The Future of Digital Freedom
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Like this? Share it with your network

Share
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
  • Thanks Jamison!

    Hopefully the 'open' world can do its part in preventing an Idiocracy like future scenario coming to pass, though that flick's [ab]use of current brands is pretty funny.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
  • handjob part of idiocracy
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s-6zA39_0aw
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
  • cool presentation, its interesting in the film called idiocracy

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C1sE1E3z7jU

    that star bucks ends up being a place where people get hand jobs... id don't agree with the general idea behind the film... as i reckon people have/deserve equal opportunity... birth rights has nothing to do with it.. i spose thats my point about star bucks though.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
11,291
On Slideshare
11,291
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0

Actions

Shares
Downloads
8
Comments
3
Likes
3

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1.
      • FSCONS
      • Göteborg
      • 2008-10-25
      • The Future of
      • Digital Freedom
      • Mike Linksvayer
      • Creative Commons
  • 2. Original photo by Brooke Novak · Licensed under CC BY · http://flickr.com/photos/brookenovak/337889974/ I AM NOT A
  • 3. ... and this is a little far afield from a normal CC presentation. The most important (and CC-relevant) takeaway is that building the commons now is critical to the future of digital freedom.
  • 4. Example threats and fears
  • 5. Cyber terrorism
  • 6. Cyber terrorism (Cyber terror war on)
  • 7. Cyber terrorism (Cyber terror war on) Privacy breaches
  • 8. Cyber terrorism (Cyber terror war on) Privacy breaches Loss of Generativity
  • 9. Cyber terrorism (Cyber terror war on) Privacy breaches Loss of Generativity Lock-in
  • 10. Cyber terrorism (Cyber terror war on) Privacy breaches Loss of Generativity Lock-in Surveillance
  • 11. Cyber terrorism (Cyber terror war on) Privacy breaches Loss of Generativity Lock-in Surveillance DRM
  • 12. Cyber terrorism (Cyber terror war on) Privacy breaches Loss of Generativity Lock-in Surveillance DRM Censorship
  • 13. Cyber terrorism (Cyber terror war on) Privacy breaches Loss of Generativity Lock-in Surveillance DRM Censorship Suppression of innovation
  • 14. Cyber terrorism (Cyber terror war on) Privacy breaches Loss of Generativity Lock-in Surveillance DRM Censorship Suppression of innovation Electoral fraud
  • 15. Threat categories
    • Legitimate security issues
    • Protectionism
    • Politics and power
    • Security theater and fear-based responses (driven by all of above, not just legitimate security issues)
  • 16. What is digital freedom?
    • Keep same rights online/digitally that we (should anyway) have offline/IRL
    • Permit innovation and participation enabled by digital world even if not possible before (probably follows from above)
  • 17. How building the commons (free software, free culture, and friends) helps
  • 18. Security
    • Data shows FLOSS is more secure
    • Security through obscurity doesn’t work
    • FLOSS encourages a heterogeneous computing environment
    • Free software and free culture both allergic to DRM and other mechanisms that sacrifice security to other goals
  • 19. Protectionism
    • Peer production undermines policy arguments for protecting knowledge industries
    • Free software and free culture both allergic to DRM
  • 20. Politics and power
    • Free software and culture improve transparency
    • ... and the ability of all to participate
    • Peer production works against concentrated power — doesn’t require concentrated production structures and lowers barriers to entry
  • 21. Security theater and fear
    • Access to facts mitigates fear and allows rational evaluation of responses
    • Commons work against three previous threats that drive security theater and fear
  • 22. What about network services? The Commons Lost ?
    • No access to source code of web applications ( none of the four freedoms!)
    • Application, data, content, even identifiers, all available at the whim of service provider
    • Non-transparent, security through obscurity
    • Subject to centralized failure, state meddling
  • 23. Autonomy in a network services environment
    • Network application providers should publish source code of running application under a free license
    • Collaboratively created content should be available under a free license
    • Private data should be available for on-demand export
    • Possibly most explicit linkage of free software and free culture yet
  • 24. Network services freedom: early efforts
    • AGPL
    • Franklin Street Declaration
    • Open Software Service Definition
    • Example compliant applications:
      • Wikipedia (!)
      • Identi.ca
    • See http://autonomo.us for ongoing discussion
  • 25. Some network services open issues
    • Governance of centralized services?
    • To what extent are completely decentralized services required to maintain freedom?
    • Much more experience is required!
  • 26. Photo by RocketRaccoon · Licensed under CC BY · http://flickr.com/photos/rocketraccoon/227241974/
  • 27. Nagging question relevant to the development of digital freedom over last ~10 years: To what extent has the attempt to suppress P2P negatively impacted the development of completely decentralized applications, shaped “Web 2.0”, and added to the network services challenge?
  • 28. Can the success of the (digital) commons alter how we view freedom and power generally?
  • 29.
    • “The gate that has held the movements for equalization of human beings strictly in a dilemma between ineffectiveness and violence has now been opened. The reason is that we have shifted to a zero marginal cost world. As steel is replaced by software, more and more of the value in society becomes non-rivalrous: it can be held by many without costing anybody more than if it is held by a few.”
    • Eben Moglen
  • 30.
    • “If we don’t want to live in a jungle, we must change our attitudes. We must start sending the message that a good citizen is one who cooperates when appropriate, not one who is successful at taking from others.”
    • Richard Stallman
  • 31.  
  • 32. What is the future of digital freedom?
    • I don’t know
    • Have a good idea of what we need to do to make it a good future
    • It is truly wonderful that creating free software and free culture has a side effect of facilitating [digital] freedom
  • 33. So Create! (and learn/experience so you can teach/recommend free software and free culture when appropriate)
  • 34. You Can Also Give Money :-) http://support.creativecommons.org
  • 35. Building the commons is key to the future of digital freedom
    • Politicians and corporations are unimaginative ... they need to see solutions, or they react in fear
    • A dominant commons makes many closed net scenarios much less likely
    • Presentation Lic ense ... http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
    • Attribution ... Author: Mike Linksvayer; Link: http://creativecommons.org
    • Questions? ... ml@creativecommons.org