Andrea Crampton Twsia

Sakai and its application to teaching forensic science across geography, time, profession and generation divides.
Dr. Andrea Crampton
Charles Sturt University
Australia

How to use Sakai and contemporary pedagogy to construct an industry relevant dynamic learning environment.

FSC 200- Introduction to Forensic Science
Courses Served
BMedSc/BForensicBiotech; Bachelor of Policing; BMedSci/BBiotech(Med-App); BPolicing(Investigations); BSc; Bachelor of Arts; BForensicBiotech
Enrolments
2007 : 37 ;7 Internal (AV age 19.5), 30 Distance (AV age 31.7)
2008 : 27 all distance

My Aim
Utilise the knowledge and skills of the experienced students in the class
Maximise student exposure to different ways in which the same information is viewed by those with a different background and with different career aspirations within the field
Promote the development of key teamwork skills
Encourage deeper learning

Pedagogical Approach
Constructionists
Guide on the side, student centred, active learning

Content Delivery
Text book – Jackson and Jackson : Forensic Science.
Lectures – live and virtual
Podcasts – Interviews with industry members
Wiki –News, tutorials and class records (fingerprint patterns)
All hosted on CSU version of Sakai called Interact

FSC 200 – Sakai Site

Tool + Aim
Scenario driven group assessment
9 teams of 4-5 students
Each team own Interact Site
Each team member given a role – “scripting”
FOA, SOCO, Lab Tech, Lab Manager

The Scenario
Assessment 1 – Define role
Scenario given to FOA
Assessment 2- Action within role and communication with group
Break in Case -2nd scene/suspect
Roles suspended, one team
Group forensic report written as wiki

A 2008 Group Page

How The Tools Were Actually Used
Chat
736 messages in 3 months
Asynchronous and Synchronous
7/9 groups at least 1 synchronous session
36 hr 38 mins synchronous
76% 8am-5pm

Asynchronous
Distance – 24 messages/ student
Internal – 13 messages/student

Group Forensic Report
Wiki
Tech Savy
Tech proficient
Tech phobic

I loved it, but what about the students?
Evaluation, use and perceptions
Reflective essay as last assessment item
Official evaluations
Comments made in chat or sent via email

Official Evaluations

Interact In Their Words!
ST1 “having the opportunity to see the benefits of Interact such as easy access to class material and the feeling of actually having constant lecturer support through the use of the announcements and results of section was a great learning experience which will hopefully be useful in the years to come.”

ST2 ”it gave direct and personal contact via the forums (chat room) to both your group participants and lecture, which I found terrific. As a group the three of us could converse directly to learn from what others were addressing in the group chat room and post our concerns. So for me it was a great Condit to other students both on-campus and DE.”
EV1 Interact was fantastic. It was so easy to use (once you knew how) and it was so easy to communicate with fellow students and academic staff. It made life a lot easier.

The Scenario/Constructionist Approach
ST3“Another advantage of doing this activity as a group is that by interaction with other students in the subject we were able to gain a greater understanding of the area forensics. …. By working with students who are already involved in the area we were able to learn things that they knew and apply them to our investigation”

ST4“Group work is an effective means of learning especially for those times when I found myself clueless. As forensic scientists interact with the police force and the legal Court of Justice’s group work gave me an inside of the real world it gave me an opportunity to learn how to adjust and respect individual differences. The activity was indeed fun and educational and are very good interactive tool for learning forensic science.”
ST5” this group activity has taught me a great deal about both working in a forensic team and in a team in general. And then how much a forensic investigation relies on teamwork and trust between its members that everyone will adequate play their part. Is not only applies in a forensic team but any team. I also learned how to manage my time effectively when trying to fit in with four other people. Is important for me to have my work in on time as the others in the group relying on my work to allow them to do theirs”

Summary: Evaluation Rubric
Communication and collaboration
30% of student assessment required ongoing communication and collaboration.
Students were given the opportunity to reflect on their actions when the group came together and peer learning and feedback was encouraged.

Learning Material
Subject outline was provided in print and online and include a table showing which role had to do what when.
Virtual tutorial using screen capture was created to guide students in how to set up and contribute to a wiki.

Learning outcomes and assessment
Student – faculty contact
Chat in teams and general page
Phone and email
Encourages cooperation among students
Team work based
Facilitated peer learning
Each student had level of responsibility to other students
Encourages active learning
Enabled students to connect theory with practice and discussion different views on choice of actions
Prompt feedback
From team members on regular basis and as part of formal procedures
From lecturer in response to emailed questions as well as the lecturer joining team chat sessions

Learning outcomes and assessment
Emphasizes time on task
Needed to meet deadlines to ensure other team members could do their work
Time allocated was proportional to value of the task
Incorporation of life experiences and prior knowledge was facilitate for the benefit of the individual and their team.
Communication of high expectations
It was actually the student’s own drive to not let the team down that created an environment of high expectations
Quality of work produced exceeded lecturer expectations
Respect diverse talents and ways of learning
Content was provided as both text and audio
Encouraging peer learning gave all opportunity to demonstrate their strengths and use them for the benefit of others.
Teams with mixed backgrounds ensured all experienced what different talents could bring to a project

Course look and fell and web usability
Consistency in tool use and presentation in both general page and team pages.
Tool bars and tables of content linking wiki pages were used to promote easy access to all areas.

Learner support
The instructor was available on a daily basis by email or phone
Institutional tech support was available 24 hours a day 7 days a week
Regular visits to each team site enabled identification of issues and potential problems early and thus facilitate introduction of preventive measure.

But Did It Work
ST6 ”I felt that due to my previous involvement in criminal investigations and court procedures I was able to contribute heavily in this respect. I was however surprised that I was so willing to spend time and effort to share my knowledge with the group. Hopefully this interaction has assisted in the overall learning effort of the team. “

Acknowledgements
Assoc Prof. Lyn Angel and Dr. Heather Cavanagh
CSU technical support and Interact pilot trial team
Prof. Ross Chambers and Dr. John Harper
Members of the School of Biomedical Sciences and School of Humanities and Social Sciences
The Students of FSC 200

Andrea Crampton Twsia

by Michael Korcuska on Jul 09, 2009

Accessibility

Categories

Tags

Upload Details

Usage Rights

1 Embed 3

Statistics

Andrea Crampton Twsia — Presentation Transcript