• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Standard 1 Item 2
 

Standard 1 Item 2

on

  • 186 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
186
Views on SlideShare
186
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft Word

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Standard 1 Item 2 Standard 1 Item 2 Document Transcript

    • Jonathan Amlin 18-EDLD-803 Written Assignment #1 Dr. Lynn Kitchen January 13, 2008 Fullan (2007) identifies many critical factors that impact innovations from the initiation stage, through the implementation stage and into the institutionalization stage. Of these factors, I have chosen the 10 that I believe are of the most relevance to my school’s ability to successfully implement a new math program. A word on the background of my district, Piqua City Schools, is needed here to explain my choice of factors. My district has been unable to pass its last two levy attempts. The local community has a median income well below the starting salary that our district offers teachers. The community’s apathy toward education is evident, not only in the failure of the levies, but also every day in a lack of parental involvement. The refusal to fund levies to retain teachers signals that the community would outraged by any perceived expenditure of new money, which a new math program would certainly demand. Finally, many of the districts teachers expect to be without a position next year, complicating the challenge of effectively training teachers in the new program because many of the teachers that would be trained this year will not be in the district next year and because many veteran teachers with licenses that are not content-specific might be teaching in areas in which they are inexperienced. In the Initiation stage, I believe that Access to Innovation, Teacher Advocacy, External Change Agents and Community Pressure/Support/Apathy are my school’s biggest concerns. Within the realm of the Implementation stage, I believe that my school’s success would be most influenced by Complexity, Quality/Practicality, District Characteristics, Principal
    • Characteristics, Teacher Characteristics. The most pertinent factor from the Institutionalization stage would be that of Continued Support from the district. My school, Wilder Intermediate School, is restricted with respect to Access to Innovation because our district has an enormous budget deficit that prevents significant spending. Likewise, any perceived spending by the district will result in increased difficulty in convincing the local community that the district desperately needs to pass a levy. My school also has to contend with Teacher Advocacy as a challenge because Piqua has a recent history of abandoning new programs soon after they are implemented. With this lack of confidence on the part of the teachers, the district would face resistance and skepticism. This teacher doubt in the life expectancy of the program would prevent them from giving their full energy and efforts to the program. The most powerful External Change Agent that faces my school’s success is the fact that a failed levy in March would result in wide cuts across the district. These cuts would greatly disrupt any progress that the school might have experienced in the innovation. Finally, Community Pressure/Support/Apathy is the overriding factor that affects all of the other aspects of this innovation. Our local community simply does not understand the long-term necessity of educational spending. I believe that the district would face community uproar if the decision were made to spend money on a new program. Between the number of inexperienced teachers currently in the district and the possibility of teachers in content areas in which they have little or no experience, the factors of Complexity and Quality/Practicality loom large as considerations in this decision. An overly complicated program would challenge teachers that need desperately to focus on other aspects of teaching. Likewise, the availability of professional development and resources must be considered when the initiative’s practicality is measured. District characteristics such as the district’s tendency to
    • perpetuate newly adopted programs and the ability to effectively provide professional development appropriate to the needs of the teaching staff. Wilder’s principal’s characteristics are among the few factors that seem to favor the new program. My principal understands the challenges inherent to implementing a new program, as such, he would spend a great deal of time ensuring that teachers understand the new program and how to effectively increase their competencies with it. Lastly, the teacher characteristics of my staff must be evaluated. I believe that my staff is capable of mastering a new program, but, as I alluded to earlier, many teachers feel betrayed by the district’s recent, unimpressive cycle of implementation and abandonment. The most important consideration from the Institutionalization stage is that of Continued District Support. As noted multiple times before, the district’s inability/refusal to provide the necessary support and dedication to recent initiatives suggests that there would be little support past the purchase of the program. Additional resources, such as consumables, manipulatives or technological resources that the district opts not to provide could be the difference between success and failure. What’s more, many recent curricular implementations have relied solely on the presentations by salespeople rather than continued, responsive professional development and assistance to train teachers. This practice has left many teachers confused by, skeptical of and disillusioned with new programs. Upon consideration of these ten factors, I have to think that now is not the right time to try to implement a new math program. None of the district personnel, teachers or community members seem to be in an ideal position to be receptive enough for a new initiative to be successful or financially justifiable. References Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College
    • Press, Columbia University.