Questões de Saúde Lésbica
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5

Questões de Saúde Lésbica



Saúde Lésbica - Tabaco, Álcool, Drogas em Geral

Saúde Lésbica - Tabaco, Álcool, Drogas em Geral



Total Views
Views on SlideShare
Embed Views



5 Embeds 270 222 24 20 3 1



Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Questões de Saúde Lésbica Questões de Saúde Lésbica Document Transcript

  • Lesbian Health Issues Paper QAHC Lesbian Health Action Group Prepared by Kate Allen 10 May 2009Promoting the health and well-being of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) Queenslanders
  • ContentsForeword........................................................................................1Definitions of Sexual Orientation...................................................2QAHC Lesbian Health Action Group..............................................4Introduction. ..................................................................................5 .Accessing Health Care. .................................................................6 .Cancer Screening & Prevention....................................................7Stigma and Discrimination..........................................................10Mental Health..............................................................................14Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drug Use.........................................15Relationships...............................................................................18Sexual Health...............................................................................20Pregnancy and Parenting............................................................21Domestic Violence.......................................................................22Obesity and Overweight...............................................................23Health Service Delivery...............................................................24Conclusion...................................................................................26Reference List..............................................................................27
  • ForewordThis paper has been written to inform the work of the QAHC Lesbian Health Action Group(QLHAG) in developing a Queensland Lesbian Health Strategy. The paper does not seek to bea comprehensive academic literature review of all issues relating to lesbian health, but ratherseeks to highlight current, urgent and relevant health issues pertinent to Queensland Lesbians.The paper is designed to be brief and user-friendly so that it is readily utilised in raisingawareness of lesbian health issues. Evidence used in the paper is from an Australian (preferablyQueensland) context and has been selected based on currency, relevance, and on the significanceof the health issues that impact on the lesbian community.Whilst we have conducted an extensive search of the literature related to lesbian health overmany months, we apologise in advance for any omissions. Our aim has been to present the mostimportant and relevant evidence at hand. Further, we acknowledge that research on lesbianhealth issues is difficult to compare and analyse due to the wide variances in methodologicalpreparations of study populations (Mravcak, 2006). Some studies use three categories(homosexual, bisexual or heterosexual) whereas others use large scales of up to sevencategories to classify sexual orientation. This means more or less women may be captured in thevarious studies. This methodological phenomenon has been taken into account when reviewingthe evidence presented herein. Lesbian Health Issues Paper - October 2009 1
  • Definitions of Sexual Orientation For the purpose of academic exercise, definitions of women’s sexual orientation are useful. Though as individuals, the lives of women, the choices they make and the way they choose to express their love and sexuality are as diverse as their finger prints. Women’s sexual orientation seems far less able to be categorised by classical stage theories and is far more about individual factors, especially their emotions and environmental contexts. Women’s sexual orientation and sexuality has been described as ‘potentially fluid, changeable over time and variable across social contexts’ and more ‘culturally and contextually malleable’ than men’s (Peplau & Garnets, 2000; Veniegas & Conley, 2000). Popular opinion suggests women’s sexual orientation fits within a continuum model. This is in contrast to traditional academics who have used a dichotomy model to theorise about homosexual men and women (Veniegas & Conley, 2000). The paradigm shift towards a continuum model in the exploration of sexual orientation is an exciting development for lesbian and feminist studies. It moves away from the stifling model of homosexual versus heterosexual, which has been purported by patriarchal theorists. The continuum theory empowers women against those who aim to engage and categorise non- conforming individuals, which is an academic approach that only leads to oppression and stigmatisation of non-heterosexuals in our society. An acceptance of the fluidity of women’s sexual orientation is particularly useful for young women, and may lead to reducing the stressor associated with coming out and may assist in the establishment of a woman’s sexual identity. Often, and most particularly for bisexual or ‘bicurious’ young (or indeed older), women feel compelled to ‘come out’ as a ‘real lesbian’ and denounce any attraction for males. The continuum model relaxes the social pressure from lesbians and heterosexuals alike. It allows young women forming their sexual identity to be free to sample a variety of life experiences without having to ‘commit’ to a life of ‘heterosexualdom’ or ‘lesbianhood’. Discourse about a woman’s perceived choice over her sexual orientation is important because where an individual perceives choice over their personal preferences and lifestyle, they experience more empowerment and are less likely to feel victimised by their circumstance. The term ‘Queensland lesbians’, for the purpose of this paper and the work of the QLHAG, refers to all people who identify as lesbian, bisexual and same sex attracted women (SSAW) in Queensland. This group includes, but is in no way limited to, lesbians, gay women, dykes, women who have sex with women (WSW), women-partnered women (WPW), queer women, lezzos, SSAW, lipstick lesbians, sporty dykes, of Sapphic inclination, butch lesbians, bull dykes, stone butches, femmes, lesbian transwomen, gender queer people, diesel dykes, baby dykes, stealth dykes, transdykes, bicurious women, non-heterosexual women, fluid, androdykes, bois, bulldaggers, vagitarians and anyone who is on this side of the fence, on our team or one of us (apologies for anyone missed, please contact the author for amendments).2 Lesbian Health Issues Paper - October 2009
  • AcknowledgementsQLHAG would like to acknowledge the lesbians and SSAW of Queensland as the experts intheir health needs, and seeks only to provide structure, awareness and support to the lesbiancommunity in their health needs. Further, we thank them for sharing their stories with us so far,which are weaved into this paper.QLHAG would like to acknowledge the workers, volunteers and supporters of QAHC, withoutwhose vision, advocacy and support, would not be in a position to advance lesbian health inQueensland.QLHAG would like to acknowledge the ACON (AIDS Council of New South Wales) Lesbian HealthProject, particularly their development of Turning Point: ACON Lesbian Health Strategy 2008-2011, from which we have drawn much inspiration, guidance and resources.The author would like to gratefully acknowledge: • Shane Garvey, QAHC ATODS Project Officer, for the section on Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drugs • Carol Jeffrey, QAHC Board Member, for the section on Obesity and Overweight • National LGBT Health Alliance, for the section on Health Services Delivery • The editors and proofreaders, who include: yy Melinda Zerner; yy Paul Martin; and yy Jacinta Walker Lesbian Health Issues Paper - October 2009 3
  • QAHC Lesbian Health Action Group (Adapted from the QLHAG Terms of Reference) The QLHAG was developed in September 2008 by a group of lesbians who were concerned and compelled to act on the growing health needs of their community. Most of these women are associated with the health care sector and volunteer their time to raise awareness of the health issues mentioned in this paper. The QLHAG is auspiced by QAHC (Queensland Association of Healthy Communities) which is a lead LGBT health promotion organisation in Queensland. The goals of the QLHAG are: 1. To improve the health and wellbeing of lesbians and same sex attracted women (SSAW) in Queensland 2. To build on past and current health initiatives and the existing strengths and resources of women 3. To develop new and innovative responses in lesbian health using evidence-based practice (Adapted from Turning Point: ACON Lesbian Health Strategy 2008-2011) Membership in the Action Group is open to all those who support the goals of the Group and are willing to work to achieve them. The Action Group is comprised of Core Members who are responsible for generating outcomes and a wider Network which will serve to inform the work of the Core. The Core Members will provide regular feedback to the Network Members on the progress and action of QLHAG. Membership to the Core Group is open and demonstrated by ongoing participation at Action Group Meetings and in business.4 Lesbian Health Issues Paper - October 2009
  • IntroductionLesbians remain largely unrecognised and inadequately catered for in the wider contextof women’s health. For many reasons, lesbians experience poor outcomes in the areas of:alcohol and drug use, weight management, sexual health and most significantly, psychosocialmaladaption with potential associated mental health issues. There is no primary reason thatclarifies why lesbians participate in health behaviours, which are deleterious to their healthstatus. Most likely, the psychosocial stress of living in a heterosexist environment creates aburden, which manifests as harmful self-soothing behaviours leading lesbians to potentiallypoorer health outcomes.The Key Health Action Areas identified by the QLHAG are outlined below. Whilst most of thehealth issues are interdependent of each other, they are examined separately. This is due to thedifferent stakeholders and service providers responsible for each health issue in our community. • Accessing Health Care • Cancer Screening & Prevention • Stigma and Discrimination • Mental Health • Alcohol, Tobacco and other Drug Use • Relationships • Sexual Health • Pregnancy and Parenting • Domestic Violence • Obesity and OverweightSome groups of women within the wider lesbian community are particularly vulnerable to theimpacts of health inequities, including: • culturally and linguistically diverse women; • indigenous women; • older women; and • women with disabilities.This paper intentionally addresses health issues, not the effects on specific populations inthe lesbian community. It is acknowledged that all of the abovementioned health issues affectvulnerable groups in different ways and may require specific and targeted interventions. Lesbian Health Issues Paper - October 2009 5
  • Accessing Health Care Anecdotal evidence collected from outreach work by the QLHAG suggests many Queensland lesbians experience difficulty in finding a lesbian-friendly General Practitioner (GP). The reasons for this include general difficulties in finding a skilled GP they can communicate clearly with, concerns of disclosure of sexual orientation and negative past experiences with GPs when sexual orientation has been disclosed. Alarmingly, myths about health care needs of lesbians are prevalent in some lesbian communities. Some women have been told by their GPs they do not need Pap smears because they have never been sexually active with a man. Lesbian GPs and the promotion of lesbian-friendly GPs are uncommon in metropolitan Queensland. They are even scarcer in regional and rural Queensland. Poor access to health care is predictive of poorer health outcomes for all people, including lesbians (World Health Organisation, 1986). The likelihood of a woman disclosing her sexual orientation to a treating health care worker is positively associated with regular health care use. Whether a lesbian discloses her sexual orientation to a health care worker is dependent on provider-related characteristics such as perceived gay-positivity, gay-friendly environmental factors, such as rainbow flags and lesbian images on posters in waiting rooms, and provider inquiry about sexual orientation, rather than patient factors such as ‘outness’ (Polek & Crowley, 2008; Steele, Tinmouth, & Lu, 2006; Mravcak, 2006; Mulligan & Heath, 2007). Lesbians use a variety of strategies to secure health practitioners who are accepting of their sexuality. Strategies include, personal recommendations from trusted sources, ‘interviewing’ of the health care provider before disclosure of sexual orientation and ‘educating’ health care providers who are not experts in lesbian health issues (Mulligan & Heath, 2007). Bisexual women and women who identify as ‘mainly heterosexual’ are less likely to disclose their sexual orientation than lesbian women, and often protect their relationship with their health care providers through non-disclosure (Polek & Crowley, 2008). The Victorian Private Lives Survey reports that 65.7% of lesbian and bisexual women were ‘out’ to their GP and 65.9% had had a ‘check up’ in the last year (Pitts, Smith, Mitchell, & Patel, 2006).6 Lesbian Health Issues Paper - October 2009
  • Cancer Screening & Prevention Theoretical risk factors for developing breast cancer which are increased in lesbians include obesity, use of alcohol, reproductive risk factors such as nulliparity (never having given birth to a child), lower contraceptive use and older age at first child birth. (Brandenberg, Matthews, Johnson, & Hughes, 2007; Pitts, Smith, Mitchell, & Patel, 2006; Cochrane, et al., 2001).Breast Cancer ScreeningBreast cancer is the second most common cause of cancer-related death in women in Australiaand age is the biggest risk factor in developing the disease (Australian Institute of Health &Welfare & Department of Health and Ageing, 2008). Over 75 per cent of breast cancers occurin women 50 years and over and early detection increases a womwan’s chance of survival(Australian Institute of Health & Welfare & Department of Health and Ageing, 2008). Theoreticalrisk factors for developing breast cancer which are increased in lesbians include obesity, use ofalcohol, reproductive risk factors such as nulliparity (never having given birth to a child), lowercontraceptive use and older age at first child birth. (Brandenberg, Matthews, Johnson, & Hughes,2007; Pitts, Smith, Mitchell, & Patel, 2006; Cochrane, et al., 2001).There are limited studies which examine the incidence of breast cancer among lesbianpopulations, as breast cancer research often does not record sexual orientation. Rates of breastcancer in lesbian women reflected in the literature ranges from 0.8% to 10%. The significantvariance in the rates is indicative of the age biases in the cohorts of the studies, that is, somecohorts recruit older populations, whilst others recruit younger ones (Pitts, Smith, Mitchell, &Patel, 2006; Hyde, Comfort, Brown, McManus, & Howat, 2007).A study by Pitts et al. found17.2% of lesbians in the target group (over 50s) had never had amammogram for cancer of the breast. Whilst this is similar to the unscreened heterosexualcohort (2006), due to the higher theoretical risks outline above the lesbian population shouldbe more thoroughly examined for breast cancer incidence in order to more accurately informprevalence data (Brown & Tracy, 2008). Additionally, targeted health promotion messages Lesbian Health Issues Paper - October 2009 7
  • highlighting these risk factors to lesbians may be beneficial in decreasing the burden of disease in an already marginalised health care consumer group. American and British lesbian cohort studies examine rates of health behaviours, including breast self examination and mammography. However, these studies do not provide useful information about Australian and Queensland lesbians, particularly in relation to the effectiveness of local health promotion efforts which aim to encourage these types of behaviours in lesbian women (Aaron, Mardovic, Danielson, Honnold, Janosky, & Schmidt, 2001; Fish, 2006). ...lesbians do not perceive health promotion messages for ‘all women’ to include them regarding sexual health issues. (McNair et al, 2009) Cervical Cancer Screening Cervical cancer is one of the most preventable and curable of all cancers. Over 90% of cervical cancers result from the human papillioma virus (HPV) (Australian Institute of Health & Welfare, 2009). It is the eighteenth most common cause of cancer mortality in Australian women. It dropped from eighth place after the introduction of the Cervical Screening Program (CSP). The CSP uses a Pap smear to detect cervical cellular changes which later lead to cervical cancer (Australian Institute of Health & Welfare, 2009). All women who have ever had sex need to have regular Pap smears. This includes women who no longer have sex (AIHW, 2009). Women should have their first Pap smear around age 18 to 20 or a year or two after first having sex, whichever is the later. They should then continue to have Pap smears throughout their life until age 70 (AIHW, 2009). ‘Sex’ is not defined in the above CSP guidelines, though a common and heteronormative interpretation may read ‘sex’ as intercourse between a man and a woman. The abovementioned guidelines are written for health care workers, which may influence their advice to lesbian patients. However, it is important to acknowledge that current social marketing campaigns, such as brochures, from the National CSP do explicitly mention lesbians (National Cervical Screening Program). While over 60% of lesbians have had a male sexual partner in their lifetime, many of these women may exclude themselves from health promotion campaign messages which do not intentionally include lesbians (McNair, Power, & Carr, 2009). Further, in a study which explored the knowledge of lesbian and other women who have sex with women about HPV and their attitudes to the HPV vaccine and cervical screening, it found lesbians do not perceive health promotion messages for ‘all women’ to include them regarding sexual health issues (McNair et al, 2009). Due to dominant sexual scripts about what ‘real sex’ is, lesbians often presume that health messages are not aimed at them because they think that health promoters do not believe what they do to be ‘real sex’ (Power, McNair, & Carr, 2009). The Victorian Private Lives Survey reports that 1.5% of the participants had been diagnosed with cervical cancer (Pitts et al, 2006). In a Western Australian cross-sectional study of lesbian and bisexual women, 10.6% of the participants had been diagnosed with cancer in their lifetime, 33% of these women suffered with gynaecological cancer (cervical cancer being one of these) (Hyde et al, 2007).8 Lesbian Health Issues Paper - October 2009
  • Australian comparative studies indicate that about 20% of lesbians report never having had a Papsmear for cancer of the cervix. About 40-56.8% of the same population reported having a Papsmear in the last year. This is comparative with heterosexual cohorts (Hyde et al, 2007; Pitts et al,2006; McNair et al, 2009).As with breast cancer prevention research, American and British lesbian cohort studies examinethe rates of cervical screening but are unhelpful in providing useful information about Australianand Queensland lesbians and the effectiveness of local health promotion efforts to encouragethese behaviours in lesbian women (Aaron et al, 2001; Fish, 2006).Lifestyle factors, poor knowledge of risk factors, a lack of targeted health information forlesbians and issues of access to appropriate health care, may put lesbians at higher risk thanheterosexual women in developing cancer of the cervix and breast (McNair & Power, 2009). TheQAHC LHAG seeks to raise awareness about cancer prevention among at risk lesbian populationsthrough persistent, effective health promotion activities. To this end, it endeavours to partnershipwith existing health promotion organisations to provide targeted, timely and appropriate healthpromotion messages and resources to lesbians and other women who have sex with women. Lesbian Health Issues Paper - October 2009 9
  • Stigma and Discrimination One key factor in women coming out in any community is the presence of lesbian role models who are accepted, or at least tolerated, by the mutual community. Invisibility Women who ‘come out’ as lesbians generally suffer some form of psychological distress during the process. Edwards (2005) in her South Australian study, reports that lesbians in rural communities are more psychologically affected than their counterparts in metropolitan regions of Australia. This is due to rural lesbians’ high levels of invisibility. Rural communities, though generally supportive and close-knit, are difficult places for lesbians due to higher levels of homophobia (Edwards, 2005). Added to this, living in a rural community places individuals in a microcosm where anonymity is a fantastical notion. Edwards suggests this leads rural lesbians to assuming invisibility concerning their sexual orientation and often adopting a public heterosexual life (2005). Whilst Edward’s study sample was small, her work has been pioneering in uncovering information about the lives of rural Australian lesbians. One key factor in women coming out in any community is the presence of lesbian role models who are accepted, or at least tolerated, by the mutual community. Edwards (2005) identified in the rural South Australian community, invisibility of role models often meant lesbians remained closeted even after self-identifying their sexual orientation. One way that women may find role models in a safe environment is to undertake excursions to larger metropolitan areas where individuals are more likely to encounter same-sex attracted women (Edwards, 2005). Women in rural areas who do actualise their same-sex attraction often go to incredible lengths to keep their relationships secret. One woman in Edward’s study reported hiding on her partner’s car floor as they drove around their town in order to avoid being spotted by townsfolk (2005). The psychological stress to concealing so much of one’s personality is considerable and undoubtedly impacts on a lesbian’s mental health. Further to this, it is likely that ‘the fear of harassment or ostracism is a prime reason for keeping their same-sex attraction relatively invisible’ (Edwards, 2005). Rural lesbians may benefit from contact with metropolitan lesbians in the form of online networking sites, wide distribution of gay press and an organised network of lesbian role models willing to support lesbian and SSAW in rural areas. Aboriginal, Torres Strait Islanders and Australian South Sea Islander same-sex-attracted women are benefitting in Queensland from peer support and community connectedness with the recent development of IndigiLez. The group has identified that Indigenous SSAW experience health inequities such as discrimination, domestic violence, mental health and wellbeing, lack of education regarding safe play and safe sex (Jeffreys, 2009). IndigiLez places a focus on developing leadership skills and empowerment, and addressing issues of racism and discrimination by offering fortnightly meetings and quarterly ‘Dreaming Retreats’ (Jeffreys, 2009).10 Lesbian Health Issues Paper - October 2009
  • Workplace harassment is another reason why lesbians choose to remain invisible or closeted.Whilst discrimination against a person for their sexual orientation in Australia is illegal, only halfof the LBGTIs surveyed in the Victorian Private Lives Surveyed stated that they were ‘out’ at work(Pitts et al, 2006). An Atlanta study of lesbian physicians found that the lesbian participants werefour times more likely than their heterosexual counterparts to suffer sexual harassment, in anysetting, but predominantly in their training and medical practice (Brogan, Frank, Sivanesan, &O’Hanlan, 1999). Any sort of interpersonal stressors in the workplace has a negative impact onwork functioning and satisfaction. The Atlanta study found ‘harassed women physicians are lesssatisfied with their careers, feel less in control of their work environments, and are more likely tohave histories of depression and suicide attempts’ (Brogan et al, 1999).Coming outLaden with difficulties, the ‘coming out’ process is vital to the self-actualisation of all lesbian, gayand bisexual (LGB) people. When this process is unsupported and an isolating experience, youngpeople are more prone to hazardous substance use, suicidal attempts and other risk-takingbehaviour (Floyd & Stein, 2002; Van Wormer & McKinney, 2003). On the other hand, when a LGByoung person is exposed to positive non-heterosexual role models, media and support servicesthey can emerge from their initial ‘coming out’ experience significantly less scathed (Floyd et al,2002; van Wormer et al, 2003). The ‘initial’ ‘coming out’ experience is highlighted because formany LGB people, life can become a constant struggle against heterosexism. A life where onemust correct others’ use of personal pronouns, be relegated to the use of ambiguous terms suchas, ‘my partner’, and assert that ‘sex’ does not always involve ‘just one penis and one vagina’ canbe difficult.One’s level of acceptance by self and others during adolescence and young adulthood ispredictive in psychological resilience across the lifespan. Health care workers and educatorshave a responsibility to provide appropriate role modeling of non-heterosexuality and homophilicenvironments where youth can develop self-acceptance as they come out. Fletcher and Russellprovide helpful guidelines for educators to create opportunities to challenge heterosexismwithin the classroom context (2001). Though Fletcher and Russell’s article is written for collegeteachers, its principles are applicable and perhaps even more appropriate to raise with youngerage groups on the basis of the stage theory for sexual orientation. Fletcher et al suggest usingnon-heterosexual examples when illustrating points of discussion in the classroom and creatinga classroom climate where homophobic comments and slurs are as unacceptable as racial andanti-Semitic remarks (2001). Women in relationships where each partner has moderate social involvement with lesbian affiliated events and social networks reported the highest level of relationship satisfaction. (Beals & Peplau, 2001) Lesbian Health Issues Paper - October 2009 11
  • Outness The degree of disclosure about sexual orientation is most often colloquially termed ’outness’ and it has been long touted that the more ‘out’ one was, they more socially and individually adjusted they were. ‘Outness’ can become a psychosocial stressor for individuals and couples where disclosure could be socially detrimental or where the individuals have differing levels of desire to self-disclose. Women in relationships where each partner has moderate social involvement with lesbian affiliated events and social networks reported the highest level of relationship satisfaction (Beals & Peplau, 2001). Beals et al. also found that lesbians who disclosed their sexual orientation did not report more satisfaction in their relationship than lesbians who did disclose their sexual orientation (2001). However, couples who disagree about their ‘outness’ to friends, family and their community are likely to experience conflict due to differing wants and needs. Couples who have discordant levels of ‘outness’ are more likely to experience conflict and relationship dissatisfaction than those couples who are out to their friends and family (Todosijevic, Rothblum, & Solomon, 2005). When considered in the context of the gay liberation movement which has worked towards increasing lesbian and gay visibility and human rights touting better lifestyle and health outcomes for being ‘out’, this finding by Beals is surprising (2005). Beals explains that though self-disclosure can provide benefits, it is burdened with risks, including: • social rejection; • loss of control over personal information; • betrayal if confidences are broken; and • the possibility of hurting or embarrassing the listener’ (2005). Young lesbians whose parents are aware of their sexual orientation experience less internalised homophobia and receive more family support than those youth whose parents are unaware of their sexual orientation. (D’Augelli, Grossman, & Starks, 2005). Acceptance of Loved Ones The old saying ‘you can chose your friends but you can’t chose your family’ is no more burdensome than in the lives of lesbians and their families who have to battle the social conditioning of heterosexism and homophobia to accept their lesbian loved ones and their sexual orientation. Lesbians have reported more stress related to their family’s acceptance of them being homosexual than their gay counterparts. Factors included experiencing: • rejection; • lack of support; and • lack of understanding by family (Todosijevic, Rothblum & Solomon,2005).12 Lesbian Health Issues Paper - October 2009
  • The Todosijevic et al study concludes it is likely that gay men and lesbians experience equal levelsof rejection by family and that perhaps women perceive family rejection as a more stressful event(2005). Coming out is most often a traumatic event not only for the individual but also for theirfamilies. The most devastating cases seem to be where a family has failed to pick up on any cluesabout homosexuality or where the family is in denial of the cues. Young lesbians whose parentsare aware of their sexual orientation experience less internalised homophobia and receive morefamily support than those youth whose parents are unaware of their sexual orientation (D’Augelli,Grossman, & Starks, 2005).Lesbians report more stressors than gay men in relation to family acceptance of their chosenpartner (Todosijevic, Rothblum, & Solomon, 2005). The study cited four main stressors forlesbians, including: • negative family reaction, • visibility with family and friends, • visibility with work and public, and • sexual orientation conflict (2005).The study reports that lesbians and gay men reported equal levels of stress related to theacceptance by loved ones of the individual’s partner choice (Todosijevic et al, 2005). Lesbian Health Issues Paper - October 2009 13
  • Mental Health The trend towards higher rates of depression and anxiety among lesbians is likely to be related to poor societal acceptance of their homosexuality and poor social support, especially from family. (Pitts et al., 2006; McNair, Kavanagh, Agius, & Tong, 2005) Lesbians suffer greater rates of anxiety and depression than heterosexual women. This is due to a variety of reasons, but mostly because of the stigma and discrimination associated with homosexuality. Heterosexuals underestimate the impact of living in a heterosexist world for lesbians where everything is geared to validate heterosexuality. Whether it is the registration form at the GP’s surgery, the advertising images on the television each night or the questioning look of your child’s teacher when he states he has two mummies, heterosexism can become daily drudgery for lesbians. This psychosocial pressure can manifest in anxiety and depression for lesbians. A Victorian self-completed survey of 178 lesbians revealed that a sense of belonging to the general community is protective against depression and that a sense of belonging to the lesbian community supported and facilitated a sense of belonging to the general community (McLaren, 2009). Large Australian cohort studies reveal higher rates of anxiety and depression than their heterosexual counterparts (Hydeet al., 2007; Pitts et al., 2006). One third of Western Australian lesbian and bisexual women had been diagnosed by a doctor with depression, in comparison with on 22% of heterosexual women (Hyde, 2007). Forty percent of this same population had been diagnosed with anxiety by a doctor, nearly 50% of these lesbians had been diagnosed in the last year (Hyde, 2007).The trend towards higher rates of depression and anxiety among lesbians is likely to be related to poor societal acceptance of their homosexuality and poor social support, especially from family (Pitts et al., 2006; McNair, Kavanagh, Agius, & Tong, 2005). Women who are forced to conceal their same-sex attraction often ‘experienced alienation from their usual social networks and intensifying psycho-social distress’, according to Edwards (2005) Edwards suggests that telephone and internet based counseling could provide a means of support for same-sex attracted women in rural areas (2005). The Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) reports that homosexuals (including lesbians and bisexual women) have poorer lifetime mental health status, with 30.2% suffering with an affective disorder (depression) compared with only 8.1% of heterosexuals, and 26% having an anxiety disorder compared with only 6.6% of heterosexuals (ABS, 2008).14 Lesbian Health Issues Paper - October 2009
  • Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drug UseThis section is provided by the QAHC ATODS Project Officer, Shane Garvey, with permission. The fullATODS Literature Review can be found on the QAHC website.Lesbians and bisexualwomen are more likelyto smoke and misusealcohol, both of whichare linked to majorchronic disease andrisk-taking behaviour inthe case of alcohol use.(Gruskin, Hart, Gordon, & Ackerson, 2001; King& Nazareth, 2006)It may be that lesbians self-medicate to deal with psychosocial stress in ways that could bepotentially harmful to their health. Lesbians and bisexual women are more likely to smoke andmisuse alcohol, both of which are linked to major chronic disease and risk-taking behaviourin the case of alcohol use (Gruskin, Hart, Gordon, & Ackerson, 2001; King & Nazareth, 2006).The ABS 2007 Mental Health and Wellbeing Report suggests that 27.5% of homosexualQueenslanders (including lesbians and bisexual women) suffer with a lifetime substance usedisorder in comparison to only 5.5% of heterosexual Queenslanders (ABS, 2008). Australian lesbians are more likely than heterosexual women to smoke. Lesbian Health Issues Paper - October 2009 15
  • Tobacco The literature suggests Australian lesbians are more likely than heterosexual women to smoke. In Australia, rates of smoking amongst lesbian and bisexual women range from 28% and 45.6% (Comfort, 2007; Pitts et al., 2006; Hillier, de Visser, Kavanagh, & McNair, 2003). A recent study reported that one third (34%) of lesbian respondents living in Sydney were current tobacco smokers (Richters, Song, Prestage, Clayon, & Turner, 2005). In 2007, 28% of lesbian and bisexual women residing in Western Australia smoked tobacco, twice the general rate for heterosexual women (Comfort, 2007). Younger lesbian and bisexual women are more likely to smoke tobacco with 76% of this group aged between 14-18 having reported smoking, compared to 19% heterosexual females of the same age (Barbeler, 1992). More recently, in a national longitudinal study of young lesbian women in Australia aged 22-27 years, just under half (45.6%) were current smokers compared to 25% for heterosexual women within the same age group (Hillier et al. 2005). Reasons for the elevated use of tobacco by lesbians and bisexual women range from stress and depression experienced as a result of external and internalised homophobia cultural factors, including the use of bars as a primary means of socialisation where smoking is prevalent; the desire to appear more masculine, peer pressure, fitting in, rebelliousness (for youth), exposure to other LGBT smokers and the perception that LGBT people generally smoke (Heffernan, 1998; Aaron et al., 2001; Gruskin et al., 2001; Ryan, Wortley, Easton, Pederson, & Greenwood, 2001). Alcohol Australian research suggests that patterns of alcohol consumption among lesbians and bisexual women are not uniform over age, and that younger lesbians are more likely to drink than heterosexual women and gay men of the same age group (Hyde et al., 2007; Hillier et al., 2005). In Australia, 38.6% of lesbians have reported low-risk-drinking-with-binging (compared to 27.9% in heterosexual women) with 7% reporting high risk drinking, compared to 3.9% of heterosexual women. (Hillier et al., 2003). Research has also indicated that 33% of lesbians in Australia drink above the recommended safe level of four drinks or less per day (Murnane, Smith, Crompton, Snow, & Munro, 2000). In a more recent study 30% of Australian lesbians have reported exceeding the safer drinking guidelines, whilst only 7% have described themselves as a heavy drinker, suggesting that “these women (are) unaware that their consumption patterns (are) potentially harmful and that heavy drinking may be a normalised behaviour amongst lesbian and bisexual women” (Hyde et al., 2007) . Some explanations for the differences in lesbian and heterosexual women’s drinking patterns include the minority stress model, whereby “health disparities are explained by stressors induced by a homophobic society”, internalised homophobia, and the centrality of the “gay” bar to socialization and social support- especially during the years of coming out are some explanations for differences between lesbian and heterosexual women’s drinking patterns (Meyer, 2003; Williamson, 2000; Eliason & Hughes, 2004). Parallels have also been drawn between problem drinking and sexual identity development whereby lesbian women who are younger when they first disclose their sexual orientation, tend to experience more negative consequences of drinking than women who disclose at a later age, resulting in a greater number of alcohol dependence symptoms. Therefore, younger lesbians,16 Lesbian Health Issues Paper - October 2009
  • most of whom must negotiate an often difficult developmental stage, may be at risk of consumingalcohol at high levels when dealing with issues related to sexual identity. (D’Augelli et al., 1998 inParks & Hughes, 2007). The risks associated with disclosure, or “coming out” can include loss offamily and community support, along with harassment and violence, and this can add additionalstress on the well being of young lesbians (Eliason & Hughes 2004; D’Augelli et al. 1998 in Parks,2007). Alternatively, “coming out” to family members and social networks, can also increase thepotential for support (Parks, 2007). Homophobic abuse; testing gender boundaries; lesbian recreational bar culture; escaping from isolation and the stress of homophobia are some of the reasons cited for the elevated use of illicit drugs by young lesbians. (Hillier et el, 2003; Hershberger & D?Augelli, 1995; Jordan, 2000)Illicit Drug UseIn Australia, lesbian and bisexual women are more likely to use and inject illicit drugs thanheterosexual women. In a 2003 study by Hillier et al., 61.2% of lesbians had reported usingillicit drugs in their lifetime (compared to 22.4% of heterosexual women) and 40.7% had usedillicit drugs in the past twelve months (compared to 10.2% of heterosexual women). Over 10%of lesbians and bisexual women reported injecting illicit drugs compared to only just over 1%of their heterosexual counterparts. Cannabis was the most commonly used illicit substance,with 84.6% ever used, and 58.2% used in the past year, far exceeding heterosexual rates ofcannabis use.Similar rates of illicit drug use can be found in The 2004 Sydney Women and Sexual HealthSurvey where cannabis (38.1%), ecstasy (28.3%) and speed (25.3%) had been used by lesbianand bisexual women aged 16-64 in the past six months. Again, these rates far exceeded illicitdrug use by heterosexual women when compared to the 2004 National Drug Household Survey(Richters et al., 2005). The most recent research to date into lesbian and bisexual women’sillicit drug use in Australia confirms these results, with 33.6% of lesbian and bisexual womenhaving reported using an illicit drug in the past six months, with cannabis (26.4%), ecstasy(17.9%) and speed (17.3%) being the most commonly used, and10.4% reporting having injectedan illicit substance in the past 6 months (Hyde et al., 2007).For younger Australian lesbians, cannabis, heroin and injecting drug use exceeds that ofyoung gay men (Hillier et al., 2005). Homophobic abuse; testing gender boundaries; lesbianrecreational bar culture; escaping from isolation and the stress of homophobia are some ofthe reasons cited for the elevated use of illicit drugs by young lesbians. (Hillier et el, 2003;Hershberger & D’Augelli, 1995; Jordan, 2000). For some, drugs are used as a temporary crutchto deal with homophobic abuse and the confusion surrounding their sexual orientation. Formany young lesbians, drug use diminished with self acceptance of their sexual orientation.However, evidence also indicates that for other young Australian lesbians, drug use continuedin to later life, even after self acceptance of sexual orientation had been achieved. (Hillier et al.,2005). Lesbian Health Issues Paper - October 2009 17
  • Relationships Relationships which are recognised gain the support and status which validates and normalises homosexuality, thus improving self-esteem and mental health and decreasing other health behaviours which are deleterious and harmful. Lesbian relationships are intricate and unique. However just like their heterosexual counterparts lesbian relationships necessitate the same maintenance of a healthy relationship while dealing with day to day life. Fraught with a lack of acceptance by the mainstream society, lesbian relationships in Australia remain invalidated in terms of marriage and equal parenting rights. Additionally, couples may struggle with maintaining a sense of self in emotionally intense unions which may be known or unknown to friends, family and society. Civil Unions and Same Sex Marriage King and Bartlett use the premise that married heterosexual men and women experience greater health outcomes than their unmarried counterparts to predict that civil unions may yield the same health benefits for gay men and lesbians (2006). Further to the health benefits of being in a long-term, committed and supportive relationship, King et al. suggests that legally recognised relationships may be a step towards reducing the psychological stress and trauma associated with being homosexual in a heterosexist if not homophobic world (2006).18 Lesbian Health Issues Paper - October 2009
  • A recent Australian study investigated the preferences of same-sex attracted Australiansregarding the legal recognition of their relationships following the introduction of de factostatus for same-sex couples at a federal Government level (Dane, Masser, & Duck, 2009). Thestudy which surveyed 2232 Australians (53% female and 37.9% lesbian) reported that of thoseparticipants who currently had their relationship recognised by a state or municipal registry(NSW, Victoria, ACT and Tasmania), 78% would prefer to be married to their partner (Dane et al.,2009). Of those participants who had an overseas marriage, 91% wanted to be legally marriedin Australia as well (Dane et al., 2009). The prohibition of same-sex couples to marry is a keyindicator of acceptance of homosexuals in society. Relationships which are recognised gain thesupport and status which validates and normalises homosexuality, thus improving self-esteemand mental health and decreasing other health behaviours which are deleterious and harmful.Extreme intimacy in relationshipsTodosijevic et al. identified that lesbians in civil unions where the couple had a significant agegap were more likely to have higher relationship satisfaction (2005). The authors purport twoexplanations for this phenomenon: 1. that women of all sexual orientations are more likely to express interest in older partners; which is an acceptable conclusion. More interestingly though; 2. that ‘heterogeneous’ couples are less likely to experience ‘over involvement’ or ‘merging’ than similarly aged couples.This second hypothesis raises fascinating phenomenological questions about the level of intimacywhich lesbians experience in their relationships. Because of the high level of emotionalityof women, common interests and exemplary communication skills, lesbians in general aremore likely to engage in an extreme emotional connectedness with their partner, than theirheterosexual counterparts. Todosijevic et al. states that this ‘fusion’ can result in ‘near completeloss of individual identity’ for similarly aged couples (2005). Furthermore, the authors suggestthat an age difference is likely to lead to ‘discordance’ in interests which may assist in fostering a‘healthy balance between closeness and distance’ (Todosijevic et al., 2005). Lesbian Health Issues Paper - October 2009 19
  • Sexual Health Whilst the literature reflects significant stressors impacting on lesbians, sexual health is one area lesbians may be ahead of their heterosexual counterparts. Peplau et al. suggests that lesbian sexuality and relationships are far less about sexual acts than the sexuality and relationships of their heterosexual female counterparts and all men (2000). The literature cited in Peplau’s et al. paper suggests that lesbians are: • less likely than gay men to have sex with a new partner on the first date; • more likely than gay men to have their first same-sex contact within the context of an established romantic relationship (70% vs 5%); and • (along with heterosexual women) are likely to have less sexual partners than all men are (2000). Though lesbian sexual behaviours over the lifespan may be protective, rates of STIs (sexually transmitted infections) among lesbians are surprisingly high based on four premises: 1. most lesbians have had sex with men in their lifetime, and many continue to do so; 2. lesbian sex, particularly orogenital, oroanal and penetrative vaginal sex with body parts and/ or toys, is a viable mode of transmission for STIs; 3. lesbians are more likely than their heterosexual counterparts, to engage in unsafe sex, that is limited use of barrier methods such as dams for oral sex, condoms/gloves or washing hands and toys before penetrative vaginal sex; and 4. lesbians are less likely to engage in regular and honest sexual health care with their health care professionals (Bailey, Farquhar, Owen, & Mangtani, 2006; Marrazzo, 2004). Higher levels of unsafe sex amongst lesbians are evidenced as in Marrazzo, who reports: • 19% of lesbians who reported no sex with men were seropositive for HPV, • 46% of lesbians were seropositive for HSV1 and 8% for HSV2 (Seattle Lesbian Health Study), • Between 24% and 51% of lesbians suffered with BV (Bacterial Vaginosis) in comparison with their heterosexual counterparts who experienced rates of 21% (2005; Bailey et al., 2006). Limited safe sex campaigns have been noted in gay press and the issue of lesbian sexual health remains largely ignored by the general sexual health community. In the lesbian community safe sex is rarely discussed and certainly not common practice. With the advent of organisations such as Queensland Association for Healthy Communities, we may hope to expect more attention for lesbian health in the future, in the form of safer sex awareness raising, affordable supply of dams and an attitudinal change amongst lesbians.20 Lesbian Health Issues Paper - October 2009
  • Pregnancy and Parenting... children brought up inlesbian families experienceas much, if not, greaterquality of mother-childinteraction than single-parent or heterosexualfamilies, lesbian couplesand families continue to besubjected to stigmatisationand discrimination.(Vanfraussen, Ponjaert-Kristoffersen, & Brewaeys, 2003)One of the most contentious issues for lesbianism today is the parenting of children withinthe lesbian family. Though research proves that children brought up in lesbian familiesexperience as much, if not, greater quality of mother-child interaction than single-parent orheterosexual families, lesbian couples and families continue to be subjected to stigmatisationand discrimination (Vanfraussen, Ponjaert-Kristoffersen, & Brewaeys, 2003). Lesbian invisibilityrears its ugly head in the parenting context for the ‘lesbian social mother’. Though ‘lesbian socialmothers’ (non-birth mothers) are as equally engaged with their children as all of their parentingcounterparts, including the birth mother (Vanfraussen, 2003), they stand in a very precariousposition. With virtually no legal rights regarding decision-making and advocacy for the child, non-birth mothers are bereft of the capacity to have custody of their child without their relationshipto the birth mother. The psychosocial stress of not being able to consent for her son’s life savingsurgery in the emergency department or having no legal case for joint custody of her daughter ifher relationship ends must be devastating. Vanfraussen states: ‘from a symbolic (linguistically) and legal point of view, the lesbian social mother remains invisible. Since she has no genetic tie with the children she parents, she cannot call on biologically based notions of parenthood to define her role as a parent. Instead she has to construct her role socially as a caregiver’ (2003).In the Queensland context there are two aspects of the law that are relevant for same-sexparents; Commonwealth laws and Queensland laws. With the recent amendments to legislationthat came in to effect on July 1, 2009, the state and federal governments have made marginalprogression towards closing the gap in the inequities for same-sex parents. Lesbian Health Issues Paper - October 2009 21
  • Domestic Violence ... internalised homophobia was associated with domestic violence for the 40% of lesbians who had been physically or sexually violent to a female partner and 44% who had been victims of domestic violence. (Balsam et al., 2005) Minority stress has been described by Balsam and Szymanski as living in an ‘oppressive cultural context’ where one is ‘stigmatised and marginalised’ (2005). Their small scale study examines the role of minority stress in relationship quality and domestic violence among lesbians, and found lesbians with less internalised homophobia had better relationship quality, were more ‘out’ and independent than those with high levels of internalised homophobia (Balsam et al., 2005). Conversely, internalised homophobia was associated with domestic violence for the 40% of lesbians who had been physically or sexually violent to a female partner and 44% who had been victims of domestic violence (Balsam et al., 2005). Most interestingly, Balsam et al. tested a hypothesis that butch women would be more likely to perpetrate domestic violence and that femmes would be more likely to be victims (2005). They found that there was no correlation between stereotyped roles and domestic violence but that femmes may be more vulnerable to insults regarding their sexual orientation by abusive partners (Balsam et al., 2005).22 Lesbian Health Issues Paper - October 2009
  • Obesity and Overweight Australian Lesbians are more likely than their heterosexual counterparts to be overweight (49% vs 38%). (Pitts et al., 2006)There has been alarming significant increases in the proportion of overweight or obeseAustralians over the last 20 years (Cameron et al., 2003). According to the figures from the AIHW7.5 million Australians aged 25 years and over (60%) were overweight or obese and of these2.6 million (21%) were obese (2002). Significantly the proportion of overweight or obese peopleincreased with age and peaked at 55-74 years for men and 65-74 years for women (AustralianInstitute of Health and Welfare, 2002). These local statistics are replicated over the Western worldwith the US peaking at 30.9% of their total population as obese (Cameron et al., 2003).Obesity is measured across the world by Body Mass Index (BMI) which is weight in kilogramsdivided by height in metres squared (Caterson, 1999; Crawford, 2002). Individuals with a BMIgreater than 30 are considered obese and are considered morbidly obese with a BMI over 40(Crawford, 2002).Australian Lesbians are more likely than their heterosexual counterparts to be overweight(49% vs 38%) (Pitts et al., 2006). Though, it should be noted that this same population reportedbetter self-rated and comparable actual health status when compared with the generalAustralian population (Pitts et al., 2006). It may be true that as lesbians age, they adjust betterto their sexual orientation and become less susceptible to the societal pressures of being in asexual minority.Furthermore there are many co-morbidities related to being obese which can include arthritis,sleep apnoea, varicose veins, diabetes, hypertension, ischaemic heart disease, fatty liver,gallstones, certain cancers and psychosocial difficulties (Caterson, 1999; Hahler, 2002; Martinez-Owens, 2003) These medical problems often prolong length-of-stay (LOS) within hospitals forgenerally routine admissions due to the nature and severity of these problems (Davidson, Kruse,Cox, & Duncan, 2003;Hahler, 2002). This extended LOS can further exacerbate issues for lesbianwomen as they will have had to negotiate their admission and then face further issues relatingto disclosure, recognition of their same sex partner and other issues already discussed in theAccessing of Health section of this paper. Lesbian Health Issues Paper - October 2009 23
  • Health Service Delivery This section is provided by the National LGBT Health Alliance, with permission. Sexual orientation should be recognised as a social determinant of health, alongside other determinants including gender, indigenous, ethnic and socioeconomic status. Research indicates that stigma, discrimination and other forms of exclusion experienced by lesbians and same sex attracted women have a detrimental impact on their health behaviours, health outcomes and access to health services. Health promotion strategies that combat sources of discrimination and foster resilience, self- esteem and an attitude of self-care among members of marginalised groups contribute to positive health outcomes. Sexual orientation can impact on the health of lesbians in three main ways: Services need to be Some health issues Some health issues affect culturally appropriate to affect lesbians/wsw more lesbians/wsw differently lesbians/wsw people to than other women. than other women. be effective. As reported above, there are a range of health behaviours and health outcomes that affect Lesbians/women who have sex with women more than other women, including mental health, tobacco & other drugs and sexually transmitted diseases. Health programs and services should prioritise the needs of gay lesbians/WSW in these areas. Health issues can also affect lesbians/WSW differently than other women. Sexual health is an obvious example of where lesbians/WSW are different from heterosexual women. However, as much health behaviour is socially determined, the social context in which lesbians/WSW live will influence behaviour in ways different than other women. Health programs and services need to understand these differences and tailor services appropriately. Health programs and services need to be delivered in a way that is culturally appropriate to Lesbians/WSW, including: • one size fits all • niche marketing • custom made • services specific to lesbians/WSW One Size Fits All - As most lesbians/WSW access most health services from the mainstream, these mainstream services have a responsibility to ensure they are knowledgeable and respectful of issues specific to lesbians/WSW. Services should ensure staff are properly trained, that there are policies and procedures in place that are inclusive of lesbians/WSW and that they are able to make referrals to lesbians specific services/resources where appropriate.24 Lesbian Health Issues Paper - October 2009
  • Niche Marketing - Mainstream health programs and services should be promoted throughcommunication channels that target sexuality, sex and gender diverse communities (e.g. press,websites, groups, venues) as well as in the mainstream, to send a clear message that theseservices are inclusive and welcoming of lesbians/WSW. Marketing should explicitly includeimages and text that ‘speak’ to lesbians/WSW.Custom Made – Some mainstream services could be more effective by making adaptations tomake them culturally appropriate to lesbians/WSW. This could include running the service in alesbian friendly setting, employing lesbian workers and using language, printed resources andexamples that lesbians/WSW can relate to.Specific Services – There will also be issues and situations where a lesbian/WSW specific serviceis required or preferred. This may be because the issue is more significant or different forlesbians/WSW. LGBT community based services, known to be run by and for lesbians/WSW areoften most effective as they have fewer barriers to access and an in-depth understanding of theissues at hand. Lesbian Health Issues Paper - October 2009 25
  • Conclusion Though there are health inequalities for lesbians, as with most other minority groups, appropriate community support and acceptance would alleviate much of this burden. Individual, societal and relationship factors all contribute to the health status which an individual enjoys. Where people can live free from stigma and feel accepted by peers and the community at large, they flourish as worthwhile contributors to society and are more likely to make healthful life choices. The Private Lives survey reports that LGBTI people live ‘happy and fulfilled’ lives, despite their heterosexist environment, reporting that friends, work/study and relationships were the best parts of their lives (Pitts et al., 2006). It seems that in gay-friendly communities, lesbians experience relative freedom and report being well-adjusted. The difficulty remains for young and closeted lesbians who are enmeshed in homophobic contexts where they are denied, discriminated against and stigmatised. In these environments, destructive self-soothing behaviours become a coping strategy for minimising the psychosocial stress of being different from the majority sexual population. While the militancy of the lesbian feminist appears to be long gone from mainstream attention, the young, disempowered and isolated remain burdened with secrets and shame of their love for women. Positive role models from all walks of life are vital to provide dislocated lesbians with forums to share their experiences and safety to be who they truly are, women loving women.26 Lesbian Health Issues Paper - October 2009
  • Reference List1. Aaron, D. J., Mardovic, N., Danielson, M., Honnold, J. A., Janosky, J. E., & Schmidt, N. J. (2001). Behavioural risk factors for disease and preventative health practices among lesbians. Americal Journal of Public Health , 19, 972-975.2. Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2008). 2007 Mental Health and Wellbeing: Lifetime Mental Health Disorders by Sexual Orientation , Commonwealth of Australia.3. Australian Government. (2008). National Cervical Screening Program. Retrieved October, 12, 2009, from http://www. 2Consumer+Resources-3&SUBMIT=Search4. Australian Institute of Health & Welfare & Department of Health and Ageing. (2008). BreastScreen Australia monitoring report 2004-2005. Retrieved May 27, 2009, from BreastScreen Australia: title/105435. Australian Institute of Health & Welfare. (2009). Cervical screening in Australia 2006-2007. Retrieved May 27, 2009, from Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2002). Australia’s Health 2002 [Online]. Retrieved April 13, 2004, from http://www. Bailey, J. V., Farquhar, C., Owen, C., & Mangtani, P. (2006). Sexually transmitted infections in women who have sex with women. BMC Public Health , 6 (127), 188-191.8. Balsam, K., & Szymanski, D. (2005). Relationship Quality and Domestic Violence in Women’s Same-Sex Relationships: The Role of Minority Stress. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 258-269.9. Barbeler, V. (1992). The Young Lesbian Report: A Study of the Attitudes and Behaviours of Adolescent Lesbians Today: Sydney Young Lesbian Support Group. Sydney.10. Beals, K., & Peplau, L. (2001). Social Involvement, Disclosure of Sexual Orientation, and the Quality of Lesbian Relationships. Psychology of Women Quarterly , 25, 10-19.11. Brandenberg, D. L., Matthews, A. K., Johnson, T. P., & Hughes, T. L. (2007). Breast cancer risk and screening: a comparison of lesbian and heterosexual women. Women and Health , 45 (4), 109-130.12. Brogan, D. J., Frank, E. E., Sivanesan, P., & O’Hanlan, K. A. (1999). Harassment of Lesbians as Medical Students and Physicians. Journal of American Medical Association , 282, 1290-1292.13. Brown, J. P., & Tracy, K. (2008). Lesbians and cancer: An overlooked health disparity. Cancer Causes Control , 19, 1009-1020.14. Cameron, A. J., Welborn, T. A., Zimmet, P. A., Dunstan, D. W., Owen, N., Salmon, J., et al. (2003). Overweight and obesity in Australia: the 1999-2000 Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle Study (AusDiab). Retrieved March 2004, from Medical Journal of Australia: Caterson, I. (1999). Obesity and its management. Australian Prescription , 22, 12-16.16. Cochrane, S. D., Mays, V. M., Bowen, D., Gage, S., Bybee, D., Roberts, S. J., et al. (2001). Cancer-related risk indicators and preventative screening behaviours among lesbians and bisexual women. American Journal of Public Health , 91 (4), 591-597.17. Crawford, D. (2002). Acting on Australia’s health: A study in obesity. NUTRI Date , 13 (4), 1-3.18. D’Augelli, A. R., Grossman, A. H., & Starks, M. T. (2005). Parents’ Awareness of Lesbian, Gay, and Bissexual Youths’ Sexual Orientation. Journal of Marriage and Family , 67 (2), 474-482.19. Dane, S., Masser, B., & Duck, J. (2009). Not so private lives: The ins and outs of same sex relationships: A report on the analyses of relationship recognition measures including the Not So Private Lives Online Survey for Same Sex Attracted Australians. (University of Queensland) Retrieved October 5, 2009, from Not So Private Lives Online Survey for Same Sex Attracted Australians: Davidson, J., Kruse, M., Cox, D., & Duncan, R. (2003). Critical care of the morbidly obese. Critical Care Nursing Quarterly , 26 (2), 105-119.21. Edwards, J. (2005). Invisibility,Safety and Psycho-social Distress Among Same-sex Attracted Women in Rural South Australia. Rural and Remote Health5 (online) , 343.22. Eliason, M., & Hughes, T. (2004). Treatment Counsellor’s Attitudes about Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Clients: Urban vs. Rural Settings. Substance Use & Misuse , 39 (4), 625-644.23. Fish, J. (2006). Exploring lesbians’ health behaviours and risk perceptions. Diversity in Health and Social Care , 3, 163-169.24. Fletcher, A. C., & Russell, S. T. (2001). Incorporating Issues of Sexual Orientation in the Classroom: Challenges and Solutions. Family Relations , 50 (1), 34-40.25. Floyd, F. J., & Stein, T. S. (2002). Sexual Orientation Identity Formation Among Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Youth: Multiple Patterns of Milestone Experiences. Journal of Research on Adolescence , 12 (2), 167-191.26. Gruskin, E. P., Hart, S., Gordon, N., & Ackerson, L. (2001). Patterns of cigarette smoking and alcohol use among lesbians and bisexual women enrolled in a large health maintenance organisation. American Journal of Public Health , 91 (6), 976-979.27. Hahler, B. (2002). Morbid Obesity: A Nursing Care Challenge. Dermatology Nursing , 14 (4), 249-256.28. Heffernan, K. (1998). The nature and predictors of substance use among lesbians. Addictive Behaviours , 23 (4), 517-528.29. Hershberger, S., & D’Augelle, A. (1995). The impact of victimisation on the mental health and suicidality of lesbian, gay and bisexual youth. Developmental Psychology , 31, 65-74. Lesbian Health Issues Paper - October 2009 27
  • 30. Hillier, L., de Visser, R., Kavanagh, A., & McNair, R. (2003). The association between licit and illicit drug use and sexuallity in young Australian women. Medical Journal of Australia , 179 (6), 326-327. 31. Hyde, Z., Comfort, J., Brown, G., McManus, A., & Howat, P. (2007). The health and well-being of lesbian and bisexual women in Western Australia. Curtin University of Technology, WA Centre for Health Promotion Research, Perth. 32. Jeffreys, E. (2009) Queers for Reconcilliation, Cherie Magazine, Retrieved October, 10, 2009 from, features/queers-for-reconciliation.html 33. Jordan, K. (2000). Substance use among gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender and questioning adolescents. School of Psychology Review , 29, 210-206. 34. King, M., & Bartlett, A. (2006). What Same Sex Civil Partnerships May Mean For Health. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health , 60, 188-191. 35. King, M., & Nazareth, I. (2006). The Health of People Classified as Lesbian, Gay and Bisexual Attending Family Practitioners in London: A Controlled Study. British Medical Council , 6 (127), 1471-2458. 36. Marrazzo, J. E. (2004). Barriers to Infectious Disease Care Among Lesbians. Emerging Infectious Diseases . Retrieved May 27, 2009, from 37. Marrazzo, J. E., Coffey, P., & Elliott, M. N. (2005). Sexual practices, risk perception and knowledge of sexually transmitted disease risk among lesbian and bisexual women, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. 27 (1), 6-12. 38. Martinez-Owens, T. (2003). Morbid obesity: The disease and comorbidities. Critical Care Nursing Quarterly , 26 (2), 162-167. 39. McLaren, S. (2009). Sense of belonging to the general and lesbian communities as predictors of depression among lesbians. Journal of Homosexuality , 56, 1-13. 40. McNair, R., Kavanagh, A., Agius, P., & Tong, B. (2005). The mental health status of young adult and mid-life non- heterosexual Australian women. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health , 29 (3), 265-270. 41. McNair, R., Power, J., & Carr, S. (2009). Comparing knowledge and perceived risk related to the human papilloma virus among Australian women of diverse sexual orientations. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health , 33 (1), 87-93. 42. Meyer, I. (2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay and bisexual populations: conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychology Bulletin , 129, 674-697. 43. Mravcak, S. A. (2006). Primary care for lesbians and bisexual women. American Family Physician , 74 (2), 279-286. 44. Mulligan, E., & Heath, M. (2007). Seeking open minded doctors: How women who identify as bisexual, queer or lesbian seek quality health care. Australian Family Physician , 36 (6), 469-471. 45. Murnane, A., Smith, A., Crompton, l., Snow, P., & Munro, G. (2000). Beyond Perceptions: A report on alcohol and other drug use among gay, lesbian, bisexual and queer communities in Victoria. Victoria: Australian Drug Foundation. 46. Parks, C., & Hughes, T. (2007). Age Differences in Lesbian Identity Development and Drinking. Substance Use & Misuse , 42 (2), 361-380. 47. Peplau, L. A., & Garnets, L. D. (2000). A New Paradigm for Understanding Women’s Sexuality and Sexual Orientation. Journal of Social Issues , 56 (2), 329-350. 48. Pitts, M., Smith, A., Mitchell, A., & Patel, S. (2006). Private Lives: A Report on the Health and Wellbeing of GLBTI Australians. La Trobe University, Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health & Society, Melbourne. 49. Polek, C. A., & Crowley, E. M. (2008). Lesbians’ disclosure of sexual orientation and satisfaction with care. Journal of Transcultural Nursing , 19 (3), 243-249. 50. Power, J., McNair, R., & Carr, S. (2009). Absent sexual scripts: lesbian and bisexual women’s knowledge, attitudes and action regarding safer sex and sexual health information. Culture, Health & Sexuality , 11 (1), 67-81. 51. Richters, J., Song, A., Prestage, G., Clayon, S., & Turner, R. (2005). The Health of Lesbian, Bisexual and Queer women in Sydney: The 2004 Sydney Women & Sexual Health Survey. Monograph 2. The University of New South Wales, National Centre in HIV Social Resaerch. 52. Ryan, H., Wortley, P., Easton, A., Pederson, L., & Greenwood, G. (2001). Smoking among lesbians, gays, and bisexuals. A review of the literature. American Journal of Preventaive Medicine , 21 (2). 53. Steele, L. S., Tinmouth, J. M., & Lu, A. (2006). Regular health care use by lesbians: a path analysis of predictive factors. Family Practice – An International Journal , 631-636. 54. Todosijevic, J., Rothblum, E. D., & Solomon, S. E. (2005). Relationship Satisfaction, Affectivity, and Gay-Specific Stressors in Same-Sex Couples Joined in Civil Unions. Psychology of Women Quarterly , 29, 158-166. 55. Van Wormer, K., & McKinney, R. (2003). What School Can Do To Help Gay/Lesbian/Bisexual Youth: A Harm Reduction Approach. Adolescence , 38 (151), 400-420. 56. Vanfraussen, K., Ponjaert-Kristoffersen, I., & Brewaeys, A. (2003). Family Functioning in Lesbian Families Created by Donor Insemination. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry , 73 (1), 78-90. 57. Veniegas, R. C., & Conley, T. D. (2000). Biological Research on Women’s Sexual Orientations: Evaluating the Scientific Evidence. Journal Social Issues , 56 (2), 267-282. 58. Williamson, I. (2000). Internalised homophobia and health issues affecting lesbians and gay men. Health education Research , 15 (1), 97 – 107. 59. World Health Organisation. (1986). Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion. Retrieved May 11, 2009, from First International Conference on Health Promotion: Lesbian Health Issues Paper - October 2009
  • Contact details Statewide Admin: 1800 177 434 Men’s Sexual Health: 1800 155 141Brisbane & Southern Qld 30 Helen Street, Newstead Qld 4006, PO Box 1372, Eagle Farm BC Qld 4009, P: 07 3017 1777, F: 07 3852 5200,E: Coast & Central Qld 10 Pikki St, Maroochydore Qld 4558, PO Box 2077, Sunshine Plaza Qld 4558, P: 07 5451 1118, F: 07 5451 1611,E: & North Q ld 290 Draper St, Cairns Qld 4870, PO Box 12112, Cairns BC Qld 4870, P: 07 4041 5451, F: 07 4041 6092, E: QAHC - RC -1009