Web 2.0: Legal Issues and Opportunities

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    2 Favorites

    Web 2.0: Legal Issues and Opportunities - Presentation Transcript

    1. WEB 2.0: LEGAL ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITIES January 20 th , 2009
    2. Overview
      • A New Technology...
      • Legal Issues
        • Privacy
          • AOL
          • Google
          • Social networks
        • Intellectual Property
      • Legal Opportunities
        • Ask Your Lawmaker
    3. A New Technology
      • Legal issues and opportunities may arise from new technology or novel way of using technology
      • Internet & Web 2.0: distinctive characteristics
        • Connectivity
        • Sharing
        • Social
        • Freedom
        • Communication
        • Search engines & data mining
      • Keep in mind that law often moves slowly...
    4. Legal Issues
      • Privacy
        • Increased sharing (video, text, photos...)
        • Public profiles?
        • Proliferation of information; information as a resource
        • Advertising
      • Intellectual property (copyright et al.)
        • Sharing of copyrighted material
        • Digital Rights Management
        • Collaborative tools
    5. Internet Privacy
      • The ability to control what information one reveals about oneself over the Internet, and to control who can access that information...
      • Questions to consider:
        • Who can see your information?
        • Is your information safe?
        • How is your information being utilised?
          • Search history
    6. Privacy Law
      • Reasonably modern innovation (1890 ~)
      • Existing privacy law embodies several legal concepts
        • Differs across countries
        • Tort law: intrusion of solitude, public disclosure of private facts, false light, appropriation
        • Right to privacy (US constitution, NZ Privacy Act 1993)
        • ‘ Expectation of privacy’ (public/private)
      • All New Zealand-based websites require privacy statements (Privacy Act 1993)
      • “ The communications revolution wrought by the Internet has rendered existing privacy jurisprudence obsolete.” (Gunasekara & Toy [G&T], 2008)
    7. The “AOL Search Data Scandal”
      • August 4 th , 2006 (Arrington, 2006)
      • An AOL researcher accidently released a text file containing: twenty million search keywords for over 650,000 users, collected over a 3-month period
        • Deleted by AOL, but already spread over the Internet
      • Users identified by a unique sequential key
        • New York Times was able to identify several users by cross-referencing with phonebooks/public records
      • CTO resigned; class-action suit brought against AOL.
    8. Social Networks
      • 90% of college students use social networking services (Solove [S], 2008)
      • Large amounts of personal, sometimes intimate data shared
        • Video, photos, comments, wall posts, etc.
        • Perpetual and cumulative
        • Very few people use the built-in privacy options to control access to their data [S]
      • The obvious risk is reputation
        • Stalking, re-identification, digital dossiers (Gross & Acquisti, 2005)
      • NZ Privacy Act has ‘information privacy principles’ [G&T]
        • Don’t cover individual users, but may provide protection from networks and third parties
    9. Social Networks (Barnes, 2006)
      • In social media spaces, public and private boundaries are unclear
      • Illusion of privacy leads to boundary problems
        • Disconnect between perceptions and behaviour regarding privacy
        • Students strongly disagreed that “everybody should know everything about everyone else”, yet seemed contrastingly unaware of the public nature of social media like Facebook
      • Barnes discusses social, technical, and legal remedies
    10. Some Terms Of Use...
      • By posting User Content to any part of the Site, you automatically grant, and you represent and warrant that you have the right to grant, to the Company an irrevocable, perpetual, non-exclusive, transferable, fully paid, worldwide license (with the right to sublicense) to use, copy, publicly perform, publicly display, reformat, translate, excerpt (in whole or in part) and distribute such User Content for any purpose, commercial, advertising, or otherwise, on or in connection with the Site or the promotion thereof, to prepare derivative works of, or incorporate into other works...
      • Most sites are a lot more respectful than this!
      • Many sites have well-developed privacy policies and terms of use.
    11. Google & Privacy
      • http://www.google.com/privacy.html
      • Google collect incredibly vast amounts of user data
      • Controversies
        • Gmail
          • Machine email reading to improve relevance of advertisements
        • Street View
          • Public/private property
          • People captured in images
        • Search histories
          • Kept for two years; identified via a cookie
    12. Street View and Gmail
    13. Intellectual Property
      • Copyright , patents, registered designs, trademarks, performer’s rights, moral rights, trademarks, database rights...
      • All normal copyright provisions apply on the Internet, eg. ownership, lifetime
      • Napster, Kazaa, BitTorrent, IRQ...
      • Digital Rights Management (DRM)
      • Additional risks given the collaborative, sharing, and informal nature of Web 2.0
        • Collaborative works
        • YouTube
    14. Collaborative Works (JISC, 2008)
      • Many Web 2.0 sites enable development of collaborative works
        • Lack of clarity regarding ownership in collaborations
            • Multiple layers or rights
            • Industry copyright traditions
            • Policing infringements
            • Exceptions
            • User attitudes
          • Who owns copyright?
          • Risks in 3 rd party copyright and ‘implied license’
          • Contractual relationships
    15. YouTube
      • Copyrighted material (consider ‘fair use’)
        • TV shows, movie clips, music
      • On upload, checked using ‘Video ID’; however, Youtube maintains that goes far beyond its legal obligations in assisting content owners to protect their works (AFP, 2008)
      • Takedown requests under Digital Millennium Copyright Act 1998
      • Defining case: Viacom
    16. Viacom vs. YouTube
      • Viacom sued YouTube, seeking:
        • $1bn in damages
        • ‘ Discovery’ phase
          • User data
          • Source code for YouTube and Google (as Viacom maintained the code treated copyrighted material ‘differently’)
      • “ A US judge has ordered Google to expose to Viacom the video-viewing habits of everyone who has ever used YouTube” (AFP, 2008)
        • IP addresses & usernames
        • Ruling condemned as a major blow to privacy; Judge Louis Stanton dismissed privacy concerns as “speculative”
    17. Legal Opportunities
      • It’s far from all bad news...
      • Web 2.0 presents a number of opportunities to improve and enhance legal discourse
        • Ask Your Lawmaker ( www.askyourlawmaker.org )
        • vLex ( www.vLex.com )
        • Change.gov ( www.change.gov )
        • Police Act Review Wiki ( www.policeact.govt.nz/wiki/)
      • Although then there’s also...
        • Rate My Cop ( www.ratemycop.com )
    18. Ask Your Lawmaker
      • USA; Capitol News Connection (a public radio service)
      • Allows users to submit questions for journalists to ask lawmakers (such as Congress members); questions are voted on, and the most popular are asked
    19. References
      • Arrington, M. (2006, ). AOL Proudly Releases Massive Amounts of Private Data . Retrieved January 19, 2009, from http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/06/aol-proudly-releases-massive-amounts-of-user-search-data/
      • AFP (2008, July 3). Judge orders Google to give YouTube user data to Viacom. AFP . Retrieved January 19, 2009, from http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5gvFPgT3MNrzaN7r-Y37eFI-qv4bA
      • Barnes, S. (2006). A privacy paradox: Social Networking in the United States. First Monday, 11(9). Retrieved January 19, 2009, from http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue11_9/barnes/index.html
      • Gross, R., & Acquisti, A. (2005). Information Revelation and Privacy in Online Social Networks [Electronic version]. Proceedings of the 2005 ACM workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society , 71-80. doi:http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1102199.1102214 from ACM.
      • Gunasekara, G. & Toy, A. (2008) "MYSPACE" OR PUBLIC SPACE: THE RELEVANCE OF DATA PROTECTION LAWS TO ONLINE SOCIAL NETWORKING , New Zealand Universities Law Review, 23(2), 191-214.
      • JISC (2008). Legal Issues arising from Web 2.0 engagement in FE and HE. Session at JISC Conference, April 15 th, 2008.
      • Privacy Commissioner (n.d.). The Privacy Act and Codes . Retrieved January 19, 2009, from http://www.privacy.org.nz/the-privacy-act-and-codes/
      • Solove, D. J. (2008, August). Do social networks bring the end of privacy? Scientific American . Retrieved January 19, 2009, from http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=do-social-networks-bring

    + morganjbrucemorganjbruce, 9 months ago

    custom

    1045 views, 2 favs, 2 embeds more stats

    Legal Issues and Opportunities arising from Web 2.0 more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 1045
      • 1021 on SlideShare
      • 24 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 2
    • Downloads 38
    Most viewed embeds
    • 22 views on http://comp113.wik.is
    • 2 views on http://www.fachak.com

    more

    All embeds
    • 22 views on http://comp113.wik.is
    • 2 views on http://www.fachak.com

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories