• Save
Embedding Educational Design Pattern Frameworks into Learning Management Systems
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Embedding Educational Design Pattern Frameworks into Learning Management Systems

on

  • 1,400 views

@TECH-EDUCA 2010

@TECH-EDUCA 2010
Athens, Greece

Statistics

Views

Total Views
1,400
Views on SlideShare
1,315
Embed Views
85

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0

2 Embeds 85

http://www.scoop.it 83
http://www.slideshare.net 2

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Embedding Educational Design Pattern Frameworks into Learning Management Systems Embedding Educational Design Pattern Frameworks into Learning Management Systems Presentation Transcript

    • Embedding Educational Design Pattern Frameworks into Learning Management Systems TECH-EDUCA 2010 May 20, 2010 – Athens, Greece Rafael A. Calvo School of Electrical & Information Engineering University of Sydney Australia Michael Derntl Faculty of Computer Science University of Vienna Austria This presentation is licensed under a Creative Commons BY-SA-NC 3.0 License
    • Motivation
      • High quality demands, complex and changing technology, missing pedagogical expertise, lack of time, ...
      • Think of courses where you use an “tools” to support non-trivial processes, i.e. more than uploading lecture slides
      LMS 1 Activity 1 Activity 1 Activity n ... Learning & teaching activity process Tool 1 Tool 2 Tool n ...
    • Motivation -- example
      • Implement a PBL course
        • Iterative development of a “product”
        • Work in teams
        • Virtual documents and work spaces
        • CMC facilities for discussion and consultation
        • Personal project journals
        • Peer review and assessment of deliverables
        • Self and assessment of final result
        • Instructor feedback on milestones
      ? ? ? ?
    •  
    •  
    •  
    •  
    • Design Patterns
      • Patterns capture reusable solutions to design problems in particular contexts and fields
      • Original idea: Describing solutions to recurring design problems in architecture (C. Alexander)
      • Increasing number of pattern initiatives in TEL
        • Pedagogical patterns project (non- e -learning)
        • E-LEN project ( http:// www.tisip.no /E-LEN )
        • Person centered e-learning patterns
        • TELL project
        • Kaleidoscope
        • Educational hypermedia, LMS patterns, etc…
        •  Common goal : capturing expert knowledge & experience for reuse
    • Example
    • Patterns and reuse
      • There are many patterns available.
        • But: where is the reuse?
      • Most pattern projects
        • don‘t provide any specific information on how to support the patterns using learning technology
        • terminate activities after final deliverable
      • Assessing the state:
        • We have patterns and we have tools
        • We lack guidance on bringing these two together
        • In SE, this was achieved by providing application frameworks
    • “ E-Learning Frameworks”
      • Objectives:
        • Improve support and reusability of educational design and implementation
      • Solution
        • Provide loosely coupled design “chunks” --- patterns
        • Provide implementation support --- mapping to tools
      • Two proposed approaches:
        • 1. Extend LMS with tools implementing the design patterns
        • 2. Provide mapping of design patterns to existing LMS tools
    • Approach (1): “Extension”
      • Provision of tailored LMS components as part of the framework
      May require an open API or plug-in architecture + optimal tool support for patterns – may require significant effort for developing suitable tools Patterns p 1 p 2 p 3 p n t 1 t 2 t 3 LMS t n x 1 x 2 LMS Extensions x n
    • Approach (2): “Facade”
      • Provide configuration façade for existing LMS components
      (adopts Façade design pattern, Gamma et al 1995: using the components of a complex system by introducing a façade component with a unified, easier-to-use interface to a family of client components) + no new tools required (only the Facade) – may require features that are not available Facade LMS Extensions t 1 t 2 t 3 t n LMS p 1 p 2 p 3 p n Patterns
    • Example implementations: “Extension”
      • Beehive
        • Application framework: software components “combined” into collaboration patterns
        • Pedagogical patterns decomposed into tasks
        • Provision of tools for the tasks
        • Recombination of tasks to scenarios
        • 14 patterns, 29 tasks, 12 components
        • Integrated into dotLRN and Sakai
    • Example implementations: “Extension”
      • Beehive
        • Tasks configuration
        • page for a pattern
    • Example implementations: “Façade”
      • PatMan
        • Pat tern Man ager
        • Facade component for configuring existing LMS components
        • Based on PCeL patterns ( http://elearn.pri.univie.ac.at/patterns )
      • Interaction
        • User (teacher): Instantiate patterns (and sub-patterns) using web-based pattern wizards
        • PatMan (facade): Instantiate and configure existing LMS components based on the wizards
      • Reference implementation using PCeL patterns on the CEWebS LMS
    • Example implementations: “Façade”
    • Example: New PBL Course pattern
    • Example: New PBL pattern
    • Example: team workspaces
    • Example: team workspaces in “live” view Additional folders created when project milestones are initiated
    • Example: peer evaluation of projects
    • Conclusions and implications
      • Proposal of two approaches to support instantiation of TEL processes on available technology
      • May help in identifying and promoting useful TEL patterns
      • Supporting TEL patterns requires at least some development effort
        • Extension approach:
          • typically requires new tools; potentially adapted to different LMS
          • offers highly targeted support
        • Facade approach:
          • requires mapping of functionality to patterns
          • may require modification of existing functionality
          • requires development of a facade component for each target LMS
    • Thank you!
      • Dr Michael Derntl
      • Faculty of Computer Science University of Vienna Austria
      • [email_address]