<ul><li>Strategic Project Grants Program - 2011 Competition </li></ul>
<ul><li>University of Waterloo </li></ul><ul><li>February 8 th , 2011 </li></ul>Katie Wallace, Program Officer Environment...
Agenda <ul><li>Strategic Project Grants Program (SPG) </li></ul><ul><li>What’s New? </li></ul><ul><li>UW and SPG </li></ul...
NSERC Budget 2010-2011 ($1.080 billion) Administration ($54M- 5%) People  ($302.4M- 28%) Innovation  ($324M- 30%) Discover...
<ul><li>RPP Toolbox </li></ul><ul><li>Strategic   Partnerships </li></ul><ul><li>(targets national priorities)  </li></ul>...
<ul><li>Strategic Project Grants (SPG) </li></ul>Objective To increase research and training in  targeted areas  that coul...
<ul><li>Why the Strategic Project Grants Program? </li></ul><ul><li>Focus on specific areas </li></ul><ul><li>Opportunity ...
<ul><li>Expected Results </li></ul><ul><li>Increased participation  of companies and/or government organizations in academ...
<ul><li>What’s in it for the Partners? </li></ul><ul><li>Access to: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Team of researchers with experti...
<ul><li>Requirements </li></ul><ul><li>The project must: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Fall within one of the target areas  </li><...
<ul><li>What’s New for 2011 </li></ul><ul><li>First competition with New Target Areas </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Target areas a...
<ul><li>Competition Statistics- (2006-2010) </li></ul>Competition Year # of Applications # of Awards Success Rate 2010 547...
<ul><li>UW and Strategic Project Grants </li></ul><ul><li>2006 to 2010:  138* applications, 41 awards (29.7%) </li></ul><u...
<ul><li>Novel conductive adhesives as a lead-free and multifunctional joining alternative for electronic packaging- Mfg </...
<ul><li>Four Target Areas </li></ul><ul><li>Priority research topics within: </li></ul><ul><li>Information and Communicati...
<ul><li>Focused Research </li></ul><ul><li>There are 3-8 priority research topics identified within each target area ( 80%...
<ul><li>Non-Academic Supporting Organizations </li></ul><ul><li>Private sector </li></ul><ul><li>Canadian-based companies ...
<ul><li>Non-Academic Supporting Organizations </li></ul><ul><li>Do not qualify as  the only  supporting organization: </li...
<ul><li>Supporting Organizations (continued) </li></ul><ul><li>A supporting organization must also: </li></ul><ul><li>Have...
<ul><li>International Collaborations </li></ul><ul><li>Concurrent call for joint research projects in all Target Areas </l...
<ul><li>The  SPG Application </li></ul><ul><li>Application for a Grant (Form 101) Parts I and II </li></ul><ul><li>Persona...
<ul><li>Research Proposal- Format </li></ul><ul><li>11 pages total: </li></ul><ul><li>Introduction  (~1 page*) </li></ul><...
<ul><li>Research Proposal- Format </li></ul><ul><li>Objectives </li></ul><ul><li>Approach and research methodology </li></...
<ul><li>Research Proposal- Format </li></ul><ul><li>Interactions with supporting organizations </li></ul><ul><li>Plan for ...
<ul><li>Letter of Support- Key Points </li></ul><ul><li>Support for and agreement with the proposal </li></ul><ul><li>Reas...
<ul><li>Additional Points to Consider </li></ul><ul><li>Collaborations outside NSE:  applicants are encouraged to collabor...
<ul><li>Evaluation Process- Timeline </li></ul><ul><li>April 15-  Submission of Applications   </li></ul><ul><li>May/June-...
<ul><li>Evaluation Process </li></ul><ul><li>Projects are evaluated against seven criteria. </li></ul><ul><li>Each criteri...
<ul><li>Selection Criteria </li></ul><ul><li>Originality of the research  </li></ul><ul><li>Quality of the research </li><...
<ul><li>Selection Criteria (cont’d)  </li></ul><ul><li>Originality of the Research </li></ul><ul><li>The project must prom...
<ul><li>Selection Criteria (cont’d)  </li></ul><ul><li>Project Work Plan </li></ul><ul><li>The project must have a clear a...
<ul><li>Selection Criteria (cont’d)  </li></ul><ul><li>Training Potential </li></ul><ul><li>The project must provide oppor...
<ul><li>Selection Criteria (cont’d)  </li></ul><ul><li>Benefits to Canada and Supporting Organizations </li></ul><ul><li>T...
<ul><li>Signs of a Good Proposal </li></ul><ul><li>All sections are clear and well described:  </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Clear...
<ul><li>Top Ten Tips </li></ul><ul><li>Start early!  </li></ul><ul><li>Make the application comprehensible to people outsi...
<ul><li>Top Ten Tips (continued) </li></ul><ul><li>Ensure that all partners and co-applicants are fully involved. </li></u...
<ul><li>Resources </li></ul>For questions relating to fit to target area, eligibility of partners or applicants or Program...
<ul><li>Questions? </li></ul>
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

NSERC Strategic Projects Grants Overview

2,279

Published on

Published in: Technology, Education
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
2,279
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

NSERC Strategic Projects Grants Overview

  1. 1. <ul><li>Strategic Project Grants Program - 2011 Competition </li></ul>
  2. 2. <ul><li>University of Waterloo </li></ul><ul><li>February 8 th , 2011 </li></ul>Katie Wallace, Program Officer Environment and Natural Resources Research Partnerships Programs
  3. 3. Agenda <ul><li>Strategic Project Grants Program (SPG) </li></ul><ul><li>What’s New? </li></ul><ul><li>UW and SPG </li></ul><ul><li>Target Areas </li></ul><ul><li>Application and Timelines </li></ul><ul><li>Evaluation Process </li></ul><ul><li>Helpful Tips </li></ul>
  4. 4. NSERC Budget 2010-2011 ($1.080 billion) Administration ($54M- 5%) People ($302.4M- 28%) Innovation ($324M- 30%) Discovery ($399.6M- 37%)
  5. 5. <ul><li>RPP Toolbox </li></ul><ul><li>Strategic Partnerships </li></ul><ul><li>(targets national priorities) </li></ul><ul><li>Strategic Projects </li></ul><ul><li>Strategic Networks </li></ul><ul><li>Partnership Workshops </li></ul><ul><li>Collaborative Health Research Projects </li></ul><ul><li>Industry-Driven </li></ul><ul><li>(Industry participation) </li></ul><ul><li>Collaborative R&D </li></ul><ul><li>Industrial Research Chairs </li></ul><ul><li>Chairs in Design Engineering </li></ul><ul><li>Interaction </li></ul><ul><li>Engage </li></ul><ul><li>Technology Transfer/Commercialization </li></ul><ul><li>Idea to Innovation </li></ul><ul><li>College and Community Innovation </li></ul><ul><li>Regional Offices </li></ul><ul><li>Bring perspectives and </li></ul><ul><li>intelligence from across </li></ul><ul><li>the country </li></ul><ul><li>Forge linkages at local level </li></ul><ul><li>Exercise more influence </li></ul>
  6. 6. <ul><li>Strategic Project Grants (SPG) </li></ul>Objective To increase research and training in targeted areas that could strongly influence Canada’s economy, society and/or environment within the next 10 years.
  7. 7. <ul><li>Why the Strategic Project Grants Program? </li></ul><ul><li>Focus on specific areas </li></ul><ul><li>Opportunity to take research beyond the university </li></ul><ul><li>NSERC will fund direct costs of a 1 to 3 year project (students, PDFs, consumables, equipment) </li></ul><ul><li>There must be significant involvement from the partner BUT a cash contribution is not required </li></ul>
  8. 8. <ul><li>Expected Results </li></ul><ul><li>Increased participation of companies and/or government organizations in academic research. </li></ul><ul><li>New knowledge/technology with strong potential to strengthen Canada’s industrial base, generate wealth, create employment and/or Canadian public policy. </li></ul><ul><li>The transfer of this knowledge/technology to Canadian-based organizations that are well positioned to apply the results for economic gain or to government organizations to strengthen public policy. </li></ul><ul><li>Highly qualified personnel trained in the target areas. </li></ul>
  9. 9. <ul><li>What’s in it for the Partners? </li></ul><ul><li>Access to: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Team of researchers with expertise in a desired area to solve a problem </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Technology/idea of commercial interest </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Research facilities and infrastructure that the industry lacks </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Potential access to a source of HQP </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Give companies a competitive edge in global markets </li></ul></ul>
  10. 10. <ul><li>Requirements </li></ul><ul><li>The project must: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Fall within one of the target areas </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Have well-defined objectives, scope and duration (1-3 years) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Have one or more supporting organizations that are actively involved in all stages of the project and can apply the results </li></ul></ul>
  11. 11. <ul><li>What’s New for 2011 </li></ul><ul><li>First competition with New Target Areas </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Target areas are reviewed every 5 years </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>2010 was the last competition for Biomedical Technologies, Quality Foods and Novel Bioproducts, and Safety and Security </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Equipment Expenses </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Purchase of major equipment items or systems is limited to a maximum of $150,000 total </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Government Supporting Organizations </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Letter of support and form 183A must be signed by the Director General (or equivalent level) </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Instructions and Application </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Status reports no longer required </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Option to attach a Gantt cart in the budget justification section </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Allowed up to 2 pages for references </li></ul></ul>
  12. 12. <ul><li>Competition Statistics- (2006-2010) </li></ul>Competition Year # of Applications # of Awards Success Rate 2010 547 122 22% 2009 465 122 26% 2008 391 153 39% 2007 309 149 48% 2006 431 133 31%
  13. 13. <ul><li>UW and Strategic Project Grants </li></ul><ul><li>2006 to 2010: 138* applications, 41 awards (29.7%) </li></ul><ul><li>2010: 29 applications, 5 awards </li></ul><ul><li>3 examples </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Manufacturing </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Sustainable Energy Systems </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Information and Communication Technologies </li></ul></ul>*does not include supplemental competitions
  14. 14. <ul><li>Novel conductive adhesives as a lead-free and multifunctional joining alternative for electronic packaging- Mfg </li></ul><ul><li>B. Zhao, Chem. Eng. </li></ul><ul><li>$180,384 over 3 years </li></ul><ul><li>2 co-applicants </li></ul><ul><li>RIM; Microbonds Inc.; Celestica International Inc. </li></ul>Operation, communications and information management for smart electricity grids- SES <ul><li>K. Bhattacharya, Elect.&Comp. Eng. </li></ul><ul><li>$ 627,394 over 3 years </li></ul><ul><li>4 co-applicants </li></ul><ul><li>IBM Canada; ABB Corporate Research; Hydro One Inc. </li></ul>Enabling seamless service provisioning over cooperative heterogeneous wireless networks- ACMI <ul><li>W. Zhuang, Elect. & Comp. Eng </li></ul><ul><li>$ 548,970 over 3 years </li></ul><ul><li>2 co-applicants </li></ul><ul><li>RIM; Industry Canada (CRC) </li></ul>
  15. 15. <ul><li>Four Target Areas </li></ul><ul><li>Priority research topics within: </li></ul><ul><li>Information and Communications Technologies </li></ul><ul><li>Environmental Science and Technologies </li></ul><ul><li>Manufacturing </li></ul><ul><li>Natural Resources and Energy </li></ul>Please note: Health and related life sciences and technologies will be covered under the Collaborative Health and Research Projects Program (check for program updates in March)
  16. 16. <ul><li>Focused Research </li></ul><ul><li>There are 3-8 priority research topics identified within each target area ( 80% of budget). </li></ul><ul><li>Projects that fall outside of the research topics but fit the context of the target area are termed “Exceptional Opportunities outside the research topics ” (up to 20% of budget). </li></ul><ul><li>Research outside the 4 priority target areas will not be considered for funding </li></ul>
  17. 17. <ul><li>Non-Academic Supporting Organizations </li></ul><ul><li>Private sector </li></ul><ul><li>Canadian-based companies or multi-nationals with Canadian operations (R&D or manufacturing) that can apply the research results for economic gain </li></ul><ul><li>Public sector </li></ul><ul><li>Canadian government organizations that can apply the research results to strengthen policies (the proposal must clearly show how the project relates to their public policy responsibilities) </li></ul>
  18. 18. <ul><li>Non-Academic Supporting Organizations </li></ul><ul><li>Do not qualify as the only supporting organization: </li></ul><ul><li>NGO’s, venture capitalists, government research labs, foreign research institutions, implementation sites, potential customers </li></ul>
  19. 19. <ul><li>Supporting Organizations (continued) </li></ul><ul><li>A supporting organization must also: </li></ul><ul><li>Have a demonstrated interest in the project (letters of support, in-kind contributions) </li></ul><ul><li>Be involved in all stages of the research (help to develop the proposal, interact with researchers and students, provide input to the project) </li></ul><ul><li>Validate the results of the research </li></ul><ul><li>Provide guidance concerning exploitation of results </li></ul>
  20. 20. <ul><li>International Collaborations </li></ul><ul><li>Concurrent call for joint research projects in all Target Areas </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Agence Nationale de la Recherche (France) and National Science Council (Taiwan) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Two separate but linked proposals: one submitted to each agency </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Canadian applications must meet all requirements of the SPG program </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>International agency will fund its scientists </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>NSERC has not reserved funds for applications related to international concurrent calls </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Funding is on a competitive basis within regular SPG Program budget </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Up to 3 additional pages are allowed </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>There is no joint review </li></ul></ul>
  21. 21. <ul><li>The SPG Application </li></ul><ul><li>Application for a Grant (Form 101) Parts I and II </li></ul><ul><li>Personal Data Forms (Form 100) + CVs of collaborators (6 pages max) </li></ul><ul><li>Form 183A (partner’s information and contributions) </li></ul><ul><li>Letter of support describing partner’s involvement </li></ul>
  22. 22. <ul><li>Research Proposal- Format </li></ul><ul><li>11 pages total: </li></ul><ul><li>Introduction (~1 page*) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Identify target area and research topic </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Why is the research you propose strategic and how does it address the research topic ? </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Justification for exceptional opportunity </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>For re-submissions, explain how concerns of the selection panel have been addressed  selection panel and reviewers do not see cover letters! </li></ul></ul>*suggested lengths
  23. 23. <ul><li>Research Proposal- Format </li></ul><ul><li>Objectives </li></ul><ul><li>Approach and research methodology </li></ul><ul><li>Workplan </li></ul><ul><li>Current scientific, technical, and commercial developments in the field with appropriate references </li></ul><ul><li>Expected impact on field of proposed research </li></ul><ul><li>Section 1 (~7 pages): </li></ul><ul><li>Training Plan </li></ul><ul><li>Identify roles of team members </li></ul><ul><li>Section 2 (~1 page): </li></ul>
  24. 24. <ul><li>Research Proposal- Format </li></ul><ul><li>Interactions with supporting organizations </li></ul><ul><li>Plan for knowledge and technology transfer (Intellectual Property) </li></ul><ul><li>Fit between the project objectives and priorities of supporting organization(s) </li></ul><ul><li>Section 3 (~1 page): </li></ul><ul><li>Potential benefits to Canada  economic, social, environmental </li></ul><ul><li>Potential benefits to supporting organizations </li></ul><ul><li>Section 4 (~1 page): </li></ul><ul><li>Additional pages – references ( 2 pages max ), relationship to other research, budget justification, details of in-kind contributions </li></ul>
  25. 25. <ul><li>Letter of Support- Key Points </li></ul><ul><li>Support for and agreement with the proposal </li></ul><ul><li>Reasons for being involved in the proposed collaboration </li></ul><ul><li>Anticipated benefits from project outcomes </li></ul><ul><li>Effort required to exploit results </li></ul><ul><li>Benefits to Canadian economy and the relevant timeframe </li></ul><ul><li>Anticipated interaction of personnel with the University </li></ul><ul><li>Company’s contribution to the project </li></ul><ul><li>Company profile (for small companies or start-ups) </li></ul>
  26. 26. <ul><li>Additional Points to Consider </li></ul><ul><li>Collaborations outside NSE: applicants are encouraged to collaborate with experts outside the NSE. Can represent up to 30% of the project costs. </li></ul><ul><li>Overlap of funds: the onus is on the applicant to provide as much information as to how/why the project differs from those currently funded (relationship to other support). </li></ul><ul><li>Provide as much detail as possible in your budget justification . Show all your calculations and how you arrived at totals presented. </li></ul><ul><li>Funding decisions are announced in October. This should be considered in the activity schedule and workplan. </li></ul>
  27. 27. <ul><li>Evaluation Process- Timeline </li></ul><ul><li>April 15- Submission of Applications </li></ul><ul><li>May/June- Pre-Selection, if required </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Preliminary review by target area selection committee </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Proposals with significant weaknesses are removed </li></ul></ul><ul><li>July/August- External referees </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Typically three per application </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Technical expertise to aid the Committee </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Appendix C: your suggestions </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Panel suggestions and NSERC database </li></ul></ul><ul><li>September- Selection Committee </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Proposals are assigned to three readers </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Discussion amongst the whole group </li></ul></ul><ul><li>October- Results announced </li></ul>
  28. 28. <ul><li>Evaluation Process </li></ul><ul><li>Projects are evaluated against seven criteria. </li></ul><ul><li>Each criterion is graded from 1 (lowest score) to 4 (highest score). </li></ul><ul><li>Each criterion is of equal weight. </li></ul><ul><li>Only projects that are strong in all 7 criteria are eligible for funding. </li></ul>
  29. 29. <ul><li>Selection Criteria </li></ul><ul><li>Originality of the research </li></ul><ul><li>Quality of the research </li></ul><ul><li>Project work plan </li></ul><ul><li>Quality of the applicants as researchers </li></ul><ul><li>Training potential </li></ul><ul><li>Interactions with the supporting organizations </li></ul><ul><li>Benefits to Canada and the supporting organizations </li></ul>
  30. 30. <ul><li>Selection Criteria (cont’d) </li></ul><ul><li>Originality of the Research </li></ul><ul><li>The project must promise to generate new knowledge or to apply existing knowledge in an innovative manner. </li></ul><ul><li>Quality of the Research </li></ul><ul><li>The project must be scientifically sound and technically feasible. It must fall within a specific target area. </li></ul>
  31. 31. <ul><li>Selection Criteria (cont’d) </li></ul><ul><li>Project Work Plan </li></ul><ul><li>The project must have a clear and coherent work plan that demonstrates a high probability of achieving the objectives in the proposed time frame. </li></ul><ul><li>Quality of the Applicants as Researchers </li></ul><ul><li>The research team must have all the expertise to address the defined objectives competently and to complete the project successfully. </li></ul>
  32. 32. <ul><li>Selection Criteria (cont’d) </li></ul><ul><li>Training Potential </li></ul><ul><li>The project must provide opportunities to train students and other highly qualified personnel with skills relevant to the needs of Canadian organizations. </li></ul><ul><li>Interactions with Supporting Organizations </li></ul><ul><li>The supporting organizations must have the capacity to apply the results of the research and must be actively involved in all stages of the project. </li></ul>
  33. 33. <ul><li>Selection Criteria (cont’d) </li></ul><ul><li>Benefits to Canada and Supporting Organizations </li></ul><ul><li>The proposal must identify how the work will benefit the supporting organization(s) and must demonstrate that exploitation of the research results will benefit Canada within a 10-year time frame. </li></ul>
  34. 34. <ul><li>Signs of a Good Proposal </li></ul><ul><li>All sections are clear and well described: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Clear summary, proposal easy to read </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Roles well defined (HQP, applicants …) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Benefits to Canada clearly demonstrated </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Guidelines followed and requirements addressed </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Strong partner(s): </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Involvement from the start </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Clear expectations (including IP) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Good communication </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>On-going interaction </li></ul></ul>
  35. 35. <ul><li>Top Ten Tips </li></ul><ul><li>Start early! </li></ul><ul><li>Make the application comprehensible to people outside your field and position your project within the current literature/state of the art - Literature review should not be Task 1 of project! </li></ul><ul><li>Pay full attention to all aspects of the application, not just the research proposal (i.e. budget justification, in-kind contributions, relationship to other support). </li></ul><ul><li>Make sure the partner is going to benefit actively from the research and will not just be an end user. </li></ul><ul><li>Explain the fit to the target area clearly. </li></ul>
  36. 36. <ul><li>Top Ten Tips (continued) </li></ul><ul><li>Ensure that all partners and co-applicants are fully involved. </li></ul><ul><li>Understand how your proposal will be evaluated (all criteria are equally weighted!). </li></ul><ul><li>Tailor your Form 100 to the program you are applying to. </li></ul><ul><li>Explain both the applied and basic aspects of the project. </li></ul><ul><li>Have a peer review your proposal against the program evaluation criteria. </li></ul>
  37. 37. <ul><li>Resources </li></ul>For questions relating to fit to target area, eligibility of partners or applicants or Program requirements, please send your query to: [email_address] For questions/support regarding the on-line application process, please contact: Helpdesk: (613) 995-4273 [email_address]
  38. 38. <ul><li>Questions? </li></ul>

×