• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
WCED Institutional Management and Governance
 

WCED Institutional Management and Governance

on

  • 1,352 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
1,352
Views on SlideShare
1,352
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
9
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    WCED Institutional Management and Governance WCED Institutional Management and Governance Document Transcript

    • Western Cape Education Department Management and Governance Indaba 25 February 2012 -  The role of Institutional Management and Governance during an era of ‘Education Crisis’ - Presenter: Dr Muavia Gallie (PhD) Education Moving Up Cc. muavia@mweb.co.za http://muavia-gallie.blogspot.com http://iwanttoturnaroundmyschool.blogspot.com Content1.  Awareness: We don’t know what we don’t know – State of Education in SA (4-17);2.  Proposition 1 – Human capital at layers beyond the schools;3.  Proposition 2 – Education is a ‘people’ intensive activity;4.  Proposition 3 – The biggest Untruth about Education in SA;5.  Proposition 4 – Compliance is a 25% level of Performance;6.  Proposition 5 – Difference between Institutional Management and Governance www.slideshare.netSearch WCED Institutional Management and Governance 1
    • Introduction•  This presentation is not personal, but it is about PEOPLE;•  Since what is going wrong in the education system, has nothing to do with money, but it is about the PEOPLE;•  What I present is not based on opinion, but rather data (information);•  This conversation is certainly not about ‘being politically correct’, but rather the ‘uncomfortable conversations’ we tend to avoid!;•  Finally, I don’t defend constituencies (learners, teachers, department, etc.), but rather Education and the future of our country! Awareness Test Do we know what we don’t know? 2
    • TIMSS Participation Countries 2007 TIMSS 2003 - Applying Maths 3
    • SACMEQ Countries Botswana Kenya Lesotho Malawi MauritiusMozambique Namibia Seychelles South Africa Swaziland Tanzania Pupil Uganda reading Zambia sco re s Zanzibar ZimbabweSource: SACMEQ Data, 2007 6 SACMEQ Results 6 7 6 2 5 2 2 12 13 11 12 15 15 13 14 4 3 1 1 7 12 4 11 13 9 14 13 1 2 3 4 9 10 9 8 5 4 6 5 3 1 5 3 10 11 8 9 14 14 12 15 11 7 10 10 8 8 15 7 4
    • 1999-2010 + Ave Comparing Grades 1-12 from 1999 to 20101,350,0001,300,0001,250,0001,200,000 19991,150,000 20001,100,000 20011,050,000 20021,000,000 2003 950,000 2004 900,000 2005 850,000 2006 800,000 2007 750,000 2008 700,000 2009 650,000 2010 600,000 Ave. 550,000 500,000 450,000 Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 12 Grade 11 Musical Chairs Game 24 1 23 2 22 3 21 4 20 5 19 6 18 7 17 8 16 9 15 10 14 11 13 12 12 13 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Gr1 Gr2 Gr3 Gr4 Gr5 Gr6 Gr7 Gr8 Gr9 Gr10 Gr11 Gr12 5
    • Average % scores after re-marking 45 Eastern Cape 40 Free State Gauteng 35 KwaZulu NatalAverage Percentage Limpopo 30 Mpumalanga 25 Norther Cape North West 20 Western Cape South Africa 15 Gr 3 Literacy Gr 3 Numeracy Gr 6 Languages Gr 6 Mathematics 6
    • Success rate = 8,1% • Success-rate of the system = 8,1% • Of every 12 learners starting Grade One, only 1 learner attains what the system is promising them - data 2005! Access vs Success Short-Listing EmploymentQuantity Quality Whether you Pass! How you Pass! 7
    • % Different Types of schools in SA Quality of Pass (Grades) 100% 90% 80% 70% 60%Quantity of Pass 50% 40% 20% 30% 20% 50% 10% 0% 20% -10% -20% 10% Anti- Dysfunctional Under- High- Functional Performing Performing 2011 Matric Results 8
    • Japp So, if we spend all thismoney (2011/12 = R178b;2012/13 = R190b; 2013/14= R218b; R236b 2014/15)on education, why are the children not benefiting? 9
    • Teachers Facilitating Learning Teacher Conditions of Unions Service School Managing Leaders Teaching and Learning Proposition 1 Circuit and Support and District Development the schools Four Layers of Expertise at layers beyond Human Capacity Provincial, Systems National, Thinking Ministerial10
    • CDE – 7 September 2011 Proposition 2 Education is a‘People’ intensive activity 11
    • Thomas JeffersonThere is nothing more unequal, than the equal treatment of unequal people. 80/20 Principle 20% 80% 80% 20% INPUT OUTPUT 12
    • Proposition 3 The biggest Untruth about Education in South Africa!We have started to believe that the Creator willapportion IQ basedon your Economic/ Social Status! 13
    • GE UPS 14 Matric Results 100 94,3 90 88,2 88,2 86,2 82,8 82,9 80 80 80,4 81 77,7 74,4 74,5 70 67,7 67,9 67,58 67,5 65,99 65,7 65,99 66,08 66,3 64,75 63,7 64,7 60 60,5 60,23 57,4 56,67 57,86 56,25 54,5 54,07 52,48 52,5 52,94 52,9 52,48 52,6 52,8 50 49,6 49,11 48,57 49,55 49,53 49,54 49,3 47,62 46,27 45,61 45,4 43,42 44,2 40 39,6 39,8 37,5 36,82 35,51 34,18 30 28,51 20 10 0 2008 2009 2010 2011 GDE PPS Matric Results 2008-2011 (2011 ascending) 100 98 96 94,9 92,2 92,2 90,9 90 88,2 88,8 85 84,3 83,8 83,3 83,8 80 78,4 79,880 77,8 76 74,274,575 75,2 73,4 73,7 73 73,5 71,2 70 70 70,6 68 67,6 68,168,6 66,766,7 66,7 66 66 67,1 64,5 65 64,9 62,8 61,862,462,9 63 62,9 61,2 60 59,7 58 57,9 57,7 57,8 56 56,6 56,7% Pass 56 55 55 53,3 53,4 53,1 54 52,2 52 51 51 50 49 50 49,5 49 49,8 48 48 48 48 47 46 46 46 46 46 46 44,9 45 43,2 42 42 41,7 41,7 40 39 39 40 39 39,2 39,2 38 38 38 38 35 35,1 34 33 30 30 30,2 29,2 29 29 30 30 29 29 28 27 27 26 26 24 22 20 16 12 10 0 Boikgethelo Ed Mashabane Sec Mphumelomuhle Sec Fontanus Comp Bona Comp Illinge Sec Memezelo Sec Meadowlands Thutopele High Ibhongo Itirele-Zenzele Comp Lobone Modiri Tech Thoko-Thaba Sec Moqhaka Westbury Sec Jet Nteo Nghunghunyane Ramosukula Ramolelle KwaBhekilanga Ikusasa Comp Sebokeng Tech Katlehong Sec Minerva Mpilisweni Sec Mamellong Comp Vosloorus Comp Senthibele Sec Kwadukathole Comp Kgokare Average 2008 2009 2010 2011 14
    • 100 90 80 70 60 2008 50 2009 2010 40 2011 30 20 10 0 Domains of Change 3. Curriculum (Learners, Parents, Educators, Community, Business, District, Management (School Readiness) (Taking Responsibility) Framework Sustainability Strategy SMT, Principal, SGB, (Education, Curriculum, Ownership Planning Instruction, Teaching, Province) Learning, Assessment, Expectations) Educator BEAR (Beliefs, Expectations, Attitudes & Relationships) 30 1. 2. 4. 5. 15
    • Ownership1. Individual Ownership2. Co-Ownership3. Co-Creation Proposition 4Compliance is 25% level ofPerformance! 16
    • ACCOUNTABILITY SCALE 25%: 50%: 25% Compliance towards Seniors 50% Job25% Description - Salary 25% Support and 50% Development - Juniors Example: Employment of Teachers•  Qualification as a Teacher in subject (whether he/she has the subject expertise);•  Registered with SACE (professionally and ethically accountable); ------------------------------------•  Whether he/she can teach the subject (pedagogical skills);•  History of success in teaching the subject and particular grades, etc. 17
    • Proposition 5 Difference between Institutional Management and Governance Strategic Planning Process AGREEMENTS (Lets do it!)MANAGEMENT GOVERNANCE Specific STRATEGIES Generic (How can we do it?) INNOVATIONS (What can we do about it?) SYSTEMS (Why is it happening?) INDICATORS (What is happening?) 18
    • Example: 15 Dec 2011 Regulations 20% 120% 100% 20% 50% 80% 80% 60% 40% 20% AFS DFS UPS HFS Final Points:•  Appoint people who can do the job, not people who belong to a group; because they are connected; etc.;•  As a principal – if you don’t care about every learner in your school as much as you care about your own child, then you are in the wrong job …;•  As an official, if you don’t know, can’t do (display), or is not better than those whom you need to manage, guide, etc., they will never TRUST what you say;•  In a functional system, you can get away with people managing “generally”, but in a dysfunctional system, you have to have the specific (technical) capacity and skills to manage and lead – ability to show them how to do things – WALK THE TALK! 19
    • ThankYou!! 20