SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 36
Download to read offline
Case Study
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
[object Object],[object Object],Eric Fellner Tim Bevan "Brit flick's twin towers of power"
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],“ Their films have grossed more than £1.2 billion  Since 1984, and that is a conservative estimate. ”
My Beautiful Laundrette  ( 1984 ) A groundbreaking script by Hanif Kureishi co-produced with  Channel 4,  fitting their remit of offering challenging work that would not find a home elsewhere on television or in UK cinema. The story revolves around the relationship between a right-wing extremist, Johnny ( Daniel Day Lewis ) and Omar (Gordon Wemecke), the Pakistani nephew of an archetypal Pakistani entrepreneur Nasser (Saeed Jaffrey), who are brought together in revamping a run-down laundrette. Frears offers a critique of the Thatcherite work ethic and the entrepreneur society, showing a white underclass declining under the determination of new immigrant businesses. With interracial homosexuality to the fore it is not surprising that this film caused a considerable stir in a society that was suffering the consequences of political and economic revolution that had as its creed "there is no such thing as society”. Made for $400,000 it took  over $2.5 in the US alone.
The success of their first three films, which all dealt with British subjects, alerted the wider film industry to this independent production company, leading first to a international co-productions in 1988 including their first Anglo-American production  For Queen and Country  (starring a youthful  Denzel Washington !). The success of this film on both sides of the Atlantic gave  Working Title   a template for co-production  that they immediately began to exploit, and one that has been the aspiration for most other British independent production companies since.
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Why UK/US Co-productions? According to Bevan: "Before co-productions we had been independent producers, but it was very hand to mouth. We would  develop a script , that would take about 5% of our time; we'd  find a director , that'd take about 5% of the time and then we'd spend  90% of the time trying to juggle together deals from different sources  to finance those films. The films were suffering because there was no real structure and the company was always virtually bankrupt."
The British film industry dilemma: ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],? ?
The British film industry dilemma: ,[object Object],[object Object],"I think anyone in Hollywood would want to do business with these guys,"   Former boss of Universal Studios Edgar Bronfman Jr.
1984  -  Working Title  founded 1985  -  My Beautiful Laundrette  is the first of a series of collaborations with  Channel 4 Films Working Title  produce a further  10  films in the  1980s 1988  - Production deal with  PolyGram Filmed Entertainment 1992  -  PolyGram  (a European music and media company) buys  Working Title .  1994  -  Four Weddings and a Funeral   A huge box office success due to the access to the US market provided by  Polygram’s  financial muscle Made for $6 million it took  over $244   million   worldwide.   A HISTORY: Working Title  produces  41  films in the  1990s
The financial stability offered by the support from a major studio allowed  Working Title  to move rapidly on to the international stage, and  PolyGram  being taken over by  Seagram  and subsumed into its film arm,  Universal Pictures , in 1999, further strengthened this. A marked change of direction took place at this point, with the traditionally provincial independent territory being scorned in favour of international prospects.  1998  -  Polygram  bought by  Universal   a Hollywood Studio itself owned by  Seagram Working Title is now owned by Universal , which is in turn owned by  Vivendi 2000  -  Seagram  is bought by  Vivendi ,  the French multimedia conglomerate
The international activity did not prevent  Working Title  from continuing to support British filmmakers and from engaging in what would have been considered traditional 'independent' Anglo-European co-productions such as Ken Loach’s  Land and Freedom  ( 1995 ) and 'offbeat'  Shaun of the Dead  ( 2004 ) and  Hot Fuzz  ( 2007 ).
So what is a Working Title film? This was once relatively easy to answer, as the films they first made all seemed to address issues of what it is to be  British  (or, more specifically,  English ), and particularly what it meant to be an outsider – like the immigrants in  My Beautiful Laundrette . Of course, the general public know them as the re-inventors of a  British romantic comedy  genre through  Four Weddings and a Funeral ,  Notting Hill  ( 1999 ) and  Love Actually  ( 2003 )
Four Weddings and a Funeral  ( 1994 ) This was the first  Working Title  collaborations with  Richard Curtis  (who’d achieved fame with the  Blackadder  TV series) and  Hugh Grant  and it set the bar for British film production, particularly in its use of soundtrack that spawned a record-breaking number one single. A rom-com that explores the relationships between a group of upper-class friends as they meet to celebrate and mourn. Curtis was able to bring established contacts to an ensemble cast (such as  Rowan Atkinson ), enhancing the potential connection with  the home audience   The film was  a massive hit in the USA , in part because of the view  'heritage Britain'  - a land of churches, old pubs and stately homes populated by 'classy' English people with obligatory bumbling fools sprinkled across the social landscape. It also helped that one of the stars American ( Andie MacDowell ).
Such an unexpected success gave  Working Title  international clout and reach, and placed it at the centre of the  Hollywood . It also placed considerable pressure on the company to become the  romantic-comedy-heritage-film company , a pressure it resisted, but did not reject, realizing that a popular film could help support a number of productions with less potential for such success yet still deserving of being made. A quick glance at the list of films in its catalogue reveals a list of over  100  films produced since  1984  - probably the only common thread among them is the desire to do something different to what is being produced at the time, and to do it well. It is the ability to make films for  specific audience groups , and to  not be pigeon-holed  that has enabled the company to ensure that its work remains fresh and successful.
It is easy to categorize them ( dismissively ) until you look through the catalogue and realize that this is a company  categorized only by diversity  and the ability to detect changes in the market that enable a reorientation of direction There is no other British Film Company like  Working Title  - it is allowed freedom to make creative decisions but it is owned by a US based conglomerate. So what is a Working Title film? How do Working Title choose which films to make? Fellner says  “projects get championed by individuals in the development department and these 'percolate' their way up to the top. Tim Bevan and I then both take the decision on what to greenlight.”
Co-production  has long been  a method of sharing risk  within the film industry, and when  Working Title  began its life, co-production was merely another revenue stream that often involved pre-sale or pre-distribution deals on world or national rights. Since one of  Working Title’s  principal partners was  Channel Four , and Channel Four pioneered international co-production in the UK, it is no surprise that  Working Title  adopted and extended the model. Working Title  and  Co-production Initially,  Working Title  explored these deals domestically, but as its success grew it found that the international market opened up to it.  Working Title  took co-production further when formalizing their relationship with  PolyGram  (later  Universal ) where US investment of 30% did not prevent them from obtaining EU/UK tax advantages. A 30% stake in the budget +  Hollywood support clearly stimulates other investors willingness to get involved in a film. It is this advance in the model that radically enhanced the production processes and values in  Working Title  films.
“ The Working Title philosophy has always been to make films for an audience - by that I mean play in a multiplex. We totally believe in this because we know it is the only hope we have of sustaining the UK film industry. ” Despite its famous name, the structure at  Working Title  is small. It employs just 42 full time staff, split between the main Working Title production arm and its recently closed low-budget offshoot  WT 2  under  Natasha Wharton . “ When I was at  Working Title  we set up a New Writers Scheme to develop new talent. The problem was that at  Working Title , smaller films would inevitably get less attention than the bigger budget projects so we decided to set up  WT2   to give proper attention to those smaller films.” How does it work? 2007  -  Why did WT 2  close down?
Does it always work? Film Year Budget (est) Worldwide Gross (est) Billy Eliot 2000 $5 million $109.3 million Long Time Dead 2002 $2 million $2 million Ali G Indahouse 2002 $5 million $12 million My Little Eye 2002 $2-3 million $3 million Shaun of the Dead 2004 $4 million $30 million The Calcium Kid 2004 $5 million £61,415 MickyBo and Me 2004 $3 million £172,336 Inside I’m Dancing 2004 $5 million $500,000 Sixty Six 2006 $3 million $1.9 million
The most important part of the business is developing scripts.  Working Title  has a strong development team and invests heavily in making sure that they get it right. They usually have around 40 - 50 projects in development at any time and their average spend on development is around $250,000 to $500,000 per script.  They aim to make around 5 to 10 films a year, spread across different budget sizes (with an average of $30 to $40 million) and genres.  How does it work? Released in 2009/10 are 10 films including the  Richard Curtis  comedy  The Boat That Rocked , political thriller  State of Play  based on the successful BBC television drama but re-imagined in Washington and  Green Zone , an Iraq war thriller that reunites the Bourne series star Matt Damon and director Paul Greengrass.
As you can see, not all of their films have been unqualified successes - as one would expect in the movie industry. Earlier flops include  Captain Corelli's Mandolin  (2001). It was their most expensive film to date, with a budget of $57 million and, ironically, the one that seemed most likely to succeed. Adapted from the popular book of the same name, with an all-star cast, it still managed to disappoint with the critics and at the box office making only $62 million worldwide. Trouble ahead? Film Year Budget (est) Worldwide Gross (est) The Boat That Rocked 2009 $50 million $36.3 million State of Play 2009 $60 million $87.8 million The Soloist 2009 $60 million $37.6 million A Serious Man 2009 $7 million $26.2 million Green Zone 2010 $100 million $86.4 million
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Does it always work?
Teaser Poster & trailer…
Main Poster & trailer…
Character posters…
Here’s our Working Title famous US star…
Soundtrack synergy…
Digital marketing  – the film used  Spotify  to create playlists for each of the 9 DJs featured in the film. For example Dave, played by Nick Frost...
iPhone app…
Something viral…
Richard Curtis  takes the complex, fascinating subject of 60s pirate radio and turns it into infantalised farce.  The Guardian Why did it ‘sink’ at the box office? The reviews weren’t great… Richard Curtis‘s The Boat That Rocked sloshes about merrily and has some magical moments…overlong, muddled and only fitfully brilliant.  Daily Telegraph *** ‘ The Ship That Sank’ would be a more appropriate title for Richard Curtis’s latest and most disappointing entertainment.  Time Out ** Curtis’s new film is a love letter to the music and rebellious spirit of the 1960s. He has given us what he imagines to be the era’s cocktail of sex, drugs and rock’n’roll — but he’s turned it into something as cosy and comforting as a sweet cup of tea.  The Times  ** Terrible reviews tend to turn into terrible word of mouth…
Social recommendation is key - a personal recommendation from a friend, colleague or relative can be the most powerful trigger for a cinema visit. Pre-requisite for favourable 'word of mouth' are high levels of awareness and strong interest. Negative word of mouth is extremely difficult to overcome. Post-release, hopefully, a combination of good word of mouth and further advertising will combine to give the film 'legs'. Why did it ‘sink’ at the box office?
It got a different name in the US…? Why did it ‘sink’ at the box office? Last Friday saw the U.S. release of the film Pirate Radio. During the 7 month delay in its arrival on these shores both DVD and Blu-Ray versions of the film came out in non-American markets, ensuring that U.S. viewers would have access via the Internet to copies. In fact, a  cam version  debuted on  Piratebay  soon after theatrical release, with DVD and Blu-Ray rips appearing in mid-August, eminently available to anybody around the world with an Internet connection. How did this affect it’s opening weekend in America? Remember - the percentage of box office that comes from the opening weekend has increased from 15.7% in the 80s to 33.1% today…
While its gross intake was relatively modest, at just under $3 million (over 800+ cinemas)  Pirate Radio  actually did very well on a  per-cinema average  which put it in third place among films in  wide-release  for the weekend.  While it is impossible to know with any real certainty what impact downloads of the DVD or Blu-Ray rips may have had on  Pirate Radio’s  box office, the film appears to have done pretty well, especially considering its foreign origin, subject matter and rather middling reviews ( 54%  on the Rotten Tomato scale). Somehow the forces behind the movie found a way to ‘compete with free’ and position it to be profitable in the US, even before its inevitable DVD and Blu-Ray releases there. Maybe the existence of free versions on the Internet did less to drive down demand for the film, but instead fostered awareness and interest in the movie above and beyond what the producers were able to do via PR and advertising? Why didn’t it ‘sink’ at the US box office?
http://filminfocus.com/focusfeatures/film/pirate_radio/ http://www.workingtitlefilms.com/ http://www.workingtitlefilms.com/film.php?filmID=120 http://www.filmeducation.org/theboatthatrocked/activity3.html Despite being a very successful business model over the past 25 years  Working Title  have had  a series of  flops that would have ‘sunk’ a UK film company that lacked the backing of a Hollywood studio. Despite making films with tried and trusted talent in recent years ( Richard Curtis ,  Matt Damon ) box office has not been great. How do you think  Working Title  can be successful again? http://benjaminwigmore.blogspot.com/2009/04/boat-that-rocked.html http://www.launchingfilms.tv/index.php

More Related Content

What's hot

Shifty case study
Shifty case studyShifty case study
Shifty case studyNaamah Hill
 
Shifty Case Study
Shifty Case StudyShifty Case Study
Shifty Case StudyNaamah Hill
 
Revision uk film and the hollywood context
Revision   uk film and the hollywood contextRevision   uk film and the hollywood context
Revision uk film and the hollywood contextlatymermedia
 
Marketing and promotion
Marketing and promotionMarketing and promotion
Marketing and promotionHeworthMedia1
 
Working title history
Working title historyWorking title history
Working title historyguestaaaa19
 
The film process
The film processThe film process
The film processNaamah Hill
 
Film4 revision
Film4 revisionFilm4 revision
Film4 revisionksomel
 
The Inbetweeners
The InbetweenersThe Inbetweeners
The Inbetweenersjwright61
 
Film Industry Answers
Film Industry AnswersFilm Industry Answers
Film Industry AnswersJu-at-BSix
 
Case study working title films
Case study   working title filmsCase study   working title films
Case study working title filmstessiemedia
 
Warp Films vs Working Title
Warp Films vs Working TitleWarp Films vs Working Title
Warp Films vs Working Titlekhalfyard
 
Case study - The Inbetweeners Movie
Case study - The Inbetweeners MovieCase study - The Inbetweeners Movie
Case study - The Inbetweeners Moviealevelmedia
 
Film Production Cycle
Film Production CycleFilm Production Cycle
Film Production CycleNaamah Hill
 
Marketing and promoting superhero films
Marketing and promoting superhero filmsMarketing and promoting superhero films
Marketing and promoting superhero filmsHeworthMedia1
 

What's hot (19)

A field in england case study
A field in england case studyA field in england case study
A field in england case study
 
Shifty case study
Shifty case studyShifty case study
Shifty case study
 
Shifty Case Study
Shifty Case StudyShifty Case Study
Shifty Case Study
 
Revision uk film and the hollywood context
Revision   uk film and the hollywood contextRevision   uk film and the hollywood context
Revision uk film and the hollywood context
 
Marketing and promotion
Marketing and promotionMarketing and promotion
Marketing and promotion
 
Task
TaskTask
Task
 
Working title history
Working title historyWorking title history
Working title history
 
The film process
The film processThe film process
The film process
 
Film4 revision
Film4 revisionFilm4 revision
Film4 revision
 
The Inbetweeners
The InbetweenersThe Inbetweeners
The Inbetweeners
 
Vertigo films
Vertigo filmsVertigo films
Vertigo films
 
Film Industry Answers
Film Industry AnswersFilm Industry Answers
Film Industry Answers
 
Case study working title films
Case study   working title filmsCase study   working title films
Case study working title films
 
Warp Films vs Working Title
Warp Films vs Working TitleWarp Films vs Working Title
Warp Films vs Working Title
 
Case study - The Inbetweeners Movie
Case study - The Inbetweeners MovieCase study - The Inbetweeners Movie
Case study - The Inbetweeners Movie
 
Film Production Cycle
Film Production CycleFilm Production Cycle
Film Production Cycle
 
Marketing and promoting superhero films
Marketing and promoting superhero filmsMarketing and promoting superhero films
Marketing and promoting superhero films
 
Working title
Working titleWorking title
Working title
 
Film case studies
Film case studiesFilm case studies
Film case studies
 

Viewers also liked

John Carter case study G322 media
John Carter case study G322 mediaJohn Carter case study G322 media
John Carter case study G322 mediaalevelmedia
 
OCR AS media Planning exam answer film industry
OCR AS media Planning exam answer film industryOCR AS media Planning exam answer film industry
OCR AS media Planning exam answer film industryhasnmedia
 
AS G322 revision booklet pt1 (Film Industry)
AS G322 revision booklet pt1 (Film Industry)AS G322 revision booklet pt1 (Film Industry)
AS G322 revision booklet pt1 (Film Industry)Belinda Raji
 
G322 Revision
G322 RevisionG322 Revision
G322 RevisionM Taylor
 
Summer 2013 paper unit g322
Summer 2013 paper   unit g322Summer 2013 paper   unit g322
Summer 2013 paper unit g322Nick Crafts
 
Synergy And Cross Media Convergence
Synergy And Cross Media ConvergenceSynergy And Cross Media Convergence
Synergy And Cross Media ConvergenceBelinda Raji
 
The boat that rocked (2009)
The boat that rocked (2009)The boat that rocked (2009)
The boat that rocked (2009)ksomel
 
Synergy And Convergence
Synergy And ConvergenceSynergy And Convergence
Synergy And Convergencecraigwinch
 
Representation of gender
Representation of genderRepresentation of gender
Representation of genderEmma Leslie
 
Representationofclassandstatus 121219110918-phpapp01
Representationofclassandstatus 121219110918-phpapp01Representationofclassandstatus 121219110918-phpapp01
Representationofclassandstatus 121219110918-phpapp01Emma Leslie
 
Representation of age
Representation of ageRepresentation of age
Representation of ageNaamah Hill
 
Impact of New Digital technology in the Film Industry
Impact of New Digital technology in the Film IndustryImpact of New Digital technology in the Film Industry
Impact of New Digital technology in the Film IndustryNaamah Hill
 
The boat that rocked production notes
The boat that rocked production notesThe boat that rocked production notes
The boat that rocked production notesBelinda Raji
 

Viewers also liked (18)

John Carter case study G322 media
John Carter case study G322 mediaJohn Carter case study G322 media
John Carter case study G322 media
 
jhfjikdp
jhfjikdpjhfjikdp
jhfjikdp
 
Q's
Q'sQ's
Q's
 
Film re
Film reFilm re
Film re
 
OCR AS media Planning exam answer film industry
OCR AS media Planning exam answer film industryOCR AS media Planning exam answer film industry
OCR AS media Planning exam answer film industry
 
Film
FilmFilm
Film
 
AS G322 revision booklet pt1 (Film Industry)
AS G322 revision booklet pt1 (Film Industry)AS G322 revision booklet pt1 (Film Industry)
AS G322 revision booklet pt1 (Film Industry)
 
G322 Revision
G322 RevisionG322 Revision
G322 Revision
 
Summer 2013 paper unit g322
Summer 2013 paper   unit g322Summer 2013 paper   unit g322
Summer 2013 paper unit g322
 
Synergy And Cross Media Convergence
Synergy And Cross Media ConvergenceSynergy And Cross Media Convergence
Synergy And Cross Media Convergence
 
The boat that rocked (2009)
The boat that rocked (2009)The boat that rocked (2009)
The boat that rocked (2009)
 
Synergy And Convergence
Synergy And ConvergenceSynergy And Convergence
Synergy And Convergence
 
Tv drama 7/9/15
Tv drama 7/9/15Tv drama 7/9/15
Tv drama 7/9/15
 
Representation of gender
Representation of genderRepresentation of gender
Representation of gender
 
Representationofclassandstatus 121219110918-phpapp01
Representationofclassandstatus 121219110918-phpapp01Representationofclassandstatus 121219110918-phpapp01
Representationofclassandstatus 121219110918-phpapp01
 
Representation of age
Representation of ageRepresentation of age
Representation of age
 
Impact of New Digital technology in the Film Industry
Impact of New Digital technology in the Film IndustryImpact of New Digital technology in the Film Industry
Impact of New Digital technology in the Film Industry
 
The boat that rocked production notes
The boat that rocked production notesThe boat that rocked production notes
The boat that rocked production notes
 

Similar to G322 Case Study - Working Title and The Boat That Rocked

Workingtitlefinal 1pptx[1]
Workingtitlefinal 1pptx[1]Workingtitlefinal 1pptx[1]
Workingtitlefinal 1pptx[1]ecclestona
 
Workingtitle 160616084210
Workingtitle 160616084210Workingtitle 160616084210
Workingtitle 160616084210banksryan4
 
Warp film & working titles films
Warp film & working titles filmsWarp film & working titles films
Warp film & working titles filmsKayyah_Robun
 
Media AS Revision 009 (Section B)
Media AS Revision 009 (Section B)Media AS Revision 009 (Section B)
Media AS Revision 009 (Section B)cskinner1
 
Working Title - Ryan Banks
Working Title - Ryan BanksWorking Title - Ryan Banks
Working Title - Ryan Banksbanksryan4
 
British Cinema History
British Cinema HistoryBritish Cinema History
British Cinema Historykingedmedia
 
The british film industry 2 SECTION A
The british film industry 2 SECTION AThe british film industry 2 SECTION A
The british film industry 2 SECTION Afilmcgs
 
Working titles andWARP
Working titles andWARPWorking titles andWARP
Working titles andWARPtaliasmith
 
Film 4 and trainspotting
Film 4 and trainspottingFilm 4 and trainspotting
Film 4 and trainspottingsparkly
 
The British and US Film Industry
The British and US Film IndustryThe British and US Film Industry
The British and US Film IndustryNaamah Hill
 
4 film4 and trainspotting section b exam prep
4 film4 and trainspotting   section b exam prep4 film4 and trainspotting   section b exam prep
4 film4 and trainspotting section b exam prepjudeevans1982
 

Similar to G322 Case Study - Working Title and The Boat That Rocked (20)

Working title - case study
Working title - case studyWorking title - case study
Working title - case study
 
G322 - Question 2 - LESSON1
G322 - Question 2 - LESSON1G322 - Question 2 - LESSON1
G322 - Question 2 - LESSON1
 
Working title
Working titleWorking title
Working title
 
Workingtitlefinal 1pptx[1]
Workingtitlefinal 1pptx[1]Workingtitlefinal 1pptx[1]
Workingtitlefinal 1pptx[1]
 
L3A&1
L3A&1L3A&1
L3A&1
 
Workingtitle 160616084210
Workingtitle 160616084210Workingtitle 160616084210
Workingtitle 160616084210
 
Warp film & working titles films
Warp film & working titles filmsWarp film & working titles films
Warp film & working titles films
 
Case studies
Case studiesCase studies
Case studies
 
Media AS Revision 009 (Section B)
Media AS Revision 009 (Section B)Media AS Revision 009 (Section B)
Media AS Revision 009 (Section B)
 
Working titles
Working titlesWorking titles
Working titles
 
Film 4 part 1
Film 4   part 1Film 4   part 1
Film 4 part 1
 
Working titles
Working titlesWorking titles
Working titles
 
Working Title - Ryan Banks
Working Title - Ryan BanksWorking Title - Ryan Banks
Working Title - Ryan Banks
 
British Cinema History
British Cinema HistoryBritish Cinema History
British Cinema History
 
The british film industry 2 SECTION A
The british film industry 2 SECTION AThe british film industry 2 SECTION A
The british film industry 2 SECTION A
 
Media Ownership - USA vs UK
Media Ownership - USA vs UKMedia Ownership - USA vs UK
Media Ownership - USA vs UK
 
Working titles andWARP
Working titles andWARPWorking titles andWARP
Working titles andWARP
 
Film 4 and trainspotting
Film 4 and trainspottingFilm 4 and trainspotting
Film 4 and trainspotting
 
The British and US Film Industry
The British and US Film IndustryThe British and US Film Industry
The British and US Film Industry
 
4 film4 and trainspotting section b exam prep
4 film4 and trainspotting   section b exam prep4 film4 and trainspotting   section b exam prep
4 film4 and trainspotting section b exam prep
 

More from Alleyn's School Film Studies Department

More from Alleyn's School Film Studies Department (20)

Film Production Guide
Film Production GuideFilm Production Guide
Film Production Guide
 
4137 mabel whall evaluation
4137 mabel whall evaluation4137 mabel whall evaluation
4137 mabel whall evaluation
 
4047 dominic griffiths evaluation
4047 dominic griffiths evaluation4047 dominic griffiths evaluation
4047 dominic griffiths evaluation
 
4064 lucy johnson evaluation
4064 lucy johnson evaluation4064 lucy johnson evaluation
4064 lucy johnson evaluation
 
4021 amy carey evaluation
4021 amy carey evaluation4021 amy carey evaluation
4021 amy carey evaluation
 
4121 evie stylianou evaluation
4121 evie stylianou evaluation4121 evie stylianou evaluation
4121 evie stylianou evaluation
 
4053 benjamin harris evaluation
4053 benjamin harris evaluation4053 benjamin harris evaluation
4053 benjamin harris evaluation
 
4027 callum close evaluation
4027 callum close evaluation4027 callum close evaluation
4027 callum close evaluation
 
4055 martha hay evaluation
4055 martha hay evaluation4055 martha hay evaluation
4055 martha hay evaluation
 
4024 crystal chan evaluation
4024 crystal chan evaluation4024 crystal chan evaluation
4024 crystal chan evaluation
 
4090 kweku obiri yeboah evaluation
4090 kweku obiri yeboah evaluation4090 kweku obiri yeboah evaluation
4090 kweku obiri yeboah evaluation
 
4050 alexis hackley evaluation
4050 alexis hackley evaluation4050 alexis hackley evaluation
4050 alexis hackley evaluation
 
4097 tallulah pollock evaluation
4097 tallulah pollock evaluation4097 tallulah pollock evaluation
4097 tallulah pollock evaluation
 
4150 hana kudryavtseva evaluation
4150 hana kudryavtseva evaluation4150 hana kudryavtseva evaluation
4150 hana kudryavtseva evaluation
 
The Exam by Kweku Obiri-Yeboah
The Exam by Kweku Obiri-YeboahThe Exam by Kweku Obiri-Yeboah
The Exam by Kweku Obiri-Yeboah
 
Lost by Dominic Griffiths
Lost by Dominic GriffithsLost by Dominic Griffiths
Lost by Dominic Griffiths
 
Martha Hay Film Script First Draft
Martha Hay Film Script First DraftMartha Hay Film Script First Draft
Martha Hay Film Script First Draft
 
Final qu4 evaluation
Final qu4 evaluationFinal qu4 evaluation
Final qu4 evaluation
 
Film production guide
Film production guideFilm production guide
Film production guide
 
The uk film industry 2016
The uk film industry 2016The uk film industry 2016
The uk film industry 2016
 

Recently uploaded

Metabolism , Metabolic Fate& disorders of cholesterol.pptx
Metabolism , Metabolic Fate& disorders of cholesterol.pptxMetabolism , Metabolic Fate& disorders of cholesterol.pptx
Metabolism , Metabolic Fate& disorders of cholesterol.pptxDr. Santhosh Kumar. N
 
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - HK2 (...
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - HK2 (...HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - HK2 (...
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - HK2 (...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
 
UNIT I Design Thinking and Explore.pptx
UNIT I  Design Thinking and Explore.pptxUNIT I  Design Thinking and Explore.pptx
UNIT I Design Thinking and Explore.pptxGOWSIKRAJA PALANISAMY
 
BBA 205 BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT UNIT I.pptx
BBA 205 BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT UNIT I.pptxBBA 205 BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT UNIT I.pptx
BBA 205 BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT UNIT I.pptxProf. Kanchan Kumari
 
Research Methodology and Tips on Better Research
Research Methodology and Tips on Better ResearchResearch Methodology and Tips on Better Research
Research Methodology and Tips on Better ResearchRushdi Shams
 
25 CHUYÊN ĐỀ ÔN THI TỐT NGHIỆP THPT 2023 – BÀI TẬP PHÁT TRIỂN TỪ ĐỀ MINH HỌA...
25 CHUYÊN ĐỀ ÔN THI TỐT NGHIỆP THPT 2023 – BÀI TẬP PHÁT TRIỂN TỪ ĐỀ MINH HỌA...25 CHUYÊN ĐỀ ÔN THI TỐT NGHIỆP THPT 2023 – BÀI TẬP PHÁT TRIỂN TỪ ĐỀ MINH HỌA...
25 CHUYÊN ĐỀ ÔN THI TỐT NGHIỆP THPT 2023 – BÀI TẬP PHÁT TRIỂN TỪ ĐỀ MINH HỌA...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
 
DNA and RNA , Structure, Functions, Types, difference, Similarities, Protein ...
DNA and RNA , Structure, Functions, Types, difference, Similarities, Protein ...DNA and RNA , Structure, Functions, Types, difference, Similarities, Protein ...
DNA and RNA , Structure, Functions, Types, difference, Similarities, Protein ...AKSHAYMAGAR17
 
3.12.24 Freedom Summer in Mississippi.pptx
3.12.24 Freedom Summer in Mississippi.pptx3.12.24 Freedom Summer in Mississippi.pptx
3.12.24 Freedom Summer in Mississippi.pptxmary850239
 
Awards Presentation 2024 - March 12 2024
Awards Presentation 2024 - March 12 2024Awards Presentation 2024 - March 12 2024
Awards Presentation 2024 - March 12 2024bsellato
 
VIT336 – Recommender System - Unit 3.pdf
VIT336 – Recommender System - Unit 3.pdfVIT336 – Recommender System - Unit 3.pdf
VIT336 – Recommender System - Unit 3.pdfArthyR3
 
LEAD6001 - Introduction to Advanced Stud
LEAD6001 - Introduction to Advanced StudLEAD6001 - Introduction to Advanced Stud
LEAD6001 - Introduction to Advanced StudDr. Bruce A. Johnson
 
Auchitya Theory by Kshemendra Indian Poetics
Auchitya Theory by Kshemendra Indian PoeticsAuchitya Theory by Kshemendra Indian Poetics
Auchitya Theory by Kshemendra Indian PoeticsDhatriParmar
 
Certification Study Group - Professional ML Engineer Session 3 (Machine Learn...
Certification Study Group - Professional ML Engineer Session 3 (Machine Learn...Certification Study Group - Professional ML Engineer Session 3 (Machine Learn...
Certification Study Group - Professional ML Engineer Session 3 (Machine Learn...gdgsurrey
 
Plant Tissue culture., Plasticity, Totipotency, pptx
Plant Tissue culture., Plasticity, Totipotency, pptxPlant Tissue culture., Plasticity, Totipotency, pptx
Plant Tissue culture., Plasticity, Totipotency, pptxHimansu10
 
DLL Catch Up Friday March 22.docx CATCH UP FRIDAYS
DLL Catch Up Friday March 22.docx CATCH UP FRIDAYSDLL Catch Up Friday March 22.docx CATCH UP FRIDAYS
DLL Catch Up Friday March 22.docx CATCH UP FRIDAYSTeacherNicaPrintable
 
BBA 205 BE UNIT 2 economic systems prof dr kanchan.pptx
BBA 205 BE UNIT 2 economic systems prof dr kanchan.pptxBBA 205 BE UNIT 2 economic systems prof dr kanchan.pptx
BBA 205 BE UNIT 2 economic systems prof dr kanchan.pptxProf. Kanchan Kumari
 
PHARMACOGNOSY CHAPTER NO 5 CARMINATIVES AND G.pdf
PHARMACOGNOSY CHAPTER NO 5 CARMINATIVES AND G.pdfPHARMACOGNOSY CHAPTER NO 5 CARMINATIVES AND G.pdf
PHARMACOGNOSY CHAPTER NO 5 CARMINATIVES AND G.pdfSumit Tiwari
 
EDD8524 The Future of Educational Leader
EDD8524 The Future of Educational LeaderEDD8524 The Future of Educational Leader
EDD8524 The Future of Educational LeaderDr. Bruce A. Johnson
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Metabolism , Metabolic Fate& disorders of cholesterol.pptx
Metabolism , Metabolic Fate& disorders of cholesterol.pptxMetabolism , Metabolic Fate& disorders of cholesterol.pptx
Metabolism , Metabolic Fate& disorders of cholesterol.pptx
 
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - HK2 (...
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - HK2 (...HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - HK2 (...
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - HK2 (...
 
UNIT I Design Thinking and Explore.pptx
UNIT I  Design Thinking and Explore.pptxUNIT I  Design Thinking and Explore.pptx
UNIT I Design Thinking and Explore.pptx
 
BBA 205 BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT UNIT I.pptx
BBA 205 BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT UNIT I.pptxBBA 205 BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT UNIT I.pptx
BBA 205 BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT UNIT I.pptx
 
Research Methodology and Tips on Better Research
Research Methodology and Tips on Better ResearchResearch Methodology and Tips on Better Research
Research Methodology and Tips on Better Research
 
25 CHUYÊN ĐỀ ÔN THI TỐT NGHIỆP THPT 2023 – BÀI TẬP PHÁT TRIỂN TỪ ĐỀ MINH HỌA...
25 CHUYÊN ĐỀ ÔN THI TỐT NGHIỆP THPT 2023 – BÀI TẬP PHÁT TRIỂN TỪ ĐỀ MINH HỌA...25 CHUYÊN ĐỀ ÔN THI TỐT NGHIỆP THPT 2023 – BÀI TẬP PHÁT TRIỂN TỪ ĐỀ MINH HỌA...
25 CHUYÊN ĐỀ ÔN THI TỐT NGHIỆP THPT 2023 – BÀI TẬP PHÁT TRIỂN TỪ ĐỀ MINH HỌA...
 
DNA and RNA , Structure, Functions, Types, difference, Similarities, Protein ...
DNA and RNA , Structure, Functions, Types, difference, Similarities, Protein ...DNA and RNA , Structure, Functions, Types, difference, Similarities, Protein ...
DNA and RNA , Structure, Functions, Types, difference, Similarities, Protein ...
 
3.12.24 Freedom Summer in Mississippi.pptx
3.12.24 Freedom Summer in Mississippi.pptx3.12.24 Freedom Summer in Mississippi.pptx
3.12.24 Freedom Summer in Mississippi.pptx
 
Awards Presentation 2024 - March 12 2024
Awards Presentation 2024 - March 12 2024Awards Presentation 2024 - March 12 2024
Awards Presentation 2024 - March 12 2024
 
VIT336 – Recommender System - Unit 3.pdf
VIT336 – Recommender System - Unit 3.pdfVIT336 – Recommender System - Unit 3.pdf
VIT336 – Recommender System - Unit 3.pdf
 
LEAD6001 - Introduction to Advanced Stud
LEAD6001 - Introduction to Advanced StudLEAD6001 - Introduction to Advanced Stud
LEAD6001 - Introduction to Advanced Stud
 
Auchitya Theory by Kshemendra Indian Poetics
Auchitya Theory by Kshemendra Indian PoeticsAuchitya Theory by Kshemendra Indian Poetics
Auchitya Theory by Kshemendra Indian Poetics
 
ANOVA Parametric test: Biostatics and Research Methodology
ANOVA Parametric test: Biostatics and Research MethodologyANOVA Parametric test: Biostatics and Research Methodology
ANOVA Parametric test: Biostatics and Research Methodology
 
Certification Study Group - Professional ML Engineer Session 3 (Machine Learn...
Certification Study Group - Professional ML Engineer Session 3 (Machine Learn...Certification Study Group - Professional ML Engineer Session 3 (Machine Learn...
Certification Study Group - Professional ML Engineer Session 3 (Machine Learn...
 
Plant Tissue culture., Plasticity, Totipotency, pptx
Plant Tissue culture., Plasticity, Totipotency, pptxPlant Tissue culture., Plasticity, Totipotency, pptx
Plant Tissue culture., Plasticity, Totipotency, pptx
 
DLL Catch Up Friday March 22.docx CATCH UP FRIDAYS
DLL Catch Up Friday March 22.docx CATCH UP FRIDAYSDLL Catch Up Friday March 22.docx CATCH UP FRIDAYS
DLL Catch Up Friday March 22.docx CATCH UP FRIDAYS
 
BBA 205 BE UNIT 2 economic systems prof dr kanchan.pptx
BBA 205 BE UNIT 2 economic systems prof dr kanchan.pptxBBA 205 BE UNIT 2 economic systems prof dr kanchan.pptx
BBA 205 BE UNIT 2 economic systems prof dr kanchan.pptx
 
PHARMACOGNOSY CHAPTER NO 5 CARMINATIVES AND G.pdf
PHARMACOGNOSY CHAPTER NO 5 CARMINATIVES AND G.pdfPHARMACOGNOSY CHAPTER NO 5 CARMINATIVES AND G.pdf
PHARMACOGNOSY CHAPTER NO 5 CARMINATIVES AND G.pdf
 
Problems on Mean,Mode,Median Standard Deviation
Problems on Mean,Mode,Median Standard DeviationProblems on Mean,Mode,Median Standard Deviation
Problems on Mean,Mode,Median Standard Deviation
 
EDD8524 The Future of Educational Leader
EDD8524 The Future of Educational LeaderEDD8524 The Future of Educational Leader
EDD8524 The Future of Educational Leader
 

G322 Case Study - Working Title and The Boat That Rocked

  • 2.
  • 3.
  • 4.
  • 5. My Beautiful Laundrette ( 1984 ) A groundbreaking script by Hanif Kureishi co-produced with Channel 4, fitting their remit of offering challenging work that would not find a home elsewhere on television or in UK cinema. The story revolves around the relationship between a right-wing extremist, Johnny ( Daniel Day Lewis ) and Omar (Gordon Wemecke), the Pakistani nephew of an archetypal Pakistani entrepreneur Nasser (Saeed Jaffrey), who are brought together in revamping a run-down laundrette. Frears offers a critique of the Thatcherite work ethic and the entrepreneur society, showing a white underclass declining under the determination of new immigrant businesses. With interracial homosexuality to the fore it is not surprising that this film caused a considerable stir in a society that was suffering the consequences of political and economic revolution that had as its creed "there is no such thing as society”. Made for $400,000 it took over $2.5 in the US alone.
  • 6. The success of their first three films, which all dealt with British subjects, alerted the wider film industry to this independent production company, leading first to a international co-productions in 1988 including their first Anglo-American production For Queen and Country (starring a youthful Denzel Washington !). The success of this film on both sides of the Atlantic gave Working Title a template for co-production that they immediately began to exploit, and one that has been the aspiration for most other British independent production companies since.
  • 7.
  • 8. Why UK/US Co-productions? According to Bevan: "Before co-productions we had been independent producers, but it was very hand to mouth. We would develop a script , that would take about 5% of our time; we'd find a director , that'd take about 5% of the time and then we'd spend 90% of the time trying to juggle together deals from different sources to finance those films. The films were suffering because there was no real structure and the company was always virtually bankrupt."
  • 9.
  • 10.
  • 11. 1984 - Working Title founded 1985 - My Beautiful Laundrette is the first of a series of collaborations with Channel 4 Films Working Title produce a further 10 films in the 1980s 1988 - Production deal with PolyGram Filmed Entertainment 1992 - PolyGram (a European music and media company) buys Working Title . 1994 - Four Weddings and a Funeral A huge box office success due to the access to the US market provided by Polygram’s financial muscle Made for $6 million it took over $244 million worldwide. A HISTORY: Working Title produces 41 films in the 1990s
  • 12. The financial stability offered by the support from a major studio allowed Working Title to move rapidly on to the international stage, and PolyGram being taken over by Seagram and subsumed into its film arm, Universal Pictures , in 1999, further strengthened this. A marked change of direction took place at this point, with the traditionally provincial independent territory being scorned in favour of international prospects. 1998 - Polygram bought by Universal a Hollywood Studio itself owned by Seagram Working Title is now owned by Universal , which is in turn owned by Vivendi 2000 - Seagram is bought by Vivendi , the French multimedia conglomerate
  • 13. The international activity did not prevent Working Title from continuing to support British filmmakers and from engaging in what would have been considered traditional 'independent' Anglo-European co-productions such as Ken Loach’s Land and Freedom ( 1995 ) and 'offbeat' Shaun of the Dead ( 2004 ) and Hot Fuzz ( 2007 ).
  • 14. So what is a Working Title film? This was once relatively easy to answer, as the films they first made all seemed to address issues of what it is to be British (or, more specifically, English ), and particularly what it meant to be an outsider – like the immigrants in My Beautiful Laundrette . Of course, the general public know them as the re-inventors of a British romantic comedy genre through Four Weddings and a Funeral , Notting Hill ( 1999 ) and Love Actually ( 2003 )
  • 15. Four Weddings and a Funeral ( 1994 ) This was the first Working Title collaborations with Richard Curtis (who’d achieved fame with the Blackadder TV series) and Hugh Grant and it set the bar for British film production, particularly in its use of soundtrack that spawned a record-breaking number one single. A rom-com that explores the relationships between a group of upper-class friends as they meet to celebrate and mourn. Curtis was able to bring established contacts to an ensemble cast (such as Rowan Atkinson ), enhancing the potential connection with the home audience The film was a massive hit in the USA , in part because of the view 'heritage Britain' - a land of churches, old pubs and stately homes populated by 'classy' English people with obligatory bumbling fools sprinkled across the social landscape. It also helped that one of the stars American ( Andie MacDowell ).
  • 16. Such an unexpected success gave Working Title international clout and reach, and placed it at the centre of the Hollywood . It also placed considerable pressure on the company to become the romantic-comedy-heritage-film company , a pressure it resisted, but did not reject, realizing that a popular film could help support a number of productions with less potential for such success yet still deserving of being made. A quick glance at the list of films in its catalogue reveals a list of over 100 films produced since 1984 - probably the only common thread among them is the desire to do something different to what is being produced at the time, and to do it well. It is the ability to make films for specific audience groups , and to not be pigeon-holed that has enabled the company to ensure that its work remains fresh and successful.
  • 17. It is easy to categorize them ( dismissively ) until you look through the catalogue and realize that this is a company categorized only by diversity and the ability to detect changes in the market that enable a reorientation of direction There is no other British Film Company like Working Title - it is allowed freedom to make creative decisions but it is owned by a US based conglomerate. So what is a Working Title film? How do Working Title choose which films to make? Fellner says “projects get championed by individuals in the development department and these 'percolate' their way up to the top. Tim Bevan and I then both take the decision on what to greenlight.”
  • 18. Co-production has long been a method of sharing risk within the film industry, and when Working Title began its life, co-production was merely another revenue stream that often involved pre-sale or pre-distribution deals on world or national rights. Since one of Working Title’s principal partners was Channel Four , and Channel Four pioneered international co-production in the UK, it is no surprise that Working Title adopted and extended the model. Working Title and Co-production Initially, Working Title explored these deals domestically, but as its success grew it found that the international market opened up to it. Working Title took co-production further when formalizing their relationship with PolyGram (later Universal ) where US investment of 30% did not prevent them from obtaining EU/UK tax advantages. A 30% stake in the budget + Hollywood support clearly stimulates other investors willingness to get involved in a film. It is this advance in the model that radically enhanced the production processes and values in Working Title films.
  • 19. “ The Working Title philosophy has always been to make films for an audience - by that I mean play in a multiplex. We totally believe in this because we know it is the only hope we have of sustaining the UK film industry. ” Despite its famous name, the structure at Working Title is small. It employs just 42 full time staff, split between the main Working Title production arm and its recently closed low-budget offshoot WT 2 under Natasha Wharton . “ When I was at Working Title we set up a New Writers Scheme to develop new talent. The problem was that at Working Title , smaller films would inevitably get less attention than the bigger budget projects so we decided to set up WT2 to give proper attention to those smaller films.” How does it work? 2007 - Why did WT 2 close down?
  • 20. Does it always work? Film Year Budget (est) Worldwide Gross (est) Billy Eliot 2000 $5 million $109.3 million Long Time Dead 2002 $2 million $2 million Ali G Indahouse 2002 $5 million $12 million My Little Eye 2002 $2-3 million $3 million Shaun of the Dead 2004 $4 million $30 million The Calcium Kid 2004 $5 million £61,415 MickyBo and Me 2004 $3 million £172,336 Inside I’m Dancing 2004 $5 million $500,000 Sixty Six 2006 $3 million $1.9 million
  • 21. The most important part of the business is developing scripts. Working Title has a strong development team and invests heavily in making sure that they get it right. They usually have around 40 - 50 projects in development at any time and their average spend on development is around $250,000 to $500,000 per script. They aim to make around 5 to 10 films a year, spread across different budget sizes (with an average of $30 to $40 million) and genres. How does it work? Released in 2009/10 are 10 films including the Richard Curtis comedy The Boat That Rocked , political thriller State of Play based on the successful BBC television drama but re-imagined in Washington and Green Zone , an Iraq war thriller that reunites the Bourne series star Matt Damon and director Paul Greengrass.
  • 22. As you can see, not all of their films have been unqualified successes - as one would expect in the movie industry. Earlier flops include Captain Corelli's Mandolin (2001). It was their most expensive film to date, with a budget of $57 million and, ironically, the one that seemed most likely to succeed. Adapted from the popular book of the same name, with an all-star cast, it still managed to disappoint with the critics and at the box office making only $62 million worldwide. Trouble ahead? Film Year Budget (est) Worldwide Gross (est) The Boat That Rocked 2009 $50 million $36.3 million State of Play 2009 $60 million $87.8 million The Soloist 2009 $60 million $37.6 million A Serious Man 2009 $7 million $26.2 million Green Zone 2010 $100 million $86.4 million
  • 23.
  • 24. Teaser Poster & trailer…
  • 25. Main Poster & trailer…
  • 27. Here’s our Working Title famous US star…
  • 29. Digital marketing – the film used Spotify to create playlists for each of the 9 DJs featured in the film. For example Dave, played by Nick Frost...
  • 32. Richard Curtis takes the complex, fascinating subject of 60s pirate radio and turns it into infantalised farce. The Guardian Why did it ‘sink’ at the box office? The reviews weren’t great… Richard Curtis‘s The Boat That Rocked sloshes about merrily and has some magical moments…overlong, muddled and only fitfully brilliant. Daily Telegraph *** ‘ The Ship That Sank’ would be a more appropriate title for Richard Curtis’s latest and most disappointing entertainment. Time Out ** Curtis’s new film is a love letter to the music and rebellious spirit of the 1960s. He has given us what he imagines to be the era’s cocktail of sex, drugs and rock’n’roll — but he’s turned it into something as cosy and comforting as a sweet cup of tea. The Times ** Terrible reviews tend to turn into terrible word of mouth…
  • 33. Social recommendation is key - a personal recommendation from a friend, colleague or relative can be the most powerful trigger for a cinema visit. Pre-requisite for favourable 'word of mouth' are high levels of awareness and strong interest. Negative word of mouth is extremely difficult to overcome. Post-release, hopefully, a combination of good word of mouth and further advertising will combine to give the film 'legs'. Why did it ‘sink’ at the box office?
  • 34. It got a different name in the US…? Why did it ‘sink’ at the box office? Last Friday saw the U.S. release of the film Pirate Radio. During the 7 month delay in its arrival on these shores both DVD and Blu-Ray versions of the film came out in non-American markets, ensuring that U.S. viewers would have access via the Internet to copies. In fact, a cam version debuted on Piratebay soon after theatrical release, with DVD and Blu-Ray rips appearing in mid-August, eminently available to anybody around the world with an Internet connection. How did this affect it’s opening weekend in America? Remember - the percentage of box office that comes from the opening weekend has increased from 15.7% in the 80s to 33.1% today…
  • 35. While its gross intake was relatively modest, at just under $3 million (over 800+ cinemas) Pirate Radio actually did very well on a per-cinema average which put it in third place among films in wide-release for the weekend.  While it is impossible to know with any real certainty what impact downloads of the DVD or Blu-Ray rips may have had on Pirate Radio’s box office, the film appears to have done pretty well, especially considering its foreign origin, subject matter and rather middling reviews ( 54% on the Rotten Tomato scale). Somehow the forces behind the movie found a way to ‘compete with free’ and position it to be profitable in the US, even before its inevitable DVD and Blu-Ray releases there. Maybe the existence of free versions on the Internet did less to drive down demand for the film, but instead fostered awareness and interest in the movie above and beyond what the producers were able to do via PR and advertising? Why didn’t it ‘sink’ at the US box office?
  • 36. http://filminfocus.com/focusfeatures/film/pirate_radio/ http://www.workingtitlefilms.com/ http://www.workingtitlefilms.com/film.php?filmID=120 http://www.filmeducation.org/theboatthatrocked/activity3.html Despite being a very successful business model over the past 25 years Working Title have had a series of flops that would have ‘sunk’ a UK film company that lacked the backing of a Hollywood studio. Despite making films with tried and trusted talent in recent years ( Richard Curtis , Matt Damon ) box office has not been great. How do you think Working Title can be successful again? http://benjaminwigmore.blogspot.com/2009/04/boat-that-rocked.html http://www.launchingfilms.tv/index.php