thomas” • John sits next to Jesus at Last Supper • John stays next to Jesus’s mother at the cross • Peter betrays Jesus during crucifixion • John outruns Peter to find the risen Christ • At Lake Gennesaret, John recognizes Jesus first
    • John’s Gospel puts Jesus over the top • John’s Jesus: “Who do you say I am?” • Jesus is more than God’s messiah, he is God • Jesus is unique, “only begotten son of God” • Thomas drops to knees “My Lord and God!” • Jesus is divine judge who condemns all who reject his gospel (“Only through me”) • Humans have no innate capacity to know God
    • Thomas Gospel • “When will the kingdom of God come?” Jesus said: “What you look forward to has already come, only you do not recognize it.” • “The kingdom of the Father is spread out upon the earth and people do not see it.” • “The kingdom of God is within you.” • “Whoever takes his place in the beginning will know the end and will not taste death.”
    • Thomas Gospel • “I am the light which is before all things. It is I who am all things. From me all things came forth, and to me all things extend. Split a piece of wood and I am there; lift up the stone and you will find me.” • If you bring forth what is within you, what you bring forth will save you. If you do not bring forth what is within you, what you do not bring forth will destroy you.”
    • Thomas Gospel • After consolidation, with John’s gospel at the top of the other three synoptic gospels, the Bishop Athanasius declared that all the other gospels were to be burned and their groups placed outside the law • Monks of Pachomius put 50 gospels, including Thomas, into a 6-foot urn and buried it in the desert where a shepherd found it in 1945
    • Celestial Hierarchy •Pseudo-Dionysius “the Areopagite”: mistaken identity, actually not the convert of St. Paul when he visited the Areopagus in Athens •Instead, he was 6th century medieval fan of Plotinus who focused on the multiple levels of emanation from the One.
    • Three Hierarchies, Spheres or Triads of angels, with each Hierarchy containing three Orders or Choirs: 3 x 3 = 9. The Greek word for “nine” is “ennea.” The “Enneads” of Plotinus are 9 sections each (six altogether).
    • Celestial Hierarchy •An org chart for divine radiation •Multiplicity of powers, tasks, beauties •Symmetry and balance •“great chain of being” in harmony •Emanation (branches of river), cascading fountain, radiant sun •Suggests “way back” to Source
    • Pope Benedict XVI If five centuries later, the author of these books chose the pseudonym of Dionysius the Areopagite, this implies that he had the intention of placing Greek wisdom at the service of the Gospel, promoting an encounter between culture and Greek intelligence with the announcement of Christ; he wanted to do what that Dionysius aimed to do, that is, that Greek thought would meet with the proclamation of St. Paul. Being Greek, he wanted to be a disciple of St. Paul and in this way, a disciple of Christ. Why did he hide his name and choose this pseudonym? One part of the answer I have already given: He wanted to express this fundamental intention of his thought. But there are two hypotheses about this anonymity and about his pseudonym. According to the first one, the pseudonym was a falsification by which, dating his works in the first century, in the times of St. Paul, he wanted to give his literary production an almost apostolic authority. But there is a better hypothesis than this first one, which seems hardly believable to me, and it is that he wanted to perform an act of humility. He didn't want to give glory to his name; he didn't want to construct a monument to himself with his works, but instead, to really serve the Gospel, to create an ecclesial theology, not individual and based in himself.
    • Pope Benedict XVI Why did he hide his name and choose this pseudonym? One part of the answer I have already given: He wanted to express this fundamental intention of his thought. But there are two hypotheses about this anonymity and about his pseudonym. According to the first one, the pseudonym was a falsification by which, dating his works in the first century, in the times of St. Paul, he wanted to give his literary production an almost apostolic authority. But there is a better hypothesis than this first one, which seems hardly believable to me, and it is that he wanted to perform an act of humility. He didn't want to give glory to his name; he didn't want to construct a monument to himself with his works, but instead, to really serve the Gospel, to create an ecclesial theology, not individual and based in himself.
    • Pope Benedict XVI In reality, he managed to elaborate a theology that we can date with certainty in the sixth century, but that we cannot attribute to any of the figures of this time period. It is a theology something "de-individualized," that is, a theology that expresses a common thought and language. Those were times of bitter conflict after that Council of Chalcedon. He, on the other hand, in his "7th Epistle," says: "I would not like to cause polemics; I simply speak of the truth; I seek the truth." And the light of truth by itself makes error fade and makes what is good shine. With this principle he purified Greek thought and related it to the Gospel. This principle, which he affirms in his seventh letter, is also the expression of a true spirit of dialogue: It is not about seeking the things that separate, one must seek the truth in Truth itself; this, then, shines and causes errors to fall.
    • Pope Benedict XVI Therefore, despite the fact that the theology of this author is, we could say, "supra-personal," truly ecclesial, we can place it in the sixth century. Why? The Greek spirit, which he placed at the service of the Gospel, he found in the books of a certain Proclus, who died in Athens in 485. This author belonged to late platonic thought, a current of thought that had transformed Plato's philosophy into a type of religion, whose final objective was to create a great apologetics for Greek polytheism and return, following the success of Christianity, to the ancient Greek religion.
    • Pope Benedict XVI He wanted to demonstrate that, in reality, the divinities were the forces of the cosmos. The consequence to be drawn from this was that polytheism should be considered truer than monotheism, than a single creator God. Proclus presented a great cosmic system of divinities, of mysterious forces, according to which, in this deified cosmos, man could find access to divinity. Now then, he made a distinction between the paths for the simple -- those who were not able to elevate themselves to the heights of truth, for whom certain rites could be sufficient -- and the paths for the wise, who on the other hand should purify themselves to arrive to pure light.
    • Pope Benedict XVI As can be seen, this thought is profoundly anti-Christian. It is a delayed reaction against the victory of Christianity: an anti- Christian use of Plato, meanwhile a Christian reading of the great philosopher was already in place. It is interesting that Pseudo-Dionysius would have dared to avail precisely of this thought to show the truth of Christ; to transform this polytheistic universe into a cosmos created by God, in the harmony of the cosmos of God, where every force is praise of God, and show this great harmony, this symphony of the cosmos that goes from the seraphim to the angels and archangels, to man and all the creatures, which together reflect the beauty of God and are praise of God.
    • Pope Benedict XVI He thus transformed the polytheistic image into praise of the Creator and his creatures. In this way, we can discover the essential characteristics of his thought: Before all, it is cosmic praise. All of creation speaks of God and is a praise of God. Given that the creature is a praise of God, the theology of Pseudo-Dionysius becomes a liturgical theology: God is found above all praising him, not just reflecting. And liturgy is not something constructed by us, something invented so as to have a religious experience for a certain amount of time. It consists in singing with the choir of the creatures and entering into the cosmic reality itself. And thus the liturgy, apparently only ecclesiastical, becomes ample and great, it unites us with the language of all creatures. He says: God cannot be spoken of in an abstract way; to speak of God is always -- he uses the Greek word -- a "hymnein," an elevating of hymns to God with the great song of creatures, which is reflected and made concrete in liturgical praise.
    • Pope Benedict XVI • Nevertheless, if his theology is cosmic, ecclesial and liturgical, it is also profoundly personal. I think it is the first great mystic theology. Moreover, the word "mystic" acquires with him a new meaning. Until this epoch, for Christians, this word was equivalent to the word "sacramental," that is, that which pertains to the "mysterion," sacrament. With him, the word "mystic" becomes more personal, more intimate: It expresses the path of the soul toward God. • And, how is it possible to find God? Here we observe again an important element in his dialogue between Greek thought and Christianity, in particular, biblical faith. Apparently what Plato says and what great philosophy says about God is much more elevated, much more true; the Bible seems very "barbaric," simple, pre-critical, we would say today. But he observes that precisely this is necessary so that we can thus understand that the most elevated concepts of God never reach his true greatness. They are always beneath him.
    • Pope Benedict XVI These images bring us to understand, in reality, that God is above every concept; in the simplicity of the images, we find more truth than in the great concepts. The face of God is our incapacity to truly express what he is. In this way he speaks -- Pseudo-Dionysius himself says -- of a "negative theology." It is easier to say what God is not than to express what he really is. Only through these images can we grasp at his true face and, on the other hand, this face of God is very concrete: It is Jesus Christ. If Dionysius shows us, following Proclo, the harmony of the celestial choirs, in such a way that it seems that all of them depend on each other, it is true that our path toward God remains very far from him. Pseudo-Dionysius shows that in the end, the path to God is God himself, who makes himself close to us in Jesus Christ.
    • In this way, a great and mysterious theology is made very concrete, both in the interpretation of the liturgy and in the reflection on Jesus Christ: With all of this, Dionysius the Areopagite had a great influence on all of medieval theology, on all of mystical theology, both in the East and in the West. He was virtually rediscovered in the 13th century above all by St. Bonaventure, the great Franciscan theologian who in this great mystical theology found the conceptual instrument for interpreting the heritage -- so simple and profound -- of St. Francis. The poor man, like Dionysius, tells us that in the end, love sees more than reason. Where the light of love is, the shadows of reason fade away. Love sees, love is an eye and experience gives us much more than reflection. Bonaventure saw in St. Francis what this experience meant: It is the experience of a very humble path, very realistic, day after day, it is to walk with Christ, accepting his cross. In this poverty and in this humility, in the humility that is lived also in the church, an experience of God is given that is more elevated than that which is attained by reflection. In it, we really touch the heart of God.
    • Pope Benedict XVI Today, Dionysius the Areopagite has a new relevance: He is presented as a great mediator in the modern dialogue between Christianity and the mystical theologies of Asia, marked by the conviction that it is impossible to say who God is, that only negative expressions can be used to speak of him; that God can only be spoken of with "no," and that it is only possible to reach him by entering into this experience of "no." And here is seen a similarity between the thought of the Areopagite and that of the Asian religions. He can be today a mediator like he was between the Greek spirit and the Gospel.
    • Pope Benedict XVI In this context, it can be seen that dialogue does not accept superficiality. Precisely when one enters into the depths of the encounter with Christ, an ample space for dialogue also opens. When one finds the light of truth, he realizes that it is a light for everyone; polemics disappear and it is possible to understand one another, or at least, speak to one another, draw closer together. The path of dialogue consists precisely in being close to God in Christ, in the depths of the encounter with him, in the experience of the truth, which opens us to the light and helps us to go out to meet others -- the light of truth, the light of love. In the end, he tells us: Take the path of the experience, of the humble experience of faith, every day. Then, the heart is made big and can see and also illuminate reason so that it sees the beauty of God. Let us ask the Lord that he help us today too to place the wisdom of our time at the service of the Gospel, discovering again the beauty of the faith, of the encounter with God in Christ.
    • Pope Benedict XVI • Dear Brothers and Sisters, • In today's catechesis we turn to the teaching of a sixth-century author whose writings have been attributed to the first-century disciple of Saint Paul, Dionysius the Areopagite. His two principal works, The Divine Names and Mystical Theology, strive to present a knowledge of God which surpasses rational understanding and culminates in spiritual perfection and transforming contemplation. Pseudo- Dionysius stresses the apophatic or "negative" understanding born of pondering God's infinite transcendence and otherness. By contemplating what God is not, and by entering more deeply into the rich symbolic language of Scripture, we grow in our relationship with the One who reveals himself in hiddenness. Contemplation is thus an ascent leading from purification to illumination, perfection and union with God. In the West, Dionysius' writings influenced the early scholastics and Saint Thomas, as well as Saint Teresa of Avila and Saint John of the Cross. His vision of a great cosmic harmony reflecting the beauty of the Creator and the love freely bestowed on us in Christ, can also inspire our efforts to work for unity, reconciliation and peace in our world.
    • Plotinus: Successors •Porphyry (234 - c. 305), edited Enneads, wrote “Life of Plotinus” •Iamblichus (245-325), “On the Egyptian Mysteries,” developed theurgy (god-magic), rituals using special costumes, props, gestures •Proclus (412-485), the “last worshipper” in Athens, wrote visionary Hymns to the Gods based on his dreams
    • What is Faith? • a system of belief or trusting our own deepest experiences? • a narrow-minded set of beliefs or feeling connected to our heart? • Agreement on terminology or a general sense of "everything is okay"? • a commodity you possess or trusting the path you are already walking? • Blind acceptance of doctrine or freedom to imagine our potentials? • pain at having one's questions silenced or humorous acceptance of how little we know? • submission to an external authority or continual need to re-balance our own center? • cleanly dividing those who belong and those who do not or a loving respect for everyone we find around us? • fueling hatred by invoking embittered agendas or an expanding sense of connecting to everyone who came before and after us?