Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Global hr forum2008-marshall smith-financial support for higher education reform
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Global hr forum2008-marshall smith-financial support for higher education reform


Published on

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total Views
On Slideshare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

No notes for slide


  • 1. FINANCIAL SUPPORT FOR HIGHER EDUCATION REFORM Teaching and Learning: Quality, Transparency, Efficiency and Productivity Global HR Forum Session A-3 Seoul, Korea November 6, 2008 Marshall S. Smith Education Program Director The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation
  • 2. Overview § Introduction: Changing world of tertiary education: Accountability for teaching and learning critical. § Three disruptive interventions for teaching and learning § OpenCourseWare: Transparency and accountability. § Open Learning Initiative: Efficiency and effectiveness. § OECD assessment. Effectiveness and productivity. § Observations. 2
  • 3. Indicators of Teaching and Learning § Tertiary education critical to economic and social capital of a nation. § Huge growth in demand. § Investment in needs growing. § Changing economies create new goals and opportunities § 21st century skills. § Web–based teaching and learning opportunities and environments. § Typical measures of inputs (books, college admission scores) and outputs (research, graduation rates). § Few measures of added value of institution to student learning. § Investors inspire growing need for assurances of effectiveness of teaching and learning. 3
  • 4. OpenCourseWare (OCW) § OCW is open, free, on the web 24/7 § OCW is course materials, syllabi, lecture notes and guides, reading lists, assessments, simulations, video, etc. § MIT started in 2001: now 1,800 courses § OCW Consortium: now 200 members: 6,000 total courses § 10 languages: many translations 4
  • 5. 5
  • 6. 6
  • 7. Universities working together to advance education and empower people OCWC Live Sites—January 2007 lllll lllll lllll lllll lllll lll lllll l lllll lllll lllll lllll lllll l • 75 live OCW sites • 6000 + published courses Dalian 2008 OCWC Conference 48 7
  • 8. Universities working together to advance education and empower people Monthly Visits: April 2007 Dalian 2008 OCWC Conference 122 8
  • 9. OCW: Quality, Transparency and Accountability § Professors value respect of peers and students. § An OCW course is open for all peers, students, parents, administrators around the world to review. § Powerful incentive to motivate high-quality work by faculty posting their work. § The transparency helps inspire other faculty to meet quality standards. 9
  • 10. Open Learning Initiative (OLI) § Carnegie Mellon University open (web-based, 24/7) full college courses. § Based on cognitive and computer science. Content exactly what corresponding lecture course has. § “Cognitive tutors” have: § very high-quality content § feedback loops to personalize instruction– individual tutors § courses under student control and motivating. § Experiments indicate as effective or more so – randomized design experiment shows more effective in one-half the time. 10
  • 11. 11
  • 12. 12
  • 13. Open Learning Initiative Possible implications § Supports learners in regular and supplemental fashion. § May replace need for lecturers in many courses. § Challenges structure of instruction and role of professors. § Challenges conventional thinking about semesters. § Probably more effective than many teachers. § Powerful implications for efficiency. § Open creates diverse opportunities for learning. 13
  • 14. OECD Learning Assessment § At meeting in 2007 OECD Ministers of Education interested in assessing impact of tertiary institutions on student learning. § Motivated by OECD Programme in Student Assessment: 21st century skills assessment for 15-year-olds. Powerful policy implications. § Planning group recommended a trial tertiary assessment. § Main purpose being formative, used for improvement: Ministers approved. 14
  • 15. OECD Institutional Assessment § Trial Assessment: 3-4 countries, 3-4 institutions per country. § Two possible assessments: 1. Based on Collegiate Learning Assessment in U.S. to assess general problem-solving, analysis, creative writing skills to sample of overall graduating class. 2. Assess widely used and relatively common content discipline area: sample of discipline area graduates. 15
  • 16. OECD Learning Assessment § If works, by 2013 available to all OECD and possibly other countries. § Institutional scores. § Perhaps pre-assessment in future to capture value-added by the institution. § Measure to be interpreted with other quality and effectiveness institutional measures. § Focus on effectiveness and productivity. 16
  • 17. Observations § Each approach: Open CourseWare, open courses, institutional assessment—affects different aspects of institution’s quality and effectiveness. § Each challenges conventional practice. § Each is entirely plausible. The implementation challenge, however, is adaptive and requires § expertise and organizational skills § great political will § The payoff is potentially substantial. 17