• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Final exam review

Final exam review



Final Exam review for CJ 202 Constitutional Law

Final Exam review for CJ 202 Constitutional Law



Total Views
Views on SlideShare
Embed Views



0 Embeds 0

No embeds



Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
Post Comment
Edit your comment
  • http://www.justice.gov/archive/ll/highlights.htm
  • http://www.washingtonlawhelp.org/resource/motion-to-vacate-judgmentorder-cr-60http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/vacate
  • http://video.search.yahoo.com/video/play;_ylt=A2KLqIHqBBNRjlkA1nP7w8QF;_ylu=X3oDMTBvbXQ4Y2xxBHNlYwNzcgRzbGsDdmlkBHZ0aWQDVjEzNw--?p=14th+amendment&vid=8dae0e550c565caa836932bc63b18ec0&l=13%3A13&turl=http%3A%2F%2Fts3.mm.bing.net%2Fth%3Fid%3DV.4902010274382230%26pid%3D15.1&rurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DKWG8AcCty_I&tit=The+14th+Amendment+of+the+U.S.+Constitution%3A+A+History&c=0&sigr=11ard7mlm&fr=yfp-t-701-s&tt=bhttp://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/amendmentxiv
  • In Terry, Cleveland Police Detective Martin McFadden observed two then three men “casing” a jewelry store, followed them, confronted, identified as a police officer, grabbed John Terry by coat and spun him around, felt what believed to be a revolver in coat pocket. P.212
  • p. 215
  • 1957 Cleveland, Ohio, police had a tip that a person wanted in a bomb making case was hiding in house of Dollree Mapp. She refused entry. They later returned with a paper supposed to be a warrant. She seized and stuffed it into the bosom. Officers got it back. Trial court convicted her of possessing pornography. Appeals affirmed. SCOTUS overturned. http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0367_0643_ZO.html
  • Patsy Stewart and Armando Sanchez,drug dealers identified by tip to police. Began surveillance. http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1983/1983_82_1771
  • Question-could the police stop the car, approach Wardlow, and ask him what he had in the bag?http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/98-1036.ZS.htmlOfficers Nolan and Harvey gave chase when Wardlow ran upon observing a “caravan of police vehicles”“Unprovoked flight is the exact opposite of “going about one’s business.” While flight is not necessarily indicative of ongoing criminal activity, Terry recognized that officers can detain individuals to resolve ambiguities in their conduct…”
  • http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/496/444/case.html
  • In Randolph, Scott and Janet Randolph were separating prior to divorce. She had been living in Canada. After a domestic dispute regarding child custody, Janet called police to their house. On arrival, Janet allowed consent search and told police where Scott kept cocaine. Police found and seized evidence. She withdrew consent, so officers got a search warrant. Won at trial, but overturned by SCOTUS. Scott had expressly forbidden, she had no right to overturn his refusal. He was present at the time. http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2005/2005_04_1067In Rodriquez, Gail Fisher, who had been living with Rodriquez called police having been beaten by Rodriquez. She led them to “our” apartment, let them in, police arrested him and also found him with controlled substance. He moved she had no authority to allow them in. Court ruled the police “reasonably believed” she did.http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/88-2018.ZO.html
  • The judges had several contradictory reasons and comments written into their opinions, but ruled 8-0 in the end. Justice Sherman Minton abstained from the vote.
  • Gault and friend, Ronald Lewis, making obscene telephone calls. Police located and took into custody. His mother came home from work and found him missing, finally found him in juvenile detention. Ordered held in juvenile detention until age 21. No means of appeal of sentence for juveniles under Arizona law. Appeal filed with Arizona Supreme Court which referred it back to state court.
  • Justice Potter Stewart dissented saying rights of criminal trials do not apply to juvenile trials because juveniles “corrective in nature.”
  • Murder case, Escobedo allegedly shot brother-in-law for mistreating his sister. Originally arrested without warrant and interrogated, released. Another man arrested then said Escobedo did shooting. Rearrested along with his sister. Told by police that another person had implicated in crime, he requested attorney. Finally during 14 hour interrogation stated he did know something about the crime, was charged. http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/378/478/case.html
  • http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/22/dzhokhar-tsarnaev-miranda_n_3134745.html
  • http://www.fbi.gov/stats-services/publications/law-enforcement-bulletin/february2011/legal_digest
  • http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca8/12-1294/12-1294-2013-03-28.pdf

Final exam review Final exam review Presentation Transcript