Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
09 3 Qtr Office Review
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×

Introducing the official SlideShare app

Stunning, full-screen experience for iPhone and Android

Text the download link to your phone

Standard text messaging rates apply

09 3 Qtr Office Review

326
views

Published on

Commerce / Cushman & Wakefield - Las Vegas Commercial Real Estate Office 3rd Qtr Market report

Commerce / Cushman & Wakefield - Las Vegas Commercial Real Estate Office 3rd Qtr Market report


0 Comments
1 Like
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
326
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
2
Comments
0
Likes
1
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Office Market Report Las Vegas, Nevada 20 09
  • 2. COMMERCE CRG is a regional real estate firm dedicated first and foremost to our clients. With the industry’s premier professionals, and industry leading technology, our mission is to exceed our clients’ expectations through service excellence. C o m m e r C e C r G | t h i r d Q ua r t e r - 2 0 0 9 | o f f i c e m a r k e t r e v i e w
  • 3. OFFICE MARKET INDICATORS Change Since Current 3Q09 3Q08 LAS VEGAS MARKET OVERVIEW Vacancy 20.50% Lease Rates $1.95 (FSG) $2.12 Net Absorption * (150,214) Construction N/A *The arrows are trend indicators over the specified time period, and do not represent a positive or negative value. (e.g., absorption could be negative but still represent a positive trend over a specified period.) LAS VEGAS MARKET OVERVIEW AT A GLANCE As the cold weather approaches with longer winter nights, Overall vacancy rates showed an increase from 20.11% in 2nd quarter the commercial real estate storm is also gathering strength. 2009 to the current rate of 20.50% at the end of 3rd quarter 2009. This rate is escalating from a year ago when rates were around 16.7%. According to the Mortgage Bankers Association, “The dollar value of loans dropped 56% for office properties.” Real Capital Average rental rates continue to show lower levels than we witnessed Analytic’s also stated, “The credit crisis has driven $138 billion a year ago at a current rate of $1.95 per square foot per month psf/mo worth of U.S. commercial properties into default, foreclosure (market average). This is also a drop from last quarter rates of $2.12 psf/ mo (market average). Full Service Gross (FSG) rates during 3rd quarter or debt restructuring.” Close to 200 small banks across the U.S declined to $2.12 psf/mo, Modified Gross (MG) reported at $1.66 psf/mo will close in the coming months and larger banks will continue and Net Net Net (NNN) rates averaged at $1.36 psf/mo to see trouble ahead as some $1.8 trillion of commercial real Economic outlook is still going to be a growing concern for both landlords estate debt hold on banks books. Jon D Greenlee, associate and tenants as tighter credit terms, rising inflation and a weak job market director at the Division of Banking Supervision and Regulation continue to affect the Las Vegas area. released that “In addition to losses caused by declining property cash flows and deteriorating conditions for construction loans, losses will also be boosted by the depreciating collateral value underlying those $500 billion maturing commercial loans. The losses will place continued pressure on banks earnings, especially those of smaller regional and community banks that have high concentrations of CRE loans.” The Feds are working on a solution and in the July they allowed “investors participating in its Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility (TALF) to purchase existing securities backed by loans the government will cover for apartment complexes, office buildings, retail shopping centers and other commercial property.” Greenlee stated. Still Lenders losses are casting a shadow over lending and they are still reluctant to extend credit as property values fall and unemployment rises. Developers have also now halted any new development based on the current fundamentals of limited to / no financing, high vacancy and greatly reduced tenant demand. National unemployment rates reached a 27 year high at 10.2 %, roughly 15.7 million unemployed workers. The Las Vegas economy also continues to be impacted by downturns and high employment rates in all major sectors, including gaming, construction, financial and real estate. The recession will most likely be a “jobless recovery.” Since World War II there have been a total of 11 recessions and in the most recent recessions before the 2007 recession, job growth lagged long after the recession. In fact it took several years for the unemployment rate to return back to prerecession levels. Employment growth is critical to future economic growth and the return to a healthy commercial market; which may take several years to accomplish. It is important to note that Las Vegas has weathered a number of economic downturns and has responded with great enthusiasm. This down cycle will likely respond similarly; only time will tell! C o m m e r C e C r G | t h i r d Q ua r t e r - 2 0 0 9 | o f f i c e m a r k e t r e v i e w
  • 4. OFFICE MARKET | OVERVIEW By the middle of 2009, the Las Vegas commercial office market continued to report upward movement in vacancies, while overall LAS VEGAS demand slowed. The latest market performance was impacted by MARKET OVERVIEW several factors, including economic weakness locally and nationally, as well as volatility in the global financial markets. Professional office tenants have been impacted by a contracting economy, continued declines in housing values, raising unemployment and ultimately impacting consumer spending and pullback within the tourism industry. OFFICE MARKET | VACANCIES Valley-wide average vacancies continued to escalate as the supply-side of the equation, combined with declining demand and contraction in real estate related industries, continues to impact the competitive landscape. The office market vacancies reached 20.50 percent at the end of the 3rd quarter, which was higher than the 20.11 percent reported one quarter ago (Q2 2009) and 3.8 points higher than the 16.7 percent reported one year ago (Q3 2008). Available sublease space dropped slightly in 3rd quarter with currently availability at 766,978 sf (1.74% of the total market) of available sublease space. Office submarkets reporting the highest level of availability included emerging submarkets with the newest supply of buildings such as the Northwest (25.70 percent), Southeast (23.8 percent), and Southwest (29.0%) submarkets. The high vacancy rates in these submarkets are a result of newer buildings that have come on line with little or no pre-leasing activity, combined with lease concessions, defaults and downsizing which is causing vacancy to rise. Below-market-average vacancies were noted in the Downtown (10.52%), Central East (16.34 %), and Central West (14.32 %). OFFICE MARKET | PRICING (Average Asking Rents) The latest performance contributed to price erosion as landlords and building owners compete for a limited number of users. By 3rd quarter 2009, the market reported average asking rents of $2.12 sf/FSG, a drop from the $2.38 sf/FSG from 3rd quarter 2008. Elevated tenant improvement allowances and free rent concessions are impacting returns for landlords and ultimately lenders. We expect this trend to continue throughout the majority of 2009 as inventory levels remain elevated. Average rents in the Top Tier Class A segment reached $3.13 sf/FSG with newer, high-end buildings targeting a price point well above the average. Lower Tier Class A buildings rates were slightly lower at $2.79 sf / FSG. Also above the valley average was Top Tier Class B buildings that reported average asking rents of $2.35 sf/FSG. However the Lower Tier Class B buildings were lower than the average at $1.96 sf/FSG. Pricing for Class C properties has average rates around $1.93 sf/FSG (Top Tier C) and $1.65 sf/FSG (Lower Tier C). Downtown ($2.32 sf/FSG), Southeast ($2.34 sf/FSG) and Southwest ($2.57 sf/FSG) submarkets show the highest lease rates, while Central West ($1.75 sf/FSG), Northwest ($1.87 sf/FSG) and Central East ($1.73 sf/FSG) submarkets show the lowest average lease rates. Please Note: the average asking rates do not take inconsideration free rent & rental concession. * Full Service Gross (FSG): A lease requiring the owner to pay all operating expenses, such as cleaning, maintenance and repairs, utilities, insurance and ad valorem taxes. OFFICE MARKET | OUTLOOK The market will continue to be impacted by cautious consumer/companies activity, causing vacancies to remain elevated and most likely continue to increase. Near-term contraction within the employment market will also have an impact on office market demand. The effect of extended lease up periods and softening economic conditions will contribute to increased repossession activity by lenders that will result in further price adjustments. The coming year will be more critical to see if the economy can continue with out the hand holding of government help in the form of stimulus spending such as cash-for-cluckers, federal programs to keep interest rates low and new home buyer credits. Expect job growth to remain sluggish and remain that way for at least 18 to 24 months before we start to see true recovery. The office market is like a big ship, years of analysis shows that once the market starts on a downward cycle it takes years to turn it around. C o m m e r C e C r G | t h i r d Q ua r t e r - 2 0 0 9 | o f f i c e m a r k e t r e v i e w
  • 5. OFFICE MARKET | PERFORMANCE BY PRODUCT TYPE & CLASSIFICATION While broader market trends are clear, by providing basic break out LAS VEGAS of the office product types, it is also important to understand the MARKET OVERVIEW performance of detailed key sectors within the commercial office market. At Commerce CRG, we know the importance of updating the classification of buildings as the market grows older. We have taken the steps this quarter to start with a new classification process. As a team, we have separated and reclassified all office buildings in a “Tier” format. The Tier format will separate out classes in a Top Tier Class and Lower Tier Class. This will help our clients to better understand, for example, the number of “real” Class A buildings that the Las Vegas area has that would qualify as Class A in other markets such as Los Angels and New York. While also taking a look at lower tier Class A buildings, buildings that is what the Las Vegas market considers Class A, but would not qualify as Class A in Los Angeles or New York. The following is the Commerce CRG 3rd Quarter Market report which highlights market conditions by building type and classification. C o m m e r C e C r G | t h i r d Q ua r t e r - 2 0 0 9 | o f f i c e m a r k e t r e v i e w
  • 6. commerce crG Las Vegas office market report Q3 2009 Professional Buildings inventory vacancy Demand & Supply Pricing No. of existing under Const. Planned Vacancy Net Space Gross Space New Sub asking rent (FSG) Bldgs. SF SF SF SF rate occupied Leased Supply Lease Low high W avg. Northwest Class tta - - - - - 0.00% - - - - Class Lta 1 126,915 - - 82,486 64.99% (1,668) - - - Class ttB 91 2,693,758 - - 569,350 21.14% (52,050) 48,810 - 32,611 $1.00 $2.50 $1.78 Class LtB 16 569,428 - - 215,929 37.92% (53,703) 1,170 - 5,668 $1.95 $2.35 $2.15 Class ttC 49 1,105,129 - - 287,530 26.02% (98,732) 9,290 - 7,034 $1.00 $2.15 $1.54 Class LtC - - - - - 0.00% - - - - total 157 4,495,230 - - 1,155,295 25.70% (206,153) 59,270 - 45,313 $1.00 $2.50 $1.87 Downtown Class tta 3 655,254 - - 32,987 5.03% 15,835 15,835 - - $3.00 $3.00 $3.00 Class Lta 1 103,951 - - - 0.00% 1,611 1,611 - - Class ttB - - - - - 0.00% - - - - Class LtB 10 581,117 - - 144,652 24.89% (22,757) 12,500 - 20,260 $1.00 $2.85 $2.08 Class ttC 5 343,032 - - 23,936 6.98% (4,879) - - 1,997 $2.60 $2.60 $2.60 Class LtC 46 860,417 - - 66,142 7.69% 64,589 64,589 - - $1.95 $1.95 $1.95 total 65 2,543,771 - - 267,717 10.52% 54,399 94,535 - 22,257 $1.00 $3.00 $2.32 central east Class tta 5 995,120 - - 76,396 7.68% 34,387 41,485 - 80,116 $3.65 $4.00 $3.25 Class Lta 5 387,590 - - 82,029 21.16% 16,016 18,016 - 8,938 $3.00 $3.65 $3.18 Class ttB - - - - - 0.00% - - - - Class LtB 6 529,138 - - 162,029 30.62% (2,171) 638 - 21,626 $1.00 $1.85 $1.39 Class ttC 75 2,601,854 - - 479,958 18.45% 39,806 128,793 - 7,316 $1.00 $1.85 $1.35 Class LtC 58 1,273,364 - - 144,977 11.39% 23,687 37,327 - 4,500 $0.99 $1.70 $1.35 total 149 5,787,066 - - 945,389 16.34% 111,725 226,259 - 122,496 $0.99 $4.00 $1.73 central west Class tta - - - - - 0.00% - - - - Class Lta 1 157,624 - - 6,319 4.01% 165 165 - - $2.90 $2.90 $2.90 Class ttB - - - - - 0.00% - - - - Class LtB 45 2,192,468 - - 292,820 13.36% (37,787) 21,825 - 41,003 $1.00 $2.25 $1.75 Class ttC 125 3,211,808 - - 500,367 15.58% 82,621 163,381 - 22,088 $1.25 $2.00 $1.56 Class LtC 52 780,205 - - 108,523 13.91% 7,921 40,135 - - total 223 6,342,105 - - 908,029 14.32% 52,920 225,506 - 63,091 $1.00 $2.90 $1.75 west Class tta 1 143,633 - - 32,025 22.30% - - - 25,530 Class Lta 3 293,255 - - 77,685 26.49% (21,608) - - - $1.95 $2.35 $2.22 Class ttB 11 760,501 - - 199,222 26.20% 30,711 60,707 - 20,178 $1.00 $2.70 $1.88 Class LtB 121 2,441,269 - - 275,225 11.27% (20,171) 35,295 - 46,122 $1.50 $2.25 $1.83 Class ttC 165 2,335,967 - - 479,981 20.55% 14,588 73,086 - 14,013 $2.50 $5.00 $3.75 Class LtC 11 245,699 - - 62,153 25.30% (9,772) 5,880 - - total 312 6,220,324 - - 1,126,291 18.11% (6,252) 174,968 - 105,843 $1.00 $5.00 $2.09 Southwest Class tta - - - - - 0.00% - - - - Class Lta 2 336,140 - - 314,214 93.48% (40,000) - - - $2.70 $3.40 $3.09 Class ttB 27 1,442,608 - - 512,257 35.51% (11,542) 39,580 - 50,543 $2.40 $2.45 $2.40 Class LtB 102 1,797,248 - - 332,775 18.52% (38,342) 33,612 - 46,113 $1.91 $2.50 $2.21 Class ttC 68 1,000,379 - - 169,667 16.96% 7,123 35,517 - 21,365 Class LtC 6 113,662 - - 34,026 29.94% (8,800) - - 1,063 total 205 4,690,037 - - 1,362,939 29.06% (91,561) 108,709 - 119,084 $1.91 $3.40 $2.57 airport Class tta - - - - - 0.00% - - - - Class Lta 5 433,464 - - 184,495 42.56% (1,554) 2,376 - 82,637 $2.00 $2.85 $2.41 Class ttB 17 1,157,337 - - 276,958 23.93% (48,322) - - - $2.35 $3.55 $2.75 Class LtB 35 1,734,417 - - 291,807 16.82% 18,767 32,693 - 111,657 $1.35 $2.35 $1.94 Class ttC 154 1,912,330 - - 485,564 25.39% (32,549) 80,194 - 8,503 $1.25 $1.25 $1.25 Class LtC - - - - - 0.00% - - - - total 211 5,237,548 - - 1,238,824 23.65% (63,658) 115,263 - 202,797 $1.25 $3.55 $2.29 Southeast Class tta - - - - - 0.00% - - - - Class Lta 4 323,132 - - 168,534 52.16% 2,295 3,403 - 11,307 $2.95 $2.95 $2.95 Class ttB 23 1,238,237 - - 342,343 27.65% 20,548 31,744 - 24,900 $2.95 $2.95 $2.95 Class LtB 40 1,220,033 - - 238,220 19.53% (58,488) 6,718 - - $1.69 $2.95 $2.32 Class ttC 311 4,195,599 - - 915,321 21.82% 21,796 143,463 - 31,539 $1.05 $2.00 $1.45 Class LtC - - - - - 0.00% - - - - total 378 6,977,001 - - 1,664,418 23.86% (13,849) 185,328 - 67,746 $1.05 $2.95 $2.34 North Class tta - - - - - 0.00% - - - - Class Lta - - - - - 0.00% - - - - Class ttB - - - - - 0.00% - - - - Class LtB 4 133,918 - - 62,287 46.51% (1,660) 9,473 - - Class ttC 70 1,431,706 - - 320,241 22.37% 11,657 63,267 - 18,351 Class LtC 19 316,522 - - 4,000 1.26% 2,218 2,218 - - total 93 1,882,146 - - 386,528 20.54% 12,215 74,958 - 18,351 Las vegas total Class tta 9 1,794,007 - - 141,408 7.88% 50,222 57,320 - 105,646 $3.00 $4.00 $3.13 Class Lta 22 2,162,071 - - 915,762 42.36% (44,743) 25,571 - 102,882 $1.95 $3.65 $2.79 Class ttB 169 7,292,441 - - 1,900,130 26.06% (60,655) 180,841 - 128,232 $1.00 $3.55 $2.35 Class LtB 379 11,199,036 - - 2,015,744 18.00% (216,312) 153,924 - 292,449 $1.00 $2.95 $1.96 Class ttC 1,022 18,137,804 - - 3,662,565 20.19% 41,431 696,991 - 132,206 $1.00 $5.00 $1.93 Class LtC 192 3,589,869 - - 419,821 11.69% 79,843 150,149 - 5,563 $0.99 $1.95 $1.65 total 1,793 44,175,228 - - 9,055,430 20.50% (150,214) 1,264,796 - 766,978 $0.99 $5.00 $2.12 C o m m e r C e C r G | t h i r d Q ua r t e r - 2 0 0 9 | o f f i c e m a r k e t r e v i e w
  • 7. OFFICE MARKET | MEDICAL OFFICE MARKET Las Vegas, Nevada | Commerce CRG Third Quarter 2009 The medical sector of the office market continues to perform slightly better than the balance of the market in 2009. Vacancies within LAS VEGAS the segment increased this quarter from 14.1 Las Vegas, Nevada | Commerce CRG percent second quarter MARKET OVERVIEW Medical Office Market 2009 to 14.6 percent third quarter 2009. Third Quarter 2009 The medical sector of the office market continues to perform slightly better than the balance of the market inOffice Market Medical 2009. Vacancies within the segment dropped again this quarter from 14.9 percent first quarter 2009 to 14.1 percent second quarter 2009. The medical sector of the office market continues to perform slightly better than the balance of the market in 2009. Vacancies within the segment dropped again this quarter from 14.9 percent first quarter 2009 to 14.1 percent second quarter 2009. Medical Office Submarket - Rates $3.00 Medical Office Submarket - Rates $2.50 $2.00 $3.00 $1.50 $2.50 $1.00 $2.00 $0.50 $1.50 $0.00 $1.00 Central Las Vegas No rthwest Do wnto wn Central East West So uthwest A irpo rt So utheast No rth West A rea To tal $0.50 FSG Rate $1.65 $ 0.00 $1.73 $1.71 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 2.26 $ 0.00 $1.84 M G Rate $1.80 $ 0.00 $1.44 $1.67 $1.83 $ 2.05 $1.53 $1.53 $ 0.00 $1.69 NNN Rate $0.001.55 $ $ 0.00 $1.34 $1.71 Central$ 1.54 $1.75 $1 .25 $1.67 $1 .39 $ 1 Las Vegas .53 No rthwest Do wnto wn Central East West So uthwest A irpo rt So utheast No rth West A rea To tal FSG Rate $1.65 $ 0.00 $1.73 $1.71 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 2.26 $ 0.00 $1.84 M G Rate $1.80 $ 0.00 $1.44 $1.67 $1.83 $ 2.05 $1.53 $1.53 $ 0.00 $1.69 NNN Rate $1.55 $ 0.00 $1.34 $1.71 $1.54 $1.75 $1.25 $1.67 $1.39 $1.53 C o m m e r C e C r G | t h i r d Q ua r t e r - 2 0 0 9 | o f f i c e m a r k e t r e v i e w
  • 8. LAS VEGAS | OFFICE SUBMARKET GRAPHS Las Vegas, Nevada | Commerce CRG Third Quarter 2009 Professional Office: Quarterly Vacancy 25% 0% 1% % .5 83 .1 20 20 . 19 20% 0% 8% 0% .3 .9 .8 17 16 16 0% 6% .8 8% 14 .6 5% 15% 3% .1 13 13 .4 .1 9% 12 2% 12 .8 % .3 10 10 57 % % % 69 9. 10% 49 18 8. 8. 8. 5% 0% 5 5 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 8 7 8 8 8 9 9 9 20 30 40 10 20 30 30 40 10 30 40 10 20 30 40 10 20 Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Professional Office: Quarterly Absorption (SF) Q 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 - (500,000) (1,000,000) 5 5 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 8 8 8 8 9 9 9 30 40 10 20 30 30 40 10 20 30 40 10 20 30 40 10 20 Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Professional Office: Inventory (SF) and Vacancy Rate (%) 50,000,000 25% 45,000,000 20% 40,000,000 15% 35,000,000 10% 30,000,000 5% 25,000,000 0% 5 5 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 8 8 8 8 9 9 9 30 40 10 20 30 30 40 10 20 30 40 10 20 30 40 10 20 Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q C o m m e r C e C r G | t h i r d Q ua r t e r - 2 0 0 9 | o f f i c e m a r k e t r e v i e w
  • 9. LAS VEGAS | OFFICE SUBMARKET GRAPHS Las Vegas, Nevada | Commerce CRG Third Quarter 2009 Professional Office: Office Employment vs Vacancy Rate (%) 350,000 25% 325,000 20.50% 20% 300,000 17.30% 15% 275,000 13.22% 8.96% 10% 250,000 10.88% 8.47% 5% 225,000 200,000 0% 04 05 06 07 08 09 20 20 20 20 20 20 Las Vegas Professional Office Market Overview 1998-2009 YTD 10,000,000 22.00% 20.50% 9,000,000 17.30% 8,000,000 15.77% 17.00% 14.62% 14.42% 14.72% 15.28% 14.20% 13.61% 7,000,000 11.59% 11.48% 6,000,000 12.00% Square Feet Vacancy 9.32% 5,000,000 4,000,000 7.00% 3,000,000 2,000,000 2.00% 1,000,000 - -3.00% 18 20 22 21 25 30 48 44 12 14 15 17 ,49 ,02 ,62 ,75 ,24 ,19 ,55 ,17 ,6 ,8 ,7 ,3 Base 32 69 81 37 6, 0, 1, 2, 1, 9, 1, 5, ,04 ,63 ,03 ,16 03 89 90 13 78 55 57 22 8 5 6 3 6 2 3 8 7 9 1 9 Ave. Lease Rate Sub $1.92 $1.94 $2.00 $1.94 $1.88 $1.87 $1.91 $2.03 $1.86 $1.91 $2.34 $2.08 Ave. Lease Rate DT $2.21 $2.19 $2.27 $2.26 $2.23 $2.16 $2.22 $2.36 $2.27 $2.29 $2.70 $2.12 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Built Net Absorption Vacant Inventory Vacancy C o m m e r C e C r G | t h i r d Q ua r t e r - 2 0 0 9 | o f f i c e m a r k e t r e v i e w
  • 10. Las Vegas, Nevada | Commerce CRG LAS VEGAS | OFFICE SUBMARKET GRAPHS Third Quarter 2009 Professional Office Submarket - Direct vs Sublease Vacancy 29.06% 30.00% 25.70% 25.00% 23.65% 23.86% 20.54% 20.50% 20.00% 1 1 8.1 % 16.34% 14.32% 15.00% 10.52% 10.00% 5.00% 3.87% 2.12% 2.54% 1.70% 1.74% 1 % .01 0.87% 0.99% 0.97% 0.98% 0.00% Central Central Las Vegas Northwest Downtown West Southwest Airport Southeast North East West Area Total Vacacny % 25.70% 10.52% 16.34% 14.32% 18.11% 29.06% 23.65% 23.86% 20.54% 20.50% Sublease % 1.01% 0.87% 2.12% 0.99% 1.70% 2.54% 3.87% 0.97% 0.98% 1.74% Professional Office: Building Class Class C Class B Class A Class A Class B Class C Sublease SF 208,528 420,681 137,769 Vacancy 1,057,170 3,915,874 4,082,386 Existing SF 3,956,078 18,491,477 21,727,673 Professional Office Submarket - Rates $3.00 $2.50 $2.00 $1.50 $1.00 $0.50 $0.00 Central Central Las Vegas Northwest Downtown West Southwest Airport Southeast North East West Area Total FSG Rate $1.87 $2.32 $1.73 $1.75 $2.09 $2.57 $2.29 $2.34 $0.00 $2.12 MG Rate $1.81 $1.51 $1.25 $1.39 $1.65 $1.88 $1.67 $1.62 $2.16 $1.66 NNN Rate $1.53 $1.55 $1.12 $1.25 $1.48 $1.46 $1.29 $1.47 $1.11 $1.36 C o m m e r C e C r G | t h i r d Q ua r t e r - 2 0 0 9 | o f f i c e m a r k e t r e v i e w
  • 11. GLOSSARy | MAjOR MARKET dEFINITIONS Top Tier Class A: Describes the highest quality office space locally available. The architecture of Class A office structures always prioritizes design and visual appeal over cost, and sometimes over practicality - a Class A building can be considered a monument and a testament to the success and power of its tenants. Class A: Generally 100,000 sq. ft. or larger (five or more floors), concrete and steel construction, built since 1980, business /support amenities, strong identifiable location/access. Most prestigious buildings competing for premier office users with above average rents for the area. Buildings have high quality standard finishes, state-of-the-art systems, exceptional accessibility and suggest a definitive market presence. Lower Tier Class A: Investment – grade property, well located and offering high-quality space. Good design, above-average workmanship and materials. Well maintained and managed, exceptionally so if an older building. Quality tenants. Building(s) location considered premier with high market perception standards. Typically higher rent with excellent building finishes, multiple building amenities and high efficiencies. Class A will have 3 or more floors, concrete and steel construction. Top Tier Class B: Building(s) location considered excellent with medium market perception standards. Renovated and in good locations. Typically lower rent than Class “A” with good building finishes, some building amenities and medium efficiencies. Built after 2000. Concrete and steel construction. Lower Tier Class B: Buildings competing for a wide range of office users with average rents for the area. Building finishes are fair to good for the area and systems are adequate, but the buildings do not compete with class A at the same price. They are less appealing to tenants than Class A properties, and may be deficient in a number of respects including floor plans, condition and facilities. They lack prestige and must depend chiefly on a lower price to attract tenants and investors. Such buildings offer utilitarian space without special attractions and have ordinary design. Built before 2000. Wood frame and tilt wall construction. Top Tier Class C: A classification used to describe buildings that generally qualify as no-frills, older buildings that offer basic space and command lower rents or sale prices compared to other buildings in the same market. Such buildings typically have below-average maintenance and management, and could have mixed or low tenant prestige, inferior elevators, and/or mechanical/electrical systems. These buildings lack prestige and must depend chiefly on a lower price to attract tenants and investors. 15 to 25 years old. Wood frame and tilt wall construction. Smaller buildings, Garden Style design. Lower Tier Class C: Older, un-renovated and of any size in average to fair condition. Basic Space in a no-frills older building. Below –Average maintenance and management. Mixed or low tenant prestige. Inferior elevators and mechanical/ electrical systems. Class C Buildings are typically 15 to 25 years old but are maintaining steady occupancy. Medical: A building is considered medical if greater than 55% of its rentable area is occupied by medical tenants. Full Service Gross (FSG): A lease requiring the owner to pay all operating expenses, such as cleaning, maintenance and repairs, utilities, insurance and ad valorem taxes. C o m m e r C e C r G | t h i r d Q ua r t e r - 2 0 0 9 | o f f i c e m a r k e t r e v i e w
  • 12. LAS VEGAS | OFFICE SUBMARKET MAP C o m m e r C e C r G | t h i r d Q ua r t e r - 2 0 0 9 | o f f i c e m a r k e t r e v i e w
  • 13. COMMERCE CRG | FuLL SERVICE COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE SOLuTIONS Commerce CRG has been among the top commercial real estate brokerage firms in the Intermountain West for 30 years. From our headquarters in Salt Lake City and offices in Provo/Orem, Park City, Clearfield and St. George, Utah and Las Vegas, Nevada we offer a full range of brokerage services, valuation and consulting, client representation and property/facility management. Our alliance with Cushman & Wakefield extends our reach worldwide. CuShMAN & WAKEFIELd ALLIANCE A number of Cushman & Wakefield offices, including Commerce CRG, are independently owned and connected with the company by way of an international alliance. Cushman & Wakefield concentrates on larger markets like Los Angeles and New York, and alliance members like Commerce CRG concentrate on developing secondary markets. Together the geographic coverage is nearly universal. This enables Cushman & Wakefield to provide comprehensive services for clients with local requirements as well as for those with more expansive national or international portfolios. In either case, Cushman & Wakefield’s services are supported by the full integrated resources of the entire alliance. Cushman & Wakefield is the world’s largest privately-held commercial real estate services firm. Founded in 1917, it has 230 offices in 58 countries and more than 15,000 employees. The firm represents a diverse customer base ranging from small businesses to Fortune 500 companies. It offers a complete range of services within four primary disciplines: Transaction Services, including tenant and landlord representation in office, industrial and retail real estate; Capital Markets, including property sales, investment management, valuation services, investment banking, debt and equity financing; Client Solutions, including integrated real estate strategies for large corporations and property owners, and Consulting Services, including business and real estate consulting. A recognized leader in global real estate research, the firm publishes a broad array of proprietary reports available on its online Knowledge Center at www.cushmanwakefield.com. 230 Offices in 58 Countries Europe Austria Bulgaria Channel Islands France Ireland Norway Russia Vienna* Pleven* Jersey* Lyon Cork* Drammen* Moscow Canada Belgium Plovdiv* Sofia* Czech Republic Paris Dublin* Oslo* Stavanger* Scotland Brussels Prague Germany Italy Edinburgh Alberta Manitoba Newfoundland Berlin Bologna Poland Glasgow Calgary Winnipeg* St. John's* Denmark Dusseldorf Milan Warsaw Edmonton* Copenhagen* Serbia New Brunswick Nova Scotia Frankfurt Rome Portugal Belgrade* British Columbia Fredericton* Halifax* England Hamburg Luxembourg Lisbon Vancouver Moncton* Birmingham Munich Slovakia Ontario Luxembourg* Saint John* London-City Romania Bratislava Greece United States London Newmarket London-West End Athens Macedonia Bucharest Spain Manchester Skopje* Timisoara Ottawa Barcelona Thames Valley Hungary Toronto Central Budapest The Netherlands Madrid Toronto East Amsterdam Alabama Sweden Maine Toronto West Birmingham* Northern Ireland Stockholm Portland Quebec Belfast* Mobile Switzerland Maryland Montreal Central Basel* Arizona Montreal Suburban Phoenix Baltimore Geneva* Tempe Bethesda Zurich* Tucson* Massachusetts Turkey California Boston Istanbul Carlsbad Michigan Inland Empire Ohio L.A. Detroit* Grand Rapids* Cincinnati* Middle East/Africa L.A. South Bay Grosse Point Cleveland* Israel South Africa United Arab Emirates L.A. West Kalamazoo* Columbus* Tel Aviv* Cape Town* Dubai Marin/Sonoma Cty Lansing* Toledo* Durban* Oakland Muskegon* Lebanon Oregon Johannesburg* Orange County Beirut* Portland Pretoria* Sacramento Minnesota San Diego - Downtown Minneapolis Minneapolis Suburban Pennsylvania San Diego - Eastgate Philadelphia San Francisco Missouri Philadelphia Suburban San Jose Kansas City* Pittsburgh* Australia/Asia Pacific Walnut Creek St. Louis* Puerto Rico Australia Malaysia Colorado Nevada San Juan* Adelaide* Kuala Lumpur* Colorado Springs* Latin America Las Vegas* Melbourne* South Carolina New Zealand Denver Reno Sydney Charleston* Auckland* Connecticut Argentina Ecuador China Wellington* New Hampshire Greenville/Spartanburg* Buenos Aires Quito Hartford Manchester Beijing Stamford Tennessee Chengdu Pakistan Brazil Mexico New Jersey Guangzhou Karachi* Memphis* Manaus Ciudad Juarez Delaware East Rutherford Nashville* Rio de Janeiro Guadalajara* Hong Kong Philippines Wilmington Edison São Paulo Mexico City Shanghai Manila* District of Morristown Texas Monterrey Shenzhen Columbia Austin* Chile Singapore New York Dallas Santiago* Peru Fiji* Washington, D.C. South Korea Albany* Lima Houston Colombia India Busan Florida Binghamton* San Antonio* Buffalo* Bogota* Venezuela Bangalore Seoul Ft. Lauderdale Corning/Elmira* Caracas Chennai Ft. Myers* Utah Gurgaon Taiwan Jacksonville Islandia Clearfield/Ogden* Taipei* Ithaca* Hyderabad Miami Park City* Kingston* Kolkata Thailand Orlando Provo/Orem* Melville, LI Mumbai – City Bangkok* Palm Beach Gardens Salt Lake City* N.Y. Downtown Mumbai – Suburbs Tampa St. George* Vietnam N.Y. Midtown New Delhi Georgia Virginia Pune Hanoi Rochester* Ho Chi Minh City C&W Owned Offices Atlanta Syracuse Fredicksburg* Indonesia Syracuse* McLean Hawaii Jakarta C&W Alliance/Associate Offices Utica* Newport News* Honolulu Watertown* Norfolk/Virginia Beach* Japan AS OF MARCH 2009 Illinois Westchester County Richmond* Tokyo Chicago Roanoke* Chicago Suburban North Carolina Washington Charlotte* Indiana Bellevue Greensboro/Winston-Salem* Indianapolis* Seattle Raleigh/Cary Kentucky Raleigh/Durham* Wisconsin Louisville* Tarboro* Milwaukee* C o m m e r C e C r G | t h i r d Q ua r t e r - 2 0 0 9 | o f f i c e m a r k e t r e v i e w