0
National Council of Staff Development   Standards in Practice Instructional Gap Analysis Strategy Aligning instruction w/ ...
What is the Education Trust? A non-profit advocacy group based in Washington DC that works with educators, policy makers, ...
  Core Beliefs  <ul><li>Schools can reduce the debilitating effects of poverty and racism on student achievement.  </li></...
Why is there an achievement gap? <ul><li>Poor Health </li></ul><ul><li>Economically Disadvantaged </li></ul><ul><li>Parent...
Cycle of Low Achievement Low Expectations Low Level Assignments/Instruction Poor Test Results Less Challenging Courses
As Grade Level Increases, the Assignments Given to Students Fall Further and Further Behind Grade Level Standards Source: ...
And this Pattern Continues in High School Source: John Holton, South Carolina Department of Education, analysis of English...
As Grade Level Increases, The Percent of Assignments Aligned to Standards Decreases Source: John Holton, South Carolina De...
In high-poverty schools, kids get A’s on a lot of misaligned assignments.
“ A” Students in High Poverty Schools Score at About the Same Level as “C” Students in Affluent Schools Source :  Prospect...
Comparison of Letter Grades and    Test Scores in English Language Arts Source:  South Carolina State Department of Educat...
Students can do no better than the  assignments they are given
Instructional Gap Analysis Exercise
Standards in Practice™ What is it? <ul><li>A process to identify and close the gap between  what students learn and what t...
Standards in Practice™  is  NOT <ul><li>Another  PROGRAM  to be added to your already full plate. </li></ul><ul><li>Anothe...
Participant Roles at a   Standards in Practice™  Team Meeting <ul><li>Facilitator/Lead Teacher Keeps team on step, focuses...
Standards in Practice™   Organization <ul><li>All activities at the school site, in school using classroom work. </li></ul...
The Steps of the Model <ul><li>We discuss the purpose of the assignment; </li></ul><ul><li>We analyze the demands of the t...
Standards in Practice™ 6 Step Model <ul><li>STEP 1:  What is the academic purpose of this assignment ? The team examines t...
Standards in Practice™ 6 Step Model <ul><li>STEP 2:  The team asks: what does someone need to know and be able to do to co...
Standards in Practice™ 6 Step Model <ul><li>STEP 3:  The team identifies the standards that apply to this assignment </li>...
Standards in Practice™ 6 Step Model <ul><li>STEP 4:  The team generates a task-specific rubric for this assignment from th...
Highly Proficient Proficient Novice Basic Standards Based System Norm Referenced System Losers Average Winners Norm Refere...
Task Specific vs General Rubrics Task specific assess the quality of a response to the  assignment being reviewed.
Task specific rubric <ul><li>4. A qualitative description of the student work on  the assignment being reviewed that is ex...
Standards in Practice™ 6 Step Model <ul><li>STEP 5:  The team diagnoses the student work, using the task-specific rubric/s...
Standards in Practice™ 6 Step Model <ul><li>STEP 6:  The team analyzes the student work to plan instructional strategies f...
Grade 10 Writing Assignment A frequent theme in literature is the conflict between the individual and society. From litera...
The Education Trust www.edtrust.org (202) 293-1217
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Standards In Practice

2,148

Published on

Published in: Education, Economy & Finance
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
2,148
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
44
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • Good morning. My name is ___________ and I am pleased to welcome you to Standards in Practice training for the Cincinnati Public Schools. At this point, tell about your connection with CPS and Standards in Practice. (Click slide)
  • Transcript of "Standards In Practice"

    1. 1. National Council of Staff Development Standards in Practice Instructional Gap Analysis Strategy Aligning instruction w/ standards and assessments The Education Trust, Inc September 2006
    2. 2. What is the Education Trust? A non-profit advocacy group based in Washington DC that works with educators, policy makers, parents and community to close the achievement gap
    3. 3. Core Beliefs <ul><li>Schools can reduce the debilitating effects of poverty and racism on student achievement. </li></ul><ul><li>When teachers “instruct” students learn. </li></ul><ul><li>Good instruction takes ongoing work on the work. </li></ul><ul><li>Parent and community involvement is a necessary but not sufficient component of education reform. </li></ul>
    4. 4. Why is there an achievement gap? <ul><li>Poor Health </li></ul><ul><li>Economically Disadvantaged </li></ul><ul><li>Parents Don’t Care </li></ul><ul><li>Rough Neighborhoods </li></ul><ul><li>Low Expectations </li></ul><ul><li>Low-level Assignments </li></ul><ul><li>Ineffective Instructional Methods </li></ul><ul><li>Inequitable Distribution of Resources </li></ul>
    5. 5. Cycle of Low Achievement Low Expectations Low Level Assignments/Instruction Poor Test Results Less Challenging Courses
    6. 6. As Grade Level Increases, the Assignments Given to Students Fall Further and Further Behind Grade Level Standards Source: John Holton, South Carolina Department of Education, analysis of assignments from 362 Elementary and Middle Schools in SC.
    7. 7. And this Pattern Continues in High School Source: John Holton, South Carolina Department of Education, analysis of English Language Art Assignments in14 High Schools in South Carolina
    8. 8. As Grade Level Increases, The Percent of Assignments Aligned to Standards Decreases Source: John Holton, South Carolina Department of Education, analysis of assignments from 362 Elementary and Middle Schools in SC.
    9. 9. In high-poverty schools, kids get A’s on a lot of misaligned assignments.
    10. 10. “ A” Students in High Poverty Schools Score at About the Same Level as “C” Students in Affluent Schools Source : Prospects (Abt Associates, 1993), in “Prospects: Final Report on Student Outcomes”, PES, DOE, 1997.
    11. 11. Comparison of Letter Grades and Test Scores in English Language Arts Source: South Carolina State Department of Education Office of Research Education Research Report; South Carolina Standards-based Education Design Team - Mohr, Holton, & Keim
    12. 12. Students can do no better than the assignments they are given
    13. 13. Instructional Gap Analysis Exercise
    14. 14. Standards in Practice™ What is it? <ul><li>A process to identify and close the gap between what students learn and what they need to learn to attain proficiency; </li></ul><ul><li>Provides a structured conversation to develop and implement instructional strategies to ensure rigorous academic work for all students </li></ul>
    15. 15. Standards in Practice™ is NOT <ul><li>Another PROGRAM to be added to your already full plate. </li></ul><ul><li>Another meeting – the process is to enhance effectiveness/focus of existing planning meetings. </li></ul><ul><li>Focused only on student work, but on teacher work. </li></ul><ul><li>Dependent upon expensive materials or consultants. </li></ul>
    16. 16. Participant Roles at a Standards in Practice™ Team Meeting <ul><li>Facilitator/Lead Teacher Keeps team on step, focuses discussion </li></ul><ul><li>Recorder Records major points of discussion using SIP record form </li></ul><ul><li>Teacher introducing the lesson Provides a BRIEF introduction to the lesson in Step 1 </li></ul><ul><li>Coach Ensures discussions are around grade appropriate content and effective instruction </li></ul>
    17. 17. Standards in Practice™ Organization <ul><li>All activities at the school site, in school using classroom work. </li></ul><ul><li>Teams can be grade level, vertical, interdisciplinary, subject matter--include teachers, administrators, higher ed faculty, parents </li></ul><ul><li>Meetings are once a week, ideally during the school day </li></ul><ul><li>Meeting “agenda” is the 6 steps of the model </li></ul>
    18. 18. The Steps of the Model <ul><li>We discuss the purpose of the assignment; </li></ul><ul><li>We analyze the demands of the task; </li></ul><ul><li>We identify the standards that apply to the assignment; </li></ul><ul><li>We generate a task-specific rubric using the standards and the assignment; </li></ul><ul><li>We score the student work, using the task-specific rubric; </li></ul><ul><li>Redesign assignment-plan instructional strategies. </li></ul>
    19. 19. Standards in Practice™ 6 Step Model <ul><li>STEP 1: What is the academic purpose of this assignment ? The team examines the task to ask about content and context: what learning was expected from this task? </li></ul>
    20. 20. Standards in Practice™ 6 Step Model <ul><li>STEP 2: The team asks: what does someone need to know and be able to do to complete the task successfully? </li></ul>
    21. 21. Standards in Practice™ 6 Step Model <ul><li>STEP 3: The team identifies the standards that apply to this assignment </li></ul><ul><li>General Standards in Practice Rule </li></ul><ul><li>Each assignment must address at least: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>One content standard—literature, math, social studies, science, art, music, world language, etc. (reading and writing are NOT content standards) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>One writing standard </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Note : If the assignment is misaligned, SKIP to step 6/redesign. </li></ul>
    22. 22. Standards in Practice™ 6 Step Model <ul><li>STEP 4: The team generates a task-specific rubric for this assignment from the standards and the assignment </li></ul>
    23. 23. Highly Proficient Proficient Novice Basic Standards Based System Norm Referenced System Losers Average Winners Norm Reference vs. Standards-based system
    24. 24. Task Specific vs General Rubrics Task specific assess the quality of a response to the assignment being reviewed.
    25. 25. Task specific rubric <ul><li>4. A qualitative description of the student work on the assignment being reviewed that is exemplary NO RETEACHING NECESSARY </li></ul><ul><li>3. A qualitative description of student work on the assignment being reviewed that meets the standard(s) NO RETEACHING NECESSARY </li></ul><ul><li>2. A qualitative description of student work on the assignment that almost meets the standard(s) student is in his/her zone of proximal development and is “using but confusing” concepts—SOME RETEACHING NECESSARY </li></ul><ul><li>1. A qualitative description of student work on the assignment that does not meet the standard(s) SIGNIFICANT RETEACHING NECESSARY </li></ul>
    26. 26. Standards in Practice™ 6 Step Model <ul><li>STEP 5: The team diagnoses the student work, using the task-specific rubric/scoring guide. </li></ul>
    27. 27. Standards in Practice™ 6 Step Model <ul><li>STEP 6: The team analyzes the student work to plan instructional strategies for improving students’ performance. Questions, such as these, are asked: </li></ul><ul><li>What changes need to be made to the assignment to make it more rigorous? </li></ul><ul><li>What instructional strategies do we need to teach the assignments? </li></ul><ul><li>What other action needs to occur at the classroom, school and district level? </li></ul><ul><li>What additional support do teachers/principals need? </li></ul>
    28. 28. Grade 10 Writing Assignment A frequent theme in literature is the conflict between the individual and society. From literature you have read, select a character who struggled with society. In a well-developed composition, identify the character and explain why this character’s conflict with society is important.
    29. 29. The Education Trust www.edtrust.org (202) 293-1217
    1. A particular slide catching your eye?

      Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

    ×