SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 30
Competition Act, 2002
   Competition

Is “a situation in a market in which firms or
    sellers independently strive for the buyers’
    patronage in order to achieve a particular
    business objective for example, profits, sales or
    market share” (World Bank, 1999)
“Competition” is an age-old phenomenon

Benefits of Competition:

   Companies : Efficiency, cost-saving operations, better
    utilization of resources, etc.

   The Consumer : Wider choice of goods at competitive
    prices

   The Government : Generates revenue
It is not necessary that there are a large number of
producers/suppliers to have competition conditions.

A single producer can exist and provide a competitive
atmosphere provided entry of new firms is easy and not
costly.

Entry barriers can be due to the market position of
incumbent firms, legal barriers or strategic barriers
   Incumbent firms may use their power as “first Movers”
   to block entry.
   Legal barriers include licensing and other Government
   regulations
OBJECTIVES OF COMPETITION LAW
                 & POLICY

   Promoting economic efficiency in both static and
    dynamic sense
   protecting consumers from the undue exercise of
    market power
   facilitating economic liberalization, including
    privatization. Deregulation and reduction of external
    trade barriers
   Preserving and promoting the sound development of a
    market economy
OBJECTIVES OF COMPETITION LAW
             & POLICY

ensuring fairness and equity in market place
transactions

Protecting the ‘public interest’ including in some
cases    considerations   relating    to   industrial
competitiveness and employment

Protecting opportunities for small and medium
business
Competition Law
   It is a tool to implement and enforce competition policy
    and to prevent and punish anti-competitive business
    practices by firms and unnecessary Government
    interference in the market.

   Competition Law generally covers 3 areas:

    – Anti - Competitive Agreements, e.g., cartels,

    – Abuse of Dominant Position by enterprises, e.g.,
    predatory pricing, barriers to entry and

    – Regulation of Mergers and Acquisitions (M&As).
Contd…
The need for Competition Law arises because market
can suffer from failures and distortions, and various
players can resort to anti-competitive activities such as
cartels, abuse of dominance etc. which adversely
impact economic efficiency and consumer welfare.

Thus there is need for Competition Law, and a
Competition Watchdog with the authority for enforcing
Competition Law.
Competition Policy

   It includes Reforms in certain Policy
    areas to make these more pro-
    competition:-

   •   Industrial policy
   •   Trade policy
   •   Privatization/disinvestment
   •   Economic Regulation
   •   State aids
Elements of Competition Policy


• Putting in place a set of Policies that enhance
  competition in local and national markets.


• A Law designed to prevent anti competitive
  business practices and unnecessary
  government intervention.
Industrial Policy
   Industrial Policy has to address and reform licensing
    requirements, restrictions on capacities, or on foreign
    technology tie ups, guidelines on location of
    industries, reservations for small scale industry, etc.
    These adversely affect free competition in the market.
Trade Policy
   Trade    policy      has   important   implications   for
    development of competition in the markets. Measures
    for liberalisation of trade promote greater competition
    e.g. reducing tariffs, removal of quotas/physical
    controls, investment controls, conditions relating to
    local content etc.
Economic Regulations
   New legislation and regulations to promote
    competition and to bring about restructuring of major
    industrial sectors is essential. Legislation to aim at
    separating natural monopoly elements from
    potentially competitive activities, and the regulatory
    functions from commercial functions, and also create
    several competing entities through restructuring of
    essential competition activities and to create a
    competitive environment .
   Examples:
    – Electricity sector
    – Telecommunications sector
    – Ports
Evolution of Competition Law
   Before MRTP Act came into force (1970), limited
    provisions existed under :
     • The Indian Contract Act
     • Directive Principles of State Policy (Non-enforceable)

   The MRTP Act brought in a four-pronged thrust :
     • Concentration of economic power
     • Restrictive Trade Practices
     • Monopolistic Trade Practices
     • Unfair Trade Practices
MRTPs vis-à-vis Competition Act
Under the Competition Act :
   • No provision for Unfair Trade Practices
   • Only Consumer Courts will have jurisdiction
   • Pending cases will be continued by MRTPC for 2 years
   • After 2 years :
         All cases (except Disparagement Cases) will be
          transferred to National Commission under CPA
         All Disparagement Cases will be transferred to
          Competition Commission
Status of the Competition
              Commission
• It is a body corporate

• It has Regulatory and quasi-judicial powers;
   functions through Benches

• Each Bench shall consist of at least two
  Members and one of such Members must be a
  judicial Member
Agreement
   Any arrangement or understanding or action in
    concert –

Whether or not such arrangement or
 understanding is formal or in writing

Or whether or not such understanding or
 arrangement is intended to be enforceable by
 legal proceedings
Anti-competitive Agreements
These are agreements which cause or are likely
to cause an appreciable adverse effect on
competition within India:

 Horizontal Agreements:
These are between and among competitors who are at the
  same stage of production, supply, distribution, etc.

These are presumed to be illegal

Examples: cartels, bid rigging, collusive bidding, sharing of
markets, etc.
Anti-Competitive Agreements

Vertical Agreements:
• Vertical Agreements are between parties
  at different stages of production, supply,
  distribution, etc.

• These are not presumed illegal; are
  subject to rule of reason.

Examples: tie-in arrangements, exclusive
 supply/distribution agreements, refusal to
 deal.
Adverse effect on competition
   Creation of barriers to entry

   Driving existing competitors out of market

   Benefits to consumers

   Benefit to Scientific and technical knowhow
CCI orders against Anti-competitive agreements

   Penalty equal to three times the amount of
    profit made out of such agreement or 10% of
    average turnover of the cartel for preceding
    three years whichever is higher


   Modification directed to the agreement
Powers of Competition Commission as Regards
                     Agreements
   After the inquiry into the Agreement, Competition
    Commission can:

    • direct parties to discontinue the agreement

    • prohibit parties from re-entering such agreement

    • direct modification of the agreement

    • impose penalty upto 10% of average turnover of
      the enterprise
Abuse of Dominance
   “Dominant position” is defined as a position of
    strength which enables the enterprise
     • to operate independently of competitive
       forces in the market, or
     • to affect its competitors or consumers in its
       favor.

   No mathematical or statistical formula is
    adopted to “measure” dominance –
Abuse of Dominant Position
Includes practices like:

   • Unfair or discriminatory conditions or prices,

   • Limiting or restricting production or
    technical/scientific development,

   • Denial of market access, and

   • Predatory pricing.
Power of the Competition
             Commission

• After inquiry into abuse of dominant position, the
  Competition Commission can order:

     discontinuance of abuse of dominant position

     impose a penalty upto 10% of the average
      turnover of the enterprise
Combinations Regulation
   Combinations, in terms of the meaning given to
    them in the Act, include mergers, amalgamations,
    acquisitions.

   in order to establish whether the higher
    concentration in the market resulting from the
    merger will increase the possibility of collusive or
    unilaterally harmful behavior, it must first be
    established as to what the relevant market is
Contd…
Horizontal Mergers

Vertical Mergers

Conglomerate Mergers

Pre-Notification
 The requirements for prior notification
Mergers and Acquisitions

   Commission is expected to regulate “Combinations”, i.e.,
    large mergers, acquisitions, etc. likely to have
    appreciable adverse effect on competition.

• Threshold:

For single enterprise
   – Assets > Rs.1000 crores
   – Turnover > Rs.3000 crores
Mergers and Acquisitions


Threshold:

For group of enterprises
   – Assets > Rs.4000 crores
   – Turnover > Rs.12000 crores



Similarly, threshold is provided for overseas groups.
Mergers & Acquisitions

• Notification of Combination to Commission is
  voluntary

   • If notified, Commission to take a decision within
    90 days on the combination. Decision may allow,
    disallow, modify, etc. the combination.

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Competition act 2002
Competition act 2002Competition act 2002
Competition act 2002
 
Competitionact2002ppt 130210021937-phpapp02 (1)
Competitionact2002ppt 130210021937-phpapp02 (1)Competitionact2002ppt 130210021937-phpapp02 (1)
Competitionact2002ppt 130210021937-phpapp02 (1)
 
Competition policy
Competition policyCompetition policy
Competition policy
 
Competition act
Competition actCompetition act
Competition act
 
CCI15.9.2011
CCI15.9.2011CCI15.9.2011
CCI15.9.2011
 
Eco pres
Eco presEco pres
Eco pres
 
Competition policy
Competition policyCompetition policy
Competition policy
 
Monopolies and restrictive trade practices act
Monopolies and restrictive trade practices actMonopolies and restrictive trade practices act
Monopolies and restrictive trade practices act
 
Dominant position
Dominant positionDominant position
Dominant position
 
Competition act Aditi Chikurdekar
Competition act  Aditi Chikurdekar Competition act  Aditi Chikurdekar
Competition act Aditi Chikurdekar
 
Competition Act,2002
Competition Act,2002Competition Act,2002
Competition Act,2002
 
Competition law and policy in india geneva 2009
Competition law and policy in india geneva 2009Competition law and policy in india geneva 2009
Competition law and policy in india geneva 2009
 
Ppt competition act
Ppt competition actPpt competition act
Ppt competition act
 
Competition act, 2002
Competition act, 2002Competition act, 2002
Competition act, 2002
 
Mrtp act
Mrtp actMrtp act
Mrtp act
 
Presentation on The competition act(2002)
Presentation on The competition act(2002)Presentation on The competition act(2002)
Presentation on The competition act(2002)
 
Competition law & policy
Competition law & policyCompetition law & policy
Competition law & policy
 
Lab project,competition act 2002
Lab project,competition act 2002Lab project,competition act 2002
Lab project,competition act 2002
 
50037397 competition-act-ppt final
50037397 competition-act-ppt final50037397 competition-act-ppt final
50037397 competition-act-ppt final
 
Competition act 2002
Competition act 2002Competition act 2002
Competition act 2002
 

Similar to Competitionact2002 090902133438-phpapp01

competition act 2002
competition act 2002competition act 2002
competition act 2002Manish Tiwari
 
Mrtp to competition when the world at large is a single platform for trade an...
Mrtp to competition when the world at large is a single platform for trade an...Mrtp to competition when the world at large is a single platform for trade an...
Mrtp to competition when the world at large is a single platform for trade an...92_neil
 
Chapter 13: How free economic competition is protected in Colombia
Chapter 13: How free economic competition is protected in ColombiaChapter 13: How free economic competition is protected in Colombia
Chapter 13: How free economic competition is protected in ColombiaTatiana Behar Russy
 
Day 1 Intro to CCP and Competition Law in Pakistan
Day 1 Intro to CCP and Competition Law in PakistanDay 1 Intro to CCP and Competition Law in Pakistan
Day 1 Intro to CCP and Competition Law in PakistanAhmed Qadir
 
Competition act
Competition actCompetition act
Competition actbogus_mk
 
Competition Act, 2002
Competition Act, 2002Competition Act, 2002
Competition Act, 2002bogus_mk
 
Competition Act 2002- April 2016,
Competition Act 2002- April 2016,Competition Act 2002- April 2016,
Competition Act 2002- April 2016,Pooja Chetri
 
The need to have an effective Competition Law regime
The need to have an effective Competition Law regimeThe need to have an effective Competition Law regime
The need to have an effective Competition Law regimeAjithaa Edirimane
 
Progression of MRTP Act to Competition Act in the era of globalization where ...
Progression of MRTP Act to Competition Act in the era of globalization where ...Progression of MRTP Act to Competition Act in the era of globalization where ...
Progression of MRTP Act to Competition Act in the era of globalization where ...92_neil
 
The Competition Act, India
The Competition Act, IndiaThe Competition Act, India
The Competition Act, IndiaNeha Kumar
 
Understanding Philippine Competition Law
Understanding Philippine Competition LawUnderstanding Philippine Competition Law
Understanding Philippine Competition LawGus Agosto
 

Similar to Competitionact2002 090902133438-phpapp01 (20)

competition act 2002
competition act 2002competition act 2002
competition act 2002
 
8. Competition Law.pptx
8. Competition Law.pptx8. Competition Law.pptx
8. Competition Law.pptx
 
Competition act
Competition actCompetition act
Competition act
 
Competition act
Competition actCompetition act
Competition act
 
Business Law 5
Business Law 5Business Law 5
Business Law 5
 
Mrtp to competition when the world at large is a single platform for trade an...
Mrtp to competition when the world at large is a single platform for trade an...Mrtp to competition when the world at large is a single platform for trade an...
Mrtp to competition when the world at large is a single platform for trade an...
 
Chapter 13: How free economic competition is protected in Colombia
Chapter 13: How free economic competition is protected in ColombiaChapter 13: How free economic competition is protected in Colombia
Chapter 13: How free economic competition is protected in Colombia
 
Competetion act
Competetion actCompetetion act
Competetion act
 
COMPETITION ACT, 2002
COMPETITION ACT, 2002 COMPETITION ACT, 2002
COMPETITION ACT, 2002
 
Day 1 Intro to CCP and Competition Law in Pakistan
Day 1 Intro to CCP and Competition Law in PakistanDay 1 Intro to CCP and Competition Law in Pakistan
Day 1 Intro to CCP and Competition Law in Pakistan
 
Competition act
Competition actCompetition act
Competition act
 
Competition act
Competition actCompetition act
Competition act
 
Competition Act, 2002
Competition Act, 2002Competition Act, 2002
Competition Act, 2002
 
Competition
CompetitionCompetition
Competition
 
Competition Act 2002- April 2016,
Competition Act 2002- April 2016,Competition Act 2002- April 2016,
Competition Act 2002- April 2016,
 
Competition act
Competition actCompetition act
Competition act
 
The need to have an effective Competition Law regime
The need to have an effective Competition Law regimeThe need to have an effective Competition Law regime
The need to have an effective Competition Law regime
 
Progression of MRTP Act to Competition Act in the era of globalization where ...
Progression of MRTP Act to Competition Act in the era of globalization where ...Progression of MRTP Act to Competition Act in the era of globalization where ...
Progression of MRTP Act to Competition Act in the era of globalization where ...
 
The Competition Act, India
The Competition Act, IndiaThe Competition Act, India
The Competition Act, India
 
Understanding Philippine Competition Law
Understanding Philippine Competition LawUnderstanding Philippine Competition Law
Understanding Philippine Competition Law
 

Competitionact2002 090902133438-phpapp01

  • 2. Competition Is “a situation in a market in which firms or sellers independently strive for the buyers’ patronage in order to achieve a particular business objective for example, profits, sales or market share” (World Bank, 1999)
  • 3. “Competition” is an age-old phenomenon Benefits of Competition:  Companies : Efficiency, cost-saving operations, better utilization of resources, etc.  The Consumer : Wider choice of goods at competitive prices  The Government : Generates revenue
  • 4. It is not necessary that there are a large number of producers/suppliers to have competition conditions. A single producer can exist and provide a competitive atmosphere provided entry of new firms is easy and not costly. Entry barriers can be due to the market position of incumbent firms, legal barriers or strategic barriers Incumbent firms may use their power as “first Movers” to block entry. Legal barriers include licensing and other Government regulations
  • 5. OBJECTIVES OF COMPETITION LAW & POLICY  Promoting economic efficiency in both static and dynamic sense  protecting consumers from the undue exercise of market power  facilitating economic liberalization, including privatization. Deregulation and reduction of external trade barriers  Preserving and promoting the sound development of a market economy
  • 6. OBJECTIVES OF COMPETITION LAW & POLICY ensuring fairness and equity in market place transactions Protecting the ‘public interest’ including in some cases considerations relating to industrial competitiveness and employment Protecting opportunities for small and medium business
  • 7. Competition Law  It is a tool to implement and enforce competition policy and to prevent and punish anti-competitive business practices by firms and unnecessary Government interference in the market.  Competition Law generally covers 3 areas: – Anti - Competitive Agreements, e.g., cartels, – Abuse of Dominant Position by enterprises, e.g., predatory pricing, barriers to entry and – Regulation of Mergers and Acquisitions (M&As).
  • 8. Contd… The need for Competition Law arises because market can suffer from failures and distortions, and various players can resort to anti-competitive activities such as cartels, abuse of dominance etc. which adversely impact economic efficiency and consumer welfare. Thus there is need for Competition Law, and a Competition Watchdog with the authority for enforcing Competition Law.
  • 9. Competition Policy  It includes Reforms in certain Policy areas to make these more pro- competition:-  • Industrial policy  • Trade policy  • Privatization/disinvestment  • Economic Regulation  • State aids
  • 10. Elements of Competition Policy • Putting in place a set of Policies that enhance competition in local and national markets. • A Law designed to prevent anti competitive business practices and unnecessary government intervention.
  • 11. Industrial Policy  Industrial Policy has to address and reform licensing requirements, restrictions on capacities, or on foreign technology tie ups, guidelines on location of industries, reservations for small scale industry, etc. These adversely affect free competition in the market.
  • 12. Trade Policy  Trade policy has important implications for development of competition in the markets. Measures for liberalisation of trade promote greater competition e.g. reducing tariffs, removal of quotas/physical controls, investment controls, conditions relating to local content etc.
  • 13. Economic Regulations  New legislation and regulations to promote competition and to bring about restructuring of major industrial sectors is essential. Legislation to aim at separating natural monopoly elements from potentially competitive activities, and the regulatory functions from commercial functions, and also create several competing entities through restructuring of essential competition activities and to create a competitive environment .  Examples: – Electricity sector – Telecommunications sector – Ports
  • 14. Evolution of Competition Law  Before MRTP Act came into force (1970), limited provisions existed under : • The Indian Contract Act • Directive Principles of State Policy (Non-enforceable)  The MRTP Act brought in a four-pronged thrust : • Concentration of economic power • Restrictive Trade Practices • Monopolistic Trade Practices • Unfair Trade Practices
  • 15. MRTPs vis-à-vis Competition Act Under the Competition Act : • No provision for Unfair Trade Practices • Only Consumer Courts will have jurisdiction • Pending cases will be continued by MRTPC for 2 years • After 2 years :  All cases (except Disparagement Cases) will be transferred to National Commission under CPA  All Disparagement Cases will be transferred to Competition Commission
  • 16. Status of the Competition Commission • It is a body corporate • It has Regulatory and quasi-judicial powers; functions through Benches • Each Bench shall consist of at least two Members and one of such Members must be a judicial Member
  • 17. Agreement  Any arrangement or understanding or action in concert – Whether or not such arrangement or understanding is formal or in writing Or whether or not such understanding or arrangement is intended to be enforceable by legal proceedings
  • 18. Anti-competitive Agreements These are agreements which cause or are likely to cause an appreciable adverse effect on competition within India:  Horizontal Agreements: These are between and among competitors who are at the same stage of production, supply, distribution, etc. These are presumed to be illegal Examples: cartels, bid rigging, collusive bidding, sharing of markets, etc.
  • 19. Anti-Competitive Agreements Vertical Agreements: • Vertical Agreements are between parties at different stages of production, supply, distribution, etc. • These are not presumed illegal; are subject to rule of reason. Examples: tie-in arrangements, exclusive supply/distribution agreements, refusal to deal.
  • 20. Adverse effect on competition  Creation of barriers to entry  Driving existing competitors out of market  Benefits to consumers  Benefit to Scientific and technical knowhow
  • 21. CCI orders against Anti-competitive agreements  Penalty equal to three times the amount of profit made out of such agreement or 10% of average turnover of the cartel for preceding three years whichever is higher  Modification directed to the agreement
  • 22. Powers of Competition Commission as Regards Agreements  After the inquiry into the Agreement, Competition Commission can: • direct parties to discontinue the agreement • prohibit parties from re-entering such agreement • direct modification of the agreement • impose penalty upto 10% of average turnover of the enterprise
  • 23. Abuse of Dominance  “Dominant position” is defined as a position of strength which enables the enterprise • to operate independently of competitive forces in the market, or • to affect its competitors or consumers in its favor.  No mathematical or statistical formula is adopted to “measure” dominance –
  • 24. Abuse of Dominant Position Includes practices like:  • Unfair or discriminatory conditions or prices,  • Limiting or restricting production or technical/scientific development,  • Denial of market access, and  • Predatory pricing.
  • 25. Power of the Competition Commission • After inquiry into abuse of dominant position, the Competition Commission can order:  discontinuance of abuse of dominant position  impose a penalty upto 10% of the average turnover of the enterprise
  • 26. Combinations Regulation  Combinations, in terms of the meaning given to them in the Act, include mergers, amalgamations, acquisitions.  in order to establish whether the higher concentration in the market resulting from the merger will increase the possibility of collusive or unilaterally harmful behavior, it must first be established as to what the relevant market is
  • 27. Contd… Horizontal Mergers Vertical Mergers Conglomerate Mergers Pre-Notification  The requirements for prior notification
  • 28. Mergers and Acquisitions  Commission is expected to regulate “Combinations”, i.e., large mergers, acquisitions, etc. likely to have appreciable adverse effect on competition. • Threshold: For single enterprise  – Assets > Rs.1000 crores  – Turnover > Rs.3000 crores
  • 29. Mergers and Acquisitions Threshold: For group of enterprises  – Assets > Rs.4000 crores  – Turnover > Rs.12000 crores Similarly, threshold is provided for overseas groups.
  • 30. Mergers & Acquisitions • Notification of Combination to Commission is voluntary  • If notified, Commission to take a decision within 90 days on the combination. Decision may allow, disallow, modify, etc. the combination.