0
LARRY GRISOLANO:
Personal Introduction
STRATEGIC SET-UP
• Foundational Insight: 3 year
recession vs. 30 year middle
class decline
• Candidates: An advocate for
t...
COMPETITIVE CONSIDERATIONS
• Anticipated a very close race and HUGE spending
advantage for GOP
• OFA placed a huge premium...
THE PROBLEM
Targets < 5% of U.S. Pop.
Who
Nielsen
Can
Target
DEFINING TARGETS
Probability Scores Applied to Individuals on Residential File
DEFINING TARGETS
Probability Scores Applied to Individuals on Residential File
Support: Predicted vs. Actual
WHY INDIVIDUAL-LEVEL TARGETING?
Traditional Media Buying:
Media Focused
Our Approach:
Consumer Focused
BENEFITS OF INDIVIDUAL-LEVEL
TARGETING
Cross Media Integration and
Message Discipline
15-20% Efficiency Gains in
TV Buying
OPTIMIZING YOUR BUY
Cost Per Target Efficiency Ratio
RESULTS
Presidential spending after June 1st
Daypart Obama + Allies Romney + Allies % Romney of Obama $
Early Morning $43,...
RESULTS
Insights from the Optimizer led OFA to invest far more
heavily in cable than Romney
DIGITAL INTEGRATION
Digital
Audience
Buying
Reinforces broadcast
Drives actions
Targeted to individual sites, video, and F...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Larry grisolano mediapost

150

Published on

Published in: Business, Technology
0 Comments
1 Like
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
150
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
4
Comments
0
Likes
1
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Transcript of "Larry grisolano mediapost"

  1. 1. LARRY GRISOLANO: Personal Introduction
  2. 2. STRATEGIC SET-UP • Foundational Insight: 3 year recession vs. 30 year middle class decline • Candidates: An advocate for the middle class vs. a wealthy investor • Constituencies: Women, Latinos, Working Class
  3. 3. COMPETITIVE CONSIDERATIONS • Anticipated a very close race and HUGE spending advantage for GOP • OFA placed a huge premium on targeting
  4. 4. THE PROBLEM Targets < 5% of U.S. Pop. Who Nielsen Can Target
  5. 5. DEFINING TARGETS Probability Scores Applied to Individuals on Residential File
  6. 6. DEFINING TARGETS Probability Scores Applied to Individuals on Residential File Support: Predicted vs. Actual
  7. 7. WHY INDIVIDUAL-LEVEL TARGETING? Traditional Media Buying: Media Focused Our Approach: Consumer Focused
  8. 8. BENEFITS OF INDIVIDUAL-LEVEL TARGETING Cross Media Integration and Message Discipline 15-20% Efficiency Gains in TV Buying
  9. 9. OPTIMIZING YOUR BUY Cost Per Target Efficiency Ratio
  10. 10. RESULTS Presidential spending after June 1st Daypart Obama + Allies Romney + Allies % Romney of Obama $ Early Morning $43,988,270 $54,177,710 123% Daytime $44,333,790 $38,290,240 86% Early Fringe $34,613,680 $39,678,820 115% Early News $23,665,720 $34,883,220 147% Prime Access $36,050,390 $48,621,520 135% Prime $78,862,880 $75,850,810 96% Late News $21,666,160 $40,644,680 188% Late Fringe $25,085,690 $28,229,980 113%
  11. 11. RESULTS Insights from the Optimizer led OFA to invest far more heavily in cable than Romney
  12. 12. DIGITAL INTEGRATION Digital Audience Buying Reinforces broadcast Drives actions Targeted to individual sites, video, and FB Typical Broadcast Buying Targeted Broadcast Buying High impact messaging. Drives high awareness and recall Inefficient impressions High impact messaging. Drives high awareness and recall Efficient impressions Maximizes spend and targets specific audience clusters Broadcast + Digital Integration Improved recall Manageable data sets More bang per dollar spent Constant refresh for actionable data
  1. A particular slide catching your eye?

    Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

×