Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Mobile Software Development - 2008 to 2011 @ MoMo Tallinn 11.04.11
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Mobile Software Development - 2008 to 2011 @ MoMo Tallinn 11.04.11

657

Published on

Mobile Software Development - 2008 to 2011 …

Mobile Software Development - 2008 to 2011
Sven Kirsimäe
Mobile Monday Estonia / Reach-U
@ MoMo "Mobile Software Development Development - 3 years later", Tallinn 11.04.11

Published in: Technology
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
657
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide
  • The Dark Ages (2000-2004) – APIs from phones, monetization by operators.The Renaissance period (2005-2009) – smartphones, appstores (API is not enough), iconic product experience, opensource displacementThe Industrial Revolution era (2010-2014) – verticalization of top companies continue, consolidation of mobile OS big players, RTOS will become a legacy and replaced by lightweight versions of OS providers, new diverse set of formfactors emerge, developers can now act more independently from operators.
  • Screen sizes:Small – 20%Medium – 20%Large – 25%X-Large – 30%Supports Polyphonic Ringtones 75.5%Supports Streaming Video 64.1%Able to Download Video Clips 78.0%Supports WAP Push Messages 70.8%
  • India/AfricaScreen sizes:Small – 40%; Medium – 20%; Large – 32%; X-Large – 6%Supports Polyphonic Ringtones 85%Supports Streaming Video 68%Able to Download Video Clips 80%Supports WAP Push Messages 90%Ref: mobile_metrics_feb_09.pdf
  • India/AfricaScreen sizes:Small – 40%; Medium – 20%; Large – 32%; X-Large – 6%Supports Polyphonic Ringtones 85%Supports Streaming Video 68%Able to Download Video Clips 80%Supports WAP Push Messages 90%Ref: mobile_metrics_feb_09.pdf
  • The Dark Ages (2000-2004) – APIs from phones, monetization by operators.The Renaissance period (2005-2009) – smartphones, appstores (API is not enough), iconic product experience, opensource displacementThe Industrial Revolution era (2010-2014) – verticalization of top companies continue, consolidation of mobile OS big players, RTOS will become a legacy and replaced by lightweight versions of OS providers, new diverse set of formfactors emerge, developers can now act more independently from operators.
  • Rich media - web, apps, download content, mobile InternetUS media subscirbers higher – better 3G coverage + flat dataplans + bigger country :P to support all thisEU5= UK, France, Germany, Italy and Spain
  • JavaME 3000 – Success defined in 2005iPhone 225000 – Success defined in 2010One of the major disparities is between the device installed base and the number ofapps per platform. One would expect that the platforms deployed on the largestnumber of devices would have the biggest number of applications. This couldn’t befurther away from the truth. For example, Java ME is available on around threebillion handsets, but the platform can boast less than half of the apps available for themuch younger Android, shipped in only 20 million devices as of the end of the secondhalf of 2010. Similarly, the Symbian operating system is deployed in around 390million handsets (end of first half of 2010), and claims over 6,000 apps, while Apple’siOS has achieved 30x more apps over just 60M units.
  • Developer bias. - across all eight major mobile platforms we surveyed, respondents felt that the best aspect of their platform was the large market penetration, even if the actual market penetration was relatively small.Learning curve and efficiency. The learning curve varies greatly across mobile platforms. Counted in multipliersMarket channels - Operator portals and ondevice preloading through OEM or operator deals is the primary channel to market for fewer than five percent of mobile developers surveyed. Our findings show that developers resort to either ‘native’ app stores, or to direct download via their own websitesDiscovery bottleneck. - lack of effective marketing channels to increase application exposure and discovery. Moreover, half of respondents are willing to pay for premium app store placement.Role of operators. Mobile developers view network operators as bit-pipes. Nearly 80 percent of respondents think that the role of network operators shouldbe to deliver data access anywhere/anytime, while only 53 percent considered their role to be delivering voice calls.Mobile web fragmentation:~60 different versions; ~12 vendors
  • - E-hääletushttp://www.vvk.ee/index.php?id=106104G– vastuvõtjad kallid
  • Transcript

    • 1. Mobile Software Development
      2008 to 2011
      Sven Kirsimäe
      sven@momoestonia.com
    • 2. The Renaissance period
      2005-2009
      The final acts
    • 3. Smartphones 2008 (admob)
      Sven Kirsimäe
      3
    • 4. Smartphones 2008 (admob)
      Sven Kirsimäe
      4
    • 5. Smartphone OS 2008 (admob)
      Sven Kirsimäe
      5
    • 6. Smartphone OS 2008 (admob)
      Sven Kirsimäe
      6
    • 7. Market state 2008 highlights
      India & Africa: 80-90% Nokia (Symbian)
      SonyEricsson & Samsung is 2nd
      Low-end non-smartphone devices
      Smartphone traffic ~25% WW
      iPhone traffic ~25% from smartphones WW
      In 2008 OS WW share changes
      iOS +30%
      Symbian -20%
      RIM, Win Mobile, Palm -10%
      Sven Kirsimäe
      7
    • 8. The challenges 2008...
      Heavy fragmentation and learning-curve still present
      J2ME, Symbian
      iOSseems to be pushing hard
      The best app distribution-model seen so far
      Will it hold?Others?
      Android platform is looking promising
      how will it play out?
      Apps, apps, apps, web is dead?
      Distribution channels
      Operators: US
      OEMs emerging: Nokia OVI, Apple, RIM
      Private: GetJar, Handago
      Operators opening up?
      traffic vs. service
      Value in mobile SW development is bubbling up
      Open-sourcing OSes
      Android
      Symbian
      Sven Kirsimäe
      8
    • 9. The Industrial Revolution era
      2010-1014
      The first act
    • 10. Smartphones 2008-2011 (VisionMobile)
      2008
      2011
      Sven Kirsimäe
      10
    • 11. Smartphone OS 2008-2011 (VisionMobile)
      2008
      2011
      Sven Kirsimäe
      11
    • 12. Looking back at 2010 (US/EU5)
      Rich media usage:
      US 47% of subscribers: +8%/y
      EU5 37% of subscribers: +7%/y
      Main reasons
      3G penetration
      Unlimited dataplans
      ~1/3 US; ~10% EU5
      Smartphone adoption of full web browsing devices
      ~50% US (+46%); ~61% EU5 (+28%)
      80% feature-phones shipped in 2010!
      Attractive for J2ME/S40 (?)
      Sven Kirsimäe
      12
    • 13. Platforms used by dev till 2011
    • 14. Disparitybetween devices and applications
      One would expect that the platforms deployed on thelargestnumber of devices would have the biggest number of applications.
    • 15. The challenges 2011...
      New formfactors
      already ~40 tablets on the market
      what problem-domain will they solve?
      SIM-enabled e-bookreaders, PCs, ...
      Always connected devices
      Mobile Cloud
      3G network overload – will LTE/4G save us?
      Developer bias
      Developers mindshare migration between the platforms
      Learning-curve and efficiency
      Platformconcurrency
      War-of-giants
      Apple and/or Android?
      Open vsclosed
      Android restrictions on OS customizations
      Nokia and/or HParesleeping dragons?
      Fragmented mobile web
      Role of operators
      Market channels
      Platform penetration matters
      Discovery bottleneck
      Vertical ecosystems prevail (?)
      Sven Kirsimäe
      15
    • 16. At the same time in Estonia
      Skype releases disruptive mobile client
      J2ME, iPhone and Android
      Some small local players become big
      LTE/4G reaches Estonia 2011
      EMT 4G, expensive, 2015 releases some additional MHz
      E-Voting
      2007 -> 2011: 5.5% -> 24.3%
      Mobile-ID: 2011 -> ~2%
      Mobile Monday Estonia is still rockin’! 
      Sven Kirsimäe
      16
    • 17. Thank You!
      Sven Kirsimäe
      sven@kirsimae.com

    ×