Rationale Approach Aims Participants Methodology Monitoring and evaluation Feedback and support for students Risk analysis and mitigating liability

Rationale

Approach

Aims

Participants

Methodology

Monitoring and evaluation

Feedback and support for students

Risk analysis and mitigating liability

Overview Pilot projects http://educationinnovators.ning.com

Overview

Pilot projects

http://educationinnovators.ning.com

Rationale Bureaucratic: ANU expectations, flexi ble delivery, college-level support Educational: Web 2.0 promotes constructivist and connectivist approaches

Rationale

Bureaucratic: ANU expectations, flexi ble delivery, college-level support

Educational: Web 2.0 promotes constructivist and connectivist approaches

Approach: Web 2.0 Participation Collaboration Interactivity Communication Community-building Sharing Networking Creativity

Approach: Web 2.0

Participation

Collaboration

Interactivity

Communication

Community-building

Sharing

Networking

Creativity

yay.

Systems vs tools LMSs: clunky, old, trauma, teacher-centred, limiting, inflexible, boring, restricting, transmission, Reject Shop, watered-down, frustrating, accounting Web 2.0 tools: creative, collaborative, flexible, education-centred, powerful, engaging, active, community, easy

Systems vs tools

LMSs: clunky, old, trauma, teacher-centred, limiting, inflexible, boring, restricting, transmission, Reject Shop, watered-down, frustrating, accounting

Web 2.0 tools: creative, collaborative, flexible, education-centred, powerful, engaging, active, community, easy

Stephen Downes. “Places to Go. Connectivism and connective knowledge.” http ://innovateonline.info/index.php?view=article&id=668&action=article

Aims Develop pedagogically sound and sustainable models for the use of various Web 2.0 tools in education that can be shared amongst teachers Identify and mitigate against any potential risks associated with the use of externally hosted web services in higher education Identify the amount and degree of teacher support required to implement such course innovations Develop and sustain a support network for participating lecturers Collect and analyse data relating to student attitudes towards and experiences of the use of Web 2.0 tools in their class

Aims

Develop pedagogically sound and sustainable models for the use of various Web 2.0 tools in education that can be shared amongst teachers

Identify and mitigate against any potential risks associated with the use of externally hosted web services in higher education

Identify the amount and degree of teacher support required to implement such course innovations

Develop and sustain a support network for participating lecturers

Collect and analyse data relating to student attitudes towards and experiences of the use of Web 2.0 tools in their class

Methodology Pilot projects Training/PD of teachers Models for use in class Mitigating liability Briefing students Sharing, networking, discovering Assessment: rubrics and instructions Academic skills

Methodology

Pilot projects

Training/PD of teachers

Models for use in class

Mitigating liability

Briefing students

Sharing, networking, discovering

Assessment: rubrics and instructions

Academic skills

Monitoring and evaluation EI@ANU network Six points of evaluation: pre-, Week 7 Week 10 Week 13 Mini-symposium (9 June) Focus groups

Monitoring and evaluation

EI@ANU network

Six points of evaluation:

pre-,

Week 7

Week 10

Week 13

Mini-symposium (9 June)

Focus groups

Feedback and support for students Mostly positive feedback so far Main concerns: lack of assignment info, rubrics Student workshops

Feedback and support for students

Mostly positive feedback so far

Main concerns: lack of assignment info, rubrics

Student workshops

Risks Legal challenges (Privacy, Disability) Work for assessment is lost (backups) Service disappears Copyright, IP Marketing, spam, monitoring

Risks

Legal challenges (Privacy, Disability)

Work for assessment is lost (backups)

Service disappears

Copyright, IP

Marketing, spam, monitoring

Mitigating liability: briefing students External provider Offensive material Information provided Copyright, IP, privacy Monitoring, marketing emails Responsibility for work

Mitigating liability: briefing students

External provider

Offensive material

Information provided

Copyright, IP, privacy

Monitoring, marketing emails

Responsibility for work

In-class practicalities Bandwidth quotas Backups Student identification and usernames Cross-platform usability Due date cut-offs

In-class practicalities

Bandwidth quotas

Backups

Student identification and usernames

Cross-platform usability

Due date cut-offs

http://web2survivalguide.wordpress.com