Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
The Future of Digital Freedom
The Future of Digital Freedom
The Future of Digital Freedom
The Future of Digital Freedom
The Future of Digital Freedom
The Future of Digital Freedom
The Future of Digital Freedom
The Future of Digital Freedom
The Future of Digital Freedom
The Future of Digital Freedom
The Future of Digital Freedom
The Future of Digital Freedom
The Future of Digital Freedom
The Future of Digital Freedom
The Future of Digital Freedom
The Future of Digital Freedom
The Future of Digital Freedom
The Future of Digital Freedom
The Future of Digital Freedom
The Future of Digital Freedom
The Future of Digital Freedom
The Future of Digital Freedom
The Future of Digital Freedom
The Future of Digital Freedom
The Future of Digital Freedom
The Future of Digital Freedom
The Future of Digital Freedom
The Future of Digital Freedom
The Future of Digital Freedom
The Future of Digital Freedom
The Future of Digital Freedom
The Future of Digital Freedom
The Future of Digital Freedom
The Future of Digital Freedom
The Future of Digital Freedom
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

The Future of Digital Freedom

8,524

Published on

Published in: Technology
3 Comments
3 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Thanks Jamison!

    Hopefully the 'open' world can do its part in preventing an Idiocracy like future scenario coming to pass, though that flick's [ab]use of current brands is pretty funny.
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  • handjob part of idiocracy
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s-6zA39_0aw
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  • cool presentation, its interesting in the film called idiocracy

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C1sE1E3z7jU

    that star bucks ends up being a place where people get hand jobs... id don't agree with the general idea behind the film... as i reckon people have/deserve equal opportunity... birth rights has nothing to do with it.. i spose thats my point about star bucks though.
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
No Downloads
Views
Total Views
8,524
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
8
Comments
3
Likes
3
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. <ul><ul><li>FSCONS </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Göteborg </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>2008-10-25 </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>The Future of </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Digital Freedom </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Mike Linksvayer </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Creative Commons </li></ul></ul>
  • 2. Original photo by Brooke Novak · Licensed under CC BY · http://flickr.com/photos/brookenovak/337889974/ I AM NOT A
  • 3. ... and this is a little far afield from a normal CC presentation. The most important (and CC-relevant) takeaway is that building the commons now is critical to the future of digital freedom.
  • 4. Example threats and fears
  • 5. Cyber terrorism
  • 6. Cyber terrorism (Cyber terror war on)
  • 7. Cyber terrorism (Cyber terror war on) Privacy breaches
  • 8. Cyber terrorism (Cyber terror war on) Privacy breaches Loss of Generativity
  • 9. Cyber terrorism (Cyber terror war on) Privacy breaches Loss of Generativity Lock-in
  • 10. Cyber terrorism (Cyber terror war on) Privacy breaches Loss of Generativity Lock-in Surveillance
  • 11. Cyber terrorism (Cyber terror war on) Privacy breaches Loss of Generativity Lock-in Surveillance DRM
  • 12. Cyber terrorism (Cyber terror war on) Privacy breaches Loss of Generativity Lock-in Surveillance DRM Censorship
  • 13. Cyber terrorism (Cyber terror war on) Privacy breaches Loss of Generativity Lock-in Surveillance DRM Censorship Suppression of innovation
  • 14. Cyber terrorism (Cyber terror war on) Privacy breaches Loss of Generativity Lock-in Surveillance DRM Censorship Suppression of innovation Electoral fraud
  • 15. Threat categories <ul><li>Legitimate security issues </li></ul><ul><li>Protectionism </li></ul><ul><li>Politics and power </li></ul><ul><li>Security theater and fear-based responses (driven by all of above, not just legitimate security issues) </li></ul>
  • 16. What is digital freedom? <ul><li>Keep same rights online/digitally that we (should anyway) have offline/IRL </li></ul><ul><li>Permit innovation and participation enabled by digital world even if not possible before (probably follows from above) </li></ul>
  • 17. How building the commons (free software, free culture, and friends) helps
  • 18. Security <ul><li>Data shows FLOSS is more secure </li></ul><ul><li>Security through obscurity doesn’t work </li></ul><ul><li>FLOSS encourages a heterogeneous computing environment </li></ul><ul><li>Free software and free culture both allergic to DRM and other mechanisms that sacrifice security to other goals </li></ul>
  • 19. Protectionism <ul><li>Peer production undermines policy arguments for protecting knowledge industries </li></ul><ul><li>Free software and free culture both allergic to DRM </li></ul>
  • 20. Politics and power <ul><li>Free software and culture improve transparency </li></ul><ul><li>... and the ability of all to participate </li></ul><ul><li>Peer production works against concentrated power — doesn’t require concentrated production structures and lowers barriers to entry </li></ul>
  • 21. Security theater and fear <ul><li>Access to facts mitigates fear and allows rational evaluation of responses </li></ul><ul><li>Commons work against three previous threats that drive security theater and fear </li></ul>
  • 22. What about network services? The Commons Lost ? <ul><li>No access to source code of web applications ( none of the four freedoms!) </li></ul><ul><li>Application, data, content, even identifiers, all available at the whim of service provider </li></ul><ul><li>Non-transparent, security through obscurity </li></ul><ul><li>Subject to centralized failure, state meddling </li></ul>
  • 23. Autonomy in a network services environment <ul><li>Network application providers should publish source code of running application under a free license </li></ul><ul><li>Collaboratively created content should be available under a free license </li></ul><ul><li>Private data should be available for on-demand export </li></ul><ul><li>Possibly most explicit linkage of free software and free culture yet </li></ul>
  • 24. Network services freedom: early efforts <ul><li>AGPL </li></ul><ul><li>Franklin Street Declaration </li></ul><ul><li>Open Software Service Definition </li></ul><ul><li>Example compliant applications: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Wikipedia (!) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Identi.ca </li></ul></ul><ul><li>See http://autonomo.us for ongoing discussion </li></ul>
  • 25. Some network services open issues <ul><li>Governance of centralized services? </li></ul><ul><li>To what extent are completely decentralized services required to maintain freedom? </li></ul><ul><li>Much more experience is required! </li></ul>
  • 26. Photo by RocketRaccoon · Licensed under CC BY · http://flickr.com/photos/rocketraccoon/227241974/
  • 27. Nagging question relevant to the development of digital freedom over last ~10 years: To what extent has the attempt to suppress P2P negatively impacted the development of completely decentralized applications, shaped “Web 2.0”, and added to the network services challenge?
  • 28. Can the success of the (digital) commons alter how we view freedom and power generally?
  • 29. <ul><li>“The gate that has held the movements for equalization of human beings strictly in a dilemma between ineffectiveness and violence has now been opened. The reason is that we have shifted to a zero marginal cost world. As steel is replaced by software, more and more of the value in society becomes non-rivalrous: it can be held by many without costing anybody more than if it is held by a few.” </li></ul><ul><li>Eben Moglen </li></ul>
  • 30. <ul><li>“If we don’t want to live in a jungle, we must change our attitudes. We must start sending the message that a good citizen is one who cooperates when appropriate, not one who is successful at taking from others.” </li></ul><ul><li>Richard Stallman </li></ul>
  • 31. &nbsp;
  • 32. What is the future of digital freedom? <ul><li>I don’t know </li></ul><ul><li>Have a good idea of what we need to do to make it a good future </li></ul><ul><li>It is truly wonderful that creating free software and free culture has a side effect of facilitating [digital] freedom </li></ul>
  • 33. So Create! (and learn/experience so you can teach/recommend free software and free culture when appropriate)
  • 34. You Can Also Give Money :-) http://support.creativecommons.org
  • 35. Building the commons is key to the future of digital freedom <ul><li>Politicians and corporations are unimaginative ... they need to see solutions, or they react in fear </li></ul><ul><li>A dominant commons makes many closed net scenarios much less likely </li></ul><ul><li>Presentation Lic ense ... http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ </li></ul><ul><li>Attribution ... Author: Mike Linksvayer; Link: http://creativecommons.org </li></ul><ul><li>Questions? ... ml@creativecommons.org </li></ul>

×