TWO BOOKS
1) The World in Depression 1929-1939
Charles P Kindleberger
2) The Great Depression in Europe
Patricia Clavin: St. Martins Press, 2000
CAUTION
“We are in the middle of the greatest
economic catastrophe----due almost entirely
to economic issues, of the modern world”
J M Keynes 1931
THIS IS NOT A BLOW BY BLOW ACCOUNT OF
THE INS AND OUTS OF THE ECONOMIC AND
FINANCIAL SHENANIGANS OF THE INTER-
WAR PERIOD. (Thank Goodness)
IF YOU FEEL UP TO IT READ THE BOOK
INDEX OF INDUSTRIAL
PRODUCTION (1929=100)
120
100
80 France
Germany
60
UK
USA
40
20
0
1929 1930 1931 1932 1933 1934 1935
Post World War One Economic
Instability
Russian Revolution (Trade and Ideology)
Loss of Traditional Export Markets (India 10% of British
Commodity Exports) In 1913 Britain, France and Germany were
the source of 60% of all manufactured goods. Countries such as
USA and Japan took up this trade.
Many more small nationalistic states. Boundaries redrawn with
scant regard for economic viability. These new economical weak
states strove to improve their finances by forcing exports and
putting import tariffs in place. Increased borders also slowed
down population movement.
Europe now could not feed itself. The war had destroyed much
agriculture with a shortage of labour, horsepower and fertiliser.
Also the loss of Russia as the ‘granary’ of Europe. Food was
having to be imported-much of it on credit. Achieved 1913
levels of production by 1925
Continued
The war had altered the entire financial balance of the
world. Huge liquidation of European investments to
pay for the war, consequent loss of repatriated
earnings.
Pre-war USA a great importer of capital; post war a
great creditor nation. American Trade Surplus (Unlike
Britain it did not reciprocate trade with primary
imports)
German Instability and hatred of ‘Versailles” Note:
Reparations France insisted on them to weaken
Germany. France would have changed this stance if
the USA had agreed to stand by France inside the
League of Nations. However the US Senate would not
ratify the treaty.
Position of the United States after World
War I: An Economic Giant but a Political
Pygmy?
Dragged into a European
‘Civil War’ (114,000 dead)
Many immigrants came to
the USA to get away from
European conditions
Almost a self sufficient
country and now a huge
creditor nation.
Refused to take part in the
League of Nations.
Isolationism won the day
Not interested in taking
Britain’s position as ‘lender
of last resort’.
USA
In 1928 the USA produced 42% of the world’s
output putting most producers of raw
materials in danger of a slowdown.
Failure to generate enough demand to sop
up its rising production. Stagnant wages and
agricultural depression led to overproduction
and financial speculation.
Rapidly increasing productivity added to this
problem.
GNP per head grew at 0.8% 1913-1938
World War
(It was all eventually owed to
USA)
The 1920s a Problem Decade for
Britain
Loss of Previous Financial and Industrial
position
Problems of unbalanced industrial scene
Continuation of Pre-war Labour unrest (1926
General Strike)
High Unemployment
Ireland
Start of lack of confidence in Empire (India)
Changing Franchise
Break-up of Liberal party and rise of Labour
1920s Germany: Life is a Cabaret
(For Some)
Still a very young and
unstable country
Loss of war
Loss of Eastern Lands
Civil War
Threat of Communist
uprising
Loss of Ruling elite
‘Versailles
Unemployment
INFLATION
MEMORIES OF THE
GREAT 1920s
INFLATION WOULD
HAUNT GERMAN
POLICY MAKERS.
IT HAD
BANKRUPTED A
CLASS IN GERMAN
SOCIETY
But, 1920s Boom Led To The
‘Grapes of Wrath’ in the USA
Hugely prosperous 1920s
1930s a Deepening
Depression
Agricultural depression
Now can make much more
than can be consumed. Era
of Mass Production
Huge emphasis on raising
demand for goods and
consumption
Some Points
Longest and most
severe depression ever
experienced by the
western world.
New York Stock
Exchange crashed
October 1929
By 1933 11,000 of the
USA’s 25,000 Banks had
failed.
A crisis of Demand
AND
1932 US Manufacturing
output had fallen to
54% of its 1929 level
By 1932 US
unemployment had risen
to between 12 to 15
millions (20-25% 0f the
workforce)
Serious Overproduction
in agriculture – falling
prices – rising debt
IN CANADA
Hard by the Depression. Between REAL GROSS NATIONAL PRODUCT
1929 and 1933, the gross national
Can USA Can/USA
product dropped 40% (compared to
37% in the US).
1929 100 100 100
Unemployment reached 27% at the
depth of the Depression in 1933. 1930 91.6 87.7 104
Many businesses closed, as fat
1931 77 79.7 97
corporate profits of $396 million in
1929 turned into losses of $98
1932 66.5 65.9 101
million in 1933.
Families saw most or all of their 1933 59.6 62 96
assets disappear, and their debts
1934 64.5 65.3 97
become heavier as prices fell.
Canadian exports shrank by 50% 1935 67.1 71.5 94
from 1929 to 1933. Worst hit were
areas dependent on primary 1936 67.5 76.4 88
industries such as farming, mining
1937 71.8 80 90
and logging, as prices fell and there
were few alternative jobs.
1938 69.7 73.2 95
1939 72.4 76.1 95
Financial Crises Are Not New:
They are Part of Capitalism
In some shape or form, prior to the
Second World War, they occurred in:
1816, 1825, 1836, 1847, 1857, 1866,
1873, 1890, 1907, 1921, 1929,
1937.1980s and today
So why was this one a disaster?
AND WAS THE DEPRESSION THE
FAULT OF WALL STREET?
A Stock Market Bubble BUT:
Less than 8% of USA population owned
stock
Stock market financed only 6% of
investment
Stock Markets Fall and
Recessions come and go: But!
This one effected the “real” economy
It lasted so long and could not be
beaten
It spread outside of national boundaries
It effected political systems
Charles P Kindleberger
THE WORLD IN DEPRESSION
“The depression was so steep and so
long because the world economic
system was rendered unstable by
British inability and US
unwillingness to assume responsibility
for stabilizing it.”
What was needed was Leadership
Attitude of American Government
Saw depression as a necessary
adjustment
It was the private sector’s job to adjust
– not the government’s
Expansion by government would hinder
re-adjustment.
Enterprises are gambles which
sometimes fail
‘Rottenness should be purged out of the
system
And it was all Going so well.
In the mid 1920s there was
no visible sign of strain on
the US Economy. Wages
were stable, savings ample
and there was excess
capacity in industry. Note:
growing problem of
demand. By March the
economy looked like it was
going into a typical ‘soft
spot’ with vehicle production
declining.
Also: huge productivity
improvements meant that
demand must accelerate to
mop up unemployment.
Money Supply
We will return to this at
the end
From 1928 a reduction in the rate of growth
of the money supply.
Interest rates raised to curb high stock prices
‘bubble’. Note: short recessions in 1924 and
1929 followed money restraint.
Why did the stock market collapse? The sage
Ronald Reagan on a later incident –
“I guess they were just too high”
But: Even the 1929 low was about as high as
1928. It was government inaction that would
drive them down later.
Nature of a Financial Crisis
Unwillingness to lend money
– prefer to hold cash –
withdraw money from banks
Banks have to withdraw
loans to cover shortfall. Note
ratio of loans to deposits
Credit creation collapses
1931 European banks
indebted to American banks.
Kreditanstalt bank in Austria
declared bankrupt.
Banks
1929-1930 over 9,000 US
Banks Failed.
It is all a ‘confidence trick’.
Banks do not have money-
they create credit.
However if there is a ‘run on
the bank’ by depositors
banks cannot cover their
loans.
They certainly will not make
new loans
It is the role of Government
to protect depositors.
In the USA a Vicious Downward
Employment Cycle Set In
Dust Bowl
Under-consumption at this time.
1) Turn down in producing industry
2) Mass Lay-offs
3) No social security so a complete loss of
spending power.
4)Furthet loss of demand as the unemployed
now cannot purchase and consume.
5) Further factory closures
6) Further lay-offs etc.
Complete Loss of Financial
Leadership in the USA from an
Administration Fighting Past Battles.
Between August 1929 –
August 1933 the stock
of money in the US
economy fell by one
third.
Recession was turned
into a catastrophe by
the Federal Reserve
Board who failed to
flood the market with
liquidity.
It could and should have
been halted with
leadership.
For Papers: Brunner,
THE SMOOT-HAWLEY TARIFF Act of 1930 raised U.S.
tariffs to historically high levels to increase the
protection afforded farmers against agricultural imports.
Another
Disaster for the World Economy.
NOTE President Wilson vetoed tariff legislation in March 1921, saying in part:
\"If ever there was a time when Americans had anything to fear from
foreign competition, that time has passed. If we wish to have Europe
settle her debts, governmental or commercial, we must be prepared to
buy from her.\"
The history of commerce in America was always one of high tariffs.
BUT THE USA WAS NOW THE WORLD FINANCIAL SUPER-POWER
The tariff provoked a storm of foreign retaliatory measures and stood as a
symbol of the ‘beggar-thy-neighbor’ policies of the 1930s. Such policies
contributed to a drastic decline in international trade. U.S. imports from Europe
declined from a 1929 high of $1,334 million to just $390 million in 1932, U.S.
exports to Europe fell from $2,341 million in 1929 to $784 million in 1932.
Overall, world trade declined by some 66% between 1929 and 1934. Smoot-
Hawley did nothing to foster trust and cooperation among nations in
either the political or economic realm during a perilous era in
international relations.
THE DEPRESSION SPREADS
Capital flows dry up and investment
crashes
As US loans are withdrawn or not
replaced weak European economies
cannot cope.
Exports to the US slump
Primary Producer prices collapse as US
imports slump. They produce more to
keep up income.
Confidence Quickly Leached Out of the
Unstable German Financial System
Large American loans being recalled
Nothing to replace these loans as USA
Govt. delayed action. (Only ones that
could help)
Victory of Nazis in Sept. 1930 alarmed
foreign investors
Run on the banks
Bank failures
Crisis of liquidity and demand
GERMANY REACTS TO PROTECT THE
VALUE OF THE CURRENCY BY USING
‘CLASSIC METHODS”
From 1930 to 1932 the Great Depression reached its low point.
Chancellor Brüning, in line with liberal economic theory that less
public spending would spur economic growth, drastically cut
state expenditures, including in the social sector. He expected
and accepted that the economic crisis would, for a while,
deteriorate before things would improve. Among others, the
Reich completely halted all public grants to the obligatory
unemployment insurance (which had been introduced only in
1927), which resulted in higher contributions by the workers
and fewer benefits for the unemployed. This was
understandably an unpopular move on his part.
The economic downturn lasted until the second half of 1932. By
this time though, the Weimar Republic had lost all credibility
with the majority of Germans. While scholars greatly disagree
about how Brüning's policy should be evaluated, it can safely be
said that it contributed to the decline of the Republic. Whether
there were alternatives at the time remains the subject of much
debate.
Percentage of Industrial Workers
Unemployed in 1933
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
USA UK Germany France Canada Australia
Did the 1930s Depression
Indirectly Cause World War Two?
Mass unemployment in Germany and
Japan hastened in right wing nationalist
governments. 25 countries became
dictatorships 1929-39.
American loans to Germany called in
causing collapse of German industry.
Problems at home can lead to a more
nationalistic foreign policy.
FOR THE NAZI PARTY AN
ECONOMIC BONANZA
In 1928 the Nazis were an
unimportant part of the political
fringe
Project the economic growth of
Germany from 1920 or 1924 to
1928 out through the 1930s, and it
would have been a different world
But after 1928, German
unemployment began to rise.
And as unemployment rose, the
Nazi Party vote rose as well. The
party that had won 2.9 percent of
the national vote in 1924 and 2.6
percent in 1928 won 19.2 percent in
the election of 1930, and 38.4
percent in the election of 1932
To Germans the Nazi Party and its Policies
Cured the Economy and Staved off
Disaster
To Many in Industrial Countries
Fascism did Appear to Work
Deficit Financing
But did the
unemployed vote
Nazi?
And we now know
that Hitler intended
others to “pay the
piper”.
Secure Trade and Markets by
Empire Building?
Japan (Manchuria)
Italy (Africa)
Germany (Eastern Europe)
Self interest prevents other countries
preventing these actions
BRITAIN IN THE 1920s/1930s
(The Mirror Image)
“The Rule of the Pygmies”
(Mowat)
OR
“—it is difficult to see a feasible policy which
could have achieved appreciably better
results” (Andrew
Thorpe)
J B Priestley (1934)
“ An England of arterial and by-pass
roads, filling stations and factories that
look like exhibition buildings, giant
cinemas and dance halls, -----
bungalows with tiny garages,
Woolworth’s, motor coaches, wireless,
factory girls looking like actresses,
greyhound racing and dirt tracks,
swimming pools”
TRADITIONAL VIEW OF 1930s
DEPRESSION
Chances of Long-Term
Unemployment in Britain
High in old Staple Export
Industries
High in old industrial
regions
High if unskilled or with
non transferable skill
Higher the older the
worker
Regional Disaster
Out of 1,717,000 unemployed in July
1936 – two thirds were to be found in
Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland and
Northern England.
Long Term unemployed situated mainly
in these areas
Juvenile unemployment situated mainly
in depressed areas
BECOMING A DIVIDED COUNTRY
AS FASCISM STALKS EUROPE
Even a fear of
revolution.
First Industrial
revolution unwinding
Health and Infant
Mortality
Parts of the South in
boom conditions
Rise of Middle Class
and suburban
England
But Also: The Rise of the New Consumer
Society and The Modern World
The 1930s House with
‘mod cons’
The Automobile (USA v
GB)
Rayon (artificial silk)
The Electric Iron of all
things
Electric Lighting
Aviation
Ready to Wear (The
man’s suit)
Cinema and mass
entertainment
BUT THE MOST IMPORTANT
‘NEW INDUSTRY’
Two Views of Interwar Britain
The ‘Feminisation’ of Employment
(Nothing to do with Mrs. Pankhurst)
Move from old ‘muscle
100
industries’ and Domestic
90
Service
80
Cotton was the Industrial
PERCENTAGE
70
Revolution !! 60
Move to new lighter industry
50
That Typing Pool
40
Move to Service and Retail 30
work 20
10
Move to London and the
south 0
21
01
11
31
51
19
19
19
19
19
Brainwork rather than
Brawn-work
For the unmarried young woman
the world was changing fast.
Courtaulds Rayon
Spinning 1929
Bobbed hair
Short Skirt
Silk Stockings
Eye brows trimmed
A new woman with
some money
A SOCIAL REVOLUTION
Changing Attitudes of these working girls
In Britain between 1861 – 1911
numbers of female clerks increased X 4.
Huge rise of working women in ‘white
collar’ trades.
In the 1930s looking at age group 18-
34, the numbers of single women in the
1930s were double that of the 1950s.
Huge rise in disposable income
Fall of Staple Trades of the First
Industrial Revolution
COTTON The Industry of the Industrial Revolution.
WW1 allowed new countries into export markets with
lower costs. Also allowed import substitution. (1938
world trade only 66% of Lancashire exports in 1913)
Huge impact on Empire.
COAL 1.1 million miners in 1919. Industry under
invested and dispersed geographically
A huge social problem
SHIPBUILDING Clyde-side build one third of world’s
ships in 1913 Inevitable decline in face of cheaper
competitors
Socially disruptive locations (Jarrow!)
NEW HOUSING
Same 3 Bedroom House
1928 1936 1990
Cost £600 £450
£100m
Interest 6% 4.5%
11%
Percentage of a male teacher’s
salary needed to pay the
mortgage
1928 = 10%
1936 = 8%
1990 = 43%
Why was the depression mild in
Britain?
Imported food prices fell – people in work actually
better off which helped purchasing power.
Consumption held up. (Terms of Trade)
No financial or bank collapse.
Britain came off the Gold Standard
Cheap Money
Re-armament from 1938
AND MAINLY Increase benefits to allow old staple
areas to survive.
SOME PARTS OF THE WORLD UNDER A DIFFERENT
SYSTEM LOOKED VERY ATTRACTIVE
INDEX OF INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION – USSR
(1929 = 100)
300
250
200
USSR
150
UK
100
50
0
1929 1930 1931 1932 1933 1934 1935
No Flight to Extremes in
Britain
Communist Party
Average % Vote = 5.1%
Party Membership approx:
15,000
Labour Party anti Communist
Fascists
NOTE Mosley in favour of
‘Keynesian policies’
Party Membership at peak
40,000
Govt. always in control
THE ARCHITECT OF THE NEW
BRITAIN
NEVILLE CHAMBERLAIN
Later to be PM and involved
in the Munich agreement
with Hitler.
Chamberlain decided
‘appeasement’ was better
than another World War and
ruination of his economic
recovery of the 1930s.
(Britain had just completed
repaying her WW2 Debts)
Some Results of the Slump
Huge demand for state action by a newly enfranchised
citizenship.
Welfare in World War compared badly with the 1930s
A re-writing of history (Political and Economic)
A re-assessment of how governments should treat economic
down-turns.
Election of ‘New Deal’ Governments
Strength and Mythology of the Labour Party
Realisation of Importance of Free Trade
Did WW2 spoil all the good work?
MONEY SUPPLY REVISITED
Monetarists, including Milton Friedman and Benjamin Bernanke, stress the
passive role taken by the American Federal Reserve System in failing to reverse
the cascading bank failures. They do not argue the Federal Reserve caused the
recession, but rather that different policies might have stopped the downward
slide into recession. By not acting, the Federal Reserve allowed the money
supply to shrink by one-third from 1930 to 1931. In A Monetary History of the
United States, Friedman argued that the downward turn in the economy starting
with the stock market crash would have been just another recession. The
problem was that some large, public bank failures, particularly the
Bank of the United States, produced panic and widespread runs on local banks,
and that the Federal Reserve sat idly by while banks fell. He claimed that if it
had provided emergency lending to these key banks or simply bought
government bonds on the open market to provide liquidity and increase the
quantity of money after the key banks fell, all the rest of the banks would not
have fallen after the large ones did, the money supply would not have fallen to
the extent and at the speed that it did. With significantly less money to go
around, businessmen could not get new loans and could not even get their old
loans renewed, forcing many to stop investing. This interpretation blames the
Federal Reserve, especially the New York branch, which was owned and
controlled by Wall Street bankers for inaction. The Federal Reserve, by design,
was not controlled by the President or the Congress
0 comments
Post a comment