Kyoto Protocol

1,694 views
1,619 views

Published on

Published in: Travel
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
1,694
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
5
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
68
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • What is the Kyoto Protocol Kyoto Protocol is the agreement to decrease and slow the emissions of the GHG (Green House Gas), which causes global warming. Why is it created It was created for two purposes, one of them is to decrease the GHG emissions. And the other is to get people’s attentions to the global warming, which is a great global issue now. Controversy over the Kyoto Protocol -There is a lot of controversy over the Kyoto protocol
  • 1 Science has proven that GHG cause Global Warming. 2 Science and technology has given us other bio fuels,and other ways to get energy like wind, water, and nuclear energy that don’t give off GHG. 3 To make countries to work together to solve one problem. They learn to make peace.
  • Slows country’s development -Kyoto Protocol makes country worry about CO2 emissions rather than making money, glowing, making new technology etc. Destroy people’s lives -People who work in places like factories may loose their jobs. Discrimination of the countries -developed countries and developing countries are treated same, but developing countries think it is not fair. They have to have time to develop first. And then they will care about CO2 emissions.
  • 1 - America, Canada, and Australia have not signed Kyoto Protocol. 2 - China and America, two of the countries with the most CO2 emissions, have not signed Kyoto Protocol. 3 - Mrs. ローによると1,2のせつめいだけで 3 の項目は説明はいらないって。
  • Countries have other things to care about. - Each country has many kinds of political problems. They have to solve them first, before worrying about global environmental problems. Kyoto just slows the growth rate of GHG emission -it does not call for the stopping of GHG emissions. Kyoto is too rash and vague  ローが、 raugh から、 vague に変えろと。 -short-sighted and not specific enough
  • Kyoto Protocol

    1. 1. Kyoto Protocol Minako Ito & Hayato Ishida
    2. 2. Background <ul><li>What is the Kyoto Protocol </li></ul><ul><li>Why is it created </li></ul><ul><li>Controversy over the Kyoto Protocol </li></ul>
    3. 3. Pro : Positive Effects <ul><li>Slows GHG emissions and global warming </li></ul><ul><li>Developments in science and technology </li></ul><ul><li>Increase of political communication </li></ul>
    4. 4. Pro : Ratified by 141 countries <ul><li>Necessity for ratification=55 countries, 141 countries for ratification are way over it </li></ul><ul><li>141 countries are mostly developing country </li></ul><ul><li>Developing country offers credit for air pollution </li></ul>
    5. 5. Pro : It is longsighted / high priority <ul><li>Kyoto is only at the first step </li></ul><ul><li>It is preparation for future </li></ul><ul><li>Global warming is destroying ecosystem </li></ul>
    6. 6. Con : Negative Effects <ul><li>Slows country’s development </li></ul><ul><li>Destroy people’s lives </li></ul><ul><li>Discrimination of the countries </li></ul>
    7. 7. Con : Not ratified by developed and industrial countries <ul><li>Developed and industrial countries are not involving Kyoto Protocol </li></ul><ul><li>The countries matter most for global warming are those who are not signing in yet </li></ul><ul><li>Without those countries involving, Kyoto Protocol does not work </li></ul>
    8. 8. Con : It is shortsighted / less priority <ul><li>Countries have other things to care about </li></ul><ul><li>Kyoto just slows the growth rate of GHG emission </li></ul><ul><li>Kyoto is too rash and vague </li></ul>
    9. 9. Current Status / Future Trend <ul><li>Thought of Global Warming by citizens </li></ul><ul><li>Increase / decrease of CO 2 </li></ul><ul><li>Steps must be taken </li></ul>
    10. 10. Works Cited <ul><li>BBC, Newscaster. &quot;Croatian parliament ratifies Kyoto Protocol .&quot; Zagreb. 27 Apr. 2007. BBC . School Library Collection . NewsBank. 24 May 2007 <http://infoweb.newsbank.com/>. </li></ul><ul><li>DeMuth, Christopher. &quot;The Kyoto Protocol Cannot Address Global Warming.&quot; Independent Newspapers Sept. 2001. Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center . Thomson Gale. 24 May 2007 <http://infotrac.galegroup.com/itweb/?db=OVRC>. </li></ul><ul><li>Dudek, Daniel J, et al. &quot;Save the Kyoto Protocol.&quot; Issues in Science & Technology 22.3 (Mar. 2006): 9-10. 2 4 May 2007 <http://web.ebscohost.com/>. </li></ul><ul><li>Gorrie, Peter. &quot;Tech firms see red in Tory pullout; some see setbacks in easing off Kyoto Easing rules clouds some business futures.&quot; The Tronto Star 22 May 2006. NewsBank. 2 4 May 2007. </li></ul><ul><li>Japanese ministry of foreign affairs. &quot;The gist of Kyoto Protocol.&quot; The gist of       Kyoto Protocol . 12 Nov. 2006. 24 May 2007 <http://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/      gaiko/kankyo/kiko/cop3/k_koshi.html>. </li></ul><ul><li>Japanese ministry of foreign affairs. &quot;What is the Kyoto Protocol?&quot; Global   Warming . 12 Dec. 2003. 2 4 May 2007 < http://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/gaiko/kankyo/kiko/ > </li></ul><ul><li>&quot;Kyoto Protocol : Factfile.&quot; Agence France-Presse (Nov. 2006). School Library Collection . NewsBank. 24 May 2007 <http://infoweb.newsbank.com/>. </li></ul><ul><li>McRae, Hamish. &quot;The Kyoto Protocol Can Help Address Global Warming.&quot; Independent Newspapers 16 Feb. 2005. Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center . Thomson Gale. 24 May 2007 <http://infotrac.galegroup.com/itweb/?db=OVRC>. </li></ul><ul><li>Schulte, Bret. &quot;Putting a Price on Pollution.&quot; U.S. News & World Report (May 2007). School Library Collection . NewsBank. 24 May 2007 <http://infoweb.newsbank.com/>. </li></ul><ul><li>Stasio, Frank. &quot;Analysis: Looking beyond the Kyoto Protocol.&quot; National Public Radio Edition . School Library Collection . NewsBank. 2 4 May 2007 <http://infoweb.newsbank.com/>. </li></ul>

    ×