• Save
He said, she said part 2
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5

He said, she said part 2






Total Views
Views on SlideShare
Embed Views



0 Embeds 0

No embeds



Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    He said, she said part 2 He said, she said part 2 Presentation Transcript

    • He said, she saidpart 2
      Gender differences in language
    • dominance
      Negative evaluation of women’s position related to the relative positions of men and women
      The dominance of men is reflected in the way men linguistically dominant
      They dominant the ‘social airwaves’, arguably speaking more often and longer than women, interrupting more frequently and the semantic downgrading of terms that refer to women.
      Men’s language active and assertive
      Women’s language passive
    • power and the dominance explanation: views
      Power is assumed to be the key theme
      Power is fought over through language
      Men’s language is the important, public language about decision, competition, power – the language of objectivity, science
      Women’s language is about nuturance, caring responsiveness
      Women’s communicative genres are trivialised as gossip, power achieved through cattiness and bitchiness. (making the assumption men don’t gossip)
    • the difference model
      “Men mistakenly expect women to think, communicate, and react the way men do; women mistakenly expect men to feel, communicate and respond the way women do. We have forgotten that men and women are supposed to be different. As a result our relationships are filled with unnecessary conflict.
      Clearly recognising and respecting these differences dramatically reduce the confusion when dealing with the opposite sex. When you remember that men are from _______________ everything can be explained.”
      Self help writer, John Gray
    • Difference
      Gray’s metaphor takes the difference explanation to an extreme conclusion
      A milder version - men and women socialised into gender roles, learnt to speak in gendered ways
      two genders are brought up in separate gendered worlds –there are 2 genderlects, cannot help but communicate differently
      Suggests that Lakoff’s dichotomy -
      Male public powerful, competitive
      Female- private, nurturing, responsive
      - is learnt.
      The self-hope approach seeks to ‘translate’ across the gender border
    • Deborah Tannen on difference
      Linguist and popular author You just don’t understand and others
      People really believe in the difference between men and women’s communication styles
      “denying real difference can only compound confusion’
      In most self-help advice, women are expected to change communicative behaviour or learn to translate men’s communication patterns (women buy self-help books)
      Problem 1: women who speak like men can be judged very harshly
      Problem 2: approach makes the differences even more real
    • Tannen’s differences
      Advice versus understanding
      Men give advice where women are seeking understanding
      “When my mother tells my father she doesn't feel well, he invariably offers to take her to the doctor. Invariably, she is disappointed with his reaction. Like many men, he is focused on what he can do, whereas she wants sympathy.”
    • Tannen’s information vs feeling
      Rapport talk
      Talk too much
      Speak in private contexts
      Build relationships
      Speak symmetrically
      (no power relationships)
      Report talk
      Get more airtime
      Speak in public
      Negotiate status/avoid failure
      Speak asymmetrically
    • Who’s interrupting?
      Folk beliefs about interruption
      Research into interruption
      Zimmerman and West (1975) one of the first serious studies
      Found men interrupted more than women
      Quite a few studies found similar results
      Quite a few studies found women interrupt more
      Quite a few studies found no gender difference
    • Why?
      Zimmerman and West suggest that interruption is a tool of control
      Fits into the dominance model – men dominate in soceity and dominate in conversation
      What counts as an interruption?
      Back channel or supportive talk , mm, yes, oh,
      Only an interruption if the speaker gives up their message?
      Zimmerman and West worked on the assumption that there should be smooth transitions between speakers’ turns?
      Is this true?
    • More than just gender
      A meta-analysis of interruption data suggests that the genders react differently to different aspects of the interaction
      Group size
      Familiarity with other speakers
    • Tannen’s understandings of interruptions - rapport vs report
      Rapport allows for interruption -> overlapping talk
      High-involvement and high-considerateness speakers
      High-involvement listeners more concerned to show they are listening, supportive, interested – simultaneous talk
      High consideration listeners– concerned not to impose on turns or conversation
      Tannen suggests high involvement listeners are also high-involvement speakers and will tolerate overlap
    • The dynamic model
      men and women share a set of variables in language use that have social meanings that index ‘gender’
      speakers deploy these meaningfully at certain moments where they want to foreground their gender
      That is we do not just have a gender
      Language is just one resource that we have that helps us ‘DO gender’
    • The value of dynamism
      This means we can still say that some of the previous findings have meaning
      But that individuals have some agency in how they use language as a component of their gender presentation
      For example, women can deploy more precise colour terms, where appropriate (not all the time) or where there is some kind of communicative effect in doing so
      Gender now is something we construct and deconstruct and reconstruct out of shared resources that have identifiable associations and meanings
    • How should we approach researching language and gender?
      With a new understanding of gender
      How can we research gender?
      What does this mean for variationist accounts of language and gender?
    • Janet Holmes describes a set of hypotheses that should be explored for their veracity and universality
      a) women and men develop different patterns of language use
      b) women tend to focus on the affective functions of language more than men do
      c) women tend to use the linguistic devices that stress solidarity more often than men
      d) Women tend to interact in ways to maintain solidarity, where men might be more interested in hierarchy
      e) Women use more standard forms than men of the same social class
      f) women are more stylistically flexible than men
    • Sally McConnell-Ginet and Penepole Eckert’s views
      Ask those working in language and gender fields to
      a. recognise that gender is not fixed and pre-existing
      b. consider how gender interacts with other identity features
      c. challenge small scale studies on a few middle class white women
      d. share research with other gender researchers in other disciplines
      e. think locally
    • Gender is not an independent variable
      Who are these women? Who are these men?
      Does the list subsume all women in this category?
      What about class factors? Ethnicity?
      How do we judge women’s class? Same as husbands? Same as father’s?
      Are non-White women are included? Are they more powerless than White women?
    • Black women’s view of white women’s language
      Mary: Well I think White women they try to be polite or you know, it doesn’t have anything behind it. It’s like you know, ((lower volume, higher pitch)) “How are you dedededede”, it’s nothing. But with Black women it’s like a message, it’s like Girl hey what’s up? It’s like friendliness, Girl, what’s up? how you doing?
    • Why local?
      McConnell-Ginet and Eckert argue that Labovian style interest in single variants only correlations not explanations
      detailed ethnographic observation looking at how speakers interact with each other not researchers as well as analysis of phonetic detail gives a better picture of gender in action
    • what about males?
      While the advice of McConnell and Ginet and the understanding of gender as a kind of performance rather than a fixed pre-existing category has been taken up by theorists trying to understand how the category women and the phenomenon language are related it is only lately in the last 5-6 years that male use of language and the category male has been scrutinised
    • Masculinity is a performance too
      Some masculine styles are valued more than others
      Are some men (at times) dominated by other men just as women are?
      ‘The poor communicator model’ needs to be understood
    • Conclusion
      Gender and language is a complex area
      Having a sounder understanding of what gender is should underpin research
      Should focus on both men and women
      In interaction,
      In conjunction with the other variables, ethnicity and sexuality
      But also Lakoffian style lists are still useful as these stereotypes are the basis of many people’s understanding