• Save
B O E 12112007
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

B O E 12112007

on

  • 658 views

Board presentation on school accountability reports December 11, 2007

Board presentation on school accountability reports December 11, 2007

Statistics

Views

Total Views
658
Views on SlideShare
658
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    B O E 12112007 B O E 12112007 Presentation Transcript

    • School Accountability Reports (SAR) Presentation to BOE December 11, 2007
    • Colorado Accountability Systems Are you closing the achievement gap? (AYP)
    • Colorado Accountability Systems Are you providing a well- rounded educational experience? (Accreditation)
    • Colorado Accountability Systems Are you succeeding in core academic subjects? (SAR)
    • Colorado Accountability Systems
    • Colorado Accountability Systems
    • Colorado Accountability Systems
    • Colorado Accountability Systems
    • Colorado Accountability Systems
    • Colorado Accountability Systems
    • Colorado Accountability Systems
    • 2 Key Metrics
    • #1 Overall Academic Performance on State Assessments
    • Excellent High Average Low Unsatisfactory
    • #2 Academic Growth of Students
    • Significant Improvement Improvement Stable Decline Significant Decline
    • School Growth What percentage of students are making adequate growth in a school?
    • a year’s growth in a year’s time
    • Previous Method for Calculating “Improvement” Year 1 Year 2 Science (all grades) Science (all grades) Math (all grades) Math (all grades) Writing Eng/Sp (all grades) Writing Eng/Sp (all grades) Reading Eng/Sp (all grades) Reading Eng/Sp (all grades) All scores are used to calculate one rating. Year 1 rating is compared to year 2 rating to measure growth. SAR SAR
    • Change from “Academic Improvement” to “Academic Growth” Problems with this method: Students in year #2 were not the same as year #1.
    • Comparing Apples to Oranges Apples Year 1 Year 2
    • Is it fair to compare one year’s students to the next year’s if they are not the same students?
    • How to calculate for a student… Step#1: Figure out individual student % rank based on scale score for year #1. Step#2: Based on % ranking obtain student’s target score range for year #2. Step #3: Determine whether student made more than a year’s growth, made a year’s growth, or made less than a year’s growth.
    • How to calculate for a student… Step#1: Figure out individual student rank based on scale score for year #1. 75% 4th grade CSAP overall score is 626 in year #1
    • How to calculate for a student… Step#2: Based on % ranking obtain student’s target score range for year #2. 75% in year #2 (grade 5) is 656
    • 873 906 th th Reading: 4 to 5 grade 687- 626 625 75% 180 220
    • How to calculate for a student… Step #3: Determine whether student made more than a year’s growth, made a year’s growth, or made less than a year’s growth. 5th grade CSAP is 676…between 625 and 687 year’s growth
    • How to calculate for a school… Step #1: Calculate growth for all students in all relevant subjects (no science). Step #2: Determine the proportion of scores that are more than a year’s growth, a year’s growth, or less than a year’s growth. Step #3: Subtract the proportion less than a year’s growth from the proportion of more than a year’s growth. Step #4: Use the result to determine “Academic Growth of Students”
    • Step #1: Calculate growth for all students in all relevant subjects (no science).
    • Step #2: Determine the proportion of scores that are more than a year’s growth, a year’s growth, or less than a year’s growth. 33 students 5 gains (15%) 9 loss (27%) 19 stable (58%)
    • Step #3: Subtract the proportion less than a year’s growth from the proportion of more than a year’s growth. 15%-27%=-12%
    • Step #4: Use the result to determine “Academic Growth of Students” Significant >=15% Improvement Improvement 5.01 to 14.99 Stable +5.00 to –5.00 Decline -5.01 to -14.99 Significant <=-15.00 Decline
    • a year’s growth in a year’s time
    • Excellent High Average Low Unsatisfactory
    • Significant Improvement Improvement Stable Decline Significant Decline
    • 5 “Average”, 9 “Low”, and 1 “Unsatisfactory” 11 “Low” Schools
    • Average and Improvement Significant >=15% Improvement Improvement 5.01 to 14.99 Stable +5.00 to – 5.00 Decline -5.01 to -14.99 Significant <=-15.00 Decline
    • Low and Significant Improvement Significant >=15% Improvement Improvement 5.01 to 14.99 Stable +5.00 to – 5.00 Decline -5.01 to -14.99 Significant <=-15.00 Decline
    • Low and Significant Decline (CLA)(3-5) Significant >=15% Improvement Improvement 5.01 to 14.99 Stable +5.00 to –5.00 Decline -5.01 to -14.99 Significant <=-15.00 Decline
    • Average and Decline Significant >=15% Improvement Improvement 5.01 to 14.99 Stable +5.00 to –5.00 Decline -5.01 to -14.99 Significant <=-15.00 Decline
    • Low and Stable (3-5) Significant >=15% Improvement Improvement 5.01 to 14.99 Stable +5.00 to –5.00 Decline -5.01 to -14.99 Significant <=-15.00 Decline
    • Average and Significant Improvement Significant >=15% Improvement Improvement 5.01 to 14.99 Stable +5.00 to – 5.00 Decline -5.01 to -14.99 Significant <=-15.00 Decline
    • Average and Significant Improvement Significant >=15% Improvement Improvement 5.01 to 14.99 Stable +5.00 to – 5.00 Decline -5.01 to -14.99 Significant <=-15.00 Decline
    • Low and Decline Significant >=15% Improvement Improvement 5.01 to 14.99 Stable +5.00 to –5.00 Decline -5.01 to -14.99 Significant <=-15.00 Decline
    • Low and Decline
    • Low and Decline (CLA)(6-8) Significant >=15% Improvement Improvement 5.01 to 14.99 Stable +5.00 to –5.00 Decline -5.01 to -14.99 Significant <=-15.00 Decline
    • Average and Stable (6-7) Significant >=15% Improvement Improvement 5.01 to 14.99 Stable +5.00 to –5.00 Decline -5.01 to -14.99 Significant <=-15.00 Decline
    • Low and Stable Significant >=15% Improvement Improvement 5.01 to 14.99 Stable +5.00 to –5.00 Decline -5.01 to -14.99 Significant <=-15.00 Decline
    • Low and Decline Significant >=15% Improvement Improvement 5.01 to 14.99 Stable +5.00 to –5.00 Decline -5.01 to - 14.99 Significant <=-15.00 Decline
    • Low and Decline Significant >=15% Improvement Improvement 5.01 to 14.99 Stable +5.00 to –5.00 Decline -5.01 to -14.99 Significant <=-15.00 Decline
    • Unsatisfactory and Significant Decline Significant >=15% Improvement Improvement 5.01 to 14.99 Stable +5.00 to –5.00 Decline -5.01 to -14.99 Significant <=-15.00 Decline
    • 2007 Highlights Kemp Elementary School moves to “Average” Hanson (6-7) is “Average” in its first year. Monaco and Alsup maintain three straight years of “Improvement” or “Significant Improvement”.
    • High Expectations
    • Standards-based Classrooms
    • Focused Professional Development
    • Data