Mass Collaboration [Policy]: What, Why, and Choices

0 views

Published on

Published in: Art & Photos
0 Comments
1 Like
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total views
0
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
5
Comments
0
Likes
1
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Mass Collaboration [Policy]: What, Why, and Choices

  1. 1. Mass Collaboration [Policy]:What, Why, and Choices 1620 2012 1605 Mike Linksvayer (@mlinksva) CODATA2012 / Taipei 2012-10-30 1
  2. 2. Intellectual Provenance ? 2
  3. 3. easy to get hung up on vulgar policy,eg licensingthink broadly about what, where, ends 3
  4. 4. what is a mass collaboration dataproject? x: latent / explicit y: distributed / centralized z: crowdsourced / collaborative …: ... 4
  5. 5. consider location of “science” “semantic web” freebase musicbrainz openstreetmap wikidata dbpedia zooniverse ... 5
  6. 6. what is a mass collaboration datapolicy? 6
  7. 7. restrictions & permissionstry to be Open; use terms otherprojects do; if you have to think, publicdomain for max donor, copyleft [lookagain at nearby projects] for maxrecipient, but also possibly be bold,assume facts are free... 7
  8. 8. “IP” never the ideal answerpoor substitute for other regulation... 8
  9. 9. ...privacy, security, integritypublic licenses dull instruments forthese legitimate objectiveswhen so used overly restrictive,incompatible 9
  10. 10. ...transparency, replicability,modifiabilitycopyleft!part copyright etc neutralization, partregulatorywholesome goalsbeware FUD, incompatibility 10
  11. 11. explicit+centralized+collaborative= evinces need for public licenses likenothing else 11
  12. 12. governanceof what?depends on location in each dimension 12
  13. 13. software to facilitate masscollaboration, egwikis~source controlsemantic stuff 13
  14. 14. data management 14
  15. 15. consider key ~policy choices (so far)made by a couple of aforementionedprojects 15
  16. 16. at what level should “policy” beconsidered (depends...)internationaljurisdicitoninstitutionalstandardsprojectindividual contributor 16
  17. 17. some things to desire (~ends) frommass collaboration projects (thus toconsider in “policy”)curationprovenancedata improvement, normalization...innovation/disruption/not imaginedusesorientation toward public good 17
  18. 18. at least 3 methods of promoting andprotecting commonslaw&policybuildingextralegaleach has reactionary and progressiveaspects 18
  19. 19. buildingfree knowledge & software invalidatesassumptions of, mitigates, and buildsconstituency against bad policyeach contribution to a commons is astrike against bad policy and dystopianfuture; that’s something to celebrateand proclaim! 19
  20. 20. imagine a world in which Wikipedia isnot unusual:where mass collaboration obtains...disruptive innovationsuperior “product”greater equalitygreater freedom...in all of the most crucial humanenterprises 20
  21. 21. links: convey yourself togondwanaland.com/mlog@mlinksva 21 K✳0♡

×