An Authoring and Peer Reviewing Activity in theMaster’s Program of Elearning Pedagogy:The Teacher and Students’ Perspectiv...
Agenda<br />1. Introduction<br />2. Background<br />3. Methodology<br />4. Development of the Activity<br />5. Conclusions...
1. Introduction<br />Online Learning / DistanceEducation<br />
2.Background <br />Master’s Program in Elearning Pedagogy<br />Totally online program<br />  2 semesters<br />25 students ...
Master’s Program in Elearning Pedagogy  <br />
The Course Models of Distance Education <br />The Learning Design of an activity emulating the production of a peer-review...
The PlanningoftheActivity<br />
3. Methodology<br /><ul><li>Written discourse analysis  </li></ul>Messages in the General Support Forum  <br />Forums of t...
4. Development of the Activity<br />
Formation of the Peer-Reviewers’ Teams <br />
Formation of the Peer-Reviewers’ Teams <br />
Master Studentsas Paper Authors<br />Source: http://lab-initio.com/<br />Source: http://www.flickr.com<br />
Master Students as Article Peer-Reviewers<br />
Master Students as Article Peer-Reviewers<br />
5. Conclusions<br />Knowledge gains<br />Promotion of team work <br />Multi-tasking<br />Academic writing skills<br />Acqu...
6. Aspects for Further Investigation<br />Factors behind the choice for teams’ formation<br />Connection between peer revi...
Contacts<br />         Web: mpel.wordpress.com <br />Facebook: MPeL.UAb<br />     Twitter: MPeL_UAb<br />
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Ed media_paper:about_master_mpel

1,287

Published on

Analysis of an online activity in a portuguese master degree about elearning: how students are doing peer-review

Published in: Education
1 Comment
1 Like
Statistics
Notes
No Downloads
Views
Total Views
1,287
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
9
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
0
Comments
1
Likes
1
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Ed media_paper:about_master_mpel

  1. 1. An Authoring and Peer Reviewing Activity in theMaster’s Program of Elearning Pedagogy:The Teacher and Students’ Perspectives<br />Maria Paula Silva <br />Maria João Spilker<br />Marina Moleirinho<br />LinaMorgado<br />Web: mpel.wordpress.com <br />Facebook: MPeL.UAb<br />Twitter: MPeL_UAb<br />UniversidadeAberta<br />Lisbon, Portugal  <br />June/2011<br />
  2. 2. Agenda<br />1. Introduction<br />2. Background<br />3. Methodology<br />4. Development of the Activity<br />5. Conclusions<br />6. Aspects for further investigation<br />
  3. 3. 1. Introduction<br />Online Learning / DistanceEducation<br />
  4. 4. 2.Background <br />Master’s Program in Elearning Pedagogy<br />Totally online program<br /> 2 semesters<br />25 students (adults)<br /> 8 courses<br />Moodle & <br />Social Media<br />
  5. 5. Master’s Program in Elearning Pedagogy  <br />
  6. 6. The Course Models of Distance Education <br />The Learning Design of an activity emulating the production of a peer-reviewed journal<br />
  7. 7. The PlanningoftheActivity<br />
  8. 8. 3. Methodology<br /><ul><li>Written discourse analysis </li></ul>Messages in the General Support Forum  <br />Forums of the Peer-Reviewer teams<br />Messages of the topic “Assessment of the activity”<br /><ul><li>Analysis of the final students’ products</li></ul>Web pages (Wiki and Google-Docs)<br />
  9. 9. 4. Development of the Activity<br />
  10. 10. Formation of the Peer-Reviewers’ Teams <br />
  11. 11. Formation of the Peer-Reviewers’ Teams <br />
  12. 12. Master Studentsas Paper Authors<br />Source: http://lab-initio.com/<br />Source: http://www.flickr.com<br />
  13. 13. Master Students as Article Peer-Reviewers<br />
  14. 14. Master Students as Article Peer-Reviewers<br />
  15. 15. 5. Conclusions<br />Knowledge gains<br />Promotion of team work <br />Multi-tasking<br />Academic writing skills<br />Acquaintance with specialized bibliography <br />A complex and challenging <br />learning design<br />
  16. 16. 6. Aspects for Further Investigation<br />Factors behind the choice for teams’ formation<br />Connection between peer reviewers work and authoring work<br />Constraints of peer reviewing<br />Transparency of the group work <br />
  17. 17. Contacts<br /> Web: mpel.wordpress.com <br />Facebook: MPeL.UAb<br /> Twitter: MPeL_UAb<br />

×