SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 4
Download to read offline
1


Open Peer Review is Finally Available for Scientists!

                                    "Open Peer Review"
                                             vs
                                 "Simple Blind Peer Review"


"Simple Blind Peer Review"
How does Science progess (or stagnate!)? Scientist researchers in Academic laboratories perform
experimentations with the aim to discover new knowledges. This is their job!
How do Scientists decide if a finding is enough new and orginal to be considered as a new
knowledge? Scientists have to write an article about their findings and discovery to make their
findings known by other scientists. The article usually presents a defined structure, for example you
can see one here. To make known their work, they have to choose a Scientific Journal and submitt
their article for publication. When the article is published, it is available for all scientists in the world.

For scientists, publications are very important. Having published articles in Scientific journals
validates a scientist as a scientist. And the prestige of the Scientific Journal in which articles are
published is also a very important point for career progression in Academia.
A famous saying: "Publish or Perish!"

There is numerous Scientific Journals, those focusing only on one subject (example Cancer research
or Alzhiemer research), those being generalist, those being more for physician community, and those
more for scientist community ... ect. The article is addressed to the Editor of the Journal. Here is the
process:
- The Editor rejects the article because it is not enough in the focus of the journal, or for 1000 other
reasons. Scientists should find another Journal to apply.
- The Editor accepts the submission. The trouble starts now!
The Editor will select some "expert" scientists working in the field of the article and ask them to
review it. The number of people reviewing an article is usually 3 to 5. These reviewers are researchers
who are not linked to the laboratory applying for the publication. The reviewers are "independent" and
have to judge the article "objectively"! The second point is that the team who apply for a publication
will never know the names of the reviewers. But the reviewers know the name of the scientists
applying for a publication.
This system is called "Simple Blind Peer Review" (or also called Blind review or Peer review):
- Simple Blind, because only one side (reviewers) knows the identity of the other side

Ari Massoudi / Consultant Strategy of Innovation / www.strategy-of-innovation.com / www.linkedin.com/in/arimassoudi
2

- Peer means by people who are expert in the scientific field to be judged

Reviewers can reject the article or accept to continue the review process under conditions. They can
ask for slight modifications, such as modifications of the text, or they can ask for supplemental
experiments with the goal to strengthen the conclusions of the article.
Scientists come back to the lab and perform asked modifications and experiments.
Reviewers can then definitively accept or reject the article. If they accept, the article will be published
in the Scientific Journal and will be available for all scientists.

This evaluation process, Simple Blind Review, causes several ethical problems and is continuously
subjected to the criticism of scientists:

- The process is time consuming: it typically takes several months or even several years in some
fields for a submitted paper to appear in print.

But the problem of being too slow is not the major problem of the Simple Blind Review!
"We know that the system of peer review is biased, unjust, unaccountable, incomplete, easily fixed,
often insulting, usually ignorant, occasionally foolish, and frequently wrong." Richard Horton, editor
of the prestigious medical journal The Lancet.

The interposition of editors and reviewers between authors and readers always raises the possibility
that the intermediators may serve as gatekeepers. Some sociologists of science argue that peer review
makes the ability to publish susceptible to control by elites and to personal jealousy and personal
interests. The peer review process may suppress dissent discovery and findings against
"mainstream" theories. Reviewers tend to be especially critical of conclusions that contradict
their own views and theory, and lenient towards those that accord with them. At the same time,
established scientists are more likely than less established ones to be sought out as referees,
particularly by high-prestige journals or publishers. As a result, it has been argued, ideas that
harmonize with the established experts are more likely to see print and to appear in prestigious
journals than are iconoclastic or revolutionary ones. Adapted from Wikipedia

Another ethical problem is that mainly all Scientific Journals ask money to scientists to submit their
work and extra-money to publish the article. These entry fees can be quite high and are unfair. Indeed,
reviewers work for free, and with the internet we do not need anymore to read articles in paper format,
and every researcher reads articles online. In addition, Scientific Journals ask also money to
Universities, Research Institutions and anyone wishing to access to the full content of their journals,
the online version! Subscriptions to Scientific Journals are amazingly high and totally unjustified!
Scientific researches done by Academia are mainly funded by public grants, therefore the results of



Ari Massoudi / Consultant Strategy of Innovation / www.strategy-of-innovation.com / www.linkedin.com/in/arimassoudi
3

research are a Public Good! And the access to these results should not be blocked by "Journals" which
are private companies! (read more at this link)




More than 5,700 researchers have joined a boycott of Elsevier, a leading publisher of science
journals:
 http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/14/science/researchers-boycott-elsevier-journal-
publisher.html?_r=3&src=me&ref=science
Join the revolution! http://thecostofknowledge.com/



 Before the popularization and democratization of the internet, there was no solution or alternative to
the Simple Blind Reviewing process, and the "Mafia of Scientific Journals"! But now, with the power
of internet a new way of reviewing science discoveries has emerged, it is called Open Peer Review !


"Open Peer Review"


Hereafter, I would like to present the only one Online Biomedical Journal based on the Open Peer
Review process: WebmedCentral
http://www.webmedcentral.com

Webmed has been founded in 2011 in UK by a group of medical and management professionals with
no affiliation to any major biomedical publishing group.

The process is very simple, scientists can submit their articles (or other scientific communications) by
up-loading their files. The article is published under 48h, and then the review process will start by
Peers. The review process is transparent and fair.
Watch these 2 videos presenting WebmedCentral:


Video 1: WebmedCentral - Why?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Llf55XsLNxg&feature=player_embedded

Video 2: WebmedCentral - How?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2gAiFkteR2U&feature=player_embedded




Ari Massoudi / Consultant Strategy of Innovation / www.strategy-of-innovation.com / www.linkedin.com/in/arimassoudi
4

WebMedCentral is a generalist online journal in biology and medical sciences. I bet that Online
Scientific Journals based on Open Peer Reviewing Process will rapidly appear for formal sciences,
physical sciences and chemistry, and even for human and social sciences!




Ari Massoudi / Consultant Strategy of Innovation / www.strategy-of-innovation.com / www.linkedin.com/in/arimassoudi

More Related Content

More from Ari Massoudi

Crowdfunding for Academic Research and Technology Transfer
Crowdfunding for Academic Research and Technology TransferCrowdfunding for Academic Research and Technology Transfer
Crowdfunding for Academic Research and Technology TransferAri Massoudi
 
What Would Happen if the Entrepreneurial Spirit Spreads into the Academic World?
What Would Happen if the Entrepreneurial Spirit Spreads into the Academic World?What Would Happen if the Entrepreneurial Spirit Spreads into the Academic World?
What Would Happen if the Entrepreneurial Spirit Spreads into the Academic World?Ari Massoudi
 
Biologie des cellules souches humaines (eBook)
Biologie des cellules souches humaines (eBook)Biologie des cellules souches humaines (eBook)
Biologie des cellules souches humaines (eBook)Ari Massoudi
 
Hollywood Au Service Des Innovations US
Hollywood Au Service Des Innovations USHollywood Au Service Des Innovations US
Hollywood Au Service Des Innovations USAri Massoudi
 
Le prochain saut évolutif de l'espèce humaine sera
Le prochain saut évolutif de l'espèce humaine seraLe prochain saut évolutif de l'espèce humaine sera
Le prochain saut évolutif de l'espèce humaine seraAri Massoudi
 
Encéphalopathie post traumatique chronique
Encéphalopathie post traumatique chroniqueEncéphalopathie post traumatique chronique
Encéphalopathie post traumatique chroniqueAri Massoudi
 
List of CrowdFunding Websites and much more!
List of CrowdFunding Websites and much more!List of CrowdFunding Websites and much more!
List of CrowdFunding Websites and much more!Ari Massoudi
 
Academic Scientist: Big Pharma is not Interested by your Discovery?
Academic Scientist: Big Pharma is not Interested by your Discovery?Academic Scientist: Big Pharma is not Interested by your Discovery?
Academic Scientist: Big Pharma is not Interested by your Discovery?Ari Massoudi
 
Entretien avec le journal Docteurs&Co de l'ABG
Entretien avec le journal Docteurs&Co de l'ABGEntretien avec le journal Docteurs&Co de l'ABG
Entretien avec le journal Docteurs&Co de l'ABGAri Massoudi
 
Soutenez l'Université Nice Sophia Antipolis
Soutenez l'Université Nice Sophia AntipolisSoutenez l'Université Nice Sophia Antipolis
Soutenez l'Université Nice Sophia AntipolisAri Massoudi
 
Scientists should have a business education
Scientists should have a business education Scientists should have a business education
Scientists should have a business education Ari Massoudi
 
Science, technology and innovation ecosystem in France
Science, technology and innovation ecosystem in FranceScience, technology and innovation ecosystem in France
Science, technology and innovation ecosystem in FranceAri Massoudi
 
1000 nouvelles sociétés de capital risque en france
1000 nouvelles sociétés de capital risque en france1000 nouvelles sociétés de capital risque en france
1000 nouvelles sociétés de capital risque en franceAri Massoudi
 
Financer votre entreprise avec le crowd funding
Financer votre entreprise avec le crowd fundingFinancer votre entreprise avec le crowd funding
Financer votre entreprise avec le crowd fundingAri Massoudi
 
How fat stem cells could or not form muscle cells (Eng)
How fat stem cells could or not form muscle cells (Eng)How fat stem cells could or not form muscle cells (Eng)
How fat stem cells could or not form muscle cells (Eng)Ari Massoudi
 
How fat stem cells could or not form muscle cells (French)
How fat stem cells could or not form muscle cells (French)How fat stem cells could or not form muscle cells (French)
How fat stem cells could or not form muscle cells (French)Ari Massoudi
 

More from Ari Massoudi (17)

Crowdfunding for Academic Research and Technology Transfer
Crowdfunding for Academic Research and Technology TransferCrowdfunding for Academic Research and Technology Transfer
Crowdfunding for Academic Research and Technology Transfer
 
What Would Happen if the Entrepreneurial Spirit Spreads into the Academic World?
What Would Happen if the Entrepreneurial Spirit Spreads into the Academic World?What Would Happen if the Entrepreneurial Spirit Spreads into the Academic World?
What Would Happen if the Entrepreneurial Spirit Spreads into the Academic World?
 
Biologie des cellules souches humaines (eBook)
Biologie des cellules souches humaines (eBook)Biologie des cellules souches humaines (eBook)
Biologie des cellules souches humaines (eBook)
 
Hollywood Au Service Des Innovations US
Hollywood Au Service Des Innovations USHollywood Au Service Des Innovations US
Hollywood Au Service Des Innovations US
 
Le prochain saut évolutif de l'espèce humaine sera
Le prochain saut évolutif de l'espèce humaine seraLe prochain saut évolutif de l'espèce humaine sera
Le prochain saut évolutif de l'espèce humaine sera
 
Encéphalopathie post traumatique chronique
Encéphalopathie post traumatique chroniqueEncéphalopathie post traumatique chronique
Encéphalopathie post traumatique chronique
 
List of CrowdFunding Websites and much more!
List of CrowdFunding Websites and much more!List of CrowdFunding Websites and much more!
List of CrowdFunding Websites and much more!
 
Academic Scientist: Big Pharma is not Interested by your Discovery?
Academic Scientist: Big Pharma is not Interested by your Discovery?Academic Scientist: Big Pharma is not Interested by your Discovery?
Academic Scientist: Big Pharma is not Interested by your Discovery?
 
Entretien avec le journal Docteurs&Co de l'ABG
Entretien avec le journal Docteurs&Co de l'ABGEntretien avec le journal Docteurs&Co de l'ABG
Entretien avec le journal Docteurs&Co de l'ABG
 
Soutenez l'Université Nice Sophia Antipolis
Soutenez l'Université Nice Sophia AntipolisSoutenez l'Université Nice Sophia Antipolis
Soutenez l'Université Nice Sophia Antipolis
 
Scientists should have a business education
Scientists should have a business education Scientists should have a business education
Scientists should have a business education
 
Science, technology and innovation ecosystem in France
Science, technology and innovation ecosystem in FranceScience, technology and innovation ecosystem in France
Science, technology and innovation ecosystem in France
 
1000 nouvelles sociétés de capital risque en france
1000 nouvelles sociétés de capital risque en france1000 nouvelles sociétés de capital risque en france
1000 nouvelles sociétés de capital risque en france
 
Financer votre entreprise avec le crowd funding
Financer votre entreprise avec le crowd fundingFinancer votre entreprise avec le crowd funding
Financer votre entreprise avec le crowd funding
 
How fat stem cells could or not form muscle cells (Eng)
How fat stem cells could or not form muscle cells (Eng)How fat stem cells could or not form muscle cells (Eng)
How fat stem cells could or not form muscle cells (Eng)
 
AM Article
AM ArticleAM Article
AM Article
 
How fat stem cells could or not form muscle cells (French)
How fat stem cells could or not form muscle cells (French)How fat stem cells could or not form muscle cells (French)
How fat stem cells could or not form muscle cells (French)
 

Recently uploaded

.NET 8 ChatBot with Azure OpenAI Services.pptx
.NET 8 ChatBot with Azure OpenAI Services.pptx.NET 8 ChatBot with Azure OpenAI Services.pptx
.NET 8 ChatBot with Azure OpenAI Services.pptxHansamali Gamage
 
Introduction to RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation) and its application
Introduction to RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation) and its applicationIntroduction to RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation) and its application
Introduction to RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation) and its applicationKnoldus Inc.
 
Explore the UiPath Community and ways you can benefit on your journey to auto...
Explore the UiPath Community and ways you can benefit on your journey to auto...Explore the UiPath Community and ways you can benefit on your journey to auto...
Explore the UiPath Community and ways you can benefit on your journey to auto...DianaGray10
 
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 4
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 4UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 4
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 4DianaGray10
 
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 1
UiPath Studio Web workshop series  - Day 1UiPath Studio Web workshop series  - Day 1
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 1DianaGray10
 
3 Pitfalls Everyone Should Avoid with Cloud Data
3 Pitfalls Everyone Should Avoid with Cloud Data3 Pitfalls Everyone Should Avoid with Cloud Data
3 Pitfalls Everyone Should Avoid with Cloud DataEric D. Schabell
 
Stobox 4: Revolutionizing Investment in Real-World Assets Through Tokenization
Stobox 4: Revolutionizing Investment in Real-World Assets Through TokenizationStobox 4: Revolutionizing Investment in Real-World Assets Through Tokenization
Stobox 4: Revolutionizing Investment in Real-World Assets Through TokenizationStobox
 
The Zero-ETL Approach: Enhancing Data Agility and Insight
The Zero-ETL Approach: Enhancing Data Agility and InsightThe Zero-ETL Approach: Enhancing Data Agility and Insight
The Zero-ETL Approach: Enhancing Data Agility and InsightSafe Software
 
UiPath Studio Web workshop Series - Day 3
UiPath Studio Web workshop Series - Day 3UiPath Studio Web workshop Series - Day 3
UiPath Studio Web workshop Series - Day 3DianaGray10
 
20140402 - Smart house demo kit
20140402 - Smart house demo kit20140402 - Smart house demo kit
20140402 - Smart house demo kitJamie (Taka) Wang
 
Technical SEO for Improved Accessibility WTS FEST
Technical SEO for Improved Accessibility  WTS FESTTechnical SEO for Improved Accessibility  WTS FEST
Technical SEO for Improved Accessibility WTS FESTBillieHyde
 
Oracle Database 23c Security New Features.pptx
Oracle Database 23c Security New Features.pptxOracle Database 23c Security New Features.pptx
Oracle Database 23c Security New Features.pptxSatishbabu Gunukula
 
How to become a GDSC Lead GDSC MI AOE.pptx
How to become a GDSC Lead GDSC MI AOE.pptxHow to become a GDSC Lead GDSC MI AOE.pptx
How to become a GDSC Lead GDSC MI AOE.pptxKaustubhBhavsar6
 
LF Energy Webinar - Unveiling OpenEEMeter 4.0
LF Energy Webinar - Unveiling OpenEEMeter 4.0LF Energy Webinar - Unveiling OpenEEMeter 4.0
LF Energy Webinar - Unveiling OpenEEMeter 4.0DanBrown980551
 
Keep Your Finger on the Pulse of Your Building's Performance with IES Live
Keep Your Finger on the Pulse of Your Building's Performance with IES LiveKeep Your Finger on the Pulse of Your Building's Performance with IES Live
Keep Your Finger on the Pulse of Your Building's Performance with IES LiveIES VE
 
IT Service Management (ITSM) Best Practices for Advanced Computing
IT Service Management (ITSM) Best Practices for Advanced ComputingIT Service Management (ITSM) Best Practices for Advanced Computing
IT Service Management (ITSM) Best Practices for Advanced ComputingMAGNIntelligence
 
EMEA What is ThousandEyes? Webinar
EMEA What is ThousandEyes? WebinarEMEA What is ThousandEyes? Webinar
EMEA What is ThousandEyes? WebinarThousandEyes
 
Q4 2023 Quarterly Investor Presentation - FINAL - v1.pdf
Q4 2023 Quarterly Investor Presentation - FINAL - v1.pdfQ4 2023 Quarterly Investor Presentation - FINAL - v1.pdf
Q4 2023 Quarterly Investor Presentation - FINAL - v1.pdfTejal81
 
Trailblazer Community - Flows Workshop (Session 2)
Trailblazer Community - Flows Workshop (Session 2)Trailblazer Community - Flows Workshop (Session 2)
Trailblazer Community - Flows Workshop (Session 2)Muhammad Tiham Siddiqui
 

Recently uploaded (20)

SheDev 2024
SheDev 2024SheDev 2024
SheDev 2024
 
.NET 8 ChatBot with Azure OpenAI Services.pptx
.NET 8 ChatBot with Azure OpenAI Services.pptx.NET 8 ChatBot with Azure OpenAI Services.pptx
.NET 8 ChatBot with Azure OpenAI Services.pptx
 
Introduction to RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation) and its application
Introduction to RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation) and its applicationIntroduction to RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation) and its application
Introduction to RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation) and its application
 
Explore the UiPath Community and ways you can benefit on your journey to auto...
Explore the UiPath Community and ways you can benefit on your journey to auto...Explore the UiPath Community and ways you can benefit on your journey to auto...
Explore the UiPath Community and ways you can benefit on your journey to auto...
 
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 4
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 4UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 4
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 4
 
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 1
UiPath Studio Web workshop series  - Day 1UiPath Studio Web workshop series  - Day 1
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 1
 
3 Pitfalls Everyone Should Avoid with Cloud Data
3 Pitfalls Everyone Should Avoid with Cloud Data3 Pitfalls Everyone Should Avoid with Cloud Data
3 Pitfalls Everyone Should Avoid with Cloud Data
 
Stobox 4: Revolutionizing Investment in Real-World Assets Through Tokenization
Stobox 4: Revolutionizing Investment in Real-World Assets Through TokenizationStobox 4: Revolutionizing Investment in Real-World Assets Through Tokenization
Stobox 4: Revolutionizing Investment in Real-World Assets Through Tokenization
 
The Zero-ETL Approach: Enhancing Data Agility and Insight
The Zero-ETL Approach: Enhancing Data Agility and InsightThe Zero-ETL Approach: Enhancing Data Agility and Insight
The Zero-ETL Approach: Enhancing Data Agility and Insight
 
UiPath Studio Web workshop Series - Day 3
UiPath Studio Web workshop Series - Day 3UiPath Studio Web workshop Series - Day 3
UiPath Studio Web workshop Series - Day 3
 
20140402 - Smart house demo kit
20140402 - Smart house demo kit20140402 - Smart house demo kit
20140402 - Smart house demo kit
 
Technical SEO for Improved Accessibility WTS FEST
Technical SEO for Improved Accessibility  WTS FESTTechnical SEO for Improved Accessibility  WTS FEST
Technical SEO for Improved Accessibility WTS FEST
 
Oracle Database 23c Security New Features.pptx
Oracle Database 23c Security New Features.pptxOracle Database 23c Security New Features.pptx
Oracle Database 23c Security New Features.pptx
 
How to become a GDSC Lead GDSC MI AOE.pptx
How to become a GDSC Lead GDSC MI AOE.pptxHow to become a GDSC Lead GDSC MI AOE.pptx
How to become a GDSC Lead GDSC MI AOE.pptx
 
LF Energy Webinar - Unveiling OpenEEMeter 4.0
LF Energy Webinar - Unveiling OpenEEMeter 4.0LF Energy Webinar - Unveiling OpenEEMeter 4.0
LF Energy Webinar - Unveiling OpenEEMeter 4.0
 
Keep Your Finger on the Pulse of Your Building's Performance with IES Live
Keep Your Finger on the Pulse of Your Building's Performance with IES LiveKeep Your Finger on the Pulse of Your Building's Performance with IES Live
Keep Your Finger on the Pulse of Your Building's Performance with IES Live
 
IT Service Management (ITSM) Best Practices for Advanced Computing
IT Service Management (ITSM) Best Practices for Advanced ComputingIT Service Management (ITSM) Best Practices for Advanced Computing
IT Service Management (ITSM) Best Practices for Advanced Computing
 
EMEA What is ThousandEyes? Webinar
EMEA What is ThousandEyes? WebinarEMEA What is ThousandEyes? Webinar
EMEA What is ThousandEyes? Webinar
 
Q4 2023 Quarterly Investor Presentation - FINAL - v1.pdf
Q4 2023 Quarterly Investor Presentation - FINAL - v1.pdfQ4 2023 Quarterly Investor Presentation - FINAL - v1.pdf
Q4 2023 Quarterly Investor Presentation - FINAL - v1.pdf
 
Trailblazer Community - Flows Workshop (Session 2)
Trailblazer Community - Flows Workshop (Session 2)Trailblazer Community - Flows Workshop (Session 2)
Trailblazer Community - Flows Workshop (Session 2)
 

Open peer review is finally available for scientists

  • 1. 1 Open Peer Review is Finally Available for Scientists! "Open Peer Review" vs "Simple Blind Peer Review" "Simple Blind Peer Review" How does Science progess (or stagnate!)? Scientist researchers in Academic laboratories perform experimentations with the aim to discover new knowledges. This is their job! How do Scientists decide if a finding is enough new and orginal to be considered as a new knowledge? Scientists have to write an article about their findings and discovery to make their findings known by other scientists. The article usually presents a defined structure, for example you can see one here. To make known their work, they have to choose a Scientific Journal and submitt their article for publication. When the article is published, it is available for all scientists in the world. For scientists, publications are very important. Having published articles in Scientific journals validates a scientist as a scientist. And the prestige of the Scientific Journal in which articles are published is also a very important point for career progression in Academia. A famous saying: "Publish or Perish!" There is numerous Scientific Journals, those focusing only on one subject (example Cancer research or Alzhiemer research), those being generalist, those being more for physician community, and those more for scientist community ... ect. The article is addressed to the Editor of the Journal. Here is the process: - The Editor rejects the article because it is not enough in the focus of the journal, or for 1000 other reasons. Scientists should find another Journal to apply. - The Editor accepts the submission. The trouble starts now! The Editor will select some "expert" scientists working in the field of the article and ask them to review it. The number of people reviewing an article is usually 3 to 5. These reviewers are researchers who are not linked to the laboratory applying for the publication. The reviewers are "independent" and have to judge the article "objectively"! The second point is that the team who apply for a publication will never know the names of the reviewers. But the reviewers know the name of the scientists applying for a publication. This system is called "Simple Blind Peer Review" (or also called Blind review or Peer review): - Simple Blind, because only one side (reviewers) knows the identity of the other side Ari Massoudi / Consultant Strategy of Innovation / www.strategy-of-innovation.com / www.linkedin.com/in/arimassoudi
  • 2. 2 - Peer means by people who are expert in the scientific field to be judged Reviewers can reject the article or accept to continue the review process under conditions. They can ask for slight modifications, such as modifications of the text, or they can ask for supplemental experiments with the goal to strengthen the conclusions of the article. Scientists come back to the lab and perform asked modifications and experiments. Reviewers can then definitively accept or reject the article. If they accept, the article will be published in the Scientific Journal and will be available for all scientists. This evaluation process, Simple Blind Review, causes several ethical problems and is continuously subjected to the criticism of scientists: - The process is time consuming: it typically takes several months or even several years in some fields for a submitted paper to appear in print. But the problem of being too slow is not the major problem of the Simple Blind Review! "We know that the system of peer review is biased, unjust, unaccountable, incomplete, easily fixed, often insulting, usually ignorant, occasionally foolish, and frequently wrong." Richard Horton, editor of the prestigious medical journal The Lancet. The interposition of editors and reviewers between authors and readers always raises the possibility that the intermediators may serve as gatekeepers. Some sociologists of science argue that peer review makes the ability to publish susceptible to control by elites and to personal jealousy and personal interests. The peer review process may suppress dissent discovery and findings against "mainstream" theories. Reviewers tend to be especially critical of conclusions that contradict their own views and theory, and lenient towards those that accord with them. At the same time, established scientists are more likely than less established ones to be sought out as referees, particularly by high-prestige journals or publishers. As a result, it has been argued, ideas that harmonize with the established experts are more likely to see print and to appear in prestigious journals than are iconoclastic or revolutionary ones. Adapted from Wikipedia Another ethical problem is that mainly all Scientific Journals ask money to scientists to submit their work and extra-money to publish the article. These entry fees can be quite high and are unfair. Indeed, reviewers work for free, and with the internet we do not need anymore to read articles in paper format, and every researcher reads articles online. In addition, Scientific Journals ask also money to Universities, Research Institutions and anyone wishing to access to the full content of their journals, the online version! Subscriptions to Scientific Journals are amazingly high and totally unjustified! Scientific researches done by Academia are mainly funded by public grants, therefore the results of Ari Massoudi / Consultant Strategy of Innovation / www.strategy-of-innovation.com / www.linkedin.com/in/arimassoudi
  • 3. 3 research are a Public Good! And the access to these results should not be blocked by "Journals" which are private companies! (read more at this link) More than 5,700 researchers have joined a boycott of Elsevier, a leading publisher of science journals: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/14/science/researchers-boycott-elsevier-journal- publisher.html?_r=3&src=me&ref=science Join the revolution! http://thecostofknowledge.com/ Before the popularization and democratization of the internet, there was no solution or alternative to the Simple Blind Reviewing process, and the "Mafia of Scientific Journals"! But now, with the power of internet a new way of reviewing science discoveries has emerged, it is called Open Peer Review ! "Open Peer Review" Hereafter, I would like to present the only one Online Biomedical Journal based on the Open Peer Review process: WebmedCentral http://www.webmedcentral.com Webmed has been founded in 2011 in UK by a group of medical and management professionals with no affiliation to any major biomedical publishing group. The process is very simple, scientists can submit their articles (or other scientific communications) by up-loading their files. The article is published under 48h, and then the review process will start by Peers. The review process is transparent and fair. Watch these 2 videos presenting WebmedCentral: Video 1: WebmedCentral - Why? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Llf55XsLNxg&feature=player_embedded Video 2: WebmedCentral - How? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2gAiFkteR2U&feature=player_embedded Ari Massoudi / Consultant Strategy of Innovation / www.strategy-of-innovation.com / www.linkedin.com/in/arimassoudi
  • 4. 4 WebMedCentral is a generalist online journal in biology and medical sciences. I bet that Online Scientific Journals based on Open Peer Reviewing Process will rapidly appear for formal sciences, physical sciences and chemistry, and even for human and social sciences! Ari Massoudi / Consultant Strategy of Innovation / www.strategy-of-innovation.com / www.linkedin.com/in/arimassoudi