Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Security in south caucasus.docx
Security in south caucasus.docx
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Security in south caucasus.docx

624

Published on

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
624
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Published on Atlantic Council (http://www.acus.org) South Caucasus Regional Security [1] On July 26, 2005, as part of its continuing interest in the South Caucasus, the Black Sea region, and Central Asia, the Atlantic Council’s International Security Program hosted Dr. David Shahnazarian, former Minister of National Security of Armenia, and founder of the Armenian National Movement Party. More than seventy invitees participated in the ninety-minute session, including representatives of the U.S. Government, Turkey, various policy and academic institutions, and other Caucasus states. Voice of America and other press agencies also covered the event for distribution in the region. In his remarks, Dr. Shahnazarian addressed many of the most pressing issues of concern to his nation and the region. Noting the “dynamically changing geo-political realities” of the area, he underlined the potential for conflict and highlighted Armenia’s place in promoting stability. As the following quote illustrates, he emphasized the need for closer collaboration and coordination between Armenia and its neighbors. "Establishment of irrevocable democracy, rule of law, free market economy relations and protection of fundamental human rights and freedoms have not assumed yet key significance in the South Caucasian countries. As a result all pressing problems of the region are intensifying further, it still continues to remain politically and economically unstable (we would like to note that so far this instability has been to a certain extent manageable, both from inside and outside)…. Which are the main problems threatening the stability and regional security in the South Caucasus?I would like to single main of them: Opposite foreign policy vectors of the South Caucasian states… Division lines separating Armenia from other countries of the region emerged in 1999, when two of the three South Caucasian states, Georgia and Azerbaijan, walked out of the Collective Security Treaty (cst) declaring integration with Euro-Atlantic international security system as their major foreign policy priority. Armenia continued to remain in the CST together with Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia and Tajikistan. In 2003 the CST was reorganized into the regional Collective Security Treaty Organization (csto)… Armenian current authorities look today at the csto as the only framework that can ensure the country’s national security (that is under Russia’s umbrella), while Georgia and Azerbaijan are striving to minimize threats to their national security by seeking rapprochement with the Euro-Atlantic security system-nato. There is no doubt that stability in the South Caucasus is possible only when all its three states, Armenia, Georgia and Azerbaijan, are in the same international security system, and this was confirmed by historical experience. Harmonization, synchronization and coordination of foreign policy priorities of all three states are the only means that can prevent the South Caucasus from developing into the hotbed of geopolitical clashes. This means that Armenia should revise its foreign policy. Armenia’s Individual Partnership Action Plan (ipap) with nato, in my view, is not sufficient to achieve this. The official Yerevan has first of all to declare clearly its intention to join nato, and not only. Armenia should not either ignore other -- still developing-international organizations, which could in future take on key security functions. In this respect Armenia’s membership in guam (Georgia, Ukraine, Azerbaijan and Moldova), would indicate Yerevan’s desire to shift towards taking up a realistic foreign policy."
  • 2. Following his remarks, Dr. Shahnazarian kindly engaged in a fruitful discussion with guests, covering topics from Turkish-Armenian affairs and the potential resolution of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict through the Minsk process to Armenia’s relationship with Russia and the European Union. Trackback URL for this post: http://www.acus.org/trackback/287 ● International Security Source URL: http://www.acus.org/event_blog/south-caucasus-regional-security Links: [1] http://www.acus.org/content/south-caucases-mapjpg

×