Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Andrew Chant\'s CanWEA  O  & M  Presentation
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×

Saving this for later?

Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime - even offline.

Text the download link to your phone

Standard text messaging rates apply

Andrew Chant\'s CanWEA O & M Presentation

930
views

Published on


1 Comment
1 Like
Statistics
Notes
  • The wind industry is getting bigger as the time pass by. This is due to the fact that wind energy is clean that makes it safe to use because it does not have any side effect that is hazardous to health or to environment. Besides, this is just for free. The energy from the wind is being converted to electricity that can sustain us for life since it is unlimited.
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
No Downloads
Views
Total Views
930
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
3
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
13
Comments
1
Likes
1
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. The Blind Man in the Dark Room with an Elephant: Estimating O & M Costs Post Warranty Presented by: Andrew Chant, ORTECH Power CanWEA: Montreal, Québec November 2, 2010
  • 2. WHO IS ORTECH Power? • Offices in Mississauga, Ontario • Division of ORTECH Consulting • 40 professionals & technicians • Over 40 years of experience in atmospheric sciences, over 10 dedicated to the wind industry • Principals of ORTECH Power have backgrounds as renewable energy developers • Client base of independent developers and financial institutions and infrastructure investors • Complete range of services to the wind industry • Unique in that we bring financial and economic analysis to wind projects; client base requires conservative outlook – real peoples’ money
  • 3. Defining the Elephant What are O & M Costs? In accountant-speak: • O & M Costs are direct costs affecting turbine operations; Revenue less O & M Costs gives Net Operating Income before GS & A costs; • O & M Costs do not include expenses such as municipal taxes, payments to landowners, accounting and legal; • These GS & A costs are generally fixed. except for royalty- like lease costs, are site market specific and easy to predict; • Some costs are borderline such as BoP Maintenance, environmental monitoring; • True O & M Costs are a measure of operating efficiency of a wind facility.
  • 4. How Important are O & M Costs? • Short answer – highly critical • Combination of shortfall in production and unplanned increase in O & M Costs of 12 to 15% will produce negative rate of return • Recent experience in US indicates most facilities operating 10-11% under P50 estimates for a variety of reasons: i) Inherent inaccuracies in energy output forecasts – is there a plus P50 or is the P50 the upper limit of output? ii) Grid curtailment issues iii) Availability issues such as gearbox failures
  • 5. Revenue & Op Costs Sensitivity
  • 6. How Big is this Elephant? Forecasting O & M Costs General Approach - Estimate each Type of O & M Costs including Contingency: 1. Routine Maintenance: Check gearbox lubricating oil, bearings, temperature, torque testing of bolts, yaw alignment, all in accordance with OEM’s operating & maintenance manual on monthly, semi-annual & annual basis. 2. Planned Maintenance: Major repairs & refurbishment to all major components such as gearboxes & generators; carried out in six to eight year cycles depending on nature of site & operational history of turbines – designed to reduce incidence of unplanned maintenance. 3. Preventative Maintenance: Consists of monitoring of turbine performance with aim of carrying out major repairs & refurbishments on major turbine components only when signs of deterioration begin to appear: should have higher contingency than Planned Maintenance; consider condition monitoring. 4. Unplanned Maintenance: Also known as Unscheduled/Reactive Maintenance; caused by unexpected breakdown of turbine components; most expensive form of maintenance in terms of repair costs and downtime. 5. BoP Maintenance: Snow clearing, access road maintenance, substation and connection point testing; generally covers everything excluded in turbine OEM’s warranty & service contract coverage; often contracted out.
  • 7. Forecasting O & M Costs • Routine/Scheduled Maintenance relatively easy: 1 technician for every 8 to 10 WTGs plus consumables • Approximately $1,500 to $2,500/year/WTG in consumables and tools including vehicles for BoP maintenance • Skimping on Scheduled Maintenance unwise; leads to higher Unplanned/Reactive Maintenance costs
  • 8. Planned Maintenance • Determine if facility is performing as expected; compare actual output against wind adjusted output less factors beyond control such as grid outages • Look at operating history of wind facility; review SCADA records & Operator’s Logs; what are the most frequent problems? • Separate WTGs into under, average and superior performers • Look at component life cycles then adjust for complex terrain/ extreme weather = turbulence = higher mechanical stress on gearboxes and drive trains • Do thorough mechanical inspections using NDT techniques or install condition monitoring to detect deterioration before component failure • Devise spare parts program; keep on hand spare yaw motors, calculate frequency of lightning strikes – necessity to replace blades
  • 9. Planned Maintenance (Cont’d) • Based on operations analysis and mechanical inspections, plan major repair and refurbishment “campaign” • Schedule for low wind/ good weather months to reduce revenue loss • Start with under-performing wind turbines • Organize replacement component plan - refurbished or new gearbox goes in, gearbox for refurbishment goes to OEM • Advantages: i) Catch deteriorating components before catastrophic failure ii) Spreads crane costs over a number of turbines – estimated savings approximately $25.000/WTG iii) Reduces downtime iv) Lowers but does not eliminate Unscheduled or Reactive Maintenance contingency reserves
  • 10. Staring Down the Beady-Eyed Bean Counters Justifying the Up-Front Costs Reactive v. Planned Maintenance Costs Component Reactive Planned Savings Gearboxes Refurbishment $250,000 $125,000 $125,000 Crane Costs $100,000 $77,000 $23,000 Downtime (Days) 14-21 2 12-19 Lost Revenue @ $1,008/WTG/Day $17,640 $2,016 $15,624 Subtotal $367,640 $204,016 Add 30% Contingency $110,292 $61,205 $49,087 Total $477,932 $265,221 Gross Savings Planned v. Reactive $212,711
  • 11. Staring Down the Beady-Eyed Bean Counters Justifying the Up-Front Costs (Cont’d) Gross Savings Planned v. Reactive $212,711 Assume 25 Year Economic Life/WTG = 3 Repair & Refurbishment Cycles Gross Savings/WTG = $638,133 Annual Gross Savings/WTG $31,907 Less: (i) Carrying Costs Spare Component Inventory $3,600 (ii) Condition Monitoring $2,500 Net Annual Savings/WTG in 2010 Dollars $25,807 Net Annual Savings for 50 WTG 100 MW Facility $1,290,350 Net Lifetime Savings in 2010 Dollars over 20 Years $25,807,000
  • 12. Lifetime Savings: Planned v. Reactive Maintenance Net Operating Income for a Proactive and Reactive O & M Routine $20.00 $21.00 $22.00 $23.00 $24.00 $25.00 $26.00 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Year NetOperatingIncome($millions) Reactive Proactive
  • 13. New Developments: Current Status of O & M Servicing Market • To obtain warranty OEM’s require that WTGs be serviced by turbine manufacturer for minimum two year period following commissioning. • Lenders will require warranty plus reserves for major repairs and refurbishment. • Previously manufacturers offered a “serial defect” clause in warranty; required replacement of all of a particular component if a percentage (15-20%) failed in the facility – no longer available. • Because of serial defect experience OEM’s shortened warranty period from 5 years to 2. • Now re-entering the O & M Servicing market with various offerings: – i) terms of 2, 5, 8 and 10 years – ii) coverage from full service to parts only or remote monitoring. – iii) costs range from $40,000 to $100,000+ per turbine annually depending on turbine model and size. • Obviously seen as area of growth. • Tendency for senior management to opt for longer term “full service” package since shifts O & M & technology risk to service provider.
  • 14. New Elephants in the Room Larger & Unproven Turbines on the Market An Example: GE 1.5 versus the GE 2.5 Features: Nameplate Capacity 1.5 2.5 Hub Height (m) 64.7/80/85 75/85/100 Rotor Diameter (m) 77 100 Swept Area (m²) 4,657 7,854 Gearbox Type Multi-staged planetary helical Combined Spur Planetary Gear Ratio 1:72 1:117.4 Generator Type Asynchronous, double fed induction Synchronous permanent magnet Generator RPM 1,500-1,800 1,650 First Installed 2005 2006 Number Installed 2010 (est.)* 14,000 200 *Source: German Wind Energy Association & GE Energy Website
  • 15. Conclusions • Using basic principles of operations analysis, understanding component life cycles and applying simple cost accounting methods, it is possible to quantify the savings from a planned maintenance program • Can be adopted to specific site conditions and WTG characteristics • Although there are upfront costs, over time there are larger and substantial savings • Planning for future O & M Costs means assessing site & turbine characteristics, estimating future repair & refurbishment costs, evaluating the value of the certainty of OEM service contracts and understanding the degree of risk you are prepared to assume. • The purpose of this presentation is to provide a framework for this risk analysis. .
  • 16. Good Luck with Your Elephant Training Program Remember: Watch Where you Step They are Hard to Paper Train Presented by: Andrew Chant, ORTECH Power CanWEA: Montreal, 2010 Tel: 905-822-4120 ext 463 achant@ortech.ca