Educational Use of Mobile Technologies: A review of the literature

3,023 views
2,858 views

Published on

A MoRSE (morse.ac.uk) project presentation by Dr Ann Ooms and Dr Stuart Downward. The paper presents an overview of literature concerning the use of mobile technologies on geography fieldwork.

Published in: Education, Business, Technology
0 Comments
1 Like
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total views
3,023
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
36
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
37
Comments
0
Likes
1
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Educational Use of Mobile Technologies: A review of the literature

  1. 1. Dr Ann Ooms Dr Stuart Downward Kingston University, London United Kingdom Educational Use of Mobile Technologies A Review of the Literature
  2. 2. Overview <ul><li>2001 Cox-Peterson & Melber </li></ul><ul><li>2001 Kakehi, Kura, Kusaka, Fujino, Fujimoto & Takahashi </li></ul><ul><li>2002 Hersthammer, Fossen, Sautter, Sæther & Johansen </li></ul><ul><li>2007 Bergin, Anderson, Molnar, Baumgartner, Mitchell, Korper, Curley & Rottmann </li></ul><ul><li>2007 Fletcher, France, Moore & Robinson </li></ul><ul><li>2007 Marskall, Stokes, Truscott, Bridge, Magnier & Calderbank </li></ul><ul><li>2008 Lynch, Bednarz, Boxall, Chalmers, France & Kesby </li></ul>
  3. 3. Cox-Peterson & Melber (2001) <ul><li>“ Using Technology to Prepare and Extend Field Trips.” The Clearing House. </li></ul><ul><li>Location: United States </li></ul><ul><li>Level: K-12 </li></ul><ul><li>Recommendations – not research based </li></ul><ul><li>Prepare students prior to field trip </li></ul><ul><ul><li>On-line resources of museums, zoos, aquariums </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Decrease novelty effect because students will know what to expect </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Teachers can find information about location, discounts, opening times, etc. </li></ul></ul>
  4. 4. Cox-Peterson & Melber (2001) <ul><li>Connecting with curriculum </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Websites: databases, puzzles, additional information to add depth, curricular materials for educators, </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Sharing field trip memories </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Use digital (video) camera </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Students develop a multimedia presentation or narratives </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Virtual trips </li></ul>
  5. 5. Kakehi, Kura, Kusaka, Fujino, Fujimoto & Takahashi (2001) <ul><li>“ Development of eTrip System: Collaborative Learning Platform for a Field Trip.” WebNet 2001: World Conference on the WWW and Internet Proceedings, Orlando, FL. </li></ul><ul><li>Location: Japan </li></ul><ul><li>Level: High School </li></ul><ul><li>Evaluation </li></ul><ul><li>eTrip System </li></ul><ul><ul><li>A collaborative learning platform for school education over the internet that supports the learning flow for a field trip: pre-during – post </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Student-extended database </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Electronic bulleting board </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Accessible by students, teachers, experts, parents, other schools </li></ul></ul>
  6. 6. Kakehi, Kura, Kusaka, Fujino, Fujimoto & Takahashi (2001) <ul><li>Pre field trip </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Students search for information in the database </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Students submit reports to the database </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Students discuss on electronic bulletin board </li></ul></ul><ul><li>During field trip </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Students record the experience (are given: digital camera, GPS, Notepad, Cellular phone) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Students submit report to the database via template </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Students look at other students’ reports </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Post field trip </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Students write full report </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Students present in class </li></ul></ul>
  7. 7. Hesthammer, Fossen, Sautter, Sæther & Johansen (2002) <ul><li>“ The use of information technology to enhance learning in geological field trips.” Journal of Geoscience Education, v. 50, n. 5, November, 2002, p. 528-538. </li></ul><ul><li>Location: Norway – on a field trip in Utah (geological and geophysical problems relevant for oil and gas exploration) </li></ul><ul><li>Level: University </li></ul><ul><li>Experiment: two groups </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Advanced flight (field) simulator </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Combines topography with any type of attribute such as geological maps, topographic maps and satellite images – 3D visualization of topography </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Digital camera and Portable PC – in groups – problem-based learning </li></ul></ul>
  8. 8. Bergin, Anderson, Molnar, Baumgartner, Mitchell, Korper, Curley & Rottmann (2007) <ul><li>“ Providing remote accessible field trips (RAFT): an evaluation study.” Computers in Human Behavior, 23, p. 192-219. </li></ul><ul><li>Location: United Kingdom </li></ul><ul><li>Level: 11 to 18 year old students </li></ul><ul><li>2 studies: linking field and classroom students </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Video-interactive trials (students communicate with remote experts at their place of work) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>21 students </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Age: 13-14 </li></ul></ul></ul>
  9. 9. Bergin, Anderson, Molnar, Baumgartner, Mitchell, Korper, Curley & Rottmann (2007) <ul><ul><li>Data-transfer and role assignment trials (field and classroom students interact - synchronous) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Students in field trips transferring information to students in classroom </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Students in field tips had specific tasks/roles assigned </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>60 students </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Age: 11-18 </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><li>Results </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Student interest in the topic increased significantly ( p < 0.05) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>RAFT is a motivating experience for both classroom and field students </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Equal levels of interest for classroom and field students </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Field students benefited more than classroom students </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>No gender difference </li></ul></ul>
  10. 10. Bergin, Anderson, Molnar, Baumgartner, Mitchell, Korper, Curley & Rottmann (2007) <ul><li>Results </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Increased interest in technology for females </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Overall a positive and engaging experience for students </li></ul></ul>
  11. 11. Fletcher, France, Moore & Robinson (2007) <ul><li>Practitioner Perspective on the use of Technology in Fieldwork Teaching”. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, Vol. 31, No. 2, 319-330. </li></ul><ul><li>Location: United Kingdom </li></ul><ul><li>Level: Higher Education </li></ul><ul><li>Methodology </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Questionnaire to GEES departments in HE </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Expert group meeting </li></ul></ul>
  12. 12. Fletcher, France, Moore & Robinson (2007) <ul><li>Results </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Hardware used: </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Desktop computers </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Laptop computers </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>GPS </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Palmtop/handheld computer </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Mobile phone </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Digital camera </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Software used: </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Spreadsheets: 50% </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Presentation applications: 40% </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Absence of a widespread pedagogic drive for use of technology </li></ul></ul>
  13. 13. Lynch, Bednarz, Boxall, Chalmers, France & Kesby (2008) <ul><li>E-learning for Geography’s teaching and Learning Spaces. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, Vol. 32, No.1, 135-149 </li></ul><ul><li>Level: higher education </li></ul><ul><li>Examples of e-learning using a variety of technologies </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Communities of learners: Blackboard, WebCT </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Mobile learning: access to resources anytime anywhere </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Podcasting </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Distance/blended/flexible learning </li></ul></ul>
  14. 14. Lynch, Bednarz, Boxall, Chalmers, France & Kesby (2008) <ul><li>Geography’s learning spaces: 3D </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Face-to-face – blended – online </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Passive learning – interactive learning </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Low technology use – high technology use </li></ul></ul>
  15. 15. Conclusion <ul><li>Use of technology to support student learning on fieldtrip is under-researched </li></ul><ul><li>Several papers provide examples but little supported by research data </li></ul>

×