Tx K12 Cto Clinic Virtualization Presentation

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Tx K12 Cto Clinic Virtualization Presentation - Presentation Transcript

    1. Steve Young, Chief Technology Officer, Judson ISD Ted Jongbloed, Director of Technology Services, Waller ISD Daniel Domain, Technology Director, Mildred ISD Don Hindsley, Technology Coordinator, Whiteface ISD y, gy ,
    2. CTO Clinic Austin TX, June 22, 2009 Judson ISD nComputing X Series Desktop Virtualization Steve Young, Chief Technology Officer, Judson ISD
    3. Judson ISD pain points with providing increased computer access to students Cost Laptops and desktops have high per seat acquisition cost Maintenance Computers have many common parts that fail or need maintenance Increasing computer technician staff not an option g p p Extended warranties can be very costly Network Access Many classrooms have limited network drops y p Cabling and new switches are very expensive Electrical Capacity y pp g Many older schools have trouble supporting more than a couple of computers per classroom Often no easy way to increase electrical capacity A/C is very expensive for schools and adding more full computers substantially raises A/C demand
    4. Solutions & Possibilities Thin clients Good in practice, but we have no spare server room space and eventually would need more network staff (another option we could not choose) ( p ) Server rooms are VERY costly, need lots of electricity, and A/C Often the cost for thin clients hardware was not significantly less than a low cost desktop Laptops Typically a higher acquisition costs when equipped with similar components as a desktop High total cost of ownership (TCO) Repairs take longer Parts more proprietary More theft prone Load Linux variant on old computers Cheap/free solution – no OS cost We have no Linux management tools and none offer functionality we require at no cost Still require expensive network ports and high electricity (higher than modern CPU) Increase number of service calls and need for repair technicians
    5. What Judson ISD selected: The nComputing X Series What it is? Modified thi li t M difi d thin client It virtualizes the host OS and shares the host’s resources host s How does it work? Install a PCI card in host machine Connect up to 3 terminals (multi boxes) per PCI card via cat 5 cable )p Connect monitor, keyboard, and mouse to each multi box
    6. Deployment details What Judson ISD did and where we did it Decided to focus X Series deployments in three areas: Elementary school classrooms Middle school classrooms Each classroom end up with 4 student workstations Library student stations Lib t d t t ti How many have we deployed in year 1? 418 sets – which created an additional 1,254 computer seats 1 254 How many have we deployed in year 2? 343 sets – which created an additional 1,029 computer seats
    7. Lower Acquisition Costs ( 3,044 computing seats ) Acquisition for a PC only deployment $ 2,374,320 Possible additional network growth $ 776,220 Acquisition cost for X Series Deployment Shared PC's $ 593,580 Access Terminals (X Series) $ 152,200 Extra Monitors $ 285,375 Keyboards & Mice $ 45,660 MS OS Licensing $ 108,594 108 594 Total X Series Acquisition Cost $ 1,185,409 Savings of 50%
    8. Energy Cost Comparison Judson ISD's School Year Energy Cost Comparison $30.00 $25.00 $ 0 00 $20.00 $15.00 $10.00 $5.00 $- Annual Energy Cost Annual Energy Cost Annual Energy Cost JISD's Annual Energy of P3 and CRT of a "green" Dual of Dual Core w/ 3 Cost Per Seat using Monitor Core PC w/LCD terminals nComputing X-Series
    9. Energy Cost Savings (Green Computing) One Year Energy Cost & Savings for Judson ISD for 3044 Total Computing Seats $ , $90,000 $ , $84,014 $80,000 $70,000 $61,354 $60,000 $50,000 $40,000 $35 852 $35,852 $30,000 $22,661 $20,000 $13,191 $ 3 9 $10,000 $ $- Yearly operating Yearly operating Yearly operating Energy savings by Energy savings cost for 3044 P3 cost for 3044 green cost - Using Core using X Series with using X Series PC's Core Duo Duo's hosting X Core Duo (instead of instead of all an Series P3) Core Duo fleet
    10. Less Electrical Capacity Needed Many schools lack electrical infrastructure to support large numbers of computers Often impractical or cost prohibitive to bring in increased electrical service One X Series set with 1 green dual core and 3 terminals use about the same electricity as a single Pentium 3 system with a CRT monitor. This allows a schools to double number of computer seats in classrooms, while reducing electrical needs by 50% This means a 4 computer classroom can replace outdated systems with modern ones: And cut acquisition costs 50% Cut energy usage 73%
    11. Less A/C Needed Less power consumption equates to less heat generated per computing seat ti t Heat output is cut the same percentage as energy usage This means heat output compared to traditional PC s can PC’s reduce heat output by 73% or higher. This translates into large savings on A/C bills or on retrofit of A/C systems to service hot rooms Less $$ is spent on building A/C per computing seat
    12. Less e-waste Created e- Long term, there is much less e-waste for disposal, i.e. there are 3 less CPU’s CPU s Less to dispose of means: Less pollution Lower disposal costs
    13. Less Network Ports Needed Less ports and drops can equate to at least $1200 L dd l savings per X Series set, if drops needed for increased computer access access. How is this money saved? Network switches can be very costly at more than $150 per port Copper prices have been rapidly rising (a key component of network cables) Labor to install cabling is expensive (from $75 to $200 per drop) g p ( $ $ p p) Switches are not always very “green” – and can consume a lot of electricity, as well as generate a lot of heat, so reducing numbers of switch ports can help schools become greener
    14. CTO Clinic Austin TX, June 22, A stin TX J ne 22 2009 Waller ISD Virtualization Project Ted Jongbloed, Director of Technology Services, Waller ISD
    15. Waller ISD Overview 4A District, 5,150 Students, 8 campuses US 290, Northwest Houston 290 Traditional small town, rural district… becoming a mixed district, with farming, ranching, light industry, growing , g, g, g y, g g suburbs Growing Hispanic and Black population Not i h N rich, not poor Slow growth, 100+ a year Limited technology in community 1,650 computers in district
    16. Spring 2007 District Network Center totally obsolete Ran out of power…total power failure on three occasions power total Insufficient cooling…temperature reached 95 degrees No more rack room…but…needed to add four servers for new Student, Finance, and Special Education applications One application / one server dilemma Solution…May 2007 Bond Election
    17. Spring 2008 Bond passes…included new Technology Center Bond tied up in year-long legal challenge year long Temporary fixes for power and cooling BUT still out of rack space and on the edge of building power Four new servers purchased…need to do something for new Student and Finance Systems S d d Fi S New Solution…Try Virtualization
    18. May 2008 Quick proof of concept Send Network Manager to VMWare Training Take four DL 380 G5 Servers and convert to VMWare Migrate campus servers and others to VMWare Training h l T i i wheel approach…removes skepticism h k i i Identifies need for more equipment Need a SAN and Vmotion iSCSI versus Fiber Channel question VM needs lots of memory and NIC’s Need management tools
    19. Summer 2008 By end of Summer moved NOC to VMWare Installed Dell/EMC AX4 SAN…ability to add drives and enclosures SAN ability over time Added additional severs over next six months…1 to 4 ratio…Retire old servers Used VMWare Tools to Virtualized existing servers Cooling, Power and Space problems eliminated… still have obsolete NOC
    20. Today VMWare Status 49 Virtual Servers 11 Physical Hosts VRanger and Foglight Only seven stand-alone servers left Down to two racks…but still have space problems Storage requirements continue to grow with Sharepoint and IP Security system requirements Other Virtualization Also implemented Ncomputing X300/350 Virtualization solution for campus computers…120 systems deployed by August 2009
    21. Other Observations No initial cost savings 11 Servers $58,377 $58 377 Additional Memory $12,441 SAN $42,827 VMWare Licenses VMW Li $33,396 $33 396 VMWare Support $19,932 Management Tools $20,100 Total $186,073 Unforeseen advantages Replaced servers used as IP Security Servers Replaced equipment used to create backup center Virtual Machines make data center disaster planning actually possible ibl Ability to add new servers…fast and painless
    22. Summary Virtualization solved an immediate problem Virtualization tools streamlined day-to-day management of day to day servers Without budget support movement to VM is difficult g pp Microsoft entry (and others) may drive down prices X300 solution solved sustainment problem at Elementary Campuses
    23. CTO Clinic Austin TX, June 22, 2009 Why Go Virtual? y A Server Virtualization Story Daniel Domain, Technology Director, Mildred ISD
    24. Problem Points Continuing need for servers Financial Constraints Storage Issues Hardware Data Technological Growth Stability
    25. Possible solutions Continue with the status quo Continue laying out money for each additional server Look into offsite storage Consider Virtualization
    26. Best Solutions
    27. Buy In? Total buy-in cost… $20,000.00 $20 000 00 – Host Servers (3) $40,000.00 – SAN Solution (iSCSI Equalogic) $10,000.00 – Initial VM-Ware Software VM-Ware for host servers (V-Sphere) Virtual Center for Control Server (Already owned) Total Cost of Ownership - $70,000.00 (approx.)
    28. $$$$$Savings$$$$$ To Date: Over $170 000 00 in server costs alone $170,000.00 $30,000.00 $30 000 00 in UPS costs Approx. $16,000.00 in shipping costs pp $ , pp g
    29. Uncalculated savings Cooling Power Storage Physical Data More time on task as result of less down time
    30. Major Benefits More Uptime Manual virtual server migration M l it l i ti Automatic virtual server migration More centralized management VC Client on any machine Web Access Less Cost Ease of growth More Versatile Software vs Hardware vs. Addition of servers at no additional cost
    31. CTO Clinic Austin TX, June 22, 2009 Citrix: Why & How? Don Hindsley, Technology Coordinator, Whiteface CISD
    32. Why? •Budget reduction •Administrative mandate to maintain current accessibility (99.65% up-time 24/7), including maintenance •Projected Budget Reduction: 33%
    33. Initial Costs Five Citrix servers (Dell PowerEdge Five Citrix servers (D ll P Ed 6850) Upgrade: All Components Redundant  74,145.00  14,829.00  (each) Citrix Presentation Server licenses 37,650.00  Equipment (3000 VA UPS, rack, …) 4,145.00  Configuration, physical set‐up, trouble‐shooting  software g 12,000.00  , $  127,940.00  Number of students in District: 350 Number of Teachers & Students On-Line at Low: 50 High: 120 any Time:
    34. Projected Savings w/o Citrix w/ Citrix Desktop Purchases D kt P h 110,000 110 000 15,000 15 000 Technician time 10,000 2,000 Down Time for desktops in classrooms 1‐2 days Almost none (Desktops replaced within  the hour) $  120,000 $ 120 000 17,000 17 000 6‐8 Years Time Frame ¼ Every  with good  (Desktop replacement): (Desktop replacement): Year performance
    35. An occasional technical issue: We were glad to have our tech support company. p y Issues: - connecting to printers - a few Exchange email issues - older software won’t work
    36. On the positive side •Budget reduction: • 1/3rd ended up at 1/4th. Many teachers and administrators insisted on new computers every three years . . . • Life span of existing student desktops: • Projected 6-8 years, but it seems we’re going to be able to make it 8-10 years before replacement. Why? • Add d Xt d cards t i Added Xtenda d to increase number of b f workstations in classrooms, giving us more “spares” waiting to be used. • After a year of study and trials, we have reduced the installed size of Windows-XP from 32 GB down to 2.4 GB – the computers boot up faster and run faster with only the minimum required windows apps running. www.mandrytechnology.com
    37. On the positive side2 • Down time & availability: • Maintaining 99%+ uptime on all computers with computers, reduced budget • Desktops merely swapped as all are generic. Just have to re-name and connect to default printer. • With Citrix, teachers now have access to ALL of their Applications and files at any computer IN THE WORLD. WORLD
    38. On the positive side3 • Technician: • Desktops are repaired whenever time is available (never an emergency) • Apps are installed only on 5 Citrix servers • 5 installs instead of 420 • 5 updates instead of 420 • Users don’t mess with apps!! pp • Users don’t need or have administrative rights to the local machine (no downloads, including spyware and viruses) • Only Windows-XP, Flash, Shockwave, Java and a few other required apps installed on local machine. • Software licensing is TOTALLY controlled and verifiable!

    + mguhlinmguhlin, 4 months ago

    custom

    268 views, 0 favs, 2 embeds more stats

    Below is the June 22, 2009 TX K-12 CTO Council Pres more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 268
      • 260 on SlideShare
      • 8 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 8
    Most viewed embeds
    • 6 views on http://www.mguhlin.org
    • 2 views on http://mguhlin.wikispaces.com

    more

    All embeds
    • 6 views on http://www.mguhlin.org
    • 2 views on http://mguhlin.wikispaces.com

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories