Tim Denton - Internet issues and the crtc
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Tim Denton - Internet issues and the crtc

on

  • 1,030 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
1,030
Views on SlideShare
718
Embed Views
312

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
10
Comments
0

2 Embeds 312

http://www.michaelgeist.ca 311
http://michaelgeist.ca 1

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment
  • It is hereby affirmed that telecommunications performs an essential role in the maintenance of Canada’s identity and sovereignty and that the Canadian telecommunications policy has as its objectives(a) to facilitate the orderly development throughout Canada of a telecommunications system that serves to safeguard, enrich and strengthen the social and economic fabric of Canada and its regions;(b) to render reliable and affordable telecommunications services of high quality accessible to Canadians in both urban and rural areas in all regions of Canada;(c) to enhance the efficiency and competitiveness, at the national and international levels, of Canadian telecommunications;(d) to promote the ownership and control of Canadian carriers by Canadians;(e) to promote the use of Canadian transmission facilities for telecommunications within Canada and between Canada and points outside Canada;(f) to foster increased reliance on market forces for the provision of telecommunications services and to ensure that regulation, where required, is efficient and effective;(g) to stimulate research and development in Canada in the field of telecommunications and to encourage innovation in the provision of telecommunications services;(h) to respond to the economic and social requirements of users of telecommunications services; and(i) to contribute to the protection of the privacy of persons.
  • http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2008/dt2008-17.htm Essential Services200. The Commission considers that the continued tariffing of non-essential services during their phase-out period and the continued tariffing of other wholesale services are necessary in light of the insufficiency of market forces as a means of achieving the policy objectives. The Commission also considers that these measures are efficient and proportionate to their purpose and interfere with the operation of competitive market forces to the minimum extent necessary to meet the policy objectives. 201. Regarding paragraph 1(b) of the Policy Direction, because the services under consideration in this proceeding are carrier services that competitors use as inputs for their retail services, the Commission considers that the determinations in this Decision that rely on regulation advance the policy objectives set out at paragraphs 7(a), (c), (f), and (h) of the Act. 202. The Commission considers that, for the reasons set out in this Decision, its determinations related to economic regulation neither deter economically efficient competitive entry into retail or wholesale markets, nor promote economically inefficient entry. Where the Commission has continued to rely on regulation that is not economic in nature, it has done so in a symmetrical and competitively neutral manner to the greatest extent possible. Regarding network interconnection services, customer access facilities, and support structure services, the Commission considers that these arrangements are technologically and competitively neutral to the greatest extent possible, enable competition from new technologies, and do not artificially favour Canadian carriers or resellers. 203. The Commission considers that its determinations in this Decision also comply with paragraph 1(c)(ii) of the Policy Direction.

Tim Denton - Internet issues and the crtc Tim Denton - Internet issues and the crtc Presentation Transcript

  • A presentation to the University of Ottawa Law School Timothy Denton, January 11, 2013
  •  This is a talk prepared for University of Ottawa law students of Professor Michael Geist in January of 2013. It does not represent the official views of either the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission, or the American Registry of Internet Numbers. 1/13/2013 2
  • An Internet-connected world requires  Cheap, ubiquitous connectivity,  Applications that are readily available from competitive sourcesThe issue is: are carriers platforms on which others mayinnovate, or are they in command of what is carried?  Carriers have the means and motives to vertically integrate:  to link the provision of services to certain carriers and not others, and  to gather the economic surplus created by the InternetWhat should regulators do? How should they thinkabout the role of the carrier? 1/13/2013 3
  •  Existing legislation was not designed for the Internet Cable and telcos grew up under different rules ◦ Common carrier versus contract carrier ◦ Different obligations to allow interconnection No structural separation of carriage and content ◦ As has occurred in the UK Third party access to facilities is treated as the ugly step-child of “real” – facilities based – competition. Leased access to facilities is always contested and more controversial – not considered “real” competition. 1/13/2013 4
  •  The CRTC dates from 1968, and is the successor to predecessor regulatory agencies ◦ It has two principal statutes, and a new one ◦ Broadcasting Act 1991, basically a rewrite of 1968 legislation ◦ Telecommunications Act 1993 ◦ Canadian Anti-Spam Law 2012 (not yet implemented) There are 9 Commissioners (down from 13) and 400 staff ◦ The Chairman is the chief executive officer, and manages the work of the organization ◦ Appoints panels 1/13/2013 5
  •  Commissioners meet monthly (full commission) and weekly in telecom and broadcast committees Staff speak directly to commissioners on the basis of powerpoint decks (with supporting documents) The Chairman directs the staff and organizes the workload Regional and national representation: the CRTC is a mini-parliament 1/13/2013 6
  • Broadcasting Act: ◦ Grants privileges to Canadian signals, and to licence holders, as well as obligations ◦ Wholly oriented to the producer of Canadian content ◦ No mention of the word “consumer” in the Act ◦ More policy objectives than there are letters in the alphabet ◦ Strong cultural nationalist bias ◦ Comprehensive scheme of regulation, covers the cable industry when it acts as carrier of broadcasting ◦ Predicated on ideas deriving from over-the-air broadcasting 1/13/2013 7
  • Telecommunications Act ◦ Some national-development objectives ◦ some consumer objectives ◦ Market forces are encouraged ◦ Covers the cable industry when it acts as a carrier No unjust discrimination and no undue preference in tariffs Extensive powers of ◦ forbearance – in relation to services ◦ Exemption – in relation to geographic markets Policy Directive of 2006 strengthened tendency to deregulate where appropriate 97% of telecom carriers’ revenues are not regulated 1/13/2013 8
  • Telecommunications – thou shalt not discriminate 27. (1) Every rate charged by a Canadian carrier for a telecommunications service shall be just and reasonable. (2) No Canadian carrier shall, in relation to the provision of a telecommunications service or the charging of a rate for it, unjustly discriminate or give an undue or unreasonable preference toward any person, including itself, or subject any person to an undue or unreasonable disadvantage.Broadcasting - thou shalt discriminate 3(e) each element of the Canadian broadcasting system shall contribute in an appropriate manner to the creation and presentation of Canadian programming; And sundry other objectives to same effect 1/13/2013 9
  •  We have not tried to regulate the Internet as if it were “broadcasting”; We have sorted out the problem of net neutrality- traffic management measures, in principle; We have continued to foster leased access, but our decisions on the details take years to make; We have engendered a revolt (and then a review) of our policies on usage-based billing (UBB). 1/13/2013 10
  •  Unless we had decided against the Broadcasting Act, every Canadian website would have been licensed as a broadcaster or else exempted under an “exemption order”; The conditions of the exemption order would have amounted to regulation (speech or content controls); The Federal Court of Appeal was asked to look at the liability of ISPs as broadcasters (2010): result – they are not, if they act in a content-neutral way Jaron Lanier saved the day. 1/13/2013 11
  •  The decision (Oct 2009) laid down a framework for how the Commission would consider “traffic management practices” [TMPs] All measures to protect network security and integrity are okay, do not need pre-approval as a general rule The burden is always on the carrier to justify departures from neutrality. Economic (price) TMPs are preferred to others. Least discrimination, least harm are preferred. Implementation required follow-up. 1/13/2013 12
  • Telecom Regulatory Policy 2009-657 established thattraffic management measures were to be  Transparent to the end user  Focused on specific needs  Not unjustly discriminatory or unduly preferential  Approved in advance if they affected wholesale suppliers especially  Preferably to be economic rather than technical 1/13/2013 13
  •  The CRTC continued to require the incumbents (cable and telco) to wholesale access at matching speeds; Evened out the access requirements on cable and telcos, by increasing the obligations of the cable industry; Declined to approve new access services based on the central office or the cable head end (access- only interconnection) on the basis that disallowing it would not decrease competition I dissented on this portion of the decision. 1/13/2013 14
  •  The Commission started a proceeding in October 2010 to see whether the ◦ the UBB components and excessive usage charges of cable and telco wholesale services should be set at levels below the incumbents’ comparable retail UBB rates and, if so, to what extent. In the decision that followed (January 2011), we decided that a 15% discount should apply But, we imposed bit caps on all the customers of the smaller ISPs instead of one big bit cap on the ISP traffic as a whole. 1/13/2013 15
  •  Despite that UBB had been imposed on the residential customers of large carriers long before, applying UBB to the customers of smaller ISPs caused a revolt. Over 470,000 signed the digital petition The Minister of Industry tweeted his displeasure The CRTC announced a reconsideration of the UBB decision would take place. Among other faults, our decision required the ISP to police the consumption of his customers without having access to their usage records. 1/13/2013 16
  •  Minority government in a pre-election period Social media http://www.stopthemeter.ca/ (see membership) tweets Importance of the internet to Canadians Perception of higher prices in Canada? 1/13/2013 17
  •  The CRTC seems at last to have accepted wholesale lease of underlying facilities as a legitimate form of competition. More effort has been put into evening the burden of wholesale lease between cable and telco. Our pricing decisions still take too long. Improved implementation processes are required, once a decision in principle has been made. 1/13/2013 18
  •  The issue of leasing wholesale services has not been settled in Canada. US policy has unambiguously rejected a leased competition strategy. Canada has established that third-party access is a legitimate, if temporary, feature. ◦ “Essential services” decision will be up for review again in 18 months Carriers insist that to be a platform would turn them into a public utility. 1/13/2013 19
  •  “Information has become exceptional as an industrial category even in relation to that industry’s own history” “The disposition of firms and industries is, if anything, more critical than the actions of the state in controlling who gets heard.” “It is industrial structure that determines the limits of free speech.” “A separations principle would mean the creation of a salutary distance between each of the major functions or layers of the information economy.” 1/13/2013 20
  •  The kinds of ideas proposed by Tim Wu and others must strive against a view of networks constantly advocated by carriers: ◦ To the victor goes the spoils ◦ We need profits to build out the networks ◦ How can we do so if our networks are “nationalized”? There is too little discussion of the role of networks in the larger public domain. Competition policy is largely silent and ex-post-facto. Regulators need to understand more clearly what is at stake in the role of carriers. 1/13/2013 21
  •  Does the appointments process evaluate candidates for their views on network issues? No Does the Commission engage in deliberate policy development about network issues? Seldom Does Industry Canada develop policy about network issues? Yes, and their last directive is imbued with the idea that “real” competition occurs only between networks, and not between services and apps on a neutral network. Network policy will continue to be accidental until a conscious decision is made. ◦ The occasion is the next review of “essential services”. 1/13/2013 22
  • 1/13/2013 23