Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
Ed media_paper:about_master_mpel
Ed media_paper:about_master_mpel
Ed media_paper:about_master_mpel
Ed media_paper:about_master_mpel
Ed media_paper:about_master_mpel
Ed media_paper:about_master_mpel
Ed media_paper:about_master_mpel
Ed media_paper:about_master_mpel
Ed media_paper:about_master_mpel
Ed media_paper:about_master_mpel
Ed media_paper:about_master_mpel
Ed media_paper:about_master_mpel
Ed media_paper:about_master_mpel
Ed media_paper:about_master_mpel
Ed media_paper:about_master_mpel
Ed media_paper:about_master_mpel
Ed media_paper:about_master_mpel
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Ed media_paper:about_master_mpel

1,272

Published on

Analysis of an online activity in a portuguese master degree about elearning: how students are doing peer-review

Analysis of an online activity in a portuguese master degree about elearning: how students are doing peer-review

Published in: Education
1 Comment
1 Like
Statistics
Notes
No Downloads
Views
Total Views
1,272
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
9
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
0
Comments
1
Likes
1
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. An Authoring and Peer Reviewing Activity in theMaster’s Program of Elearning Pedagogy:The Teacher and Students’ Perspectives
    Maria Paula Silva
    Maria João Spilker
    Marina Moleirinho
    LinaMorgado
    Web: mpel.wordpress.com
    Facebook: MPeL.UAb
    Twitter: MPeL_UAb
    UniversidadeAberta
    Lisbon, Portugal 
    June/2011
  • 2. Agenda
    1. Introduction
    2. Background
    3. Methodology
    4. Development of the Activity
    5. Conclusions
    6. Aspects for further investigation
  • 3. 1. Introduction
    Online Learning / DistanceEducation
  • 4. 2.Background 
    Master’s Program in Elearning Pedagogy
    Totally online program
    2 semesters
    25 students (adults)
    8 courses
    Moodle &
    Social Media
  • 5. Master’s Program in Elearning Pedagogy  
  • 6. The Course Models of Distance Education
    The Learning Design of an activity emulating the production of a peer-reviewed journal
  • 7. The PlanningoftheActivity
  • 8. 3. Methodology
    • Written discourse analysis
    Messages in the General Support Forum  
    Forums of the Peer-Reviewer teams
    Messages of the topic “Assessment of the activity”
    • Analysis of the final students’ products
    Web pages (Wiki and Google-Docs)
  • 9. 4. Development of the Activity
  • 10. Formation of the Peer-Reviewers’ Teams
  • 11. Formation of the Peer-Reviewers’ Teams
  • 12. Master Studentsas Paper Authors
    Source: http://lab-initio.com/
    Source: http://www.flickr.com
  • 13. Master Students as Article Peer-Reviewers
  • 14. Master Students as Article Peer-Reviewers
  • 15. 5. Conclusions
    Knowledge gains
    Promotion of team work
    Multi-tasking
    Academic writing skills
    Acquaintance with specialized bibliography
    A complex and challenging
    learning design
  • 16. 6. Aspects for Further Investigation
    Factors behind the choice for teams’ formation
    Connection between peer reviewers work and authoring work
    Constraints of peer reviewing
    Transparency of the group work
  • 17. Contacts
    Web: mpel.wordpress.com
    Facebook: MPeL.UAb
    Twitter: MPeL_UAb

×