Brief Prosperity Profile of Kitchener, Ontario

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Brief Prosperity Profile of Kitchener, Ontario - Presentation Transcript

    1. A Brief Prosperity Profile of Kitchener, Ontario Dr. Kevin Stolarick Research Director March 27, 2009
    2. Outline / Approach 1. Present Benchmark Peers 2. Describe Selected Measures a. Some “Lagging” b. Some “Leading” 3. Get Your Thinking Where does Kitchener rank? 4. Discussion 2
    3. Benchmark Peers 3
    4. Peer Selection Ann Arbor, MI • 20 peer states/ Canton, OH • provinces for Fort Wayne, IN • Ontario based on Lansing, MI • population. Peoria, IL • Reading, PA • Santa Barbara, CA • 10 cities/regions Spokane, WA • selected with Tallahassee, FL • populations Victoria, BC • approximately the Kitchener, ON • same as Kitchener. 4
    5. Technology 5
    6. Technology “A high technology base is both a necessary condition for and a result of a region having a strong creative economy. Being known as a \"high-tech\" region helps to attract the creative workforce, which, in turn, generates new technologies making the region even more high-tech.”
    7. Technology “Tech Pole” Index (based on Milken Institute) • – Share of total US/Canada “high technology” – Regional concentration of “high tech” among all industries Combination allows smaller, tech-intensive • regions to score well US & Canada, based on total employment • 7
    8. Tech-Pole Index: Where does Kitchener rank? Ranking out of 11 (Kitchener + 10 peers) • Peer Average: 0.119 • Lowest peer score: 0.008 (Canton, OH) • Highest peer score: 0.385 (Ann Arbor, MI) • • Where does Kitchener rank? –Top 3? –Bottom 3? –Middle 5? 8
    9. Tech-Pole Index: Kitchener “Middle 5” North American Tech Pole Index Kitchener, ON and Peer Regions, 2006 Ann Arbor, MI 0.385 Santa Barbara, CA 0.319 Kitchener, ON 0.260 Victoria, BC 0.115 Fort Wayne, IN 0.066 Spokane, WA 0.059 Reading, PA 0.046 Tallahassee, FL 0.023 Lansing, MI 0.022 Peoria, IL 0.009 Canton, OH 0.008 9
    10. Talent 10
    11. Talent “The concentration of people in the Creative and Super Creative Classes, has a stronger relationship with economic growth. Creative people don't just cluster where the jobs are. They cluster in places that are centers of creativity and also where they like to live. Places need a people climate -- or a creativity climate -- as well as a business climate.”
    12. Talent “BA and above” • Percent of population 25 and older with a • bachelor’s (4-year) university degree or higher (masters, graduate, PhD) 12
    13. Talent Index: Where does Kitchener rank? Ranking out of 11 (Kitchener + 10 peers) • Peer Average: 28.1% • Lowest peer score: 18.1% (Canton, OH) • Highest peer score: 51.7% (Ann Arbor, MI) • • Where does Kitchener rank? –Top 3? –Bottom 3? –Middle 5? 13
    14. Talent Index: Kitchener “Bottom 3” Talent Index (Pop > 25, BA and above) Kitchener, ON and Peer Regions, 2006 Ann Arbor, MI 51.7% Tallahassee, FL 32.2% Lansing, MI 31.7% Santa Barbara, CA 30.4% Spokane, WA 27.9% Victoria, BC 26.1% Peoria, IL 25.3% Fort Wayne, IN 23.8% Reading, PA 21.4% Kitchener, ON 20.8% Canton, OH 18.1% 14
    15. Talent Now, a “Creative Economy” • – Innovation, Thinking, Creativity “Paid to think” • – Everyone has the potential to be creative Percent of workforce in the “Creative Class” • T = Technology and R&D Innovation A = Arts and Culture P = Professional and Managerial E = Educating and Training 15
    16. Creative Class: Where does Kitchener rank? Ranking out of 11 (Kitchener + 10 peers) • Peer Average: 30.1% • Lowest peer score: 25.3% (Reading, PA) • Highest peer score: 38.2% (Tallahassee, FL) • • Where does Kitchener rank? –Top 3? –Bottom 3? –Middle 5? 16
    17. Creative Class: Kitchener “Middle 5” Creative Class as % of Workforce Kitchener, ON and Peer Regions, 2006 Tallahassee, FL 38.2% Ann Arbor, MI 36.7% Lansing, MI 34.3% Victoria, BC 33.2% Santa Barbara, CA 29.0% Kitchener, ON 0 27.9% Fort Wayne, IN 27.3% Spokane, WA 27.0% Peoria, IL 26.7% Canton, OH 25.4% Reading, PA 25.3% 17
    18. Tolerance / Inclusiveness 18
    19. Tolerance / Inclusiveness “Diversity has become a politically charged buzzword. To some it is an ideal and rallying cry, to others a Trojan-horse concept that has brought us affirmative action and other liberal abominations. Creative Class people use the word often, but not to press any political hot buttons. Diversity is simply something they value in all its manifestations.”
    20. Tolerance / Inclusiveness Mosaic Index • Percent of population foreign born • Immigrants generate growth and are a sign or • regional “openness” 20
    21. Mosaic Index: Where does Kitchener rank? Ranking out of 11 (Kitchener + 10 peers) • Peer Average: 9.8% • Lowest peer score: 2.2% (Canton, OH) • Highest peer score: 23.6% (Santa Barbara, CA) • • Where does Kitchener rank? –Top 3? –Bottom 3? –Middle 5? 21
    22. Mosaic Index: Kitchener “Middle 5” Mosaic Index (% Pop) Kitchener, ON and Peer Regions, 2006 Santa Barbara, CA 23.6% Kitchener, ON 22.8% Victoria, BC 18.8% Ann Arbor, MI 11.4% Reading, PA 6.9% Lansing, MI 6.0% Tallahassee, FL 4.9% Spokane, WA 4.8% Fort Wayne, IN 4.5% Peoria, IL 2.4% Canton, OH 2.2% 22
    23. Population Growth 23
    24. Population Growth Percent growth/decline in total population • Between 2001 and 2006 • 24
    25. Population Growth: Where does Kitchener rank? Ranking out of 11 (Kitchener + 10 peers) • Peer Average: 4.5% • Lowest peer score: 0.2% (Santa Barbara) • Highest peer score: 8.9%(Kitchener, ON) • • Where does Kitchener rank? –Top 3? –Bottom 3? –Middle 5? 25
    26. 3” Population Growth: Kitchener “Bottom Population Growth Kitchener, ON and Peer Regions, (00-05) Kitchener, ON 8.9% Reading, PA 7.4% Spokane, WA 6.9% Ann Arbor, MI 6.6% Victoria, BC 5.8% Tallahassee, FL 5.5% Fort Wayne, IN 4.8% Lansing, MI 1.4% Peoria, IL 0.9% Canton, OH 0.8% Santa Barbara, CA 0.2% 26
    27. Discussion / Summary 27
    28. For More Information Benchmark Summary: Kitchener vs Peer Regions Peer Min Peer Peer Max N.A. Average of Summary Statistics Kitchener, ON Value Average Value Urban Regions 451,000 330,088 396,000 454,000 Total Population, 2006 546,000 GDP (CAD millions) 2006 $18,000 $22,000 $14,000 $22,000 $29,000 Median Age, 2006 36.4 33 36.6 43.1 37.5 Overall Cost of Living 88.7 0.5 0.6 0.7 101.5 Kitchener, Peer Peer Min Peer Peer Max N.A. Average of Overall Performance ON Ranking Value Average Value Urban Regions Population Growth (00-05) 8.9% 1 0% 4.5% 8.9% 5.7% 6.2% 4 -3.3% 4.3% 11.6% Job Growth (00-05) 9.3% GDP per capita, 2006 $48,000 4 37,500 $47,000 $65,200 $45,000 Change in Average Wage (00-05) 2.2% 3 -8.8% 0.1% 9.0% 0.1% Creativity Index 0.69 5 0.36 0.61 0.83 NA Kitchener, Peer Peer Min Peer Peer Max N.A. Average of Technology ON Ranking Value Average Value Urban Regions Total Patents, 2005 113 4 31 115 394 517 Patents per 10,000, 2005 2.50 4 0.9 3.00 11.45 2.46 Patent Growth, Short Term (00-05) #REF! 3 -12.7% 2.0% 17.5% -0.5% North American High Tech LQ, 2006 1.14 3 0.26 0.83 1.87 0.63 0.189 North American Tech Pole Index 0.260 3 0.008 0.119 0.385 Kitchener, Peer Peer Min Peer Peer Max N.A. Average of Talent ON Ranking Value Average Value Urban Regions Creative Class as % of Workforce, 2006 27.9% 6 25.3% 30.1% 38.2% 26.1% Super Creative Core as % of Workforce, 2006 15.9% 3 9.4% 13.2% 18.6% 11.0% Pop > 25, Above High School below BA, 2006 55.7% 8 41.2% 57.6% 67.5% 59.0% Talent Index (Pop > 25, BA and above), 2006 20.8% 10 18.1% 28.1% 51.7% 21.7% 7.5% Pop > 25, Graduate and/or Professional Degree, 2006 8.3% 8 6.0% 11.0% 26.2% 0.88 1.27 NA Brain Drain/Gain Index, 2006 0.59 11 0.59 Kitchener, Peer Peer Min Peer Peer Max N.A. Average of Tolerance ON Ranking Value Average Value Urban Regions Visible Minorities (% Pop), 2006 13.6% 7 9.2% 17.0% 37.7% 11.1% Mosaic Index (% Pop), 2006 22.8% 2 2.2% 9.8% 23.6% 7.9% Gay and Lesbian Index, 2006 0.78 7 0.59 0.94 1.62 0.81 Bohemian Index, 2006 1.01 3 0.35 0.73 1.60 0.69 0.71 0.90 Integration Index, 2006 0.77 4 1 Kitchener, Peer Peer Min Peer Peer Max Territorial Assets ON Ranking Value Average Value Social and Cultural Assets Arts and Cultural Establishments per 10,000 4.45 2 0.77 2.08 6.85 Resturants and Bars per 1,000 2.24 2 1.67 2.00 2.75 Student/teacher Ratio 16.73 6 11.37 16.50 21.63 Doctor's per 1,000 0.41 10 0.20 0.94 1.86 Civic Assets Voter Turnout (%) 66% 6 54% 64% 71% Crime per Capita 0.05 7 0.03 0.05 0.09 Housing and Transportation Assets Population Density (Km^2) 546 8 52.78 184.08 545.58 Median Housing Value to Income Ratio $3.69 2 $2.44 $4.61 $12.82 Auto Dependency 8.89 11 3.47 18.74 37.98 28
    29. For More Information • Richard Florida’s books – “The Rise of the Creative Class” – “The Flight of the Creative Class” – “Who’s Your City?” • www.martinprosperity.org • www.creativeclass.com 29
    30. Thank You Kevin Stolarick kms@rotman.utoronto.ca

    + mpianmpian, 9 months ago

    custom

    276 views, 0 favs, 1 embeds more stats

    An analysis of the prosperity of Kitchener-Waterloo more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 276
      • 255 on SlideShare
      • 21 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 4
    Most viewed embeds
    • 21 views on http://static.slidesharecdn.com

    more

    All embeds
    • 21 views on http://static.slidesharecdn.com

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories