Collaboration and communities of practice nzcomPresentation Transcript
Collaboration and communities ofpractice. The reality of rural midwiferypractice.Presentation to NZCOM ConferenceWellington 2012Carolyn McIntosh, Senior lecturer in Midwifery,Otago Polytechnic.
IntroductionIn this presentation I will cover the following topics: Communities of practice, what they are and why they may be important. Rural midwifery practice in the South Island of NZ: What communities of practice are midwives engaged with? Challenges for rural midwives in practice relationships which may influence communities of practice and collaboration. Some possible benefits of effective collaboration.
Communities of practice. Midwives work in a variety of locations alongside a variety of other health professionals e.g. ◦ Midwives, Obstetricians, Plunket nurses, GPs, Practice nurses, Ambulance personnel, Radiographers, Physiotherapists, Occupational therapists, Mental health services. And a variety of lay groups who support women and families e.g ◦ La leche league, Plunket mothers groups, etc. Etc. ◦ not forgetting women themselves and their
Communities of practice Professional interactions with all of these groups are centred on the care and interests of the mother and her infant. As matters of interest arise information may be shared (within the bounds of confidentiality) which may stimulate investigation and exploration. Group interactions provide a mechanism for knowledge transfer and contextualising evidence to the local practice situation.
Communities of practiceWenger (1996) Learning is primarily social and occurs through the variety of communities to which participants belong.Learning is integrated into participation in communities of practice (COP).COP create their own identity and boundaries.Boundaries are crossed and negotiated between COP. Learning may be facilitated or inhibited.It is this negotiation between COP where Innovation is most likely to occur “much learning happens when boundaries are rich in interactions”
Rural midwives communities of practice.Practice communities are unique to the midwives geographical location.Depends on the realities of the practice in the area.COP may be a local group of midwives ormay involve other health professionals in the local area (Midwives, GPs, District nurses, facility nurses, Plunket nurses, allied health professionals)COP may also be more geographically distant,McIntosh (2007) communicating through technology.
C.O.P.May be influenced by: Individual and group philosophy. Local relationships between health care providers. How specialist services are accessed. ◦ Are there local specialist clinics or do women have to travel to the main centre for specialist services.
Midwife two F2F networks Other Ruralmidwives Rural Facility Remote Rural midwife Solo Secondary GP Facility
Creatively establishing communities of practice.In rural Australia advanced practice nurses (APNs) use a variety ofmethods including face to face to connect with other healthprofessionals (Conger, Plager, 2008)Geographically isolated rural midwives in New Zealand were found tohave a similar pattern of connectedness (McIntosh, 2007).
Other midwifery relationships Midwives usually live in the communities in which they work. Hence they are also involved in community activities and have relationships outside work with women and families for whom they also provide care. Rural midwives are always a midwife in every social interaction. (Baird, 2005; Patterson, 2007) This is common to all rural health workers and creates some additional challenges for health professionals. (Bourke, Sheridan, Russell, Jones, Liaw. 2004 ) Rural midwives may also be involved with lay groups which provide information and support to rural women (McIntosh, 2007). Learning may also be stimulated through interactions with these lay communities.
“Boundaries between practices are fertile grounds for innovation. As communities of practice collaborate, clash, merge, diverge, the required process of coordination, translation, and negotiation is also a process of learning”(Wenger, 1996)
Team learning Agreeableness is defined as being friendly, trusting, tolerant, compliant and modest. High levels of agreeableness may have a negative effect on problem solving as compliance and consensus is reached early. Effective collaboration within and between teams requires a full and critical discussion of available data and ideas. Participation in “constructive controversy”.
Constructive controversy Communities of practice are identified by shared wisdom and understanding When this is in conflict with the understanding of another group resolution is required This process requires ◦ Critically analysing the situation ◦ Transforming knowledge into argument ◦ Viewing the issue from different perspectives ◦ Synthesis and consensus Johnson, Johnson and Smith, 2000
Constructive controversy Although controversy can be transformative and beneficial certain conditions are required for this to happen. There are two possible contexts for the controversy Cooperative and Competitive
Cooperative (constructive) Willing to listen Clearly communicate ideas Motivated to hear opposing arguments Comfortable discussing opposing perspectives and Willingness to create new understanding Johnson, Johnson & Smith, 2000
Competative (notconstructive) Personalise argument Unwilling to hear alternative perspectives Closed minded Combative Disagreeing while implying the other is incompetentJohnson et al, 2000
Improving quality in primarycare Lanham, McDaniel et al, 2009. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2928073/
Advancing learning through communities ofpractice:The benefits of collaboration and connectedness Interaction through COP advances learning, working together towards a common goal. Interaction between different COPs can produce tensions and controversy. Controversy may lead to conflict amongst health professionals which may impact negatively on the quality of care Resolving tensions, working constructively through controversy and seeking common ground can advance learning, leading to new understanding and improved quality of care These challenging boundaries of COP have potential to improve understanding, develop practice wisdom, transform and improve the quality of care. Marshall and Robson, 2005; Wenger 1996) (Bartunek, 2011;
Conclusion COP are important for sustaining and supporting practice. Midwifery practice communities are diverse, influenced by the area in which the midwives live and work and may involve a variety of health care professionals and lay groups. There is potential for controversy between COPs Being able to resolve controversy improves understanding, can increase knowledge and practice wisdom and improves the quality of care for the families midwives work with. Learning is advanced through interaction and collaboration with a variety of COP.
References Baird, M. (2005). Sustaining rural midwifery practice: New Zealand Midwives’ experiences. Unpublished masters thesis, Otago Polytechnic: Dunedin, New Zealand. Bourke, L., Sheridan, C., Russell, U. Jones, G., DeWitt, D. and Liaw, S.T. (2004) Developing a conceptual understanding of rural health practice. Australian Journal of Rural Health. 12:181-186 Burtenek, J. M. (2011). . Intergroup relationships and quality improvement in healthcare. BMJ Quality and Safety, (Supplement 1). doi:10.1136/bmjqs.2010.046169 Conger, M. M., Plager, K. A. (2008). Advanced nursing practice in rural areas: Connectedness versus disconnectedness. Online journal of rural nursing and healthcare. 8 (1), 24-38. retrieved from http://www.rno.org/journal/index.php/online- journal/article/viewFile/156/194
Hollenbeck, J, R., Ellis, A,P, J., Humphrey, S. E., Garz, A, S., & Iligen, D, R. (2011). Asymmetry in structural adaptation: The differential impact of centralizing versus decentralizing team decision making structures. Organisation behaviour and human decision processes. 114(1), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.08. 003 Marshall, P., Robson, R. (2005). Preventing and managing conflict: Vital pieces in the patient safety puzzle. Healthcare quarterly. 8: 39-44. McIntosh, C. (2007). Wise womens web: Rural midwives’ communities of practice. Unpublished maters thesis, Otago Polytechnic: Dunedin, New Zealand Patterson, J. (2007). Rural midwifery and the sense of difference. New Zealand college of midwives journal. 37: 15-18 Wenger, E. (1996). Communities of practice the social fabric of the learning organization.