Eric War And Peace In The Middle East - Presentation Transcript
War and Peace in the Middle East A Critique of American Policy Written by: Avi Shlaim Powerpoint by: Eric Paradis World Civ., F Period
Shlaim’s Thesis
Middle Eastern problems were caused by the neglect of controlling powers and super powers to take into account the regional interests of local inhabitants.
Simplified: external ruling powers caused the many problems and prolonged them while in the Middle East
Argument
Divided into four parts, times, empires
Ottoman
European (mainly British / French)
Superpower (America and the Soviet Union)
American
Ottoman Empire
Ruled the Arab lands from 1516 to 1918
dynastic, Islamic, and multiethnic empire
Ottoman government respected distinctive laws and customs of the locals
allows people to maintain regional control and order
late 18th century: internal decline, empire begins to fall apart
European Contol
European power increase coincides with that of the Ottoman decline
Ottoman loses control completely roughly at the end of WWI and European powers keep control until 1956
Western powers create a new political and territorial order
state lines are drawn up with boundaries and rulers are appointed
Main Problems
Britain made promises to countries to gain support for the war
to France: divide the land between the Med and Persian Gulf into two “spheres of influence”
promised Hussein support of Arab independence if they took up arms against the Turks
most importantly they promised a homeland to Jews in Palestine during the Balfour Declaration
Sir Anthony Parsons “Palestine problem as the single most terrible and enduring part of the British legacy in the Middle East”
Israeli-Arab Conflict
Territorial quarrels
Six wars in postwar Middle East
1948 Palestine War
1956 Suez War
June 1967 Six-Day War
1969-70 War of Attrition
October 1973 Yom Kippur War
1982 Lebanon War
Super Power Control
Period following the decline of western control was actually a time of local independence
Following this the superpowers did not actually try to take political control or occupy the states
more indirect form of control: providing economic and military aid and making alliances
American Control
Gained complete control and emerged as the dominant global power after the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991
Main course of action was to keep the “status quo”
try to keep the many warring and conflicting nations under control
Shlaim’s Critiques (not specific to American time of control)
Says that America mistook forms of nationalism as Soviet attempts for Communist expansion
“the Middle East policy was largely an extension of it’s Cold War strategy”
America’s main concern was control of the oil, not letting others get a “choke hold”
Placed Israel in front of other nations
Critiques cont.
America backs Israel despite actions during Lebanon war (critique of Reagan administration)
Israel was “not a bastion of stability but a source of regional turmoil and violence” which Shlaim says is a “serious viability”
America contributes to the destruction of Lebanese state and collapse of regional order
America’s uncritical support of Israeli security (as defined by the Israeli govt.)
Gulf Critiques
America’s policy in the Gulf: “bolster independence, security, and stability of oil producing states” and “contain the spread of Soviet military power and influence” everything else was secondary
Shah regime collapses, loses links with Iranian military, world economy shocked as oil goes from $13 to 39$/barrel
Iran-Iraq War
Shlaim says that Reagan unnecessarily prolonged the war
in the end both sides felt cheated with the results: Iraq felt like they could have taken out the Khomeini regime if allowed to, Iran felt that without American intervention (hadit been a fair fight) they could have destroyed Saddam’s regime
“ the hostility between Iran and Iraq, and Iran and America, was as great, if not greater, at the end of the eight-year was as it had been at the beginning”
Desert Shield / Storm
Conflict itself was due to the British territorial flaws, Saddam claimed that Kuwait was a creation of British imperialism
Bush overrides the advice of his military advisers and secretary of state, instead he approves the air strike and steers the country towards war
Desert cont.
Iraqi forces are successfully pushed out
Bush then “snapped defeat from the jaws of victory”
leaves Saddam in power instead of overthrow and continues persecuting his people
Conclusion
Shlaim says that over time, controlling powers only prolonged and intensified the conflicts and wars going on in the Middle East. Even though there were times of good results, the overall aftermath of the greater powers after the collapse of the Ottomans was neither positive or helpful and the powers (British, French, American) are to blame.
0 comments
Post a comment