Taguchi quality guru
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Taguchi quality guru

on

  • 856 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
856
Views on SlideShare
856
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
18
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Taguchi quality guru Taguchi quality guru Presentation Transcript

    • Genichi Taguchi -Quality imperatives
    • Genichi TaguchiGenichi Taguchi has developed methods for on-line & off-line qualitycontrol which formed the basis of his approach towards total qualityassurance. His methods are primarily used by designers & engineersto optimize settings so that the products are robust. These methodsare intended as problem solving tools in the early stages of productdevelopment cycle. His broad tenets are given on the following slides.
    • 1. Minimize loss to the societyThe aim of a good design is to minimize loss to the customer andthe society .Sources of loss : Product life , wear and tear, set up time etc.
    • II. Robust & simple designA good design is the optimal trade off between cost and performanceand must aim at simplicity . It is easier to make complicated designs ,but it takes a genius to simplify the design. Costs are reduced as aresult of :Fast assembly & productionRobustnessfewer suppliers & less administration.
    • III. Reduce Signal to noise ratioA good design should aim at reducing Signal to noise ratio.Televisions emit both signal and noise . The signal consists ofsound and picture. It is the desired part of transmission . The noise isthe unwanted part of transmission.
    • Taguchi - Quality imperatives Quality losses result from product failure after sale. Product ‘robustness’ is more a function of product design than on-line control, however stringent the manufacturing processes. Robust products deliver a strong ‘signal’ regardless of external ‘noise’ and with a minimum of internal ‘noise’. Any strengthening of design, that is, any market increase in the signal-to-noise ratios of component parts, will simultaneously improve the robustness of the product as a whole.
    • Taguchi - Quality imperatives To set targets at maximum signal-to-noise ratios, develop a system of trials that allows you to analyze change in overall system performance according to the average effect of change in component parts, that is, when you subject parts to varying values, stresses and experimental conditions. In new products, average effects may be most efficiently discerned by means of ‘orthogonal arrays’.
    • Taguchi - Quality imperatives To build robust products, set ideal target values for components and then minimize the average of the square of deviations for combined components, averaged over the various customer-user conditions.
    • Taguchi - Quality imperatives Before product go on to manufacturing, tolerances are set. Overall quality loss then increases by the square of deviation from the target value, that is, by the quadratic formula L = DC, where the constant C, is determined by the cost of the counter-measure that might be employed in the factory. This is the ‘quality loss function’. Virtually nothing gained in shipping a product that just barely satisfies the corporate standard over a product that just fails. Get on target, don’t just try to stay in spec.
    • Taguchi - Quality imperatives Work relentlessly to achieve designs that can be produced consistently: demand consistency from the factory. Catastrophic stack-up is more likely from scattered deviation within specifications than from consistent deviation outside. Where deviation from target is consistent, adjustment to the target is possible. A concerned effort to reduce product failure in the field will simultaneously reduce the number of defectives in the factory. Strive to reduce variances in the components of the product and variances will be reduced in the production system as a whole.
    • Taguchi - Quality imperatives Competing proposals for capital equipment or competing proposals for on-line interventions may be compared by adding the cost of each proposal to average quality loss, that is, the deviations expected from it.