Sakai 3 Boston

Friday Session Notes
9:30-10:30am College of the Redwoods - World's fastest Sakai deployment?
Formerly Radford
Don’t forget about the closing remarks at 3:15
Room Notes
Empress is on 14th Floor
Charles View is on 16th Floor

Sakai 3What and why and when and how?
March 2009
Michael Korcuska

Why Sakai 3?
Functionality & User Experience
Technology and Developer Experience
Community Practices and Culture

Why Sakai 3 Now?
The time to repair the roof is when the sun is shining.
John F. Kennedy

User perspective
Why Sakai 3?

Sakai 3 for Users
Changing expectations
Google docs/apps, Social Networking, Web 2.0
Success of project sites = Sakai beyond courses
New technologies
Standards-based, open source projects
JCR (Jackrabbit)
Open Social (Shindig)
Client-side programming
JavaScript/AJAX
6

Content Tagging & Management
Sakai 3 Themes
7
Content Authoring
Academic Networking
Breaking the Site Boundary
Academic Workflows, not (just) Tools
The unSakai

Content Authoring
Content Basics:
Simple page creation (wiki-like)
WYSIWG Editing
Template-based authoring
Versioning
Interactive Widgets
8

Tagging & Management
Everything is content
Classic “resources”
Discussion post, user profile, test questions
Taggable, searchable, linkable, portable
Unified content repository
Content not tied to site
Everything in one storage area
BUT: Sakai is not a full Content Management System
9

Sakai2
?
Site B
Site A
Users find things by remembering what site they added it to
10

Sakai3
Tags: System, Organizational & User
Smart Folders
Search
11

Benefits
Web 2.0 “search” interaction supported
Tagging & content search
Smart Folders retain hierarchical structure if desired
Folders for each site, each user and more
Portfolio and other “cross-site” needs
Tags allow simple aggregation of diverse content
Organizational & User tag systems support multiple portfolio requirements
12

Academic Networking
Academic Networking
People are important, but “friends” aren’t enough
Content-based – Who is reading the same articles?
Activity based – Who has taken the same classes?
13
Content
People

Sakai 2: Users & Sites
14
Site A
Site B
User 1
User 2
User 3
User 4
User 5
.
.
.
User N
User 1
User 2
User 3
User 4
User 5
.
.
.
User N
Group B1
Group A1
Users and groups exist within the context of a site.

Sakai 3 Groups & Sites
Groups & Sites managed separately
Member of a group – People with something in common
Access to a site– Collection of content & functionality
Support for hierarchy
Site A
Group 1
Group 1.1
Site AA
Site AB
Site B
Group 1.2
Group 2
Site C
Group 3
15

Kernel
Tool
Architecture
16
Kernel
Service
Tool
Tool
Service
Service
Kernel
Service
Service
Tool
Tool
Service
Tool
Facilitates independent tool development
Resists intuitive workflows
Contributes to inconsistent user experience

Architecture
17
Kernel
Workflow
Kernel
Service
Workflow
Workflow
Service
Service
Kernel
Service
Service
Workflow
Workflow
Service
Services need to respond to more customers
UX oversight is more complicated
Workflows built across services
Encourages presentation & service separation
Workflow

Academic Workflow
Beyond Tool Silos
Academic work flows often cross tool boundaries
Anything can be graded!
Anything can be discussed!
This is beginning to appear in Sakai 2
Examples: Open Syllabus, Assignments 2
But it is too difficult and more needs to be done
Example: Instructor puts into syllabus an assignment to create a discussionpost that will be graded.
4 tools for both instructors and students!
18

Workflow Example
19
Select text & click “Create Assignment”
All
Media
Images
Videos
Audio
Forums
Tests
Site Pages
Polls
Jackson Response Forum (3 posts)
Create Assignment…
Name: Jackson Reading Response
Due Date: September 10, 2009
Points: 10 (of 150)
Type: Individual
Description: Respond to the Jackson article in no more than 500 words. Post that response to the class discussion forum.
Link To: Select...
Class Intro Forum (27 posts)
Forums
Edit Assignment Information
Some Other Forum (0 posts)
Create
Cancel
Advanced Options…
Link to Something
Choose
New…

Student View
20
Assignment: Jackson Reading Response
Due Date: September 10, 2009 ( due tomorrow)
Status: Not submitted
Points: 10 possible (of 150).
Description: Respond to the Jackson article in no more than 500 words. Post that response to the class discussion forum. Read more…
Link(s): Jackson Response Discussion Forum (Create Post…)

Student View, Graded
21
Assignment: Jackson Reading Response
Due Date: September 10, 2009 (due date passed)
Status: Submitted and Graded
Points: 9/10 (of 150). View feedback
Description: Respond to the Jackson article in no more than 500 words. Post that response to the class discussion forum. Read more…
Link(s): Jackson Response Discussion Forum (go to Forum now)

The unSakai
Multiple Configurations
Sakai as CMS
Sakai as Collaboration System
Sakai as Portfolio System
Sakai Integrations
Google Applications
Social Networks (Open Social, Facebook)
22

The unSakai
23
Kernel
Service
Service
Service
iGoogle
Facebook
Kernel
Service
Service
Service
Documented data feeds allow Sakai to appear anywhere
Mobile Apps
Windows/Mac Widgets

unSakai Economics
We want to position Sakai for a transition to the “we don’t need no stinking LMS”
We don’t care about “owning” the enterprise
We aren’t afraid of eroding license fees because other applications take over “core LMS” features

Sakai 3 Demo
http://3akai.sakaifoundation.org
25

Sakai 3 Technology
Why Sakai 3?

Sakai 3 Technology Goals
Scalability
Remove bottlenecks from Sakai 2
Improve cluster support
Developer Productivity
Faster builds
UX & back-end development separated
Code Quality & Maintenance
Reliance on other open source efforts
Increase unit testing
Easier to install/build
To improve initial experience for new developers
27

JCR as Content Store
Standards-based
JSR 170
Ships with Apache Jackrabbit, but can be changed
Everything as content
Discussion post, User profile information, etc.
Components put Content into JCR Content store
Sakai Kernel creates relational indices in DB
Component doesn’t need to do anything
Automatic tracking of most events by kernel
28

The Point
Don’t write our own code
Criteria:
Functionality
License-compatible open source
Open standard
Approachable community

JSON
Sakai Kernel supports JSON microformat
Components use REST calls to interact with Kernel
Again, standards based
JAX-RS currently in Kernel (JSR 311)
Benefits
Back-end services stay Java-based
UX programmers more often skilled in JavaScript
Easier UX developers can work on Sakai
Tools like GWT can be used for Java-based UI
Components can be written using other languages
30

Timelines and adoption

Timelines
32
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Sakai 2.5
Sakai 2.6
Sakai 2.7
Hybrid
Mode
Sakai 3.0
Official Releases
Previews
Sakai 2.8?

New Adoptions: 2 or 3?
It Depends!
Of Course
On what?
Your production timeline
Your appetite for running “.0” software
Your functional needs

Adopting 2 or 3?
2.6 or 2.7
Sakai 2 works well today
3 doesn’t exist yet
The best path to 3 will be through 2
Bb/WebCT migration to 3 is undefined
Bb/WebCT migration to 2 is well known
Many will be migrating from Sakai 2 to 3
Straight to 3
You don’t have a CMS or you are using something like SharePoint
Your production timeline is 2012 or later

Adopting 2 or 3?
Maybe the wrong question
Adopt both!
Hybrid mode
Sakai 2 for courses, Sakai 3 for project collaboration
Gradually move users to Sakai 3

Community Practices

Community Practices
Functional Leadership
Design First
Minimize Technology Frameworks
Quality Focused
Unit (and other) Tests

Get involved!

Sakai 3 Boston

by Michael Korcuska on Jul 13, 2009

Accessibility

Categories

Tags

Upload Details

Usage Rights

1 Embed 1

Statistics

Sakai 3 Boston — Presentation Transcript