POSTMODERNISM AND HISTORY M Esterman, 2009
THE “AGES OF HISTORIOGRAPHY”  (FROM A POSTMODERN PERSPECTIVE)
PREMODERN HISTORY
MODERN HISTORY
POSTMODERN HISTORY
POSTMODERNIST THEORY ON HISTORY
IS THERE SUCH A THING AS A POSTMODERNIST “SCHOOL”? <ul><li>“ Postmodern” Historians </li></ul>
POSTMODERN HISTORIANS AND HISTORICAL THINKERS <ul><li>Do not share all common traits, methodology or purpose </li></ul><ul...
“ POSTMODERN” HISTORIANS – WEBB,  EXTENSION HISTORY: THE HISTORIANS <ul><li>Paul Carter,  Lost Subjects  (1999): </li></ul...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Postmodernism and history

10,090

Published on

A short overview of some ideas relating to postmodernism and history.

Published in: Education, Spiritual
0 Comments
4 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
10,090
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
2
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
208
Comments
0
Likes
4
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Postmodernism and history

  1. 1. POSTMODERNISM AND HISTORY M Esterman, 2009
  2. 2. THE “AGES OF HISTORIOGRAPHY” (FROM A POSTMODERN PERSPECTIVE)
  3. 3. PREMODERN HISTORY
  4. 4. MODERN HISTORY
  5. 5. POSTMODERN HISTORY
  6. 6. POSTMODERNIST THEORY ON HISTORY
  7. 7. IS THERE SUCH A THING AS A POSTMODERNIST “SCHOOL”? <ul><li>“ Postmodern” Historians </li></ul>
  8. 8. POSTMODERN HISTORIANS AND HISTORICAL THINKERS <ul><li>Do not share all common traits, methodology or purpose </li></ul><ul><li>Are not all historians but rather apply other theories to history (e.g. Literary, gender etc) </li></ul><ul><li>Often have competing views about the focus of history/meanings of history </li></ul><ul><li>Use varying methodologies – not all are trained historians </li></ul><ul><li>Are from different contexts (time, historiographical, philosophical etc) </li></ul><ul><li>Have different aims – some to destroy past assumptions, some to question, some to enhance </li></ul>
  9. 9. “ POSTMODERN” HISTORIANS – WEBB, EXTENSION HISTORY: THE HISTORIANS <ul><li>Paul Carter, Lost Subjects (1999): </li></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Presents his history by means of a series of ‘voices’. No omniscient narrator. (much like Herodotus?) </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><li>Simon Schama, Dead Certainties (1991): </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Admits that parts of the history is a “work of the imagination that chronicles historical events” – either his own interpretation of a variety of sources combined OR entirely his ideas based on what he understands was likely to have happened. </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Richard Price, Alabi’s World , (1990): </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Using different fonts to give the idea of different voices – requires reader to imagine various accents, voices etc. </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Norman Davies, The Isles (1999): </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Doesn’t use national teminology i.e. “Britain” as he says it detracts from the contribution of other groups </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Uses various other time-neutral imaginary terms e.g. “Midnight Isles” </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Mixes traditional sources (Celtic archaeology) with non-traditional (myths, ancient Irish literature & modern songs) </li></ul></ul>
  1. A particular slide catching your eye?

    Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

×