Evaluation of Lumbar Spine Disease starts with understanding the clinical back grounds. It starts with good history and physical examination. This is a teaching lecture given twice by Prof. Dr. Mohamed Mohi Eldin, professor of neurosurgery, in the Basic Spine Course, Egyptian Medical Syndicate, Cairo, March 2009 and in 2010.
11. Eliminate serious pathology
(red flags)
⢠unexplained weight loss
⢠night pain
⢠poor general health/systemic symptoms
⢠fever
⢠previous history of cancer
⢠failure to improve with bed rest & therapy
⢠history of trauma
⢠steroid use (osteoporosis)
⢠very severe pain/muscle spasm
⢠Pain that worsens in supine
⢠bowel/bladder frequency (cauda equina syndrome)
⢠widespread neurological symptoms
⢠non-mechanical behaviour of symptoms
⢠Age > 50 years
⢠Constant progressive non-mechanical pain
⢠Persisting severe restriction of lumbar flexion
14. Decisions
⢠If suspect pathology, refer patient to appropriate
health professional
⢠If NSLBP, use knowledge (evidence-based practice)
seriousnesss
probability
15. Yellow flags
⢠Previous history of LBP
⢠Radiating leg pain, NR involvement
⢠Poor fitness
⢠Poor extensor endurance
⢠Poor general health
⢠Psychological distress (fear avoidance behaviour,
depressed)
⢠Much time lost from work
⢠Disproportionate illness behaviour
⢠Low job satisfaction
⢠Personal problems (alcohol, marital, financial)
⢠Adversarial medico-legal proceedings
16. Clinical Course
acute sub-acute chronic
6 weeks 3 months
Time
acute sub-acute chronic
most recover
without
intervention
some recover very few
recover
psychosocial domain
fear of activity
acute sub-acute chronic
Rx:
spinal manual
therapy
McKenzie exercises
spinal manual
therapy
exercises
exercise
cognitive
behavioural
therapy
17. Clinical Examination
¡ observation
¡ active movements
¡ tension tests ***
¡ palpation
As applicable:
¡ stress active movements
¡ neurological examination
¡ muscle performance
¡ passive tests
20. LLuummbbaarr SSppiinnee DDiisseeaassee
⢠Low back pain is second
to upper respiratory
problems as a reason for
visits to a physician
⢠In the U.S., back pain is
the most common cause
of activity limitation in
people younger than 45
years
⢠Cost of low back pain to
industry estimated $35-
75 billion
21. EEvvaalluuaattiioonn ooff LLuummbbaarr SSppiinnee DDiisseeaassee
⢠Where to start?
⢠What do we know?
⢠What to do?
⢠Who to consult?
⢠What will they do?
22. What we know v. wwhhaatt wwee tthhiinnkk wwee kknnooww**
% answering % very
Topic ?s correctly confident
SI joint pain 4.4 32.2
Lumbar stenosis 12.6 28.6
Leg length differences 42.0 27.0
Fibromyalgia 57.1 35.5
Myofascial pain (piri) 68.7 8.5
*J Am Geriatr Soc 54:1772-1777; 2006
23. EEvvaalluuaattiioonn ooff LLuummbbaarr SSppiinnee DDiisseeaassee
From the top
⢠Patient History:
â Location of pain
â Duration of pain
â Character/quality of
pain
â Weakness
â Numbness
24. Evaluation ooff LLuummbbaarr SSppiinnee DDiisseeaassee
⢠Bowel, bladder or sexual
dysfunction
⢠Prior or current treatments
including medication
⢠Smoking (smokers complain of
more severe symptoms and
have less improvement
postsurgically)
⢠Obesity (obese patients more
likely to suffer radicular pain
or neurologic symptoms and
carry more comorbidities)
⢠Diabetes (may need
neurophysiology testing)
⢠Psychological factors: anxiety,
depression, somatization
symptoms, stressful
responsibilities, job
dissatisfaction, mental stress
at work, negative body image,
weakness in ego functioning
(prospective predictors of
developing back pain)
⢠Activities that affect pain (e.g.
leaning forward in spinal
stenosis, sitting down,
coughing, sneezing, Valsalva
for herniated discs)
29. EEvvaalluuaattiioonn ooff LLuummbbaarr SSppiinnee DDiisseeaassee
⢠Range of Motion:
â Straight leg raise - most
sensitive for sciatic pain
syndromes
â Pain in contralateral leg with
straight leg raise is most
specific for sciatic pain
syndromes
â Lumbar flexion/extension
(lumbar stenosis worse with
extension, better with
flexion)
30. EEvvaalluuaattiioonn ooff LLuummbbaarr SSppiinnee DDiisseeaassee
⢠ROM to rule out other
causes of back/leg pain:
internal and external hip
rotation
⢠Palpation over spine, SI
joint, pelvis and hip
31. Evaluation ooff LLuummbbaarr SSppiinnee DDiisseeaassee
⢠Clinical impression:
â lumbar disc herniation: pain, paresthesias, weakness,
depressed DTRs in an anatomic distribution (i.e. down
lower extremity)
â lumbar stenosis: diagnosis made mainly by history; low
back/leg pain with walking or standing improved by
sitting or lying down (not just standing still); no severe
cramping in calf; no trophic changes in skin; a.k.a.
neurogenic claudication
32. Evaluation ooff LLuummbbaarr SSppiinnee DDiisseeaassee
⢠Clinical impression:
â lumbar instability: pain with motion; improved with lying down;
>5 mm motion on flexion/extension x-rays indicates unstable
motion segment; look for defects in neural arch (lamina, pedicle,
pars interarticularis); 30% of patients with degenerative
spondylolisthesis (subluxation) will have progressive slippage
â compression fracture: acute to subacute onset of pain, pain to
palpation; +/- history of trauma/cancer
â musculoskeletal: pain with active but not passive motion; point
tenderness over joint; +/- history of trauma
33. Evaluation ooff LLuummbbaarr SSppiinnee DDiisseeaassee
⢠If clinical suspicion high for âsoft tissueâ (i.e. muscle, tendon, joint,
ligament) source of symptoms then: NSAIDS, narcotics,
antidepressant, cox-2 inhibitor, PT (exercise), +/- muscle relaxants,
+/- chiropractor referral, +/- acupuncture, +/- behavioral therapy, ?
corsets, ?massage, ?traction, ?TENS, ?epidural/facet injections,
BUTâŚcontinue ordinary activities in the acute period* AND in the
post-acute period begin conditioning activities to strengthen back,
legs, abdomen to prevent recurrence^
⢠+/- = some evidence; ? = unknown
⢠*NEJM 332:351-5, 1995
⢠^JAMA 272:1286-91, 1994
34. Evaluation ooff LLuummbbaarr SSppiinnee DDiisseeaassee
⢠Options when clinical suspicion low or diagnosis unclear:
â 1. Observe (80-90% will resolve in <6 weeks)
⢠most common diagnosis of acute (i.e. <6 weeks) back pain =
âlumbar strainâ
⢠pathobiology ( any pain sensitive structure): muscle, tendon,
ligaments, disc, facet joints, periosteum, meninges, blood
vessels, or âdegenerative changes*â
⢠NSAIDS, narcotics, antidepressant, cox-2 inhibitor, PT while
you are observing
â 2. Imaging
⢠BUT ASK THE PATIENT: are you willing to have surgery or other
invasive procedure if we do this work up?
⢠For back pain pts: 4% will have compression fx, 1% will have a
tumor, 3% will have a herniated disc
35. Imaging ooff LLuummbbaarr SSppiinnee DDiisseeaassee
⢠If clinical suspicion high for intraspinal source of
symptoms â i.e. radiculopathy, neurogenic
claudication, lumbar instability, compression fx
then:
â 1) MRI, MRI, MRI unless there is a
contraindication (see next slide)
⢠Add contrast only if patient has had prior surgery or a
history of cancer; perhaps with a demyelinating process like
multiple sclerosis
⢠If not sure; order without contrast and radiology will pick up
the ones that do need it
36. Imaging ooff LLuummbbaarr SSppiinnee DDiisseeaassee
â 2) If there is a contraindication to MRI then CT
myelogram (contraindications to MRI = heart stent < 2
weeks old, defibrillator, pacemaker, pain pump, spinal
cord or deep brain stimulator, prior lumbar spine
instrumentation, programmable shunt)
⢠Questions?: call radiology or specialist involved in placing device
or hardware
⢠If patient is too large for closed MRI then order open MRI
⢠CT is WAY OVERUTILIZED as a spine diagnostic test and delivers A
LOT of radiation to the patient
37. Imaging ooff LLuummbbaarr SSppiinnee DDiisseeaassee
â 3) if signs of spondylolisthesis then
flexion/extension x-rays (lateral)
â 4) pain medications (NSAIDS, narcotics, +/- oral
steroid taper, +/- muscle relaxant)
â 5) Consultation after MRI or CT myelogram
results show something other than âdegenerative
changesâ*
38. Consultation aatt tthhee SSppiinnee CCeenntteerr
⢠âWhoâ should I send âwhatâ to?
⢠General recommendations:
â Acute pain problems â surgeons & pain management
⢠Surgeons â usually after imaging
â Active smokers will be strongly encouraged to stop
â Poorly controlled diabetics (Hgb A1C > 7) will result in re-evaluation
request with primary care prior to surgery
⢠Pain management â does not require imaging
â Chronic pain problems â physiatry & neurology
⢠Does not require imaging
39. SSPPOORRTT SSttuuddyy**
⢠Conservative therapy isnât the worst idea for patients with a
herniated disc and mild to moderate symptoms
⢠2-year prospective randomized trial of patients with
radicular symptoms > 6 weeks and imaging evidence of a
herniated disc
â Randomized to surgery or PT, exercise, NSAIDS
⢠LOTS of patients cross-over to opposite group if symptoms
are too mild or too severe
⢠BUT at 2-year follow-up, both surgery and conservative
management was effective
⢠*JAMA 2006;296:2451-2459
40. SShhoouulldd II rreeiimmaaggee??
⢠Have symptoms or signs changed
significantly?
⢠Has there been a recent intervention (e.g.
surgery) or trauma?
⢠Look at patientâs chart â has it been >1 year
since last imaging?
⢠If the answer to these 3 questions is ânoâ
then reimaging is not indicated
41. SSuummmmaarryy
⢠Start with good history and physical
⢠Is this emergent, urgent or routine?
⢠Is the cause most likely disc, stenosis,
instability, compression fracture or soft
tissue?
⢠Typically start conservative and escalate as
necessary
43. The Importance of History and
Physical Examination
⢠The most valuable service
ďźthe correct diagnosis
ďźthe magnitude of the problem
ďźthe appropriate treatment
44. Image studies
⢠Image studies Vs.
Time-consuming process of history taking and P.E.
⢠High false positive rate for spinal disease
⢠No information about the source of pain
⢠To confirm the diagnosis
⢠To help guide any surgical procedure
46. History
⢠Backache
ďź In the lumbosacral junction?
ďź In the thoracolumbar junction?
ďź In the buttock and thigh?
⢠Sciatica?
47. History
⢠The ratio of back pain to leg pain symptoms
⢠The pain intensity on a scale 1 to 10
⢠Functional impairment:
ďź Stable
ďź Deterioration
⢠Psychosocial issues
48. Axial Symptoms: Back and Neck Pain
⢠To characterize the nature of the pain
ďź Location
ďź Onset
ďź Duration
ďź Character
ďź Periodicity
ďź The precipitating factors
ďź The aggravating factors
ďź The relieving factors
49. Location
⢠Local or diffuse, midline or paraspinous
⢠Midline pain:
spondylolisthesis or bony pathology
⢠Paraspinous pain:
muscular and spasm
⢠Focal, highly localized pain:
fracture, tumor, infection or single-level arthrosis or
instability
⢠Diffuse symptoms: DDD
⢠Chronic, diffuse symptoms are seldom likely to warrant
surgical treatment
50. Onset
⢠Acute onset:
acute injury
⢠Insidious onset:
repetitive trauma, degenerative disease or a
progressive disorder
⢠Insidiously but progressive rapidly:
more serious underlying causes
ďź Pathological fracture: tumor, infection, or osteoporosis,
ďź Visceral disease: pancreatitis, AAA
51. Duration
⢠Sprain/strain causing backache usually
improves within 6 to 8 weeks of onset
⢠Degenerative disease pain waxes and wanes
over a period of years or decades
⢠New pains, or pains that are new to
longstanding backache
52. Character
⢠Most backache: fairly focal pain
intensified by activity and fatigue,
improved by rest
⢠Neoplasm/infection: boring, deep pain
unrelieved by rest or recumbency
⢠Instability: sharp, stabbing, incapacitating pain
superimposed on a baseline ache
a shift or âcatchâ with motion
53. Character
⢠Discogenic pain:
intensified by sitting and vibration exposure,
flexion/extension, and axial loading
⢠Discitis, osteomyelitis
greater intensity, absolute intolerance of motion
54. Periodicity
⢠Symptoms recur more frequently
⢠To miss work several times in a given year
Need further evaluation and more aggressive treatment
55. Factors that
Precipitate, Aggravate, Relieve pain
⢠Flexion: aggravate disc-related symptoms
⢠Extension: irritate the facets
⢠Motion: trigger instability, causing acute giving out or
stabbing pain.
⢠Whole body vibration: precipitate neuropeptide
release that can sensitize nerve endings and directly irritate
the disc
56. Factors that
Precipitate, Aggravate, Relieve pain
⢠Mechanical disorder:
Pain caused by bending, lifting, twisting, or axial loading, and
relieved by recumbancy
⢠Discogenic pain:
Pain aggravated by flexion, or by prolonged sitting or riding in
a car
ďź Back pain caused by hypertension may be facet-related
ďź Leg pain in extension usually is a result of spinal stenosis
57. Factors that
Precipitate, Aggravate, Relieve pain
⢠Profound morning stiffness:
requiring 30 mins to an hour to âloosen upâ (inflammatory
arthropathy)
⢠Inquires about injury and the circumstances
associated with the pain first appearing
⢠Did pain come on immediately after an accident?
⢠Was there an examination or radiography at that time?
58. Peripheral Symptoms: Arm and Leg Pain
⢠Radiculopathy:
Painful, hyperesthetic, numb, tingling, burning
⢠HIVD Vs. Central spinal stenosis
⢠Thoracic spine disorder: Belt-like radicular symptoms
Herpes zoster; the pain is severe and predates the vesicles
59. Peripheral Symptoms: Arm and Leg Pain
⢠Neurogenic Vs. Vascular claudication
(The spine in flexion or extension)
ďź Walk
ďź Stand still
ďź Sit
ďź Uphill
ďź Downhill
ďź Pedaling a bicycle
ďź Lean forward over a shopping cart (on a counter)
60. Peripheral Symptoms: Arm and Leg Pain
⢠Radicular pain reproduced by coughing,
sneezing, or straining at stool (increasing
intrathecal pressure)
⢠Lhermitteâs sign
⢠Resting the forearm over the head
61. Peripheral Symptoms: Arm and Leg Pain
⢠Loss of bowel continence, urinary retention,
and saddle anesthesia (accompanied by
varying degrees of leg weakness)
---Cauda Equina Syndrome
⢠Spasticity, and urinary incontinence (diffuse
lower and upper extremity weakness)
---Spinal Cord Injury
68. Evaluation
⢠Primary role of ATC:
â On-field evaluation:
⢠Rule out (R/O) bony trauma which has, or may, damage
to spinal cord
â Clinical evaluation:
⢠Evaluate specific cause of injury and devise a
rehabilitation plan
69. History
⢠Location of pain:
â Localized or radiating?
⢠Onset of pain:
â Acute, chronic, insidious?
⢠Consistency of pain:
â Constant/intermittent?
â Improves/Worsens with
activity?
⢠Mechanism:
â Flex, ext, rotation, lat. Flex
â Direct blow/trauma
70. History
⢠PMH of injuries/surgery?
⢠Smoker?
⢠Bowel/bladder
symptoms?
â Incontinence or Ă
frequency
â Immediate referral
⢠Referral history
â Time in the medical
system?
â # of physicians seen?
76. Muscle Strains
⢠Pain localized to
paraspinal musculature
& PSIS
⢠Spasm probable
⢠Limited flex. & ext.
(pain)
⢠No radiating pain
⢠May not correlate to
specific mechanism
77. Facet Joint Syndrome
⢠Table 10-10,p.354
⢠~40% of all LBP
⢠Vague symptoms that
mimic other pathologies
⢠Common with repeated
spine-loading activities
⢠Localized pain
⢠Often improves with activity
⢠Nerve entrapment may
result from compensatory
posturing
⢠Worsened by:
â Repeated spine-loading
activities (ext, side
bending, rotation)
â Poor LE flexibility
â Poor Trunk strength
78. Disk lesion
⢠Crack in annulus fibrosus
ď herniation of nucleus
pulposus
⢠Pressure on nerve
rootď pain/burning
sensation
⢠âBulgeâ š pathology
⢠Radiating pain into
buttocks and down leg
⢠MRI for best diagnosis
⢠Altered standing posture
⢠Symptoms à with activity
⢠Bilateral or unilateral
symptoms
⢠Usually acute onset
79. Spondylopathies
⢠Vertebral defect
⢠May occur at any
age/sports
⢠Congenital?
⢠Stress fx?
⢠Common is sports with
forced hyperextension
⢠Generally occurs at L4-
L5 or L5-S1 levels
80. Spondylolysis
⢠Defect at pars
interarticularis
⢠Unilateral or bilateral
⢠Signs/ Symptoms:
â NL spinal alignment
â LBP Ă during & after activity
â Localized lumbar spine pain
â NL flex; restricted ext.
â (-) neuro. Test
⢠X-rays show âcollaredâ
Scotty Dog
81. Spondylolysthesis
⢠May occur with
spondylolysis
⢠Anterior displacement
of proximal vertebrae
on distal
⢠Pain more
intense/constant than
spondylolysis
⢠Neuro signs sometimes
(+) if displacement
worsens
⢠Possible step-off deformity
⢠X-rays show âdecapitatedâ
Scotty Dog
⢠(+) Stork test
82. Straight leg raise test (SLR)â
p.347, fig. Box 10-9
⢠Supine with knees extended
⢠PROM hip flexion to point of
discomfort or end of range
⢠à hip flexion and move into
passive dorsiflexion
⢠(+) = pain reproduced and
recurs with reduced SLR
⢠(-) =pain reproduced but does
not return with reduced SLR
⢠If pain does not recur:
â Tight hamstrings
83. Well-leg SLR test
p.348, Box 10-10
⢠Supine with knees
extended
⢠Passively raise one leg
â Similar to SLR test
â Raise leg with symptoms
â Provocation test
⢠(+)=Symptoms felt in
the other leg (âwellâ
leg)
84. Valsalva maneuver
p. 344, Box 10-6
⢠Increasing intrathecal
pressure to reproduce
symptoms
⢠(+)=Reproduced
symptoms :
Radiating pain or
Numbness
85. Kernigâs Testâp. 346
⢠Box 10-8
⢠Provocation test to
elongate the spinal cord
⢠Active SLR until point of
pain (knee straight)
⢠Flex knee @ point of pain
⢠(+)= pain in LB or radiating
pain in LE
⢠Brudzinskiâs Test=Kernig
with cervical flexion
86. Hoover test
p.351, Box 10-13
⢠Tests compliance & effort
⢠âMalingeringâ
⢠Procedure:
â Supine with knees extended
â Active hip flexion
â Pressure should be felt on
opposite leg as SLR is
attempted
⢠(+)=No pressure=low effort
87. Babinski test
p. 383, Box 11-3
⢠Tests presence of upper
motor neuron pathology
⢠Blunt device moved across
plantar aspect of foot from
calcaneus to 1st metatarsal
head (great toe)
â (-)=toe flexion
â (+)=great toe extension with
splaying of other toes
⢠Normally (+) in newborns
88. Hamstring flexibility
⢠Tripod sign
⢠90-90 position for
testing
⢠Tight hamstringsď
pelvic tiltď
Stretched extensorsď
Pain/spasm
89. Strength tests
⢠Isometric strength tests
⢠Held for 60 sec.
⢠Flexor strength testing
⢠Extensor strength
testing
90. Lifting Technique
⢠Maintain natural curves
â Sitting, standing, walking,
lifting
⢠10:1 ratio
⢠Use large LE muscles
⢠Keep items close to body
⢠Hip = axis (not LS)
⢠Avoid rotating spine
⢠Get help when needed
Editor's Notes
I have here 2 diagrams of patients who presented to me with LB and leg pain.
With every patient, we take a history that begins with getting a description of the symptoms: what symptoms the patient has, where the symptoms are located, a description of the type of symptoms and the intensity.
The patient on the left has pain in the L/S and leg. The back pain is worse than the leg pain. This is a typical presentation of NSLBP. With our knowledge of pain patterns and anatomy, we know that the pain is likely to arise from either the L/S or the SIJ. Without any further information we already have hypotheses about the diagnosis, physical examination and treatment. We then get a lot more information from the history to check whether these hypotheses are correct.
On the right, the patient has a more complex pattern of LBP and leg pain. The pain is worse in the leg, and both legs are involved. This is a very unusual pattern of pain, and is unlikely to arise from a single cause, unless it is a large tumour in the spinal canal, compressing the spinal cord. Our hypotheses for this patient, even at this stage in the history, would include serious pathology or some people with chronic pain have this kind of presentation. It is very unlikely that this patient has acute NSLBP.