• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Conway learning cop-ies02

Conway learning cop-ies02






Total Views
Views on SlideShare
Embed Views



0 Embeds 0

No embeds



Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Conway learning cop-ies02 Conway learning cop-ies02 Document Transcript

    • This article was downloaded by: [University College Cork]On: 7 October 2008Access details: Access Details: [subscription number 785045793]Publisher RoutledgeInforma Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House,37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Irish Educational Studies Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t716100713 Learning in communities of practice: Rethinking teaching and learning in disadvantaged contexts Paul F. Conway a a College Lecturer in the Education Department, University College, Cork Online Publication Date: 01 December 2002To cite this Article Conway, Paul F.(2002)Learning in communities of practice: Rethinking teaching and learning in disadvantagedcontexts,Irish Educational Studies,21:3,61 — 91To link to this Article: DOI: 10.1080/0332331020210308URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0332331020210308 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLEFull terms and conditions of use: http://www.informaworld.com/terms-and-conditions-of-access.pdfThis article may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial orsystematic reproduction, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply ordistribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden.The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contentswill be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae and drug dosesshould be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss,actions, claims, proceedings, demand or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directlyor indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.
    • Irish Educational Studies, Vol. 21, No. 3, Winter, 2002 61 LEARNING IN COMMUNITIES OF PRACTICE: RETHINKING TEACHING AND LEARNING IN DISADVANTAGED CONTEXTS Paul F. Conway Introduction A well-documented finding across many educational cultures is that students in disadvantaged communities have less challenging pedagogical and curricular experiences than their counterparts in moreDownloaded By: [University College Cork] At: 18:00 7 October 2008 advantaged contexts. This paper makes a case for the relevance of new ideas about cognition and learning for rethinking teaching and learning in disadvantaged contexts in the light of efforts to promote more active learning by students in primary and secondary education. Even though there has been an emphasis on the promotion of active student engagement in the learning process at primary level since the advent of the "New Curriculum" (Ireland, 1971) and more recently, in the last decade, at second-level, research suggests that teaching focuses predominantly on lower order thinking (Shiel, Forde and Morgan, 1996). This paper has four sections. First, I note the persistence of educational disadvantage despite impressive advances in the education system as a whole, and then discuss what some commentators see as the relative dominance of technical and transmission oriented discourse in relation to pedagogy in Irish education. Second, I outline some of the findings internationally and in Ireland on the school experiences of disadvantaged students and argue that their pedagogical experiences in Ireland are characterised by an emphasis on low-order thinking and a persistent assumption of the solo or individual learner - like their more advantaged counterparts. Furthermore, there is some evidence that students labeled disadvantaged may experience diminished curricular and pedagogical experiences - unlike their advantaged counterparts. In the third section of the paper, I outline the assumptions underpinning behavioural and cognitive perspectives on learning and cognition. Drawing on the work of Brown (Brown, 1994; Brown, 1997a), Rogoff et al. (1996), and Lave and Wenger (1991) and others, I compare the behavioural and cognitive positions with the fundamental assumptions of emergent socio-cultural perspectives on cognition and learning with a focus on the socio-cultural position as a powerful model on which to base initiatives to address educational disadvantage. Ideas such as
    • 62 Irish Educational Studies, Vol. 21, No. 3, Winter 2002 "situated cognition", "distributed cognition", and "communities of practice" may present an even more fundamental shift than that between the behaviourist and cognitive views of learning. The final section of the paper addresses the implications of these new views of learning and cognition for students in educationally disadvantaged settings. The many notable and impressive achievements of the Irish education system over the last forty years are an important preface to the critique of Irish educational discourse and practice in this paper. Among these notable achievements are: "the epoch making" impact of the Investment in Education report (Lynch, 1998), the overall increase in the capacity of the education system as well as the rise in overallDownloaded By: [University College Cork] At: 18:00 7 October 2008 attainment rates (Fitzgerald, 1998), the improvement in curricular opportunities for both girls and boys, the significant increases in public expenditure on primary, secondary and third level education as well as the overall increase in expenditure on education as a percentage of Exchequer expenditure (Thomhill, 1998), the vast increase in the range of areas of study at third level, developments in both pre- and in-service teacher education, and the provision of well qualified graduates to foster social and economic well-being (Coolahan, 1994; Hyland, 1998). Despite these watershed developments, educational disadvantage persists (Hyland, 1998; McCormack, 1998) and Irish society is becoming more rather than less inequitable (Breen and Whelan, 1996; Lynch and Lodge, 2002). Thus, while the education system has in many respects been an effective agent of social and economic change in Irish society it has been considerably less effective in combating long standing societal inequalities. In addressing these persistent problems, I make a case for a greater interrogation of the assumptions about learning underpinning various pedagogical practices, aware that neither classroom practices nor the education system writ large are wholly responsible for educational disadvantage. However, the education system does play an important, albeit contested, role in reinforcing or challenging long-standing patterns of social reproduction. The potential influence of some system features and how they contribute to educational disadvantage and social inequality has received some attention while others have not. It is to this imbalance in attention I now turn. Debate on pedagogy in Irish education? Various commentators have highlighted how Irish educational discourse has been notable in its inattention to and resistance to
    • Irish Educational Studies, Vol. 21, No. 3, Winter, 2002 63 problematize curricular concerns regardless as to whether students are viewed as advantaged or disadvantaged. What I mean by curriculum here, in a similar fashion to the use of curriculum in the White Paper on Education, is not only what subject matter is taught, but also how and why, and its impact on students (Gleeson, 1998). Drawing on Habermas framework for understanding knowledge-constitutive activities in society, Gleeson (1998) has critiqued the dominance of technical discourse in Irish education to the relative exclusion of practical or emancipatory dialogue. Similarly, Callan (1997), commenting in the context of second-level curriculum initiatives, has pointed out the technical nature of concerns with the dominance of class size (1998) and access to resources as issues, to the relativeDownloaded By: [University College Cork] At: 18:00 7 October 2008 exclusion of more reflexive discourses examining the ideological bases of preferred beliefs and classroom teaching practices. Similarly, Gleeson (1998) laments the dominance of power and control issues in the 1990s post National Education Convention (Coolahan,1994), Green (Ireland, 1992), and White paper (Ireland, 1995) debates to the relative exclusion of curricular issues. Despite the dominance of a technical discourse, a considerable body of critiques and position papers on Irish education emerged in the 1990s both in anticipation of and response to changes in the education system (e.g. (Hogan, 1995; Gleeson, 1998; McCormack, 1998) and CMRS/CORI publications (CORI, 1992; CORI, 1998). While the range of issues addressed in this body of literature is beyond the scope of this paper, the focus was primarily on the system-level issues such as certification, selection, assessment (examinations mainly) rather than classroom practices. While these debates clearly recognize the education system as a site for the partial perpetuation or redress of inequality, they nevertheless veil pedagogical practices as a site in the brokerage of inequality/equality. As such, the moment-to-moment transactions between students, teachers and curriculum have received insufficient attention in various efforts to address educational disadvantage. In sum, conflict and debate about pedagogical and curricular concerns (i.e. what is taught, how and why it is taught and its impact) remains marginal in both educational research and debates on educational disadvantage. While there has been some debate, as noted by Gleeson (1998), about history and health and personal education, these are exceptions. Conspicuously missing from the 1990s, in contrast to the power and control discourse, was rigorous critical engagement and reflection on the nature of whose knowledge is taught, how and why it is taught and its impact on disadvantaged students. Consequently, the classroom in Irish education remains largely a secret garden.
    • 64 Irish Educational Studies, Vol. 21, No. 3, Winter 2002 The OECD (OECD, 1991) review of Irish education raised serious concern about the dominance and widespread prevalence of a transmission model of teaching, low level cognitive demands in classroom teaching, and low levels of pupil involvement in the learning process in Irish schools. What is unclear from the OECD report is the extent to which transmission oriented teaching was or is more prevalent in educationally disadvantaged schools. Without leaving much doubt as to impressions of the examiners the report (OECD 1991, p. 55) concluded that: The face...Irish schools present to the world is quite recognisably that of previous generations. There is aDownloaded By: [University College Cork] At: 18:00 7 October 2008 growing dissonance between it and the development of the learning sciences and modern teaching technologies that require a very different approach ... Co-operative (team) teaching and non-instructional forms of learning have not been conspicuous elements in determining design and layout in the past. Drawing upon this OECD report Callan (1997) noted that "the reality of school-learning can be profiled with such descriptors as "primarily didactic in nature, the teacher is the primary initiator, students work alone; lessons are structured around content with a focus on factual content; little or no small group problem solving approaches; little use of computer/video technology". Subsequently, the goal of active learning has become a more central feature of educational documents in Ireland over the last decade as reflected in both the National Education Convention Report (Coolahan, 1994) and in various curriculum and assessment reform initiatives e.g. (Callan, 1997; Gleeson and Granville, 1996; Gleeson, 1998; Hanafin, 1997; Hyland, 2000). While child-centered teaching was espoused in the New Primary Curriculum in 1971 transmission models of teaching nevertheless remained dominant particularly at second level (OECD, 1991; Coolahan, 1994). In the 1991 OECD report, the authors recommended that attention be turned towards cognitive theories of learning that might inform pedagogical practices in an effort to displace transmission oriented teaching (which they implied was based implicitly on common sense behavioural psychology). In rethinking practice in disadvantaged contexts, I want to take the focus on theories of learning one step further and turn to socio-cultural, situative-pragmatic, cultural or socio-genetic theories of learning, which have turned the spotlight away from the capacities of the solo learner to the creation of classrooms as communities of learners
    • Irish Educational Studies, Vol. 21, No. 3, Winter, 2002 65 (Brown, 1994) or communities of practice (Lave and Wenger, 1991; Wenger, 1998). Research in other educational cultures on classroom practices for educationally disadvantaged students Considerable evidence internationally points to the diminished classroom pedagogical and organisational experiences of students in low income, high poverty and/or minority communities (Anyon, 1981; Oakes, 1986; Oakes and Lipton, 1999). Organisationally, teachers typically tend to adopt stricter discipline procedures, more classroom structure, and incorporate less social interaction. In terms ofDownloaded By: [University College Cork] At: 18:00 7 October 2008 curriculum and teaching, teachers tend to provide less challenging content knowledge, engage in more repetitive curricular experiences, break down tasks into smaller pieces, provide fewer opportunities to engage in higher-order thinking or problem solving, and provide fewer open ended divergent tasks (Means, Chelemer, and Knapp, 1991). In sum, teachers tend to rely on drill and practice of basic skills in efforts to compensate for the perceived deficits that students bring to school. The result of such compensatory efforts, often based on deficit models of students,, is the exacerbation of differences in instruction between the "haves" and "have nots" (Means, Chelemer, and Knapp, 1991). In the next section, I attempt to paint a composite picture of classroom practice in Irish classrooms, attentive to the limitations of this endeavor given the paucity of observational and/or ethnographic research on classroom practices in Irish schools. Notable exceptions, which shed a critical light on classroom practice, include Sugrues (1997) interpretive interview and case study of primary teachers views of child centered teaching and Drudy and Ui Chathams (1998) gender focused action research using an interaction analysis frame. Furthermore, at present, there is an emerging and long overdue focus on classroom practice in Irish educational research. Two recent significant studies have provided insights on classroom teaching and are beginning to redress the relative neglect of classroom practice in Irish educational research. Lynch and Lodges (Lynch and Lodge, 2002) multi-method (i.e. classroom observations, questionnaires and essays, one-to-one and focus group interviews, classroom observations) study of twelve single-sex and co-educational second- level schools provides many insights on the dynamics of equality, power and exclusion as they play out in a range of classroom and school contexts. Lyons, Lynch, Close, Sheerin and Bolands (2003, forthcoming) video study, of Mathematics (mainly) and English teaching in ten different second-level schools, is the first such video
    • 66 Irish Educational Studies, Vol. 21, No. 3, Winter 2002 study in Irish classrooms and promises to shed light on the relationships between teacher beliefs and practices, common trends and diverse practices inside mathematics classrooms, and the impact of social class and gender on the mediation of subject learning. In the next section, with a view to understanding the largely implicit assumptions about learning, I argue that an individualist epistemology informs classroom practice in Irish education. Second, based on an individualist epistemology, I argue that classroom practice may be qualitatively different in disadvantaged settings, that is, a differential pedagogy hypothesis.Downloaded By: [University College Cork] At: 18:00 7 October 2008 Research in Ireland on classroom organisational and pedagogical practices My concern, in this paper, is with how and why teaching is enacted as it is in disadvantaged settings. Educational research in Ireland has, almost overwhelmingly stayed at arms length from classroom teaching practices. Maybe this is, in part due to, what the OECD examiners termed, the "legendary autonomy" of Irish teachers as well as the assumption that generic good teaching is readily identifiable and universal in its efficacy. What teachers do in terms of best practice in advantaged or disadvantaged settings in Irish schools remains, in large part, a "black box". An important point to note, is that considerable attention has been paid in Ireland to reducing the pupil teacher ratio. The presumption, whether in advantaged or disadvantaged communities, seems to be that merely ensuring change at the level of inputs (a greater number of teachers) will be sufficient to improve both pedagogical and organisational processes leading to enhanced academic outcomes (e.g. the reduction of pupil-teacher ratio to 15:1 in Breaking the Cycle). The underlying assumption here appears to be that there are little or no differences in the pedagogical and organisational, practices between disadvantaged and advantaged communities. In other words, what remains relatively unquestioned, uncontested, and unexamined is the nature of the pedagogical practices themselves. Individualist epistemology Both in academic and folk psychology individualist epistemologies are dominant in Irish education. In teacher education a generic constructivist theory dominates the discourse but is implicitly
    • Irish Educational Studies, Vol. 21, No. 3. Winter, 2002 67 individualist in assumptions (i.e. Piagetian assumptions of the 1971 New Primary Curriculum). Furthermore, for example, reviewing recent volumes of Irish Educational Studies, the Irish Journal of Education or Oideas: Journal of the Department Education and Science there has been no debate about the meta-theoretical bases of learning and cognition. When learning and cognition are addressed the focus is on educational applications of individualist epistemologies (e.g. Gardners Multiple Intelligences Theory, Piagetian-inspired active learning initiatives). In using the term, meta-theoretical I want to draw attention to the underlying assumptions of dominant schools of thought or paradigms in the learning sciences over the last one hundred years. Attention to meta-theoretical issues provides anDownloaded By: [University College Cork] At: 18:00 7 October 2008 opportunity to examine definitions, tease out assumptions, illuminate guiding metaphors and categorise the pedagogical implications of various learning theories. The conspicuous lack of a meta-theoretical debate in Irish educational debates is problematic given the upsurge of discussion and research internationally on cognition and learning, and emergence in the last twenty years of socio-cultural approaches to learning that have challenged the dominance of behavioural and cognitive perspectives. Attempting to characterize the epistemological beliefs held more broadly among teachers and students is more difficult. However, Raths interview study of second-level teacher candidates is illuminating (Rath, 2000). She noted deeply entrenched cultural beliefs and practices about learning among student teachers. In particular, she documented, a focus on (a) learning as something done in isolation, and (b) a pervasive focus on the memorization of information at a superficial level for the purposes of individual performance in examinations. Furthermore, Lynch, (1999) building on her earlier work, has pointed to the pervasive competitive individualism of Irish secondary schooling. In addition, Fontes, Kellaghan, Madaus, and Airasians (1983) study, of a nationally representative sample of Irish peoples conceptions of intelligence, presented evidence that they believed strongly in innate and immutable conceptions of cognitive capacity (e.g. "...71% agreed that education cannot make up for a lack of natural ability", p. 55). As such, their views were consistent with psychometric notions of singular intelligence and therefore deeply rooted in an individualist epistemology. What is the connection between individualist epistemologies and differential pedagogy hypothesis? An important logical connection between the individualist epistemologies and subsequent
    • 68 Irish Educational Studies, Vol. 21, No. 3, Winter 2002 differential pedagogical hypothesis can be understood in terms of the psychology of individual differences or differential psychology. Thorndike (Thorndike, 1903; Thorndike, 1931), among others, advocated in the early part of the 20th century that educators should devote their energy to understanding the individual student. Subsequently, various measures of individual difference were developed including intelligence tests used to sort students into ability groups, streams, and special education categories. While the large- scale intelligence testing movement to a great extent bypassed Ireland, the focus on the sorting of students into ability groups and streaming did not, and these have become central to school organisation in Ireland at both primary (Devine, 1993) and secondary level (Smyth, 1999; Smyth, 2000). Indeed, Smyths (1999) work provides strongDownloaded By: [University College Cork] At: 18:00 7 October 2008 evidence of the negative impact of such streaming practices on both social and academic outcomes. Differential pedagogy hypothesis What evidence is there about organisational, curriculum, and teaching practices in Irish primary and secondary schools? Relatively little attention has been paid to understanding the school and classroom experiences of students in Ireland, although Lynch and Lodge (Lynch and Lodge, 1999; Lynch and Lodge, 2002) have cogently unveiled secondary school students experiences of power and authority in school. In particular, the pedagogical experiences of students at primary or secondary level remain relatively hidden, be they portrayed through the voice of researchers and/or students themselves. A study (OSullivan, 1980a; OSullivan, 1980b), based on teacher self report, compared teachers beliefs in working- and middle class schools about their own teaching styles in the light of the 1971 New Primary Curriculum but did not provide observational or ethnographic evidence of teaching practices. OSullivan (1980a) assessed the degree to which Bowles and Gintis (1976) differential socialization hypothesis might be acting as a crucial mechanism in the reproduction of social inequalities between middle and working class students. His survey study, of one hundred and fifty three Cork primary teachers in six middle- and fifteen working-class schools, concluded that "there is little evidence in the findings on school and classroom organization and teaching style in my study to support this view of differential socialization" (OSullivan, 1980a, p. 84). However, there is some evidence to support the differential pedagogical hypothesis from research on the school organisational practices such as ability grouping and streaming as well as research on
    • Irish Educational Studies, Vol. 21, No. 3, Winter, 2002 69 the extent that secondary schools contribute differentially to student achievement. Lynch has documented the widespread use of streaming and ability grouping in Irish primary and secondary schools and has criticised the continued reliance on ability grouping in primary schools and the continued existence of streaming, grouping or banding at second level (Lynch, 1999; Lynch and Lodge, 2002). The impact on students designated as low ability invariably confines that student to a school career in the low group or stream exacerbating educational disadvantage. However, the pedagogical experiences of students designated as disadvantaged remains relatively unexamined despite the fact that research in other countries has pointed out the differential pedagogical and classroom organisational experiences of studentsDownloaded By: [University College Cork] At: 18:00 7 October 2008 labeled as disadvantaged. Smyths multi-level or hierarchical linear modeling analysis of a nationally representative sample of second- level schools provides clear support for differential pedagogy hypothesis with schools differential contribution to student achievement evident even after controlling for students background characteristics (Smyth, 1999). In summary, considerable evidence points to a system-wide emphasis on lower order skills. There is also considerable evidence to support the differential pedagogy hypothesis and both can be seen as underpinned by individualist epistemologies. The strongest evidence to support the differential pedagogy hypothesis is from Lynch and Lodges research (2002) on the widespread prevalence of ability grouping and Smyths (Smyth, 1999) documentation of differences between secondary schools in their contribution to student achievement after controlling for background factors. However, the extent to which differential pedagogy plays out according to advantaged/disadvantaged groups is not clear. In the next section I note the emphasis on an individualist epistemology in both the behavioural and cognitive perspectives and present the socio-cultural perspective as a generative alternative. Three theories of cognition and learning Broadly speaking, over the last one hundred years the learning sciences have provided three distinct camps of learning theories: the behaviourist-empiricist, the cognitive-rationalist, and situative- pragmatic1 (Greeno, Collins, and Resnick, 1996). The notion of communities of practice emanates from this last cluster of learning theories. While a detailed exposition of the differences between these three traditions is beyond the scope of this paper, it is worth addressing how each defines learning, knowing, intelligence, and the design of learning environments (Table 1). In the behaviourist
    • 70 Irish Educational Studies, Vol. 21, No. 3, Winter 2002 tradition learning is change in behaviour, in the cognitive tradition learning is change in thinking, and in the socio-cultural tradition learning is change in participation. These widely diverging definitions of learning draw the attention of teachers and researchers to different sets of questions in pondering and planning learning, teaching, and assessment.Downloaded By: [University College Cork] At: 18:00 7 October 2008
    • Irish Educational Studies, Vol. 21, No. 3, Winter, 2002 71 Table 1. Three perspectives on learning and their implications for teaching and assessment2 Camp Behaviourism Cognitive •-.•••! Socio-cultural Learning Change in Change in thinking Change in practices of as... behaviour communities. & ability of individuals to participate Intelligence How smart are you? In what contexts are you In what ways are smart? you smart? Knowing ...organised ...Structures of ...distributed in the as... collection of knowledge and world among collections processes that individuals, tools, between elements construct patterns of . artifacts, texts people or behavioural ;• symbols in order to: use and fosteringDownloaded By: [University College Cork] At: 18:00 7 October 2008 units. 1. Understand communities of learners concepts & in which they participate 2. Engage in general skills such as < reasoning and problem solving Examples • Precision • General schemata • Fostering communities teaching (Jean Piaget) of learners (Ann Brown) j • Computer •General and : • Cognitive * Assisted specific apprenticeship (Collins, Instruction competencies e.g. etal) (CAI)... i.e. Multiple mastery learning Intelligences &TfU (Howard Gardner), Designing TEACHING: TEACHING ..; TEACHING ; [earning . Simplify and • Interactive • Communities of environments sequence tasks environments for : learning for active into discrete steps knowledge participation in the • Routines of construction and - formulation and How can we activity understanding : ] resolution of realistic design • Clear goals, •Sequences of • problems/inquiry teaching for" feedback, and conceptual . • Development of learning? reinforcement development disciplinary practices of • Individualization • Explicit attention discourse, i.e. "ways of with technologies to generality • J ; talking" e.g. CAI •• • / • ^ . • • ^ 1 : 1 v V ^ ••• - . ^ : . .• ••••? • A sequence of ::ASSESSMENT.. J:.: ASSESSMENT component to •Extended • Extended performance composite skills • performance: • assessment and assess ASSESSMENT: assessments and ; , change in participation Assessments that crediting varieties of .) tap into excellence ;i components To the extent that there has been explicit attention to and preference for assumptions about learning in Irish educational discourse over the last thirty years, the focus has been on cognitive theories particularly the work of Piaget, as evidenced by the 1971
    • 72 Irish Educational Studies, Vol. 21, No. 3, Winter 2002 New Primary School curriculum, and more recently the cognitive symbol systems focus of Gardners Multiple Intelligences theory which has been used as the basis for widely publicized curriculum initiatives (Hanafin, 1997; Hyland, 2000). Common in both Piagets and Gardners vision, given their shared cognitive assumptions, is that the learner is primarily viewed as an individual cognizer or solo learner (Phillips and Soltis, 1998). In contrast, socio-cultural, cultural or socio-genetic theories assume the learning itself is socially and culturally rooted in communities of practice, encompassing the artifacts and relationships of a particular time and place. An important point here is that social is not just another variable, nor is it only the interpersonal, rather it encompasses both artifacts and relationships as they are situated historically (Vygotsky, 1978; Cole, 1996; Daniels,Downloaded By: [University College Cork] At: 18:00 7 October 2008 2001). Thus, one can speak of what Valsiner and van der Veer call, in their recent germinal work, the social mind (Valsiner and Van der Veer, 2000). They trace the long tradition of scholarship underpinning the idea of the social mind drawing a portrait of its lineage by tracing the intellectual interdependency of the work of Lev Vygotsky, George Herbert Mead, James Mark Baldwin, and Pierre Janet. More recently, the work of cultural psychologist Arm Brown, who is credited with creating the socio-cultural-based "community of learners" (COL) model, has drawn attention to the rich pedagogical implications of the socio-genetic tradition (Brown, 1994; Brown, 1997a; Brown, 1997b). Drawing on Vygotskys notion of the zone of proximal development (ZPD) she highlights how reciprocal teaching, jigsaw co-operative learning, and majoring (in-depth study of content focusing on understanding)3 embody her conception of a community of learners (Brown, 1993; Brown, 1994). The distinctive pedagogical practices emanating from these three camps of learning theories can be seen by examining the section "Designing teaching: How can we design teaching for learning?" (see Table 1). In the next section, I briefly describe the assumptions and implications of the three camps. The behavioural approach: clarity and targeted direct teaching followed by controlled practice Teaching approaches based on either common sense, what Olson and Bruner (1996) call "folk psychology", or theoretically-inspired behaviourism put a premium on three basic pedagogical strategies: breaking down tasks into small and manageable pieces, teaching the basics firsthand incrementally reinforcing or rewarding observable progress. It is my contention, that these strategies have particular
    • Irish Educational Studies, Vol. 21, No. 3, Winter, 2002 73 appeal in educationally disadvantaged contexts. What are some of the assumptions underpinning these hallmark strategies? Based on empiricist philosophy, typified by Locke, Hume and Thorndike, behaviourisms key assumptions are that learning occurs though the detection of stimuli in the world by the sensory organs, the detection of patterns in these stimuli, and the means through which these "new associations" are transferred to different contexts. A corollary of these assumptions is that knowledge is consistent with or a reflection of experience (Greeno, Collins and Resnick, 1996). In sum, these assumptions amount to viewing learning as the collection and organisation of elements, associations, or behavioural units.Downloaded By: [University College Cork] At: 18:00 7 October 2008 What are the implications of these assumptions for our views of knowledge, intelligence, and pedagogy? From this perspective, knowledge can be seen as a hierarchical assembly or collection of associations or behavioural units. Intelligence is viewed as an individual trait and a fixed commodity that puts a limit on the pace or rate of learning. Perhaps the most widely recognised and intuitively appealing implications of the behavioural perspective are its recommendations for designing teaching. These are the simplification and sequencing of tasks into discrete hierarchical steps and reinforcing successful approximations of desired activity. In sum, the hallmarks of behaviourism are presenting learning in small steps, in the simplest possible form, sequencing tasks in a hierarchy from the simple to the complex, and rewarding successful observed behaviours. Two problems associated with this approach to teaching, are the assumption of "vertical transfer" and the decomposition of activities such as reading, writing, problem solving, resulting in a lack of task wholeness and authenticity. Vertical transfer assumes that learners will assemble the various associations or connections lower down on the learning hierarchy, and integrate these in order to eventually engage in higher order tasks. This vertical transfer problem is interwoven with, what critics view as, the lack of task authenticity when teaching is designed from a behavioural perspective. Thus, rather than involving learners in the full authenticity of say reading, a behavioural perspective focuses on teaching the fundamental elements (e.g. in the case of reading, perception of print, that is, single letters or words) prior to the more complex elements (reading sentences and extended text). Using the analogy of soccer, it is like teaching novice soccer players (novice readers) via repetitive practice how to head, kick, and dribble the ball (identify and sound out letters and words), that is the basics, for
    • 74 Irish Educational Studies, Vol. 21, No. 3, Winter 2002 prolonged periods before they ever get to play the game. Furthermore, the "slow" soccer learners get to head, kick and dribble the ball for even longer, before having the opportunity to engage in and make sense of the whole game (read extended text for meaning) until "the basics" have been thoroughly mastered. Despite these, and other problems, behaviourism has had a powerful influence on views of learning, approaches to teaching, and classroom management strategies in education systems across the world. Furthermore, formally and/or informally, many compensatory (targeted initiatives to overcome disadvantage) and remedial (with a high concentration of educationally disadvantaged students) interventions have been profoundly influenced by behavioural assumptions about learning.Downloaded By: [University College Cork] At: 18:00 7 October 2008 Writing in an Irish context, although not addressing educational disadvantage per se, Dunne (1995, pp. 74-75) comments on the importance of engaging students in the fullness of human social practices such as reading and writing, claiming that It seems likely many people have been greatly shortchanged in their education, precisely because they were introduced to these activities not as practices, but rather as sites where decomposed drills, exercises and micro-skills were rehearsed as means, while a taste of the whole activity as an end was continually deferred or displaced. The apparently concrete, "practical" and observable nature of drills and micro-skills, allied to the assumption of vertical transfer, gives a compelling validity to these pedagogical strategies, and resonates with Anyon (1981) and Oakes (1986) research that educationally disadvantaged students (read lower working class) typically experience diluted curricular experiences, involving task decomposition and infrequent opportunities to engage in higher order thinking. The cognitive-rationalist perspective: creating contexts for making meaning through guided discovery Drawing upon continental rationalism, typified by Descartes and Kant, cognitive theorys key assumption is that learning occurs as the mind imposes order on the world through its own particular structures such as the order-imposing structures inherent in information processing schema theory, Piagets schema-based stage theory of cognitive development, or the modular structures of the mind underpinning Gardners multiple intelligences, MI, theory. Kant, responding to the
    • Irish Educational Studies, Vol. 21, No. 3, Winter, 2002 75 British Empiricists, argued that the mind imposes, rather than detects, order in the world (Case, 1996). A corollary of these assumptions is that knowledge is not a copy of reality. Resnick (1989, p. 2) conveys this position well commenting that "Learning occurs not by recording information but by interpreting it". In sum, these assumptions amount to viewing learning as the active construction of knowledge by the individual learner. What are the implications of these assumptions for our views of knowledge, intelligence, and pedagogy? From this perspective, knowing involves the structures of knowledge and processes that construct patterns of symbols to understand concepts and deployDownloaded By: [University College Cork] At: 18:00 7 October 2008 general problem solving and reasoning strategies (e.g. Piagetian position that learners deploy general logico-mathematical thinking across contexts). Thus, knowledge rather than being "out there", the basic assumption from behaviourist-empiricist stance, is constructed by our actions on the world. As such, knowledge is made as we engage with and experience the world. Intelligence is viewed as an individual trait and portrayed as either a unitary (lumper position, e.g. dominant "g" based views of IQ) or a multifaceted (splitter position, e.g. Multiple Intelligences theory) commodity. The cognitive perspective has provided many important insights with which <to plan classroom teaching. Among the most important of these are the that learning is active, learning is about the construction of meaning, learning is both helped and hindered by our prior knowledge and experience, learning reorganises our minds, the mind develops in stages, and learning is more often than not unsettling. Based on these insights, a diverse range of strategies has been developed for classroom practice many of which are evident in various textbooks, teacher handbooks, and curricular documents in Irish education over the last thirty years. Much of the appeal of cognitive theories, in the Irish context, grew out of the desire to move away from didactic and transmission oriented teaching. Many advocates of active learning would echo Dewey (1933/1993, p. 201), who in his book How We Think, in opposition to the didactic nature of classroom teaching at that time, spoke out against "the complete domination of instruction by rehearsing second-hand information, by memorizing for the sake of producing correct replies at the proper time". Anticipating some of the arguments and claims made by cognitive and educational psychologists over the last forty years, Dewey argued for the importance of students active involvement in the learning process and problem solving as the context within which to learn information.
    • 76 Irish Educational Studies, Vol. 21, No. 3, Winter 2002 In sum, implications flowing from behavioural and cognitive epistemologies are familiar to most educators and embedded in policies and practices of teaching and learning in classrooms. For example, it is my contention that pedagogy in educationally disadvantaged settings is heavily influenced by behavioural principles of learning in particular, and many remedial teaching strategies borrow heavily from both behavioural and to a lesser extent cognitive principles. Furthermore, various forms of programmed instruction or mastery learning (Skinner, 1954) emanate directly from behavioural assumptions about learning. While behavioural and cognitive theories are based on very different assumptions about learning, knowing and intelligence and have very different implications for classroomDownloaded By: [University College Cork] At: 18:00 7 October 2008 practice, they share one defining feature, namely their focus on the solo learner. Rather than viewing the learner as part of family, community and social group embedded in a particular time and place, both the behavioural and cognitive perspectives portray learning as primarily a solo undertaking. Thus, what is neglected, in this focus on the solo learner, is how the learner is situated amidst levels of guidance by more knowledgeable others, nurtured via social support, influenced by peer norms, and shapes and is shaped through engaging in communication with other humans and various media within evolving cultural and historical circumstances. As such, from a learning perspective, attempting to understand and ameliorate educational disadvantage, based on the assumption of the solo learner, forecloses on opportunities to interrogate the extent to which educational disadvantage is culturally and socially constructed in classrooms, schools, and communities. The socio-cultural perspective: promoting a community. of learners Rooted in the socio-genetic philosophies of Hegel and Marx, socio- cultural theories assert that the mind originates dialectically through the social and material history of a culture in which a person inhabits. This position is in marked contrast to the view that the mind has its primary origin in the structures of the objective world (behaviourist position), has its origin in the order-imposing structures of the mind (cognitive/Information processing position), or has its origins in the interaction of the individual learner and the objective world (cognitive/Piagetian position) (Case, 1996). What are the implications of these assumptions for our views of knowledge, intelligence and pedagogy? Knowledge, from a socio- cultural perspective, is viewed as a construction of groups and as such
    • Irish Educational Studies, Vol. 21, No. 3, Winter, 2002 77 is distributed as individuals and groups shape and are shaped through various social practices. Learning occurs, not through order-imposing structures of the mind, but through initiation and participation in out of or in school social practices. In marked contrast to conventional views of intelligence rooted in a cognitive perspective (here I include traditional notions of singular intelligence and multiple intelligences), intelligence is seen as distributed across a group and is not necessarily the property of individuals but refracted through the lens of "learners- in-context" as they use culturally valued tools, symbols and other artifacts that assist social and cognitive performance. In terms of pedagogy, socio-culrural theories put a heavyDownloaded By: [University College Cork] At: 18:00 7 October 2008 emphasis on fostering communities of learners (FCL), which provide not only opportunities for cognitive development but also the development of students identities as literate and numerate members of knowledge-building communities. In her classic article, "The Advancement of Learning" (Brown, 1994), first delivered as the Presidential address at the American Educational Research Association (AERA) annual meeting in 1994, the late English born and US based educator, Ann Brown outlined a coherent set of principles underpinning the notion of a "community of learners" as well key strategies for its implementation. These principles are: • Academic learning as active, strategic, self-motivated and purposeful • Classrooms as settings for multiple zones of proximal development • Legitimization of differences • Developing communities of discourse and practice, and • Teaching deep conceptual content that is sensitive to developmental nature of students knowledge in particular subject areas The integrated implementation of these five principles forms the support for the emergence of communities of learners in classroom settings. First, based upon the insight that much academic learning is active, strategic, self-motivated and purposeful, Brown emphasized how FCLs ought to focus on the development of students capacity to think about thinking, that is engage in meta-cognition. As such, a key feature of FCLs is the promotion of a culture of meta-cognition, directed toward the development of learning to learn strategies. Second, drawing upon Vygotskys Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD), that is the difference between what a learner can do by
    • 78 Irish Educational Studies, Vol. 21, No. 3, Winter 2002 themselves versus what they can do with the assistance of another person and/or tool, Brown emphasized teaching toward the upper rather than lower bounds of students competence. Much contemporary pedagogical practice, she claims, focuses on matching teaching with students existing levels of competence, that is, the lower bounds of competence. In practice, this means that adult, peer and technology-based guidance reaching toward the upper bounds of the ZPD becomes a guiding beacon in both the planning and enactment of teaching. Third, FCLs are intended to value and nurture students diverse cultural perspectives, support multiple entry points into subject matter (via art, music, drama, technology, story, text...etc.), and foster diversity in the distribution of expert knowledge. Fourth, FCLs is premised on the belief that higher-levelDownloaded By: [University College Cork] At: 18:00 7 October 2008 thinking is an internalised dialogue. Based on this premise, classroom talk takes on particular importance as the primary tool in fostering mindful engagement with ideas. FCLs are "meant to foster change by encouraging newcomers to adopt the discourse structure, goals, values, and belief systems of the community...these interpretative communities give place to multiple voices in Bakhtins (1986) sense of voice as the speaking personality" (Brown, 1997a, p. 71). Fifth, questioning the underestimation of children and adolescents that has resulted from simplistic interpretations of Piagetian stage theory, Brown makes a case for teaching inquiry and deep disciplinary understanding in the light of careful developmental analysis of how children and adolescents thinking evolves in particular knowledge domains, and what they can rather than cant understand. This last principle, in particular, is in marked contrast to the emphasis on the clarity, dilution of curriculum content, and task decomposition in teaching "the basics" that, it has been argued, is too often evident in disadvantaged settings. In sum, the overarching goal of FCL is to develop a classroom environment modeled on a research seminar, dialogical in nature, where interaction, respect, sharing of roles, and reciprocity are the cultural norms. Among the strategies that she used to exemplify this overarching goal and principles was reciprocal teaching (RT). Reciprocal teaching as an exemplar Reciprocal teaching was first developed at the US National Reading Centre at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, in the early 1980s. It grew of out of a stream of applied research called cognitive strategy instruction (CSI). The basic insight guiding CSI research was that expert readers, writers, or mathematicians, compared to their novice counterparts, employ specific teachable strategies in
    • Irish Educational Studies, Vol. 21, No. 3, Winter, 2002 79 comprehending and composing text and solving problems. RT was initially developed in response to the observation that many primary and early secondary school students were proficient at decoding text but very poor at text comprehension. As such, RT sought to improve students comprehension monitoring and comprehension fostering strategies. Typically, RT involves the teacher beginning a discussion about a text, video or other material that students are trying to understand. The teacher models four strategies: asking questions, seeking clarification, making predictions, and summarizing text. Over time the teachers role shifts from one of model to coach as students take turns in leading the discussion and responsibility for enhancing understanding shifts from teacher to the students. Mature RT groupsDownloaded By: [University College Cork] At: 18:00 7 October 2008 will eventually be student led with the teacher fading as a natural outgrowth of the cognitive apprenticeship cycle of modeling, coaching, and fading. RT is intended to provide multiple zones of proximal development and foster both the understanding of text as well as the development of a community of interpretation over time. Brown has offered a warning about severing the principles of learning from the four RT strategies, and emphasized that the integrity of reading for meaning must not be lost by engaging in the "surface rituals" of questioning, predicting, clarifying, and summarizing. Implications of a socio-cultural perspective on learning Socio-culrural theories of learning emphasize that learning is a social act. This does not mean that the occasional use of co-operative learning or reciprocal teaching insulated from a more individualist set of classroom structures and pedagogical practices constitute a coherent socio-genetic learning philosophy. Rather socio-cultural approaches open up a range of new questions with which to interrogate classroom practices. Socio-cultural, situative-pragmatic, cultural-historical or socio-genetic theories of learning provide a perspective on cognition and learning that could address a cascade of new and crucial questions in understanding issues of teaching and learning in educationally disadvantaged contexts. First, as Prawat (1992) claims, in tracing the shift from a psychology of individual differences to learning communities, the teachers primary role is that of building a community of learners rather than exhibiting discrete sets of behaviors associated with "effective teaching". Furthermore, teachers and educational researchers need to address a "host of new questions" (Prawat, 1992, p. 11) such as the following: What are the norms of interaction in the classroom? What are the different opportunities for participation?
    • 80 Irish Educational Studies, Vol. 21, No. 3, Winter 2002 What are the classroom participation structures (Mehan et al., 1995)? To what extent does the classroom provide opportunities for all children to participate in the discourse? To what extent does the classroom provide opportunities for all children to participate in different disciplinary discourses? To what extent does the work of school resemble that of out of school activities? What language practices do students bring with them to school and how do these relate to the language of power in a given culture and society? Second, as Oakes and Lipton (1999) have claimed, socio- cultural theories offer the possibility of a more socially just perspective on learning and teaching than either behavioural or cognitive learning theories since they place responsibility forDownloaded By: [University College Cork] At: 18:00 7 October 2008 disadvantage on society rather than on educationally disadvantaged communities, families, or students. A corollary of this stance is that socio-cultural theories challenge deficit thinking which is characterised by beliefs, policies, practices that "blame the victim", whereby the more powerful party blames the individual or a particular sector of the community rather than the society as a whole (Valencia, 1997). Third, socio-cultural theories focus on discontinuities between home and school rather than deficits in families and students as a way of characterizing educational disadvantage. What were once seen as deficits (e.g. particular language practice) may be seen as assets of families and communities but nevertheless discontinuous with school discourse structures (Gallimore and Au, 1997). The onus on educators then is to recognize and affirm these differences while also teaching students the "language of power" in a society (Delpit, 1995). Fourth, socio-cultural theory provides a new perspective on intelligence or "ability", a construct that is central to the ways schools operate in attempting to ascertain cognitive capacity and design educational experiences for students. Whereas the cognitive perspective typically asks one of two questions - "how smart are you?" (conventional IQ-question)...or "in what ways are you smart?" (MI question) - the socio-cultural perspectives question is "in what contexts are you smart?" Both questions posed within the cognitive perspective reflect its fundamental individualist assumptions, namely that intelligence is inherent in the individual, and is as such cranium- bound. However, a socio-cultural view focuses on assessing intelligence as individuals are embedded in cultural practices using the social and technological supports that assist performance. These issues are important, in the Irish context, since over the last decade
    • Irish Educational Studies, Vol. 21, No. 3, Winter, 2002 81 there has been considerable focus on providing a viable alternative to singular and immutable views of intelligence, and Gardners theory of multiple intelligences has appropriately garnered extensive attention. However, in terms of an approach to learning and cognition and despite its very valuable role and impact on public and educational consciousness, in raising questions about broadening our understanding of human potentialities, in my view, like other cognitive positions, offers a rather limited framework for addressing educational disadvantage. As such, cognitive approaches to learning pay insufficient attention to social context in a manner that can guide our understanding of learning and educational practices in terms of home-school discontinuities, power and "resistance", classroomDownloaded By: [University College Cork] At: 18:00 7 October 2008 participation structures, classroom and school streaming/grouping practices, differential curriculum practices, access to knowledge resources, home-school-classroom communication dynamics, and finally why learners may appear "smart" in one context and not another - all of which are crucial in addressing educational disadvantage. Fifth, one of the most important implications of a socio-cultural perspective is that it broadens the lens beyond a preoccupation with the individual learner as the primary unit of analysis and brings into the analytic frame the role of dyadic interactions and small group dynamics in formative learning encounters (in or out of school), the constraints and affordances of technologies that assist learning, the generativity of language as a tool for thinking and self-regulation, and the communication dynamics of culturally valued discourses and practices into which learners are being initiated. In the context of understanding and ameliorating disadvantage in schools, a socio- cultural position shifts the unit of analysis away from a preoccupation with the individual learner - as "weak" or "bright", as having "no motivation" or "great motivation" - toward an analysis of participation structures and contexts within which learners are provided with opportunities for initiation into advanced and complex ways of knowing. Sixth, socio-cultural definitions of ability/disability and competence/ incompetence challenge current conceptions of these important educational constructs by shifting the focus from the individual student to the student-in-context. Here context is not a given, prescribed by the physical location only (in- or out of school, at home...etc.) but constituted by the moment-to-moment interactions, that is, teachers-to-student and student-to-student, within particular cultural practices and activity settings. McDermott captures this shift
    • 82 Irish Educational Studies, Vol. 21, No. 3, Winter 2002 in perspective powerfully in the title of his classic article: "The acquisition of a child by a learning disability" (McDermott, 1993). Seventh, a socio-cultural perspective has a number of important implications for the preparation and evaluation of teachers in educationally disadvantaged settings (Conway and Artiles, 2001). Addressing these in any detail is beyond the scope of this paper. However, I note three important implications. First, one of the myths of learning to teach and teacher education is that novice teachers benefit from the "sink or swim" and solo performance focus of the teaching practice experience. Consequently, from a socio-cultural perspective, opportunities to learn to teach through co-planning andDownloaded By: [University College Cork] At: 18:00 7 October 2008 co-teaching with more experienced teachers are foreclosed, as they "sink or swim" while practicing their teaching in relative isolation. In the absence of mentoring opportunities such as co-planning and co- teaching, novice teachers preconceptions about teaching in disadvantaged settings are likely to be reinforced making subsequent change in teaching practice even more difficult. However, one could also argue that even with adequate opportunities for co-planning and co-teaching student teachers may become inducted into attitudes and practices that, focus on students deficits rather than strengths. Nevertheless, a move way from a "sink or swim" toward a mentoring model-of learning to teach is more likely to provide opportunities in which to challenge deficit views of students and communities labeled disadvantaged. Second, a socio-cultural perspective has a rich array of conceptual constructs with which to reflect on teaching and learning to teach. Among the most insightful of these are such constructs as participation structures, the zone of proximal development, assisted performance, cognitive apprenticeship and dynamic assessment. Third, a socio-cultural view of reflective practice as a model of teacher education puts a premium on structures and practices that foster dialogical relations both within and between the university and school as sites for teacher education (Manning, 1993; Conway, 2001). Fourth, a socio-cultural perspective, recognising the central role of culture in the construction of both teachers beliefs and cultural identity, places these more centrally in the teacher education curriculum. As such, engaging prospective teachers, mainly from middle class communities, in inquiry about their own cultural identities, in the context of the interlocking nature of social class, ethnic and gender relations, takes on renewed importance (Clark, 2001; Florio-Ruane, 2001). Eighth, the socio-cultural approach to learning is best seen as a cluster of theories rather than just one theory. A number of different
    • Irish Educational Studies, Vol. 21, No. 3, Winter, 2002 83 avenues have developed, all with similar roots, but with distinctive theoretical constructs and somewhat different pedagogical implications. Delineating the nature and origin of the distinctions between these strands of socio-genetic learning theory is beyond the scope of this paper. However, for example, there has been considerable work undertaken in educational settings based on the community of learners model (Crawford, Krajcik et al.., 1999; Matusov, 1999), guided participation (Wells, 1993; Rogoff, 1995), cognitive apprenticeship (Collins et al.., 1987; Collins et al.., 1991; Jarvela, 1995), and Leontevs activity theory (Leontev, 1981; Beach, 1996; Daniels, 2001; Engestrom, Miettinen et al.., 1999; Jonassen and Rohrer-Murphy, 1999).Downloaded By: [University College Cork] At: 18:00 7 October 2008 Ninth, socio-cultural theories, by re-conceptualizing the assumed linear and hierarchical relationship between basic and higher order thinking skills, challenges teachers to scaffold students talk, thinking, and actions in a more pedagogically challenging fashion (Tharp and Gallimore, 1988). Conclusion In conclusion, socio-cultural theory by itself is neither a panacea for changing pedagogical practices in educationally disadvantaged settings, nor a magic wand to redress broader patterns of social reproduction. For example, Tormey (2001), drawing upon Bourdieus theory of social reproduction (Bourdieu, 1977), has argued that over the last twenty years, there has been a focus in Irish educational policy on raising absolute attainment among primary and secondary school students from different socio-economic backgrounds. However, this has not led to greater equity in Irish society, even though attainment levels have risen across different socio-economic groups, since those in power, from their more advantaged socio-economic, bureaucratic, and political positions in society, manage to reproduce themselves by excluding those less advantaged than themselves through providing access for their offspring to social networks of power and privilege (Breen and Whale, 1996). For example, Layte and Whelan (2000) have analysed national data sets from 1973, 1987 and 1994 to determine the degree to which social class predicts access to third- level education. Their findings provide strong support for social reproduction theories in Irish society indicating that, over the twenty years "the relative access of those from professional and managerial backgrounds to third-level qualifications improves over time" (p. 100) despite the fact that students from working class backgrounds have availed of third level education in greater numbers that ever before.
    • 84 Irish Educational Studies, Vol. 21, No. 3, Winter 2002 A socio-cultural approach to rethinking pedagogical practices in school cannot by itself redress these out of school social network influences, but it can contribute substantively by alerting educators to the importance of providing initial in-school access to languages and discourses of societal power for educationally disadvantaged students. There is an urgent need for a greater understanding of the nature and range of pedagogical practices in Irish schools across different settings. From a socio-cultural perspective, this calls for approaches to research that adopt interpretive oriented anthropological and socio- linguistic approaches to understanding classroom pedagogical practices. A different way of thinking about learning and teachingDownloaded By: [University College Cork] At: 18:00 7 October 2008 alone will not resolve the many challenges of addressing educational disadvantage. Nevertheless, socio-cultural theories present a range of new and important questions to consider in approaching educational disadvantage. Endnotes 1 Greeno, J. G., Collins, A. M., and Resnick, L. B. (1996) Cognition and Learning, in D. C. Berliner and R. C. Calfee (eds) Handbook of Educational Psychology, New York, Macmillan, pp. 15-47. I use the term situative- pragmatic, rather than socio-cultural or socio-historic, to distinguish the US stream of socio-genetic theories from the European stream. Henceforth, in this paper, I will use the term socio-cultural. 2 Adapted from (1) Greeno, J. G., Collins, and Resnick, L. B. (1996) Cognition and Learning, in D. C. Berliner and R. C. Calfee (eds) Handbook of Educational Psychology, New York: Macmillan, pp. 15-47. (2) Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. New York: Cambridge University Press. (3) Seifert, K. L. (1999) Constructing a Psychology of Teaching and Learning, Boston: Houghton Mifflin. 3 There is considerable overlap between majoring and the Multiple Intelligences based notion of Teaching for Understanding (TfU) given the emphasis in both on in-depth understanding over superficial coverage.
    • Irish Educational Studies, Vol. 21, No. 3, Winter, 2002 85 REFERENCES Anyon, J. (1981) Elementary schooling and distinctions of social class, Educational Policy. Vol. 12, No. 2-3, pp. 118-32. Anyon, J. (1981) Social class and school knowledge, Curriculum Inquiry, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 3-42. Bakhtin, M. M. (1986) Speech Genres and Other Late Essays, Austin: University of Texas Press. Beach, K. D. (1996) A cultural-historical study of learning and development: The arithmetic practices of rural Nepali adolescents and adults in transition between school and work activities, Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: TheDownloaded By: [University College Cork] At: 18:00 7 October 2008 Sciences & Engineering, Vol. 56, No. 10-B, p. 5789. Bourdieu, P. (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice, Nice, R. (trans) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Bourdieu, P. (1977) Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture, London: Sage. Bowles, S. and Gintis, H (1976) Schooling in Capitalist America: Educational Reform and the Contradictions of Economic Life, New York: Basic Books. Breen, R. and Whelan, C. T. (1996) Social Mobility and Social Class in Ireland, Dublin, Gill and Macmillan. Brown, A. L. (1994) The advancement of learning, Educational Researcher, Vol. 23, No. 8, pp. 4-12. Brown, A. L. (1997a) The advancement of learning, in Walberg, H, J. and Haertel, G. D. (eds) Psychology and Educational Practice, San Pablo, CA: McCutchan Publishing, pp. 52-76. Brown, A. L. (1997b) Transforming schools into communities of thinking and learning about Serious Matters, American Psychologist, Vol. 52, No. 4, pp. 399-413. Brown, A. L., Ash, D., Rutherford, M., Nakagawa, K., Gordon, A., and Campione, J. (1993) Distributed expertise in the classroom, in G. Salomon (ed.) Distributed Cognitions, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 188-228. Bruner, J. (1996) The Culture of Education, Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Callan, J. (1997) Active learning in the classroom: a challenge to existing educational values and practices, Issues in Education, Dublin: ASTI. Case, R. (1996) Changing views of knowledge and their impact on educational research and practice, in Olson, D. R. & Torrance, N., (eds) The Handbook of Education and Human Development, Oxford: Blackwell.
    • 86 Irish Educational Studies, Vol. 21, No. 3, Winter 2002 Clark, C. M. (ed) (2001) Talking shop: Authentic conversation and teacher learning, New York: Teachers College Press Cole, M. (1996) Cultural Psychology: A Once and Future Discipline, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Collins, A. and Others, A. (1987) Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the Craft of Reading, Writing, and Mathematics, Technical Report No. 403. ERIC Document ED284181 Collins, A. and Others, A. (1991) A Cognitive Apprenticeship for Disadvantaged Students, ERIC Document ED338729. Conway, P. F. (2001) Anticipatory reflection while learning to teach: From a temporally truncated to a temporally distributed modelDownloaded By: [University College Cork] At: 18:00 7 October 2008 of reflection in teacher education, in Teaching and Teacher Education, Vol. 17, No.l, pp. 89-106. Conway, P. F. and Artiles, A. A. (2001) A social-cultural perspective on teacher performance assessment, paper presented at the Holmes Partnership 5th Annual Conference, Urban Initiative in Teacher Education (UNITE), Albuquerque, New Mexico. Coolahan, J. (1994) Report of the National Education Convention, Dublin, Government Publications. CORI (1992) Education and Poverty: Eliminating Disadvantage in the Primary school years, discussion paper, Dublin: Education Commission Conference of Religious in Ireland (CORI). CORI (1998) Inequality in Education: The Role of Assessment and Certification, Dublin, Education Commission Conference of Religious in Ireland (CORI). Crawford, B. A., and Krajcik, J. S. (1999) Elements of a Community of Learners in a Middle School Science Classroom, Science Education, Vol. 83, No. 6, pp. 701-23. Daniels, H. (2001). Vygotsky and pedagogy. London Routledge/Falmer. Delpit, L. (1995) Other Peoples Children, New York: The New Press. Devine, D. (1993) A study of reading ability groups: Primary school childrens experiences and views, Irish Educational Studies, Vol. 12, pp. 134-142. Dewey, J. (1933/1993) How We Think: A Restatement of the Relation of Reflective Thinking to the Educative Process, Boston: D.C. Heath, & Co. Drudy, S. and Ní Chatháin, M. (1998) Gender Interaction in Irish Secondary Schools, Maynooth, Education Department, National University of Ireland, Maynooth. Dunne, J. (1995) Whats the good of education? in Hogan, P. (ed.) Partnership and the Benefits of Learning, Maynooth, Educational Studies Association of Ireland, pp. 60-82.
    • Irish Educational Studies, Vol. 21, No. 3, Winter, 2002 87 Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R., and Punamäki, R. L. (eds) (1999) Perspectives on activity theory. Learning in Doing: Social, Cognitive, and Computational Perspectives, New York: NY, Cambridge University Press. Fitzgerald, J. (1998) The way we are: Education and the Celtic Tiger, in B. Farrell (ed.) Issues in Education: Changing Education, Changing Society, Dublin: Association of Secondary Teachers of Ireland (ASTI), pp. 35-44. Florio-Ruane, S with deTar, J . (2001). Teacher Education and the Cultural Imagination: Autobiography, Conversation, and Narrative. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Downloaded By: [University College Cork] At: 18:00 7 October 2008 Fontes, P. J., Kellaghan, T., Madaus, G. F., and Airasian, P. (1983) Opinions of the Irish public on intelligence, Irish Journal of Education, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 55-67. Gallimore, R. and Au, K. H. P. (1997) The competence/incompetence paradox in the education of minority culture children, in Cole, M., Engestrom, Y., and Vasquez, O. A. (eds) Mind, Culture and Activity: Seminal Papers from the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 241-253. Gleeson, J. (1998) Curriculum and assessment: some political and cultural considerations, in CORI (ed.) Inequality in Education: The Role of Assessment and Certification, Dublin: Conference of Religious in Ireland, (CORI). Gleeson, J. and Granville, G. (1996) Curriculum reform, educational planning and national policy: the case of the Leaving Certificate Applied, Irish Educational Studies, Vol. 15, pp.113-132. Greeno, J. G., Collins, A. M., and Resnick, L. B. (1996) Cognition and Learning, in Berliner, D. C. and Calfee, R. C. (eds) Handbook of Educational Psychology, New York: Macmillan, pp. 15-47. Hanafin, J. (ed.) (1997) Towards New Understandings: Assessment and the Theory of Multiple Intelligences, Cork: Education Department, University College, Cork. Hogan, P. (ed.) (1995) Partnership and the benefits of learning: A symposium on philosophical issues in educational policy, Maynooth: Educational Studies Association of Ireland. Hyland, A. (1998) Symposium on the economic returns to education, Journal of the Statistical and Social Inquiry Society of Ireland, Vol.27, pp.129-137.
    • 88 Irish Educational Studies, Vol. 21, No. 3, Winter 2002 Hyland, A. (ed.) (2000) Multiple Intelligences: curriculum and assessment project (Final Report), Cork: Education Department, University College, Cork. Ireland (1971) The Primary Teachers Handbooks, Vol 1 and 2, Dublin: Government Publications Office. Ireland (1992). Education for a Changing World: Green paper, Dublin: Government Publications. Ireland (1995) Charting our Education Future: White Paper on Education, Dublin: Government Publications. Järvelä, S. (1995) The cognitive apprenticeship model in a technologically rich learning environment: Interpreting the learning interaction, Learning and Instruction, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 237-59.Downloaded By: [University College Cork] At: 18:00 7 October 2008 Jonassen, D. H. and Rohrer-Murphy, L. (1999) Activity Theory as a framework for designing constructivist learning environments, Educational Technology Research and Development, Vol. 47, No.l, pp. 61-79. Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, New York: Cambridge University Press. Layte, R. W. and Whelan, C. T. (2000) The rising tide of equality of opportunity: the changing class structure. Bust to boom? in Nolan, B., OConnell, P. J. and Whelan, C. T. (eds) The Irish Experience of Growth and Inequality, Dublin: Institute of Public Administration. Leontev, A. N. (1981). The problem of activity in psychology, in Wertsch, J. V. (ed.) The Concept of Activity in Soviet Psychology, Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, pp. 37-71. Lynch, K. (1999) Equality in Education, Dublin: Gill & Macmillan. Lynch, K. and Lodge, A. (1999) Essays on school, in Lynch, K. Equality in Education, Dublin: Gill Macmillan. Lynch, K. and Lodge, A. (2002) Equality and Power in Schools: Redistribution, Recognition and Representation, London: Routledge/Falmer. Lynch, P. (1998) Societal change and education: Investment in Education revisited, in Farrell, B., Issues in Education: Changing Education, Changing Society, Dublin: Association of Secondary Teachers of Ireland (ASTI), Vol. 3, pp. 3-7. Lyons, M., Lynch, K., Close, S., Sheerin, E., and Boland, P. (2003, forthcoming) Inside Classrooms: The Teaching and Learning of Mathematics in Social Context, Dublin: Gill and Macmillan. Manning, B. H. and P., B. D. (1993) A Vygotskian-based theory of teacher cognition: Toward the acquisition of mental reflection
    • Irish Educational Studies, Vol. 21, No. 3, Winter, 2002 89 and self-regulation, Teaching and Teacher Education, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 361-371. Matusov, E. (1999) How Does a Community of Learners maintain itself? Ecology of an innovative school, Anthropology & Education Quarterly, Vol. 30, pp. 161-86. McCormack, T. A. P. (1998) Inequality in Education: The role of assessment and certification, in CORI (ed.) Inequality in Education: The Role of Assessment and Certification, Dublin: Education Commission Conference of Religious in Ireland (CORI). McDermott, R. P. (1993) The acquisition of a child by a learning disability, in Lave, J. (ed) Understanding Practice:Downloaded By: [University College Cork] At: 18:00 7 October 2008 Perspectives on Activity and Context, New York: Cambridge, pp. 269-305. Means, B., Chelemer, C., and Knapp, M. S. (eds) (1991) Teaching Advanced Skills to At-risk Students: Views from Research and Practice, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc., Publishers. Mehan, H. et al. (1995) Ethnographic Studies of Multicultural Education in Classrooms and Schools, ERIC Document, ED382703: 16. OSullivan, D. (1980a) Teacher profiles, school organization, and teaching styles in contrasting socio-economic contexts, Irish Journal of Education, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 75-87. OSullivan, D. (1980b) Teacher socialisation and teaching style in an Irish cultural context, European Journal of Education, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 387-97. Oakes, J. (1986) Keeping Track, Part 2: Curriculum inequality and school reform, Phi Delta Kappan, Vol. 68, No. 2, pp. 148-54. Oakes, J. (1986) Tracking, inequality, and the rhetoric of school reform: Why schools dont change? Journal of Education, Vol. 168, pp. 61-80. Oakes, J. and Lipton, M. (1999) Teaching to Change the World, Boston: McGraw-Hill College. OECD (1991) Ireland. Reviews of National Policies for Education, Paris: OECD Phillips, D. C. and Soltis, J. F. (1998) Perspectives on Learning, New York: Teachers College Press. Olson, D. R. and Bruner, J. (1996) Folk psychology and folk pedagogy, in Olson, D. R. and Torrance, N. (eds) The Handbook of Education and Human Development, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 9-27. Prawat, R. S. (1992) From Individual differences to learning communities-Our changing focus, Educational Leadership, Vol. 49, No. 7, pp. 9-13.
    • 90 Irish Educational Studies, Vol. 21, No. 3, Winter 2002 Rath, A. (2000) Reflective Practice: Mapping a pedagogy for transformation, in Hyland, A (ed) Multiple Intelligences: Curriculum and Assessment Project (Final Report), Cork: Education Department, University College, Cork, pp. 140-183. Resnick, L. B. (ed.) (1989) Introduction. Knowing, Learning and Instruction: Essays in Honor of Robert Glaser, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Rogoff, B. E. (1995) Observing socio-cultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship, in del Rio, P., Alvarez, A., Wertsch, J. V. (eds) Socio-cultural Studies of Mind, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp.139-164. Rogoff, B., Matusov, E., and White, C. (1996) Models of teaching andDownloaded By: [University College Cork] At: 18:00 7 October 2008 learning: Participation in a community of learners, in Olson, D. R. and Torrance, N (eds) The Handbook of Education and Human Development, Maiden, MA: Blackwell Publishers, pp. 388-414. Seifert, K. L. (1999) Constructing a Psychology of Teaching and Learning, Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Shiel, G., Forde, P. and Morgan, M. (1996) International studies of educational achievement: What do they tell us? Oideas, Vol. 44, pp. 80-97. Skinner, B. F. (1954) The science of learning and the art of teaching, Harvard Educational Review, Vol. 24, pp. 86-97. Smyth, E. (1999) Do schools differ? Academic and Personal Development Among Pupils in the Second-level Sector, Dublin: Oak Tree Press/Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI). Smyth, E. (2000) Assessing school effectiveness: Evidence from the Irish context, Irish Educational Studies, Vol. 19, pp. 35-45. Sugrue, C. (1997) Complexities of Teaching: Child-centred Perspectives, London: Falmer Press. Tharp, R. G. and Gallimore, R. (1988) Rousing Minds to Life: Teaching, Learning, and Schooling in Social Context, New York: Cambridge University Press. Thorndike, E. L. (1903) Educational Psychology, New York: Lemke & Buechner. Thorndike, E. L. (1931) Human Learning, New York: Century. Thornhill, D. (1998) A response to John Fitzgeralds article - The way we are: Education and the Celtic Tiger, in B. Farrell (ed.) Issues in Education: Changing Education, Changing Society, Dublin: Association of Secondary Teachers of Ireland (ASTI). Vol. 3, pp. 45-57.
    • Irish Educational Studies, Vol. 21, No. 3, Winter, 2002 91 Tormey, R. (2001) Finding a language to talk (to each other): Towards a unified theory of educational disadvantage, paper presented at the Educational Studies Association of Ireland conference, Limerick. Valencia, R. R. (ed.) (1997) Conceptualising the Notion of Deficit Thinking. The Evolution of Deficit Thinking: educational thought and practice, London: Falmer. Valsiner, J. and Van der Veer, R. (2000) The Social Mind: Construction of the Idea, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Vygotsky, L. (1978) Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, Cambridge, MA: Harvard UniversityDownloaded By: [University College Cork] At: 18:00 7 October 2008 Press. Wells, G. (1993) Text, talk and inquiry: Schooling as semiotic apprenticeship, ERIC document, ED371618. Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity, New York: Cambridge University Press.