• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Acs0523 Hepatic Resection 2007
 

Acs0523 Hepatic Resection 2007

on

  • 1,847 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
1,847
Views on SlideShare
1,847
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
7
Downloads
0
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Acs0523 Hepatic Resection 2007 Acs0523 Hepatic Resection 2007 Document Transcript

    • © 2007 WebMD, Inc. All rights reserved. ACS Surgery: Principles and Practice 5 GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT AND ABDOMEN 23 Hepatic Resection — 1 23 HEPATIC RESECTION Clifford S. Cho, M.D., James Park, M.D., and Yuman Fong, M.D., F.A.C.S. Liver resections were first described centuries ago, but until the most readily apparent visual landmark on the anterior liver) but latter half of the 20th century, the majority of such resections were follows a line projected through a plane (the principal plane, or performed for management of either injuries or infections. Today, Cantlie’s line) that runs posterosuperiorly from the medial margin these procedures are performed not only for treatment of acute of the gallbladder to the left side of the vena cava. emergencies (e.g., traumatic injuries or abscesses) but also as The venous drainage of the liver consists of multiple small veins potentially curative therapy for a variety of benign and malignant draining directly from the back of the right hemiliver and the cau- hepatic lesions.1-5 date lobe to the vena cava, along with three major hepatic veins. The first planned anatomic resection of a lobe of a liver is cred- These major hepatic veins occupy three planes, known as portal ited to Lortat-Jacob, who in 1952 performed a right lobectomy as scissurae.The three scissurae divide the liver into the four sections, treatment for metastatic colon cancer.6 It was not until the 1980s, each of which is supplied by a portal pedicle; further branching of however, that major hepatectomies became commonplace. Since the pedicles subdivides the sections into their constituent segments. then, the safety of these operations has improved dramatically, and The right hepatic vein passes between the right anterior section as safety has improved, the indications for hepatic resection have (segments 5 and 8) and the right posterior section (segments 6 and become better refined as well. Currently, resection of as much as 7) in the right scissura.This vein empties directly into the vena cava 85% of the functional liver parenchyma is being performed at near the atriocaval junction. The middle hepatic vein passes numerous centers with an operative mortality of less than 2%.The between the right anterior section and the left medial section (seg- duration of hospitalization is typically less than 2 weeks, and ment 4, sometimes subdivided into segments 4a and 4b) in the almost all individuals regain normal hepatic function.7 central, or principal, scissura, which represents the division In this chapter, we focus on the technical aspects of hepatic between the right hemiliver and the left.The left hepatic vein runs resection, emphasizing efficiency and safety and taking into in the left scissura between segments 2 and 3 (which together make account recent developments, current controversies, and special up the left lateral section). In most persons, the left and middle operative considerations (e.g., the cirrhotic patient and repeat liver hepatic veins join to form a common trunk before entering the vena resection). Detailed discussions of the indications for hepatic cava. Occasionally, a large inferior right hepatic vein is present that resection are available elsewhere.8-10 may provide adequate drainage of the right hemiliver after resec- tion of the left even when all three major hepatic veins are ligated.13 The portal vein and the hepatic artery divide into left and right Hepatic Anatomy branches below the hilum of the liver. Unlike the major hepatic Familiarity with the surgical anatomy of the liver is essential for veins, which run between segments, the portal venous and hepat- safe performance of a partial hepatectomy.11 In 1998, as a ic arterial branches, along with the hepatic ducts, typically run response to the confusion created by the various anatomic nomen- centrally within segments [see Figure 1]. On the right side, the clatures applied to the liver, the International Hepato-Pancreato- hepatic artery and the portal vein enter the liver substance almost Biliary Association (IHPBA) appointed a committee that was immediately after branching. The short course of the right-side charged with deriving a universal terminology for hepatic anatomy extrahepatic vessels and the variable anatomy of the biliary tree and hepatic resections. In 2000, the recommendations of this make these vessels vulnerable to damage during dissection.14 In committee were accepted at the IHPBA’s biannual meeting in contrast, the left branch of the portal vein and the left hepatic duct Brisbane. Accordingly, this system for naming the anatomic divi- take a long extrahepatic course after branching beneath segment sions of the liver and the corresponding resections has come to be 4. When these vessels reach the base of the umbilical fissure, they known as the Brisbane 2000 terminology.12 are joined by the left hepatic artery to form a triad, which then In the Brisbane 2000 system, the anatomy of the liver may be enters the substance of the left hemiliver at this point. It must be thought of in terms of first-order, second-order, and third-order emphasized that proximal to the base of the umbilical fissure, the divisions, all of which are based on the underlying vascular and bil- left-side structures are not a triad. A consequence of the long iary anatomy rather than on surface features [see Figure 1]. At the extrahepatic course of the left-side structures is that for tumors first level, the liver is divided into two hemilivers (right and left). that involve the hilum (e.g., Klatskin tumors), when a choice exists At the second level, it is divided into four sections (right posterior, between an extended right hepatectomy and an extended left right anterior, left medial, and left lateral). At the third level, it is hepatectomy [see Operative Technique, below], most surgeons divided into nine segments, each of which is a discrete anatomic choose the former because the greater ease of dissection on the left unit that possesses its own nutrient blood supply and venous and side facilitates preservation of the left-side structures. Knowledge biliary drainage. of the relative anatomic courses of the portal veins, the hepatic The right hemiliver consists of segments 5 through 8 and is arteries, and the hepatic ducts is the basis of the classical extrahep- nourished by the right hepatic artery and the right portal vein; the atic dissection for control of hepatic inflow [see Operative left hemiliver consists of segments 2 through 4 and is nourished by Technique, Right Hepatectomy, Step 6 (Extrahepatic Dissection the left hepatic artery and the left portal vein. (The caudate lobe, and Ligation), below]. a portion of the liver that is separate from the two hemilivers, con- The fibrous capsule surrounding the liver substance was sists of segments 1 and 9.) The anatomic division between the described by Glisson in 1654.15 It was Couinaud,16 however, who right hemiliver and the left is not at the falciform ligament (the demonstrated that this fibrous capsule extends to envelop the por-
    • © 2007 WebMD, Inc. All rights reserved. ACS Surgery: Principles and Practice 5 GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT AND ABDOMEN 23 Hepatic Resection — 2 Right Hemiliver (Right Liver) Left Hemiliver (Left Liver) Inferior Vena Cava Middle Hepatic Vein Right Hepatic Vein Left Hepatic Vein 2 8 1, 9 7 3 4 Falciform Ligament 5 Portal Vein 6 Common Hepatic Artery Common Bile Duct Right Posterior Right Anterior Left Medial Left Lateral Section Section Section Section Figure 1 The liver is separated into nine anatomic segments, each with an independent nutrient blood supply and venous and biliary drainage. Appreciation of this segmental anatomy is the basis of anatomic resection of the liver. tal triads as they pass into the liver substance. Thus, within the thin-slice (1 to 2 mm) images captured by current spiral (helical) liver, the portal vein, the hepatic artery, and the hepatic duct run- CT scanners can be reconstructed to provide angiographic pic- ning to each segment of the liver lie within a substantial sheath. tures whose level of detail rivals that of direct angiograms [see This dense sheath allows rapid control of inflow vessels to specif- Figure 2]. Triple-phase scans (including a noncontrast phase, an ic anatomic units within the liver and permits en masse ligation of arterial phase, and a venous phase) are recommended: these yield these vascular structures in a maneuver known as pedicle ligation the best definition and characterization of intrahepatic lesions. For [see Operative Technique, Right Hepatectomy, Step 6— example, some vascular tumors become isodense with liver Alternative (Intrahepatic Pedicle Ligation), below].17 parenchyma after contrast injection. By first obtaining noncon- trast scans and then obtaining contrast scans at two different times after contrast injection, the examiner stands a better chance Preoperative Evaluation of visualizing such tumors. Cross-sectional imaging modalities such as computed tomog- For small tumors, a CT variant known as CT portography is raphy, magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasonography play an recommended. In this technique, contrast material is injected important role in enhancing the safety and efficacy of hepatic through the superior mesenteric artery, and images are obtained resection. These modalities, along with biologic scanning tech- during the portal venous phase. The normal liver receives the niques such as positron emission tomography (PET), are also majority of its nutrient blood from the portal vein and is therefore invaluable for staging malignancies so as to improve patient selec- contrast-enhanced in this phase.Tumors, on the other hand, usu- tion and thereby optimize long-term surgical outcome.3 ally derive their nutrient blood from the hepatic artery and there- At a minimum, all candidates for hepatic resection should fore appear as exaggerated perfusion defects. CT portography is undergo either CT or MRI.These imaging tests not only identify the most sensitive test available for identifying small hepatic the number and size of any mass lesions within the liver but also tumors.18 delineate the relations of the lesions to the major vasculature— MRI may also be valuable for characterizing lesions and defin- data that are crucial for deciding whether to operate and which ing them vis-à-vis the vasculature. It is particularly helpful in diag- operative approach to follow. nosing benign lesions such as hemangiomas, focal nodular hyper- Use of contrast enhancement during CT scanning is vital for plasia, and adenomas.Whenever any of these benign lesions is sus- accurate definition of the vascular anatomy. In fact, data from pected, MRI is usually indicated. With regard to surgical plan-
    • © 2007 WebMD, Inc. All rights reserved. ACS Surgery: Principles and Practice 5 GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT AND ABDOMEN 23 Hepatic Resection — 3 ning, magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is useful for iden- pelled by more recent data.26-28 Advanced chronologic age is not a tifying the major hepatic veins and clarifying their relations to any complete contraindication to hepatectomy. tumor masses.19 Anemia and coagulopathy, if present, are corrected. All patients Over the past decade, biologic scanning, in the form of 18F-flu- are now encouraged to donate two units of autologous blood orodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET), has before a major hepatectomy. As an alternative, hemodilution, emerged as an invaluable technique for preoperative staging of whereby a portion of the patient’s blood volume is withdrawn patients with hepatic malignancies. In patients with metastases to intraoperatively and reinfused immediately after the completion of the liver who are being considered for hepatic resection, FDG- the hepatectomy, may be considered. PET allows better determination of candidacy for operative man- Appropriate single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis is administered agement, thereby both reducing the incidence of nontherapeutic [see 1:2 Prevention of Postoperative Infection]. laparotomy20 and improving long-term survival in cases where ANESTHESIA resection is indicated.21 The role of FDG-PET in the workup of patients with primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is less Decisions regarding anesthesia should take into account the clear, in that many tumors cannot be distinguished from the sur- possibility of baseline hepatic dysfunction, as well as the postoper- rounding liver through assessment of glucose metabolism alone. ative hepatic functional deficits resulting from resection of a major Imaging recommendations may be summed up as follows. A portion of the hepatic parenchyma. triple-phase CT should be obtained for most patients under con- The most important consideration, however, is the possibility of sideration for hepatic resection. If diagnostic doubt remains after major intraoperative hemorrhage. Suitable monitoring and suffi- CT, particularly if the differential diagnosis includes an asympto- cient vascular access to permit rapid transfusion should be in matic benign tumor, MRI should be performed. If questions place. At some centers, fluid resuscitation and blood transfusion remain after CT as to the extent of hepatic venous or major biliary are begun early in the course of resection to increase intravascular involvement, MRI or duplex ultrasonography should be consid- volume as a buffer against sudden blood loss. At Memorial Sloan- ered.22 If small tumors are encountered, CT portography should Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), we favor the opposite be performed. Duplex ultrasonography, by demonstrating the vas- approach, whereby a low central venous pressure is maintained cular hilar structures, the hepatic veins, and the inferior vena cava, during resection. The rationale for our preference is that general- renders angiography unnecessary in many cases.19,23 For patients ly, most of the blood lost during hepatic resection comes from the with liver metastases from a primary colorectal cancer,4 breast major hepatic veins or the vena cava.29,30 If central venous pressure cancer, or melanoma, an FDG-PET scan should be performed is kept below 5 mm Hg, there is less bleeding from the hepatic before hepatic resection. Direct hepatic angiography is rarely venous radicles during dissection. Reduction of intrahepatic required, and inferior vena cavography is almost never needed. venous pressure can be facilitated by performing the dissection with the patient in a 15° Trendelenburg position, which increases venous return to the heart and enhances cardiac output. Central Operative Planning venous pressure is maintained at the desired level through a com- bination of anesthesia and early intraoperative fluid restriction. PREPARATION The minimal acceptable intraoperative urine output is 25 ml/hr. In general, preparation for hepatic resection is much the same The need for intraoperative blood transfusion can be minimized as that for other major abdominal procedures. All patients who are by accepting hematocrits lower than the common target figure of older than 65 years or have a history of cardiopulmonary disease 30%: 24% in patients without antecedent cardiac disease and undergo a full cardiopulmonary assessment. It was once common- 29% in patients with cardiac disease. If blood loss is estimated to ly believed that patients 70 years of age or older were poor candi- reach or exceed 20% of total volume or the patient becomes dates for major liver resection,24,25 but this notion has been dis- hemodynamically unstable, transfusion is indicated.29,30 a b Figure 2 (a) The arterial anatomy of the celiac axis is reconstructed from thin-slice CT images. (b) The hepatic venous anatomy is similarly reconstructed, with the tumor superim- posed on the vascular reconstruction.
    • © 2007 WebMD, Inc. All rights reserved. ACS Surgery: Principles and Practice 5 GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT AND ABDOMEN 23 Hepatic Resection — 4 PATIENT POSITIONING over wedge resections, wedge resections were associated with a The patient should be supine: to date we have not found a lat- 16% rate of positive margins, compared with a 2% rate for eral position to be necessary even for the largest of tumors. anatomic resections.32 Electrocardiographic leads should be kept clear of the right chest There are two oncologic settings where nonanatomic resections wall and the presternal area in case a thoracoabdominal incision is are favored. In patients with HCC, viral hepatitis and cirrhosis are necessitated by the position of a tumor or by intraoperative hem- often complicating factors. Cirrhotic patients tolerate resection of orrhage. Preparation and draping should therefore also allow for more than two segments of functional parenchyma poorly. For exposure of the lower chest and the entire upper abdomen down these patients, the smallest resection that will achieve complete past the umbilicus. A crossbar or a similar device that holds self- tumor excision is favored, even if it is a wedge resection. For man- retaining retractors should be used to elevate the costal margin. agement of metastatic neuroendocrine tumors, in which resec- Some surgeons prefer ring-based self-retaining retractors. In our tions are merely debulking procedures designed to alleviate symp- experience, although these retractors are adequate for most resec- toms, nonanatomic resections are accepted because cure is highly tions, the rings tend to restrict lateral access, thereby potentially unlikely. hindering posterior dissection, particularly of the vena cava. Hepatic resections for benign hepatic tumors are usually per- formed for one of three reasons: (1) to relieve symptoms (e.g., ANATOMIC VERSUS NONANATOMIC RESECTION pain or early satiety), (2) because the diagnosis is uncertain, or The key decision in planning a hepatectomy is whether the (3) to prevent malignant transformation. A goal of such resec- resection should be anatomic or nonanatomic. For treatment of tions should be to spare as much normal parenchyma as possi- malignant disease, anatomic resection is usually favored because ble. Consequently, lesions such as hemangiomas, adenomas, the long-term outcome is better. Anatomic resections permit exci- complex cysts, and focal nodular hyperplasia are often excised by sion of parenchymal areas distal to the index tumors, where there means of enucleation or another nonanatomic resection with is a high incidence of vascular micrometastases. In addition, they limited margins. are significantly less likely to have positive margins than nonanatomic resections are. In a large series of hepatectomies for Operative Technique metastatic colorectal cancer, wedge or nonanatomic resections were associated with a 19% rate of positive margins.31 In one Theoretically, any hepatic segment can be resected in isolation. examination of the increasing preference for anatomic resections For practical purposes, however, there are six major types of anatomic resection. Until comparatively recently, most authors have followed the commonly used terminology of Goldsmith and Woodburne in referring to these procedures.33 Some authors have a Right Hepatectomy b Left Hepatectomy preferred other systems of nomenclature, based on the anatomic descriptions of Couinaud16 or Bismuth.34 In this chapter, howev- 4 8 2 er, we use the Brisbane 2000 terminology for hepatic resections 7 1, 9 [see Figure 3]. 3 The essential principles of all anatomic hepatectomies are the 5 4 same: (1) control of inflow vessels, (2) control of outflow vessels, 6 Cantlie's and (3) parenchymal transection.To illustrate these principles, we Line begin by outlining the steps in a right hepatectomy [see Figure 3a] in some detail, describing both extrahepatic vascular dissection c Right Trisectionectomy and ligation and the alternative approach to inflow control, intra- (Extended Right Hepatectomy) d Left Lateral Sectionectomy hepatic pedicle ligation. Left hepatectomy [see Figure 3b] and other common anatomic resections [see Figures 3c, d, e, f] share a num- ber of steps with right hepatectomy; accordingly, we discuss them in somewhat less detail. Further detail on these procedures is avail- able in other sources.35,36 RIGHT HEPATECTOMY e Left Trisectionectomy Step 1: Laparoscopic Inspection (Extended Left Hepatectomy) f Right Posterior Sectionectomy Experience from MSKCC37,38 and other centers39,40 indicates that laparoscopy allows detection of unresectable disease and pre- vents the morbidity associated with a nontherapeutic laparotomy. We generally perform laparoscopy immediately before laparotomy during the same period of anesthesia. The laparoscopic port sites are placed in the upper abdomen along the line of the intended incision [see Step 2, below]. The first two ports are usually 10 mm ports placed in the right subcostal area along the midclavicular line Figure 3 Shown are schematic illustrations of standard hepatic and along the anterior axillary line.These ports allow inspection of resections, with the shaded areas representing the resected por- the abdomen and of the entire liver, including the dome and seg- tions: (a) right hepatectomy, (b) left hepatectomy, (c) right trisec- ment 7.The port along the right anterior axillary line is particular- tionectomy (extended right hepatectomy), (d) left lateral sec- ly suitable for laparoscopic ultrasound devices. If additional ports tionectomy, (e) left trisectionectomy (extended left hepatectomy), are necessary, a left subcostal midclavicular port is usually the best and (f) right posterior sectionectomy. choice.
    • © 2007 WebMD, Inc. All rights reserved. ACS Surgery: Principles and Practice 5 GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT AND ABDOMEN 23 Hepatic Resection — 5 Winslow to permit identification of the portal vein and palpation of the portocaval lymph nodes.The hilar lymph nodes are palpat- ed, and any suspicious nodes are removed for frozen-section E examination. The entire abdomen is inspected for evidence of extrahepatic tumor if the operation is being done to treat cancer. Step 4: Mobilization of Liver D Once the decision is made to proceed with hepatic resection, the liver is fully mobilized by detaching all ligamentous attachments on the side to be resected. (Some surgeons defer completion of mobi- F lization to a later stage in the procedure.) In particular, the supra- hepatic inferior vena cava and the hepatic veins above the liver are dissected to facilitate the subsequent approach to the hepatic veins [see Step 7, below]. Once the liver is mobilized, further palpation is B C done to detect any small lesions that may have been obscured ini- A tially. This additional palpation is particularly important on the right side because before mobilization, the posterior parts of the liver cannot be effectively palpated, and intraoperative ultrasonog- raphy may fail to detect small lesions in this area.41 If, in the course of mobilization, tumor is found to be attached to the diaphragm, the affected area of the diaphragm may be excised and subsequently repaired. Figure 4 Right hepatectomy. A right subcostal incision (A) with a midline extension to the xiphoid (D) is the most common choice; Step 5: Identification of Arterial Anomalies an extension to the left subcostal area (C) is sometimes added to Any hepatic arterial anomalies present should be identified provide further operative exposure. We prefer a long midline inci- before resection is begun. With good preoperative imaging, the sion from the xiphoid (D) to a point approximately 2 to 3 cm arterial anatomy is usually defined with sufficient exactitude above the umbilicus (B) along with a rightward extension (A) because this incision provides superb exposure of both the right before laparotomy. It is also possible to gain a clear picture of the side and the left without the wound complications of a trifurcated arterial anatomy intraoperatively by means of simple maneuvers incision. The chest can be entered through either a median ster- that do not involve major dissection. notomy (E) or an anterolateral right thoracoabdominal incision The lesser omentum should be examined to determine whether (F). there is a vessel coursing through its middle to the base of the umbilical fissure, and the hepatoduodenal ligament should be pal- pated with an index finger within the foramen of Winslow to see Step 2: Incision whether there is an artery in the gastropancreatic fold on its medi- For the majority of hepatic resections, most surgeons use a al aspect. The usual bifurcation of the hepatic arteries occurs low bilateral subcostal incision extended vertically to the xiphisternum and medially in the hepatoduodenal ligament, and the left hepatic artery normally travels on the medial aspect of the ligament to [see Figure 4]. Our own preference, however, is to use an upper reach the base of the umbilical fissure. Thus, if an artery is palpa- midline incision extending to a point approximately 2 cm above ble in the medial upper portion of the hepatoduodenal ligament, it the umbilicus, with a rightward extension from that point to a is the main left hepatic artery. Any vessel seen in the lesser omen- point in the midaxillary line halfway between the lowest rib and tum must therefore be an accessory left artery. If no pulse is found the iliac crest [see Figure 4]. We find that this incision provides in the medial upper portion of the hepatoduodenal ligament, the superb access for either right- or left-side resection, without the vessel in the lesser omentum must be a replaced left hepatic artery. wound complications often encountered with trifurcated incisions The right hepatic artery usually travels transversely behind the (e.g., ascitic leakage and incisional hernia). On rare occasions common bile duct (CBD) to reach the base of the cystic plate. A (e.g., in the resection of large, rigid posterior tumors of the right vertically traveling artery on the lateral hepatoduodenal ligament hemiliver), a right thoracoabdominal incision may be required. In must therefore be either a replaced or an accessory right hepatic a series of nearly 2,000 resections at MSKCC, however, a thora- artery, probably arising from the superior mesenteric artery. coabdominal incision proved necessary in only 3% of patients; the most common indication was repeat liver resection after previous Step 6 (Extrahepatic Dissection and Ligation): Control of right hepatectomy [see Repeat Hepatic Resection, below]. Inflow Vessels Step 3: Abdominal Exploration and Intraoperative The classic approach to extrahepatic control of the inflow ves- sels in a right hepatectomy involves extrahepatic dissection and Ultrasonography ligation [see Figure 5].The cystic duct and the cystic artery are lig- The liver is palpated bimanually. Intraoperative ultrasonogra- ated and divided. The gallbladder may be either removed or left phy is systematically performed to identify all possible lesions and attached to the right hemiliver, according to the surgeon’s prefer- their relations to the major vascular structures. This modality is ence. The usual practice is to ligate first the right hepatic duct, capable of identifying small lesions that preoperative imaging then the right hepatic artery, and finally the right portal vein, studies and palpation of the liver may miss.41 The lesser omentum working from anterior to posterior. Our preference, however, is to is incised to allow palpation of the caudate lobe and inspection of work from posterior to anterior, as follows. the celiac region for nodal metastases. A finger is passed from the The sheath of the porta hepatis is opened laterally. Dissection is lesser sac inferior to the caudate lobe through the foramen of then performed in the plane between the CBD and the portal
    • © 2007 WebMD, Inc. All rights reserved. ACS Surgery: Principles and Practice 5 GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT AND ABDOMEN 23 Hepatic Resection — 6 a b c Figure 5 Right hepatectomy. For control of the inflow vessels of the right hemiliver, the liver is retracted cephalad to allow exposure of the porta hepatis. (a) The gallbladder is resected to allow access to the bile duct and hepatic vessels. (b) The right hepatic duct is ligated to allow access to the hepatic artery and the portal vein. (c) After the right hepatic artery is divided, the right portal vein is controlled and divided. Alternatively, the vessels may be approached from a posterolateral direction and the portal vein and hepatic artery may be divided first, with the hepatic duct left intact until the parenchymal transection. vein. To facilitate this dissection, the CBD is elevated by applying main right portal vein is ligated in a patient who exhibits this forward traction to the ligated cystic duct. The portal vein is then anatomic variant, the portion of the liver remaining after resection followed cephalad until its bifurcation into the left and right por- will lack any portal flow.There is usually a small portal branch that tal veins is visible. In a small percentage of patients, the left portal passes from the main right portal vein to the caudate process. vein arises from the right anterior branch of the portal vein. If the Ligation of this branch untethers another 1 to 2 cm of the right Glisson's Sheath Figure 6 Right hepatectomy. Glisson’s sheath is a Sheath cut away vascular and biliary pedicle that contains the portal from this point triad. If this sheath is not violated, the entire pedi- cle can be suture-ligated or staple-ligated with con- fidence and safety.
    • © 2007 WebMD, Inc. All rights reserved. ACS Surgery: Principles and Practice 5 GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT AND ABDOMEN 23 Hepatic Resection — 7 4 5 3 C Figure 7 Right hepatectomy. Depicted are E sites where hepatotomies can be made to per- B mit isolation of various vascular pedicles. Incisions at sites A and B allow isolation of D the right main portal pedicle. Incisions at F sites A and D allow isolation of the right pos- A terior portal pedicle. Incisions at sites B and 6 2 D allow isolation of the right anterior pedicle. Incisions at sites C and E allow isolation of 1 the left main portal pedicle; if the caudate lobe is to be removed, incisions are made at sites C and F. portal vein, thereby allowing safer dissection and ligation. The incisions must be fairly substantial and reasonably deep. Care right portal vein is usually clamped with vascular clamps, divided, must be taken to avoid the terminal branches of the middle hepat- and oversewn with nonabsorbable sutures. Once this is done, the ic vein, which are the most common source of significant bleed- right hepatic artery is visible behind the CBD and can easily be ing. By means of either finger dissection or the passage of a large secured and ligated with nonabsorbable sutures. Because of the curved clamp, a tape is then placed around the right main sheath multitude of biliary anatomic variations, we usually leave the right [see Figure 8]. This tape can be pulled medially to provide better hepatic duct intact until parenchymal dissection [see Step 8, below] exposure of the intrahepatic right pedicle and to retract the left bil- is begun, when this structure can be secured higher within the iary tree and portal vein away from the area to be clamped and hepatic parenchyma and divided with greater safety. divided. Clamps are then applied, the right pedicle is divided, and the stumps are suture-ligated. Staple ligation Vascular staplers may be used for stapling In practice, for right hepatectomies, we prefer to isolate the the right or the left portal vein during extrahepatic vascular dissec- right anterior and posterior pedicles separately [see Figure 8] and tion42,43; however, suture ligation of the extrahepatic portal veins is ligate them individually. This measure ensures that the left-side such a straightforward technical exercise that staplers add little structures cannot be injured. Any minor bleeding from a hepato- except cost. tomy usually ceases spontaneously or else stops when Surgicel is placed into the wound. Step 6—Alternative (Intrahepatic Pedicle Ligation): Control of Inflow Vessels Staple ligation The use of staplers is now well established The observations of Glisson and Couinaud (see above) that the for liver resections,42-47 and we find that staple ligation greatly nutrient vessels to the liver are contained within a thick connec- increases the speed with which intrahepatic portal pedicle liga- tive tissue capsule [see Figure 6] were the basis for the initial pro- tions can be performed.To control the intrahepatic portal pedicles posal by Launois and Jamieson that intrahepatic vascular pedicle for a right hepatectomy, incisions are made at hepatotomy sites A ligation could serve as an alternative to extrahepatic dissection and and B [see Figure 7]. Ultrasonography directed from the inferior ligation for controlling vascular inflow to the liver.17 This alterna- aspect of the liver helps determine the depth at which the right tive technique has the advantages of being rapid and of being pedicle lies, which is usually 1 to 2 cm from the inferior surface. unlikely to cause injury to the vasculature or the biliary drainage The right main pedicle is then secured either digitally or with a of the contralateral liver. Given adequate intrahepatic definition curved blunt clamp (e.g., a renal pedicle clamp), and an umbilical and control of the portal triads supplying the area of the liver to tape is placed around it [see Figure 9a].The hilar plate in the back be resected, one can readily isolate the various major pedicles by of segment 4 is lowered via an incision at hepatotomy site C [see using simple combinations of hepatotomies at specific sites on the Figure 7] to ensure that the left-side vascular and biliary structures inferior surface of the liver [see Figure 7]. are mobilized well away from the area of staple ligation. A trans- The right hemiliver is completely mobilized from the retroperi- verse anastomosis (TA) vascular stapler is applied to the right toneum.The most inferior small hepatic veins are ligated, and the main pedicle while firm countertraction is being applied to the inferior right hemiliver is mobilized off the vena cava. Incisions are umbilical tape to pull the hilum to the left [see Figure 9a].The sta- then made in the liver capsule at hepatotomy sites A and B [see pler is fired, and the pedicle is divided [see Figure 9b]. Figure 7]. The first incision is made though the caudate lobe. The full thickness of the caudate lobe is divided with a combination of Troubleshooting There are several important guiding prin- diathermy, crushing, and ligation. The second incision is made ciples that should be followed in deciding on and performing almost vertically in the medial part of the gallbladder bed. Both intrahepatic pedicle ligation.The most important principle is that
    • © 2007 WebMD, Inc. All rights reserved. ACS Surgery: Principles and Practice 5 GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT AND ABDOMEN 23 Hepatic Resection — 8 Right Main Sheath Left Main Sheath right hepatectomy. Application of the Pringle maneuver decreases bleeding during hepatotomy and isolation of the pedicle. Finally, the lowest hepatic veins behind the liver should be dissected before any attempt is made to isolate the right-side portal pedicles: incis- ing the caudate lobe without dividing the small hepatic veins 8 5 draining this portion of the liver to the vena cava can lead to sig- nificant hemorrhage. 7 Step 7: Control of Outflow Vessels Control of the outflow vasculature begins with division of the 6 hepatic veins passing from the posterior aspect of the right hemiliver directly to the vena cava. After the right hemiliver is completely mobilized off the retroperitoneum by dividing the right triangular ligament, it is carefully dissected off the vena cava. Dissection proceeds upward from the inferior border of the liver Lesser Omentum until the right hepatic vein is exposed. Complete mobilization of Portal Vein the right hemiliver is particularly critical for tumors close to the vena cava. The right hepatic vein is then isolated, cross-clamped, Caudate Inferior Process Vena Cava divided, and oversewn [see Figure 10]. Unless the tumor or lesion involves the middle hepatic vein close to its junction with the vena Figure 8 Right hepatectomy. Depicted is isolation of the main right portal pedicle. The pedicle is controlled with a vascular tape and cava, the middle hepatic vein usually is not controlled extrahepat- retracted from within the liver substance. This tape can be used for ically for right-side resections and is easily secured during paren- countertraction when a vascular clamp or stapler is applied. The chymal transection. main right portal pedicle has anterior and posterior branches. The If there is a large tumor residing at the dome of the liver, gain- right anterior pedicle consists of pedicles to segments 5 and 8. The ing control of the hepatic veins and the vena cava may prove very right posterior pedicle usually consists of only the segment 6 pedicle difficult. If so, one should not hesitate to extend the incision to the but may also give rise to the segment 7 pedicle. chest by means of a right thoracoabdominal extension. The mor- bidity of a thoracoabdominal incision is preferable to the poten- in patients undergoing operation for cancer, an intrahepatic pedi- tially catastrophic hemorrhage that is sometimes encountered cle approach should not be used when a tumor is within 2 cm of when the right hepatic vein is torn during mobilization of a rigid the hepatic hilum. In such cases, extrahepatic dissection should be right hemiliver containing a large tumor. performed to avoid violation of the tumor margin. From a technical standpoint, removal of the gallbladder greatly Staple ligation Staple ligation has proved useful for outflow facilitates isolation and control of right-side vascular pedicles in a control during hepatectomy. When the tumor is in proximity to a b Figure 9 Right hepatectomy. Shown is staple ligation of the right portal pedicle. (a) After the liver is incised across the caudate lobe and along the gallbladder bed, the right main pedicle is isolated and held with an umbilical tape. Countertraction is placed on the umbilical tape while a TA vascular stapler is placed across the pedicle, allowing the left hepatic duct and the left vascular structures to be retracted away from the line of stapling. (b) After the stapler is fired, the pedicle is clamped and divided.
    • © 2007 WebMD, Inc. All rights reserved. ACS Surgery: Principles and Practice 5 GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT AND ABDOMEN 23 Hepatic Resection — 9 nant is well documented. Even in patients with cirrhosis, the warm ischemia produced by continuous application of the Pringle maneuver is well tolerated for as long as 1 hour.49 Our practice is to apply the Pringle maneuver intermittently for periods of 10 minutes, with 2 to 5 minutes of perfusion between applications to allow decompression of the gut. Parenchymal division is then begun along the line demarcated by the devascularization of the right hemiliver.The line of transec- tion along the principal plane is marked with the electrocautery and then cut with scissors. Stay sutures of 0 chromic catgut are placed on either side of the plane of transection and used for trac- tion, separation, and elevation as dissection proceeds. Many special instruments have been proposed for use in parenchymal transection, including electrocauteries, ultrasonic dissectors, and water-jet dissectors. We find that for the majority of hepatic resections, blunt clamp dissection is the most rapid method and is quite safe. In essence, a large Kelly clamp is used to crush the liver parenchyma [see Figure 12]. The relatively soft liver substance dissects away, leaving behind the vascular and bil- iary structures, which are then ligated. With this technique, the principal plane of the liver can usually be transected in less than 30 minutes. Vena Cava In cirrhotic patients, the clamp-crushing technique may not work as well because of the firmness of the liver substance: the ves- sels often tear before the parenchyma does. Accordingly, in cir- rhotic patients, ultrasonic dissectors that coagulate while transect- Figure 10 Right hepatectomy. Once the small perforating vessels ing the parenchyma may be a better choice. Water-jet dissectors to the vena cava have been ligated, further dissection cephalad may be useful in defining the major intrahepatic vascular pedicles leads to the right hepatic vein. This vessel is controlled with vascu- or the junction of the hepatic vein and the vena cava, particularly lar clamps and divided. if tumor is in close proximity. After the specimen is removed, the raw surface of the hepatic remnant is carefully examined for hemostasis and biliary leakage. the hepatic vein–vena cava junction, extrahepatic control of the Any oozing from the raw surface may be controlled with the argon hepatic veins is essential for excision of the tumor with clear mar- gins, and it limits blood loss during parenchymal transection.48 Ligating the hepatic veins, particularly with a large and rigid tumor in the vicinity, can be a technically demanding and danger- ous exercise.Tearing the hepatic vein or the vena cava during this maneuver is the most common cause of major intraoperative hemorrhage.36 The endoscopic gastrointestinal anastomosis (GIA) stapler is well suited for ligation of the major hepatic veins, in that it has a low profile and is capable of simultaneously sealing both the hepatic vein stump on the vena cava side and the one on the specimen side. For staple ligation of the right hepatic vein, the right hemiliver is mobilized off the vena cava. Any large accessory right hepatic vein encountered can be staple-ligated, as can the tongue of liver tissue that often passes from the right hemiliver behind the vena cava to the caudate lobe. The right hepatic vein is then identified and isolated. It is the practice of some authors to introduce the stapler from the top of the liver downward,43 but we find that in most patients, the liver is sufficiently high in the surgical wound to render this angle of introduction technically impracticable. Right Accordingly, we introduce the stapler parallel to the vena cava and Lobe Diaphragm direct it from below upward [see Figure 11].To ensure that the sta- Vena Cava pler does not misfire, care should be taken to confirm that no vas- Figure 11 Right hepatectomy. As an alternative to clamping and cular clips are near the site where the stapler is applied. division, the right hepatic vein may be staple-ligated. Once the Step 8: Parenchymal Transection small perforating tributaries from the right hemiliver to the vena cava have been divided, the right hepatic vein is isolated and ligat- Inflow to the left hemiliver is temporarily interrupted by clamp- ed with an endoscopic GIA vascular stapler. The safest method for ing the hepatoduodenal ligament (the Pringle maneuver) [see 7:6 introducing this stapler is to retract the liver cephalad and to the Injuries to the Liver, Biliary Tract, Spleen, and Diaphragm].The safe- left while advancing the stapler cephalad in the direction of the ty of temporary occlusion of the vessels supplying the hepatic rem- vena cava.
    • © 2007 WebMD, Inc. All rights reserved. ACS Surgery: Principles and Practice 5 GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT AND ABDOMEN 23 Hepatic Resection — 10 Figure 12 Right hepatectomy. The parenchyma can be quickly and safely transected by means of the clamp-crushing technique. Large vessels and biliary radicles are visualized and ligated or clipped. This is usually done in tandem with inflow occlusion (i.e., the Pringle maneuver). Alternatively, the parenchyma can be bluntly dissected away by means of the finger-fracture technique. beam coagulator. Biliary leaks should be controlled with clipping Step 6—Alternative (Intrahepatic Pedicle Ligation): Control of or suture ligation. The retroperitoneal surfaces should also be Inflow Vessels examined carefully for hemostasis, and the argon beam coagulator If the hepatectomy is being done to treat benign disease or to should be used where necessary. remove a malignancy that is remote from the base of the umbilical Step 9: Closure and Drainage fissure, we highly recommend performing stapler-assisted pedicle ligation in preference to extrahepatic dissection and ligation. The abdominal wall is closed in one or two layers with contin- The left portal pedicle is identified at the base of the umbilical uous absorbable monofilament sutures. The skin is closed with fissure. The hilar plate is lowered through an incision at hepatoto- staples or with subcuticular sutures. Drains are unnecessary in my site C [see Figure 7], and a second incision is made in the back most routine cases50; sometimes, in fact, they may exert harmful of segment 2 at hepatotomy site E [see Figure 7], thereby allowing effects by leading to ascending infection or fluid management isolation of the left portal pedicle with minimal risk of injury to the problems if ascites develops. There are four clinical situations in which we routinely place a drain: (1) clear biliary leakage, (2) an infected operative field, (3) a thoracoabdominal incision, and (4) biliary reconstruction. In the case of the thoracoabdominal inci- sion, a drain is placed to ensure that biliary leakage does not devel- op into a fistula into the chest. LEFT HEPATECTOMY Steps 1 through 5 E D Left hepatectomy involves removal of segments 2, 3, and 4, and sometimes 1 and 9 as well.The first five steps of the procedure are much the same as those of a right hepatectomy. F C Step 6 (Extrahepatic Dissection and Ligation): Control of B Inflow Vessels Extrahepatic control of vascular inflow vessels can be achieved in essentially the same fashion as in a right-side resection. Our preference is to start the dissection at the base of the umbilical fis- A sure. The left hepatic artery is divided first. The left branch of the portal vein is then easily identified at the base of the umbilical fis- Figure 13 Left hepatectomy. Ligation of vascular pedicles at spe- sure. The point at which the left portal vein is to be divided cific sites in the left hemiliver interrupts inflow to specific areas. depends on the extent of the planned parenchymal resection [see Ligation at A interrupts inflow to the entire left hemiliver, as well Figure 13]: if the caudate lobe is to be preserved, the left portal vein as the caudate lobe. Ligation at B interrupts blood flow to the left is ligated just distal to its caudate branch (line B); if the caudate liver while sparing the caudate lobe. Ligation at C devascularizes lobe is to be removed, the left portal vein is ligated proximal to the segment 2, and ligation at D devascularizes segment 3. Ligation at origins of the portal venous branches to this structure (line A). E and F devascularizes segment 4.
    • © 2007 WebMD, Inc. All rights reserved. ACS Surgery: Principles and Practice 5 GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT AND ABDOMEN 23 Hepatic Resection — 11 hilum. If the caudate lobe is to be removed as well, incisions should be made at hepatotomy sites C and F [see Figure 7] to allow isola- tion of the main left portal pedicle proximal to the vessels nourish- ing the caudate.The portal pedicle is isolated and secured with an umbilical tape.There is some risk that in the course of securing the left portal pedicle, the middle hepatic vein, which lies immediately lateral to the left portal pedicle, may be injured. To minimize this risk, firm downward traction is applied to the umbilical tape, and a TA-30 vascular stapler is placed across the left portal pedicle [see Figure 14].The pedicle is then stapled and divided. Step 7: Control of Outflow Vessels The left hemiliver is retracted to the patient’s right, and the entire lesser omentum is divided. The ligamentum venosum is identified between the caudate lobe and the back of segment 2 and is then divided near its attachment to the left hepatic vein; this measure facilitates identification and dissection of the left and middle hepatic veins anterior to the inferior vena cava. The left and middle hepatic veins are isolated in preparation for division. Control of the left hepatic vein is quickly and safely accom- plished with staple ligation. In approximately 60% of patients, the left and middle hepatic veins join to form a single trunk before entering the vena cava. In a left hepatectomy, the middle hepatic vein is often left intact; accordingly, if this is the surgeon’s intent, it is vital to protect the middle hepatic vein while ligating the left. Figure 14 Left hepatectomy. After hepatotomies in segment 4 After the left hepatic vein is identified, an endoscopic GIA-30 vas- and in the back of segment 2, the left portal pedicle is isolated, cular stapler is directed from above downward [see Figure 15] to stapled, and divided. ligate this vessel. The liver is retracted to the right to permit visu- alization of the junction of the left and middle hepatic veins. If lig- ation of the middle hepatic vein is desired as well, as is the case when there is tumor in proximity to the vessel, this can be accom- plished with a stapler directed along the same path used for left hepatic vein ligation. Steps 8 and 9 Parenchymal transection and closure are accomplished in much the same manner in a left hepatectomy as in a right hepatec- tomy (see above). OTHER ANATOMIC RESECTIONS In the ensuing review of the other major anatomic resections, we focus primarily on the major points in which they differ from right and left hepatectomy. More detailed discussions of these operations are available in specialty texts on liver resection.35,36 Right Trisectionectomy (Extended Right Hepatectomy) A right trisectionectomy (extended right hepatectomy) involves removal of the right hemiliver along with segment 4—that is, all liver tissue to the right of the falciform ligament [see Figure 3c]. The initial steps of this operation are the same as those of a right hepatectomy, up through division of the right inflow vessels and the right hepatic vein. The next step is devascularization of segment 4. The umbilical fissure is dissected to permit identification of the vascular pedicles to segments 2, 3, and 4, which lie within this fissure [see Figure 13]. Ligamentum Teres Vena Cava In most cases, the lower part of the umbilical fissure is concealed Caudate Lobe by a bridge of liver tissue fusing segments 2 and 3 to segment 4. Figure 15 Left hepatectomy. Staple ligation of the left hepatic After this tissue bridge is divided with diathermy, the ligamentum vein. After the left hemiliver is completely mobilized through divi- teres is retracted caudally to reveal the vascular pedicles from the sion of the left triangular ligament and the lesser omentum, the umbilical fissure to segment 4 (lines E and F [see Figure 13]). We left hepatic vein is isolated and ligated with an endoscopic GIA generally suture-ligate these pedicles before dividing them. vascular stapler. The best angle for introducing the stapler is from The liver tissue is then transected immediately to the right of the xiphoid posteriorly and caudad. the falciform ligament, from the anterior surface back toward
    • © 2007 WebMD, Inc. All rights reserved. ACS Surgery: Principles and Practice 5 GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT AND ABDOMEN 23 Hepatic Resection — 12 the divided right hepatic vein. The middle hepatic vein is gener- The liver is fully mobilized by dividing not only the left triangu- ally left intact until it is encountered in the upper part of the dis- lar ligament but also the ligaments on the right.This step is essen- section, at which point it is controlled and either suture- or tial for identifying the correct plane of parenchymal dissection and staple-ligated. for ensuring safe dissection along the right hepatic vein. The initial dissection is the same as for a left hepatectomy. The Left Lateral Sectionectomy liver is turned to the right side and the portal triad approached. A left lateral sectionectomy involves removal of only segments 2 The inflow vessels to the left hemiliver are ligated, and the left and 3—that is, all liver tissue to the left of the falciform ligament hepatic vein and the subdiaphragmatic inferior vena cava are dis- [see Figure 3d]. These segments are mobilized by dividing the left sected free. The left and middle hepatic veins are controlled and falciform and triangular ligaments. As this is done, care must be ligated in the extrahepatic portions of their courses.52 The left taken not to injure the left hepatic and phrenic veins, which lie on hemiliver is thereby freed, and dissection on the right hemiliver is the medial portion of the left triangular ligament. greatly facilitated. The falciform ligament is retracted caudally, and the bridge of Next, the plane of transection within the right hemiliver is liver tissue between segment 4 and segments 2 and 3 is divided defined. This plane is horizontal and lies lateral to the gallbladder with diathermy. Dissection is then performed within the umbilical fossa and just anterior to the main right hepatic venous trunk in fissure to the left of the main triad. The vascular pedicles to seg- the right scissura, halfway between the right anterior pedicle and ments 2 and 3 usually are then readily dissected and controlled the right posterior pedicle. The plane can be approximated by (lines C and D [see Figure 13]). Control of these pedicles within drawing a line from just anterior to the right hepatic vein at its the umbilical fissure is particularly important for tumor clearance insertion into the vena cava to a point immediately behind the fis- if tumor is in proximity to the umbilical fissure: if the condition is sure of Gans. This line can be accurately defined by clamping the benign or if tumor is remote from the umbilical fissure, the liver portal pedicle to the right anterior section of the liver.52 If the may be split anteroposteriorly just to the left of the ligamentum tumor is remote from the junction of the right anterior and poste- teres and the falciform ligament, and the vascular pedicles may be rior portal pedicles, the anterior pedicle is controlled as outlined identified and ligated as they are encountered in the course of earlier [see Right Hepatectomy, Step 6—Alternative (Intrahepatic parenchymal transection. Pedicle Ligation), above]. A vascular clamp is placed on the pedi- Once the inflow vessels have been ligated, the left hepatic vein cle and the line of demarcation on the liver surface inspected is identified and then divided either before parenchymal transec- before the pedicle is divided. If segment 7 appears to be ischemic tion or as the vessel is encountered near the completion of as well, further dissection must be done to identify and protect the parenchymal transection. If there is tumor near the dome, it is par- origins of the vessels supplying segment 7. ticularly important for tumor clearance that the left hepatic vein be Parenchymal dissection is then carried out from below upward, controlled and ligated early and outside the liver. with bleeding controlled by means of low central venous pressure anesthesia and intermittent application of the Pringle maneuver. If Left Trisectionectomy (Extended Left Hepatectomy) the caudate lobe is to be removed as part of the total resection, the A left trisectionectomy (extended left hepatectomy) involves veins draining the caudate must be controlled before parenchymal resection of segments 2, 3, 4, 5, and 8, and sometimes 1 and 9 as transection. well [see Figure 3e]. In essence, it is a left hepatectomy combined with a right anterior sectionectomy; it may or may not include Segment-Oriented Resection excision of the caudate lobe. This complex resection is usually Each segment of the liver can be resected independently. In undertaken to excise large tumors that occupy the left hemiliver addition, resections involving only the right posterior section (seg- and cross the principal scissura into the right anterior section. ments 6 and 7) [see Figure 3f] or the right anterior section (seg- In this procedure, it is essential to preserve the right hepatic ments 5 and 8) are not uncommon. Extensive and excellent vein, which constitutes the sole venous drainage of the hepatic descriptions of so-called segment-oriented hepatic resection are remnant. Usually, however, parenchymal transection must be per- available elsewhere.53,54 formed along the course of this vein; thus, the major potential dan- ger in the operation is injury to the vessel, which could lead to hemorrhage or hepatic failure from venous congestion of the Postoperative Care hepatic remnant. In addition, because the blood supply to seg- I.V. fluids administered postoperatively should include phos- ment 7 often arises from the right anterior portal pedicle or from phorus for support of liver regeneration. For large-volume hepat- the junction of the right anterior and posterior pedicles [see Figure ic resections, electrolyte levels, blood count, and prothrombin 8], there is a risk that the operation may result in devascularization time (PT) are checked after the operation and then daily for 3 to of a large portion of the hepatic remnant. Finally, because of the 4 days. Packed red blood cells are administered if the hemoglo- great variability of the biliary anatomy and the extensive intrahep- bin level falls to 8 mg/dl or lower, and fresh frozen plasma is atic dissection required in this procedure, there is a significant risk given if the PT is longer than 17 seconds. Postoperative pain of biliary complications.51 For all of these reasons, left trisectionec- control is best achieved with patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). tomies are rarely performed outside major centers.52 Because of the decreased clearance of liver-metabolized drugs In the planning of a left trisectionectomy, particularly close atten- after a major hepatectomy, selection and dosing of pain medica- tion must be paid to preoperative imaging investigations so that the tions should be adjusted accordingly. An oral diet can be right-side intrahepatic vessels and biliary structures can be accurate- resumed as early as postoperative day 3 unless a biliary-enteric ly delineated.Thin-slice CT or MRI images in the form of arterial, anastomosis was performed. portal venous, and hepatic venous reconstructions [see Figure 2] are Peripheral edema is common after major hepatic resections and quite helpful in this regard. For large tumors encroaching on the may be treated with spironolactone. If an unexplained fever occurs hepatic hilum or on the junction of the right anterior and posterior or the bilirubin level rises when other hepatic function parameters pedicles, direct angiography may still be necessary. are normal, an intra-abdominal bile collection may be present, and
    • © 2007 WebMD, Inc. All rights reserved. ACS Surgery: Principles and Practice 5 GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT AND ABDOMEN 23 Hepatic Resection — 13 a CT scan should be obtained. Percutaneous drain placement manipulation of the tumor has the theoretical advantage of pre- usually brings about resolution of such collections after a few days; venting vascular dissemination of cancer cells caused by compres- reoperation is rarely necessary. sion of the tumor. For these reasons, some authors proposed an anterior approach whereby the liver parenchyma is transected from the anterior surface to reach the vena cava, with ligation of Special Considerations the inflow and outflow vasculature carried out before mobilization of the right hemiliver.60 This approach is now widely followed for TOTAL VASCULAR ISOLATION FOR CONTROL OF BLEEDING resection of HCC. For control of bleeding during liver parenchymal transection, a Subsequently, other authors proposed a modification of this technique known as total vascular isolation can be used as an alter- technique whereby dissection is performed along the anterior sur- native to the Pringle maneuver. In this technique, the liver is isolat- face of the vena cava and a tape passed in this plane to lift the liver ed by controlling the inferior vena cava (both above and below the and thereby facilitate transection of the parenchyma and ligation liver), the portal vein, and the hepatic artery.This approach is based of the vasculature [see Figure 16].61 The first step in this so-called on techniques developed for liver transplantation and on the obser- hanging maneuver is to dissect the space between the right and vation that the liver is capable of tolerating total normothermic middle hepatic veins downward for approximately 2 cm. Next, ischemia for as long as 1 hour.55 Its primary advantage is that while dissection is performed between the vena cava and the caudate the liver is isolated, little or no bleeding occurs. It does, however, lobe on the left side of the inferior right hepatic vein. A clamp is have disadvantages as well. In some patients, temporary occlusion then passed along this plane in the notch between the right and of the inferior vena cava causes hemodynamic instability as a con- middle hepatic veins, and an umbilical tape is passed for suspen- sequence of reduced cardiac output coupled with increased sys- sion of the liver.Transection of the parenchyma is performed in an temic vascular resistance.56 Cardiac failure with marked hypoten- anterior-to-posterior direction until the vena cava is reached. The sion, cardiac arrhythmia, and even cardiac arrest may ensue. In right side of the vena cava is then dissected, and the right hepatic addition, when hepatic perfusion is restored, the sudden return of vein and the inferior hepatic veins are ligated.The triangular liga- stagnant potassium-rich blood to the systemic circulation can ment and the retroperitoneal attachments are transected, and the aggravate the situation. For these reasons and because bleeding is specimen is removed. generally well controlled with low central venous pressure anesthe- THE CIRRHOTIC PATIENT sia, we believe that total vascular isolation is useful only in rare cases. The clinical data published to date support this view. A Cirrhotic patients, by definition, have reduced hepatic function- prospective study from 1996 found that total vascular isolation had al capacity and reserve. Accordingly, these patients are at higher no major advantages over the approach described earlier [see risk from hepatectomy and require careful assessment of liver Operative Technique, Right Hepatectomy, Step 8, above] and was function, appropriate selection for surgery and choice of opera- actually associated with greater blood loss.48 tion, and greater attention to perioperative care. The one setting where we believe that total vascular isolation may have a significant role to play is in the surgical management Operative Planning of hepatic tumors, particularly very large tumors that compromise Selection of patients Hepatic failure is the major cause of the vena cava or the hepatic veins. To extend the duration of vas- hospital death and long-term morbidity after hepatic resection in cular isolation in this setting, a venovenous bypass that vents the cirrhotic patients.62-66 Consequently, determination of a cirrhotic splanchnic blood into the systemic circulation may be used.57 To patient’s candidacy for hepatectomy is based on preoperative further minimize parenchymal injury during vascular isolation, assessment of baseline liver function. the liver may be perfused with cold organ preservation solutions. A variety of tests have been proposed for assessment of hepatic For extensive vascular invasion that necessitates major vena caval reserve, including measurement of clearance of various dyes and or hepatic venous reconstruction, some authors have suggested metabolic substrates (e.g., indocyanine green67,68 and aminopy- that the liver can be removed during venovenous bypass and rine62). Measurement of the urea-nitrogen synthesis rate has also resection and reconstruction performed extracorporeally.58 been suggested as a way of predicting outcome after resection.65 Although there are clinical situations that call for venovenous bypass Another functional test involves administering lidocaine and mea- and ex vivo resection, in practice, these techniques are very rarely nec- suring levels of monethylglycinexylidide (a metabolite of lidocaine essary: short-length vena caval resection and reconstruction can be that is generated mostly through the cytochrome P-450 enzyme performed quite safely without resort to them. In fact, involvement system in the liver) as a gauge of liver function.69 Measurement of of the retrohepatic vena cava at a level below the major hepatic the hepatic portal venous pressure gradient via invasive radiologic veins can generally be treated with simple excision of the affected techniques has been found to predict postoperative hepatic fail- segment without replacement,59 particularly if complete obstruc- ure.70 Assessment of portal venous hemodynamics by means of tion at this level has already led to established collateral circulation. noninvasive Doppler ultrasonography has also been found to pre- dict outcome after hepatectomy.71 HANGING MANEUVER IN MAJOR HEPATECTOMY Currently, none of these functional tests are routinely done at The classic technique for a right hepatectomy (see above) most major liver resection centers. In practice, the Child-Pugh involves complete mobilization of the right hemiliver before vascu- score [see 5:3 Jaundice] is the most commonly employed clinical lar control and parenchymal transection. In cases where the tumor tool for selection of surgical candidates. A Child-Pugh score high- has invaded the retroperitoneum or diaphragm, however, such er than 8 is generally accepted as a contraindication to major mobilization may be difficult. Moreover, in cases where the tumor hepatic resection.64,66,72-75 is a large, soft, vascular one such as HCC, the earlier mobilization of the right hemiliver may increase the risk of tumor rupture. Choice of procedure The appropriate extent of resection for Finally, division of the vascular inflow and outflow vessels before cirrhotic patients may be quite different from that for noncirrhotic
    • © 2007 WebMD, Inc. All rights reserved. ACS Surgery: Principles and Practice 5 GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT AND ABDOMEN 23 Hepatic Resection — 14 Figure 16 Illustrated is clamp dissection in prepa- a ration for the hanging maneuver. (a) A long vascu- lar clamp is passed between the vena cava and the caudate lobe. This clamp is directed at the notch between the right and middle hepatic veins, which has been dissected from above. (b) An umbilical tape is then passed to suspend the plane of parenchymal transection. b patients. In cirrhotic patients, the majority of hepatectomies are struct the right hepatic vein for the purpose of preserving venous performed to eradicate HCC.5 A prime consideration in such outflow in segments 5 and 6 after resection of segments 7 and 8. resections is the margin needed to ensure tumor clearance. Most clinicians aim for a tumor-free margin of 1 cm. A 1989 study, how- Operative Technique ever, found that in cirrhotic patients with HCC, as long as the Hepatic resection in cirrhotic patients is associated with certain tumor margin was microscopically clear of cancer, the exact size of specific technical difficulties that substantially increase the com- the margin was not correlated with the incidence of recurrence.76 plexity of the operation. The liver parenchyma is hard, which In fact, the acceptance of limited margins, coupled with the accep- makes retraction of the liver difficult. In addition, anatomic land- tance of nonanatomic resections aimed at preserving as much func- marks are distorted and difficult to find as a consequence of fibro- tional parenchyma as possible, is the single change in technical sis and atrophy-hypertrophy. Finally, portal hypertension and tis- practice that is most responsible for the great improvements in the sue friability contribute to increased blood loss during mobiliza- safety of hepatic resection observed worldwide in cirrhotic patients. tion and parenchymal transection. The guiding principle for hepatectomy in cirrhotic patients is that limited resections should be favored, with as much function- Exposure and mobilization Trifurcated incisions and tho- al parenchyma spared as possible. In general, even for patients racoabdominal incisions should be avoided in cirrhotic patients with well-compensated Child’s grade A cirrhosis, we try to limit because of the potential for ascitic leakage externally or into the resections to less than two segments of functional liver. Patients chest. The increased firmness of the cirrhotic liver and the conse- with large tumors are more likely to tolerate a major resection quent difficulty of retraction can lead to significant blood loss from because little functional parenchyma must be removed along with retroperitoneal or phrenic collateral vessels during mobilization. the tumor. Major hepatic resections involving removal of at least To prevent such bleeding, it may be preferable to use an anterior one hemiliver are now reported to carry an operative mortality of approach in which the liver parenchyma is split within the princi- less than 10% in cirrhotic patients.77,78 Such procedures are usu- pal scissura down to the anterior surface of the vena cava before ally performed in cirrhotic patients who have large tumors replac- the right hemiliver is mobilized off the retroperitoneum.60 The ing most of one hemiliver, acceptable liver function, and no atro- right hemiliver is then mobilized in a medial-to-lateral direction, phy of the uninvolved hemiliver. Small tumors are often more dif- and the right hepatic vein is secured during mobilization of the ficult to manage. For patients with small, deeply placed tumors right hemiliver off the vena cava. whose resection would necessitate removal of a large amount of functional parenchyma, an ablative alternative or even transplan- Inflow control At one time, it was widely doubted whether tation might be more suitable. the Pringle maneuver was safe in cirrhotic patients. Subsequently, In an attempt to preserve as much functional liver as possible, however, many studies verified that this maneuver can be per- many surgeons resort to more technically challenging operations. formed for extended periods in cirrhotic patients without increas- Most will perform multiple limited resections in order to avoid per- ing either morbidity or mortality.81-86 Nevertheless, it is advisable forming a full hemihepatectomy.79,80 Some go so far as to recon- to employ the Pringle maneuver sparingly in this population so as
    • © 2007 WebMD, Inc. All rights reserved. ACS Surgery: Principles and Practice 5 GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT AND ABDOMEN 23 Hepatic Resection — 15 to minimize ischemic stress. Our practice is to clamp the portal operative management of the hepatic damage that can result from triad with a vessel loop tourniquet for 10-minute periods with 5- the use of these newer agents.95 minute breaks in between. We have not found additional protec- The hepatic surgeon must therefore be vigilant for the condi- tive maneuvers (e.g., topical cooling87,88) to be necessary. tion commonly known as chemotherapy-associated steatohepati- tis (CASH).96 This disease is associated with a characteristic clin- Parenchymal transection In patients with normal liver ical triad consisting of (1) hepatic steatosis, (2) splenomegaly, and parenchyma, most experienced hepatic surgeons use blunt dissec- (3) thrombocytopenia. Fatty infiltration of the liver can be tion, with either the clamp-crushing technique or the finger-frac- assumed if hepatic attenuation is found to be lower than splenic ture technique, to transect the liver tissue.89 In patients with cir- attenuation. Splenomegaly is a sign of portal hypertension, as is rhosis, however, the firmness of the parenchyma makes the clamp- refractory consumptive thrombocytopenia that is not related to crushing technique less than ideal: because the parenchyma is bone marrow suppression and therefore is not corrected even often harder than the underlying vasculature and biliary radicles, when chemotherapy is stopped. blunt dissection is likely to tear these vessels. Accordingly, ultra- When CASH is documented, patients should be selected for sonic dissectors that coagulate and seal vessels during dissection hepatectomy according to the same criteria used for patients with are more suitable for parenchymal transection in this population. early cirrhosis. Consideration should also be given to preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE) (see below) before hepatectomy to Closure and drainage Because of the likelihood of postop- increase the size of the hepatic remnant. erative ascites, the abdominal wall is closed with a heavy continu- PREOPERATIVE PORTAL VEIN EMBOLIZATION ous absorbable monofilament suture to create a watertight clo- sure. To prevent major fluid and protein losses and ascending Most liver surgeons would be reluctant to resect more than the infections, abdominal drains generally are not used.50 Reports equivalent of two segments of functional liver in a patient with specifically examining the role of drainage in cirrhotic patients documented cirrhosis.97 Consequently, many cirrhotic patients documented a much lower incidence of postoperative complica- with technically resectable tumors are relegated to noncurative tions and a shorter hospital stay for patients in whom no drains ablative therapy out of concern over possible postoperative hepat- were placed.90,91 ic failure.The situation may be changing, however, with the grow- ing use of preoperative PVE, which may extend surgeons’ ability Postoperative Care to resect tumor in cirrhotic patients. The focus of postoperative care in cirrhotic patients is on man- In PVE, access to the portal vein on the side of the liver to be agement of cirrhosis and portal hypertension [see 5:10 Portal resected is gained via a percutaneous transhepatic approach. The Hypertension]. In most such patients who undergo hepatic resec- vein is embolized approximately 1 month before the planned tion, transient hepatic insufficiency develops postoperatively, with resection so as to produce ipsilateral atrophy along with compen- hyperbilirubinemia, ascites formation, hypoalbuminemia, edema, satory hypertrophy of the contralateral future hepatic remnant.98 and worsening of the baseline coagulopathy. The degree of compensatory hypertrophy can be dramatic [see In the first 24 hours after the procedure, crystalloid must be Figure 17] and may modulate postoperative hepatic dysfunction. administered at a level sufficient to maintain adequate portal per- PVE is also employed in patients with normal parenchyma in fusion.92 If patients are stable after the first 24 hours, they are sub- whom extensive resection may result in a very small hepatic rem- jected to water and sodium restriction and receive liberal amounts nant. In patients undergoing right trisectionectomy, particularly of salt-poor albumin for volume expansion if needed. those with congenitally small left lateral sections, the entire area of Spironolactone is started in all patients as soon as oral diet is the extended right hepatectomy, including the main right portal resumed, and furosemide is added as needed. On rare occasions, vein and the segmental branches supplying segment 4, can be a peritoneovenous shunt may have to be employed to control embolized.99 postoperative ascites,93 but this measure is usually unnecessary if There is substantial evidence that preoperative PVE can be suc- patients were properly selected. The PT is checked twice daily cessfully used in patients with cirrhotic livers or impaired hepatic during the immediate postoperative period; a PT longer than 17 function and that such use is generally well tolerated.100-103 One seconds is corrected by administering fresh frozen plasma. immediate benefit of PVE is that it may act as a kind of stress test for the liver, allowing preoperative determination of the likelihood CHEMOTHERAPY-ASSOCIATED STEATOHEPATITIS of liver regeneration. If no compensatory hypertrophy is seen 4 One of the most important advances in the treatment of weeks after PVE, the decision to perform a major hepatectomy metastatic colon cancer over the past few years has been the devel- should be reconsidered. opment and approval of a number of newer chemotherapeutic agents, such as irinotecan, oxaliplatin, cetuximab (C225), and bevacizumab (Avastin). These agents target the cancer cell cycle, Repeat Hepatic Resection paracrine growth factors, and angiogenic factors, and they have Since 1984, when one of the first reports of repeat hepatic led to substantial improvements in survival for patients with resection was published,104 a number of reports from around the hepatic colorectal metastases. They are currently being used not world have demonstrated that repeat resection can be done safely only to allow effective palliative treatment to be provided in cases and with good long-term results even for recurrent malignancies. where resection is not feasible but also, by downstaging certain The morbidities and mortalities reported after repeat hepatecto- hepatic tumors, to allow surgical treatment to be provided for a my for metastatic colorectal cancer105-117 and hepatocellular carci- percentage of patients who were previously thought to have unre- noma118-125 are comparable to those reported after initial hepatec- sectable disease. Consequently, it is now common for patients to tomy. Extended survival has been demonstrated, and in selected be subjected to a number of chemotherapies before being consid- cases, survival is equivalent to or even better than that observed ered for hepatectomy.94 Along with the benefits of these advances after initial resection.106,113,120,126 In the following section, we con- in chemotherapy, however, has come the challenge posed by post- centrate on the key technical aspects of repeat hepatic resection;
    • © 2007 WebMD, Inc. All rights reserved. ACS Surgery: Principles and Practice 5 GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT AND ABDOMEN 23 Hepatic Resection — 16 a b Figure 17 Liver atrophy and hypertrophy occur after right portal vein embolization. Shown are images of the liver (a) at baseline and (b) 6 weeks after PVE. The right hemiliver is outlined in white. discussions of indications, patient selection, and outcome are these should be found early on. The ligamentum teres may be available in other sources.106,113,120,126 followed to the base of the umbilical fissure to define the loca- Repeat hepatic resection poses certain technical difficulties that tion of the left hepatic artery.Whether this artery arises from the are not commonly encountered during initial resection.105,127,128 common hepatic artery or from the left gastric artery, it passes First, adhesions at the previous line of parenchymal transection into the liver parenchyma at the base of the umbilical fissure.The can make reexposure of the liver difficult. Mobilizing the liver off second landmark is the caudate lobe. The lesser omentum the vena cava and reexposing the porta hepatis and the hepatic should be opened early on to reveal this lobe. An index finger veins can be extremely hazardous if dissection was previously done should then be passed in front of the caudate toward the obliter- in these areas. Second, liver regeneration and systemic chemother- ated foramen of Winslow to define the porta hepatis and the apy can induce accumulation of fat within the liver, thereby ren- location of the portal vein. The third landmark is the vena cava. dering it more friable106; the increased friability further increases Performing the Kocher maneuver to mobilize the duodenum off the difficulties of reexposure and predisposes to tearing of the vena cava allows this vessel to be dissected, thus further Glisson’s capsule.127 Third, regeneration alters the normal anatomic configuration of the portal structures [see Figure 18].129 For example, after a right hepatectomy, the porta hepatis is rotat- Left ed posteriorly and to the right. The normal anatomic relations Right among the portal structures are altered, with the bile duct dis- placed posteriorly and the portal vein displaced anteriorly. 2+3 Preoperative imaging is even more important for repeat resec- tions than for primary resections; the reason is that scarring limits access to the liver for intraoperative assessment via palpation or 4 ultrasonography. Before embarking on a repeat resection, it is essential to know the exact number and locations of the lesions to be treated within the regenerated parenchyma. Preoperative imag- ing also facilitates operative planning by accurately delineating the vasculature within the regenerated liver. In a repeat resection after a previous major right hepatectomy, it is important to be prepared to convert the incision into a thora- coabdominal incision if necessary. Access through the right chest Hepatic Artery may be required for mobilization of the liver because of adherence Portal Vein of the previous resection margin to the diaphragm, or it may be Normal Common Bile Duct required for access to the rotated CBD and portal vasculature at the porta hepatis. Atrophied/ Hypertrophied In the dissection of the right upper quadrant after a previous right hepatectomy, three landmarks are particularly helpful in Figure 18 Repeat hepatic resection. Depicted are the changes in defining the anatomic structures within the regenerated left the relations of the portal structures that occur as a result of hemiliver. The first landmark is the remnants of the ligamentum right-liver atrophy or resection and left-side hypertrophy. The teres, which defines the demarcation between the left lateral sec- structures in the porta hepatis rotate to the right, with the CBD tion (segments 2 and 3) and the left medial section (segment 4); coming to rest laterally rather than anteriorly.
    • © 2007 WebMD, Inc. All rights reserved. ACS Surgery: Principles and Practice 5 GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT AND ABDOMEN 23 Hepatic Resection — 17 Figure 19 Laparoscopic hepatic resection: hand-assisted. Introduction of the hand within the abdomen restores tac- tile sensation to the surgeon and facilitates resection of the liver. The hand is the best liver retractor available and can be used to dissect the parenchyma. The specimen can be extracted through the hand access port. defining the portocaval plane. Definition of this plane leads to Laparoscopic Hepatic Resection the correct plane for dissection and mobilization of the liver off In addition to revolutionizing treatment of gallstone disease,132 the vena cava; it also allows isolation of the hepatoduodenal lig- laparoscopic techniques are increasingly used for fenestration of ament for application of the Pringle maneuver and for extrahe- benign cysts of the liver133,134 and for staging of hepatobiliary patic dissection of the inflow vessels. malignancies to prevent unnecessary laparotomies.38,135-137 Until In a repeat resection after a previous left hepatectomy, the main comparatively recently, however, laparoscopic resection of liver concern with regard to mobilization of the liver is the anterior tumors was described only in case reports or small series.133,138-142 position of the portal vasculature after right-side hypertrophy. It is Perhaps the main reason for the strong resistance to laparoscopic therefore prudent to mobilize the right hemiliver, perform a hepatic resection has been fear of catastrophic bleeding. If inad- Kocher maneuver, and follow the vena cava caudally to identify vertent damage to a major hepatic vein or the vena cava occurs the portal vein from the right.The stomach and the colon usually during an open operation, the bleeding can be controlled with are adherent to the edge of the previous resection and must be direct manual compression until the vessel is repaired; however, if carefully dissected free to allow access to the liver. If the middle such damage occurs during a laparoscopic operation, control of hepatic vein was preserved in the earlier left hepatectomy, it will lie the bleeding is considerably more difficult. In addition, damage to immediately deep to the plane of the stomach or the colon and a hepatic vein or the vena cava during a laparoscopic procedure thus may be a source of hemorrhage during dissection. can theoretically result in CO2 embolism. Another concern is that Control of the inflow or outflow vasculature may be compro- the loss of tactile sensation characteristic of laparoscopic surgery mised by the scarring resulting from the previous operation. If may lead to inadequate tumor clearance. Finally, whereas there extensive extrahepatic dissection was performed for control of are many liver retractors designed to hold the liver in one position, inflow vasculature in the earlier procedure, control of these ves- there is no good retractor for repeatedly moving the liver from side sels in the repeat resection is more safely accomplished via intra- to side, as would be necessary during a laparoscopic hepatectomy. hepatic pedicle ligation [see Operative Technique, Right The human hand is still the best tool for this purpose. Hepatectomy, Step 6—Alternative (Intrahepatic Pedicle Laparoscopic hepatic resection has been greatly facilitated by Ligation), above]. several recent technologic advances, including laparoscopic sta- A major concern with repeat hepatectomy is that it is some- plers143 and ultrasonic dissectors,144 which can be used for ligation times necessary to perform more limited resections than would of the hepatic vasculature and transection of liver parenchyma. otherwise be indicated. Normally, for removal of liver tumors, we The most important advance, however, is the hand access port, a avoid wedge excisions because these nonanatomic resections are small port through which one hand can be introduced into the more often associated with greater blood loss and positive margins abdomen for a hand-assisted laparoscopic resection [see Figure than anatomic resections are.112,130 In a repeat hepatectomy, how- 19].145-147 With this approach, the surgeon not only regains a mea- ever, anatomic considerations arising in the regenerated liver may sure of tactile sensation but also is able to employ the best liver make a wedge resection the best choice. retractor available. Moreover, direct manual compression of any With appropriate patient selection and careful operative plan- bleeding vessels is once again possible, and the incision made for ning, very favorable perioperative and long-term results can be the hand access port is also used for extraction of the resected achieved after repeat hepatic resection. It is noteworthy that stud- specimen. ies addressing repeat resection have not documented any substan- Appropriate patient selection is essential for safe laparoscopic tial increases in blood loss, duration of operation, or rate of com- resection of liver tumors. Resection of any two segments along the plications in comparison with the initial resection.106-110,131 lower edge of the liver is easily accomplished laparoscopically. At
    • © 2007 WebMD, Inc. All rights reserved. ACS Surgery: Principles and Practice 5 GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT AND ABDOMEN 23 Hepatic Resection — 18 a b 5 mm 5 mm 5 mm 12 mm 5 mm 12 mm 5 mm 12 mm 12 mm 5 mm Hand port Figure 20 Shown are the recommended port placements for (a) laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy and (b) hand-assisted laparoscopic right hepatectomy. MSKCC, we have laparoscopically resected lesions from all seg- Some situations call for the use of a hand access port, which can ments.47 In the following section, we provide a general overview of be of great help in several ways. First, the hand access port allows laparoscopic hepatic resection; more in-depth discussions of the the surgeon to retract and compress the liver manually if bleeding is technical aspects of these procedures and the results reported encountered, thereby increasing the overall speed of the procedure. from various centers are available elsewhere.148 Second, large resected liver specimens can be removed through the hand access port, without any need for a separate extraction site. OPERATIVE TECHNIQUE Third, if intracorporeal suturing is required to manage bleeding or The patient is placed on the operating table in the supine posi- bile leakage, the surgeon can use the right hand to place the suture tion, with the arm on the side of the resection out from the body and the left hand, placed through the hand access port, to tie the at a 60° angle and the contralateral arm tucked. The patient is knots. A disadvantage of the hand access port, however, is that it securely strapped down to allow for rotation of the table. For a may get in the way of the other trocars, especially in a small patient. right hepatectomy or resection of segments 7 and 8 (bisegmentec- Hence, knowing when and where to place the hand access port tomy 7, 8), the patient may be positioned in the left lateral decu- requires a measure of experience. For a left-side resection, the hand bitus position.The surgeon stands on the side opposite the side of access port should be placed through a transverse incision in the left the resection. upper quadrant [see Figure 19]. For a right-side resection, the port A left lateral sectionectomy typically requires the placement of may be placed in the right lower quadrant [see Figure 20b]. five ports [see Figure 20a]. Pneumoperitoneum is achieved via an Alternatively, the port may be placed in the upper midline; traction initial port placed at the umbilicus; to prevent gas embolism during is then provided by the hand used to retract the left hemiliver medi- liver transection, it is maintained at the lowest pressure possible ally while the triangular ligament provides countertraction. (typically 10 to 12 mm Hg). Subsequent ports are then placed The procedure starts with the placement of a 10 mm port, usu- along the subcostal line. A second 5–12 mm port is placed at the ally in the right or left upper quadrant on the side opposite that on intersection of the subcostal and midclavicular lines to permit dis- which the hand access port will be placed. After staging is per- section of the triangular ligament, the hepatic vein, and the inferior formed to confirm that the lesion is resectable, a 5 to 6 cm inci- vena cava. A third 5–12 mm port is placed between the previous sion is made for placement of the hand access port. The port site two ports to permit dissection of the porta hepatis.The fourth 5–12 should be chosen so as to allow manual retraction of the part of mm port is placed in the right midclavicular line to permit the the liver to be resected, with the falciform and triangular ligaments introduction of an endovascular stapler for division of the portal used to provide countertraction. Once the access port is in place, structures and liver parenchyma.We prefer using 5–12 mm ports in the abdomen is fully palpated under laparoscopic vision. A laparo- the beginning, so that the camera and the staplers can be passed tomy sponge is placed into the abdomen to facilitate retraction through any of the ports. If a 5 mm camera is available, 5 mm tro- and absorb blood, and a long bulldog clamp is inserted for use in cars can be placed at certain spots, usually at the most lateral posi- the Pringle maneuver. A long umbilical tape is tied to the bulldog tions.This step frees up the 12 mm ports that are used to pass the clamp beforehand so that the instrument can be easily located endoscopic GIA stapler.We generally use the 45 mm rotating artic- throughout the procedure. Additional ports are then placed as ulated stapler loaded with the white 2.5 mm cartridge. necessary for introduction of the stapler or the ultrasonic scalpel.
    • © 2007 WebMD, Inc. All rights reserved. ACS Surgery: Principles and Practice 5 GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT AND ABDOMEN 23 Hepatic Resection — 19 The area to be resected is outlined with the electrocautery.The ulator (Conmed Corporation, Utica, New York) and hemostatic liver is manually retracted, intermittent application of the Pringle agents may be used. maneuver is initiated, and the parenchyma is transected. Liver The laparoscopic approach is suitable for both minor and parenchyma remote from the major portal pedicles and hepatic major hepatic resections. At present, however, it remains unclear veins may be transected either with the ultrasonic dissector or by whether this approach constitutes a significant advance in liver means of finger fracture. Near the major portal pedicles and surgery. To clarify this issue, further study of laparoscopic hepatic hepatic veins, an endoscopic GIA vascular stapler may be used. resection with respect to perioperative outcome, quality of life, After removal of the specimen, the laparoscopic argon beam coag- and long-term survival is required. References 1. Weitz J, Klimstra DS, Cymes K, et al: Manage- 19. Hann LE, Schwartz LH, Panicek DM, et al: 5:333, 1995 ment of primary liver sarcomas. Cancer 109:1391, Tumor involvement in hepatic veins: comparison 37. Jarnagin WR, Conlon K, Bodniewicz J, et al: A clin- 2007 of MR imaging and US for preoperative assess- ical scoring system predicts the yield of diagnostic 2. Weitz J, Blumgart LH, Fong Y, et al: Partial hepa- ment. Radiology 206:651, 1998 laparoscopy in patients with potentially resectable tectomy for metastases from noncolorectal, non- 20. Akhurst T, Kates TJ, Mazumdar M, et al: Recent hepatic colorectal metastases. Cancer 91:1121, neuroendocrine carcinoma. Ann Surg 241:269, chemotherapy reduces the sensitivity of [18F]fluo- 2001 2005 rodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in 38. Jarnagin WR, Bodniewicz J, Dougherty E, et al: A 3. Charnsangavej C, Clary B, Fong Y, et al: Selection the detection of colorectal metastases. J Clin Oncol prospective analysis of staging laparoscopy in of patients for resection of hepatic colorectal 23:8713, 2005 patients with primary and secondary hepatobiliary metastases: expert consensus statement. Ann Surg 21. Strasberg SM, Siegal BA: Survival of patients malignancies. J Gastrointest Surg 4:34, 2000 Oncol 13:1261, 2006 staged by FDG-PET before resection of hepatic 39. Lo CM, Lai EC, Liu CL, et al: Laparoscopy and 4. Morris KT, Song TJ, Fong Y: Recent advance- metastases from colorectal cancer. Ann Surg laparoscopic ultrasonography avoid exploratory ments in diagnosis and treatment of metastatic col- 235:308, 2002 laparotomy in patients with hepatocellular carcino- orectal cancer to the liver. Surg Oncol 15:129, 22. Hann LE, Fong Y, Shriver CD, et al: Malignant ma. Ann Surg 227:527, 1998 2006 hepatic hilar tumors: can ultrasonography be used 40. Callery MP, Strasberg SM, Doherty GM, et al: 5. Song TJ, Ip EW, Fong Y: Hepatocellular carcino- as an alternative to angiography with CT arterial Staging laparoscopy with laparoscopic ultrasonog- ma: current surgical management. Gastroenterolo- portography for determination of resectability? J raphy: optimizing resectability in hepatobiliary and gy 127:S248, 2004 Ultrasound Med 15:37, 1996 pancreatic malingnancy. J Am Coll Surg 185:33, 23. Gibson RN, Yeung E, Thompson JN, et al: Bile 1997 6. Lortat-Jacob JL, Robert HG: Hepatectomie droite reglee. Presse Med 60:549, 1952 duct obstruction: radiologic evaluation of level, 41. Castaing D, Kunstlinger F, Habib N: Intraoper- cause and tumor resectability. Radiology 160:43, ative ultrasound study of the liver: methodology 7. Fong Y, Gonen M, Rubin D, et al: Long-term sur- 1986 and anatomical results. Am J Surg 149:676, 1985 vival is superior after resection for cancer in high- volume centers. Ann Surg 242:540, 2005 24. Fortner JG, Lincer RM: Hepatic resection in the 42. McEntee GP, Nagorney DM: Use of hepatic sta- elderly. Ann Surg 211:141, 1990 plers in major hepatic resections. Br J Surg 78:40, 8. Fong Y: Hepatic colorectal metastasis: current sur- 25. Karl RC, Smith SK, Fabri PJ: Validity of major 1991 gical therapy, selection criteria for hepatectomy, and role for adjuvant therapy. Adv Surg 34:351, cancer operations in elderly patients. Ann Surg 43. Cohen AM: Use of laparoscopic vascular stapler at 2000 Oncol 2:107, 1995 laparotomy for colorectal cancer. Dis Colon 26. Mazzoni G, Tocchi A, Miccini M, et al. Surgical Rectum 35:910, 1992 9. Jarnagin WR, Fong Y, Blumgart LH: The current management of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Adv treatment of liver metastases from colorectal can- 44. Jurim O, Colonna II JO, Colquhoun SD, et al: A Surg 33:345, 1999 cer in elderly patients. Int J Colorectal Dis 22:77- stapling technique for hepatic resection. J Am Coll 83, 2007. Surg 178:510, 1994 10. Fong Y, Sun RL, Jarnagin W, et al: An analysis of 412 cases of hepatocellular carcinoma at a Western 27. Aldrighetti L, Arru M, Catena M, et al. Liver resec- 45. Yanaga K, Nishizaki T, Yamamoto K, et al: center. Ann Surg 229:790, 1999 tions in over-75-year-old patients: surgical hazard Simplified inflow control using stapling devices for or current practice? J Surg Oncol 93:186, 2006 major hepatic resection. Arch Surg 131:104, 1996 11. D’Angelica M, Maddineni S, Fong Y, et al: Optimal abdominal incision for partial hepatecto- 28. Fong Y, Brennan MF, Cohen AM, et al: Liver 46. Lefor AT, Flowers JL: Laparoscopic wedge biopsy my: increased late complications with Mercedes- resection in the elderly. Br J Surg 84:1386, 1997 of the liver. J Am Coll Surg 178:307, 1994 type incisions compared to extended right sub- 29. Cunningham JD, Fong Y, Shriver C, et al: One 47. Fong Y, Jarnagin W, Conlon KC, et al: Hand-assist- costal incisions. World J Surg 30:410, 2006 hundred consecutive hepatic resections: blood loss, ed laparoscopic liver resection: lessons from an ini- 12. Strasberg SM, Belghiti J, Clavien P-A, et al: The transfusion and operative technique. Arch Surg tial experience. Arch Surg 135:854, 2000 Brisbane 2000 terminology of liver anatomy and 129:1050, 1994 48. Belghiti J, Noun R, Zante E, et al: Portal triad resections. HPB Surg 2:333, 2000 30. Melendez J, Ferri E, Zwillman M, et al: Extended clamping or hepatic vascular exclusion for major 13. Baer HU, Dennison AR, Maddern GJ, et al: hepatic resection: a 6-year retrospective study of liver resection. Ann Surg 224:155, 1996 Subtotal hepatectomy: a new procedure based on risk factors for perioperative mortality. J Am Coll 49. Bothe AJ, Steele G Jr: Is there a role for periopera- the inferior right hepatic vein. Br J Surg 78:1221, Surg 192:47, 2001 tive nutritional support in liver resection? HPB 1991 31. Scheele J, Stangl R, Altendorf-Hofmann A, et al: Surgery 10:177, 1997 14. Smadja C, Blumgart LH: The biliary tract and the Indicators of prognosis after hepatic resection for 50. Fong Y, Brennan MF, Brown K, et al: Drainage is anatomy of biliary exposure. Surgery of the Liver colorectal secondaries. Surgery 110:13, 1991 unnecessary after elective liver resection. Am J and Biliary Tract, 2nd ed. Blumgart LH, Ed. 32. Weber SM, Jarnagin WR, DeMatteo RP, et al: Surg 171:158, 1996 Churchill Livingstone, London, 1994 Survival after resection of multiple hepatic colorec- 51. Starzl TE, Iwatsuki S, Shaw BW, et al: Left hepatic 15. Glisson F: Anatomia Hepatis. O Pullein, London, tal metastases. Ann Surg Oncol 7:643, 2000 trisegmentectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 155:21, 1654 33. Goldsmith NA, Woodburne RT: The surgical 1982 16. Couinaud C: Le Foie: Etudes Anatomiques et anatomy pertaining to liver resection. Surg 52. Blumgart LH, Baer HU, Czerniak A, et al: Chirurgicales. Masson, Paris, 1957 Gynecol Obstet 105:310, 1957 Extended left hepatectomy: technical aspects of an 17. Launois B, Jamieson GG: The importance of 34. Bismuth H: Surgical anatomy and anatomic evolving procedure. Br J Surg 80:903, 1993 Glisson’s capsule and its sheaths in the intrahepat- surgery of the liver. World J Surg 6:3, 1982 53. Scheele J: Segment oriented resection of the liver: ic approach to resection of the liver. Surg Gynecol 35. Blumgart LH, Jarnagin W, Fong Y: Liver resection rationale and technique in hepato-biliary and pan- Obstet 174:7, 1992 for benign disease and for liver and biliary tumors. creatic malignancies. Lygidakis NJ, Tytgat GNJ, 18. Soyer P, Levesque M, Elias D, et al: Preoperative Surgery of the Liver and Biliary Tract, 3rd ed. Eds. Thieme, Stuttgart, 1989 assessment of resectability of hepatic metastases Blumgart LH, Fong Y, Eds. WB Saunders, 54. Scheele J, Stangl R: Segment oriented anatomical from colonic carcinoma: CT portography vs sono- London, 2000, p 1639 liver resections. Surgery of the Liver and Biliary graphy and dynamic CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 36. Blumgart LH, Fong Y: Surgical management of Tract. Blumgart LH, Ed. Churchill Livingstone, 159:741, 1992 colorectal metastases to the liver. Curr Probl Surg London, 1994
    • © 2007 WebMD, Inc. All rights reserved. ACS Surgery: Principles and Practice 5 GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT AND ABDOMEN 23 Hepatic Resection — 20 55. Huguet C, Nordlinger B, Gallopin JJ, et al: of liver resection in Child grade A cirrhotic 94. Kornprat P, Jarnagin WR, Gonen M, et al: Normothermic hepatic vascular occlusion for patients. World J Surg 21:390, 1997 Outcome after hepatectomy for multiple (four or extensive hepatectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 75. Capussotti L, Borgonovo G, Bouzari H, et al: more) colorectal metastases in the era of effective 147:689, 1978 Results of major hepatectomy for large primary chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 14:1151, 2007 56. Pappas G, Palmer WM, Martineau GL, et al: liver cancer in patients with cirrhosis. Br J Surg 95. Karoui M, Penna C, Amin-Hashem M, et al: Hemodynamic alterations caused during ortho- 81:427, 1994 Influence of preoperative chemotherapy on the risk topic liver transplantation in humans. Surgery 76. Yoshida Y, Kanematsu T, Matsumata T, et al: of major hepatectomy for colorectal liver metas- 70:872, 1971 Surgical margin and recurrence after resection of tases. Ann Surg 243:1, 2006 57. Shaw BW, Martin DJ, Marquez JM, et al: Venous hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: 96. Fong Y, Bentrem DJ: CASH (chemotherapy-asso- bypass in clinical liver transplantation. Ann Surg further evaluation of limited hepatic resection. Ann ciated steatohepatitis) costs. Ann Surg 243:8, 2006 200:524, 1984 Surg 209:297, 1989 97. Shirabe K, Shimada M, Gion T, et al: Postoper- 58. Pichlmayr R, Grosse H, Hauss J, et al: Technique 77. Vauthey JN, Klimstra D, Franceschi D, et al: ative liver failure after major hepatic resection for and preliminary results of extracorporeal liver Factors affecting long-term outcome after hepatic hepatocellular carcinoma in the modern era with surgery (bench procedure) and of surgery on the in resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Surg special reference to remnant liver volume. J Am situ perfused liver. Br J Surg 77:21, 1990 169:28, 1995 Coll Surg 188:304, 1999 59. Cunci O, Coste T, Vacher B, et al: Resection de la 78. Poon RT, Fan ST, Lo CM, et al: Intrahepatic 98. Makuuchi M, Thai BL, Takayasu K, et al: veine cave inferieure retro-hepatique au cours recurrence after curative resection of hepatocellu- Properative portal embolization to increase safety d’une hepatectomie pour tumeur. Ann Chir lar carcinoma: long-term results of treatment and of major hepatectomy for hilar bile duct carcino- 37:197, 1983 prognostic factors. Ann Surg 229:216, 1999 ma: a preliminary report. Surgery 107:521, 1990 60. Lai EC, Fan ST, Lo CM, et al: Anterior approach 79. Makuuchi M, Hasegawa H,Yamazaki S, et al: Four 99. Nagino M, Nimura Y, Kamiya J, et al: Right or left for difficult major right hepatectomy. World J Surg new hepatectomy procedures for resection of the trisegmental portal vein embolization before 20:314, 1996 right hepatic vein and preservation of the inferior hepatic trisegmentectomy for hilar bile duct carci- right hepatic vein. Surg Gynecol Obstet 164:68, noma. Surgery 117:677, 1995 61. Belghiti J, Guevera OA, Noun R, et al: Liver hang- ing maneuver: a safe approach to right hepatecto- 1987 100. Shimamura T, Nakajima Y, Une Y, et al: Efficacy my without liver mobilization. J Am Coll Surg 80. Makuuchi M, Mori T, Gunven P, et al: Safety of and safety of preoperative percutaneous transhep- 193:109, 2001 hemihepatic vascular occlusion during resection of atic portal embolization with absolute ethanol: a the liver. Surg Gynecol Obstet 164:155, 1987 clinical study. Surgery 121:135, 1997 62. Lau H, Man K, Fan ST, et al: Evaluation of preop- erative hepatic function in patients with hepatocel- 81. Nagasue N, Uchida M, Kubota H, et al: Cirrhotic 101. Lee KC, Kinoshita H, Hirohashi K, et al: lular carcinoma undergoing hepatectomy. Br J livers can tolerate 30 minutes ischaemia at normal Extension of surgical indications for hepatocellular Surg 84:1255, 1997 environmental temperature. Eur J Surg 161:181, carcinoma by portal vein embolization. World J 1995 Surg 17:109, 1993 63. Takenaka K, Kanematsu T, Fukuzawa K, et al: Can hepatic failure after surgery for hepatocellular 82. Wu CC, Hwang CR, Liu TJ, et al: Effects and lim- 102. Wakabayashi H, Okada S, Maeba T, et al: Effect of carcinoma in cirrhotic patients be prevented? itations of prolonged intermittent ischaemia for preoperative portal vein embolization on major World J Surg 14:123, 1990 hepatic resection of the cirrhotic liver. Br J Surg hepatectomy for advanced-stage hepatocellular 83:121, 1996 carcinomas in injured livers: a preliminary report. 64. Nagasue N,Yukaya H, Kohno H, et al: Morbidity Surg Today 27:403, 1997 and mortality after major hepatic resection in cir- 83. Kim YI, Kobayashi M, Aramaki M, et al: “Early- rhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. stage” cirrhotic liver can withstand 75 minutes of 103. Azoulay D, Castaing D, Krissat J, et al: HPB Surg 1:45, 1988 inflow occlusion during resection. Hepatogastro- Percutaneous portal vein embolization increases enterology 41:355, 1994 the feasibility and safety of major liver resection for 65. Paquet KJ, Koussouris P, Mercado MA, et al: hepatocellular carcinoma in injured liver. Ann Surg Limited hepatic resection for selected cirrhotic 84. Kim YI, Nakashima K, Tada I, et al: Prolonged 232:665, 2000 patients with hepatocellular or cholangiocellular normothermic ischaemia of human cirrhotic liver carcinoma: a prospective study. Br J Surg 78:459, during hepatectomy: a preliminary report. Br J 104. Tomas de la Vega JE, Donahue EJ, Doolas A, et al: 1991 Surg 80:1566, 1993 A ten year experience with hepatic resection. Surg Gynecol Obstet 159:223, 1984 66. Fan ST, Lai EC, Lo CM, et al: Hospital mortality 85. Smadja C, Kahwaji F, Berthoux L, et al: [Value of of major hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcino- total pedicle clamping in hepatic excision for hepa- 105. Bismuth H, Adam R, Navarro F: Re-resection for ma associated with cirrhosis. Arch Surg 130:198, tocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients.] Ann colorectal liver metastasis. Surg Oncol Clin North 1995 Chir 41:639, 1987 Am 5:353, 1996 67. Hasegawa H, Yamazaki S, Makuuchi M, et al: 86. Elias D, Desruennes E, Lasser P: Prolonged inter- 106. Adam R, Bismuth H, Castaing D, et al: Repeat [Hepatectomy for hepatocarcinoma on a cirrhotic mittent clamping of the portal triad during hepate- hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases. Ann liver: decision plans and principles of perioperative ctomy. Br J Surg 78:42, 1991 Surg 225:51, 1997 resuscitation. Experience with 204 cases.] J Chir 87. Yamanaka N, Furukawa K,Tanaka T, et al:Topical 107. Fong Y, Blumgart LH, Cohen A, et al: Repeat (Paris) 124:425, 1987 cooling-assisted hepatic segmentectomy for cir- hepatic resections for metastatic colorectal cancer. 68. Makuuchi M, Kosuge T, Takayama T, et al: rhotic liver with hepatocellular carcinoma. J Am Ann Surg 220:657, 1994 Surgery for small liver cancers. Semin Surg Oncol Coll Surg 184:290, 1997 108. Petrowsky H, Gonen M, Jarnagin W, et al: Second 9:298, 1993 88. Kim YI, Kobayashi M, Nakashima K, et al: In situ liver resections are safe and effective treatment for 69. Ercolani G, Grazi GL, Calliva R, et al: The lido- and surface liver cooling with prolonged inflow recurrent hepatic metastases from colorectal can- caine (MEGX) test as an index of hepatic func- occlusion during hepatectomy in patients with cer: a bi-institutional analysis. Ann Surg 235:863, tion: its clinical usefulness in liver surgery. Surgery chronic liver disease. Arch Surg 129:620, 1994 2002 127:464, 2000 89. Lin TY: A simplified technique for hepatic resec- 109. Pinson CW, Wright JK, Chapman WC, et al: 70. Bruix J, Castells A, Bosch J, et al: Surgical resection tion: the crush method. Ann Surg 180:285, 1974 Repeat hepatic surgery for colorectal cancer metas- of hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients: tases to the liver. Ann Surg 223:765, 1996 90. Smadja C, Berthoux L, Meakins JL, et al: Patterns prognostic value of preoperative portal pressure. of improvement in resection of hepatocellular car- 110. Tuttle TM, Curley SA, Roh MS: Repeat hepatic Gastroenterology 111:1018, 1996 cinoma in cirrhotic patients: results of a non resection as effective treatment for recurrent col- 71. Yin XY, Lu MD, Huang JF, et al: Significance of drainage policy. HPB Surg 1:141, 1989 orectal liver metastases. Ann Surg Oncol 4:125, portal hemodynamic investigation in prediction of 1997 91. Franco D, Smadja C, Meakins JL, et al: Improved hepatic functional reserve in patients with hepato- early results of elective hepatic resection for liver 111. Nordlinger B, Vaillant JC, Guiguet M, et al: cellular carcinoma undergoing operative treat- tumors: one hundred consecutive hepatectomies in Survival benefit of repeat liver resections for recur- ment. Hepatogastroenterology 48:1701, 2001 cirrhotic and noncirrhotic patients. Arch Surg rent colorectal metastases: 143 cases. J Clin Oncol 72. Franco D, Capussotti L, Smadja C, et al: 124:1033, 1989 12:1491, 1994 Resection of hepatocellular carcinomas: results in 92. Tsuge H, Mimura H, Orita K, et al: Evaluation of 112. Fernandez-Trigo V, Sharmsa F, Sugarbaker PH, et 72 European patients with cirrhosis. Gastroentero- preoperative and postoperative sodium and water al: Repeat liver resections from colorectal metasta- logy 98:733, 1990 loading in patients undergoing hepatectomy for sis. Surgery 117:296, 1995 73. Wu CC, Ho WL,Yeh DC, et al: Hepatic resection liver cirrhosis complicated by hepatocellular carci- 113. Yamamoto J, Kosuge T, Shimada K, et al: Repeat of hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic livers: is it noma. Hepatogastroenterology 38(suppl 1):56, liver resection for recurrent colorectal liver metas- unjustified in impaired liver function? Surgery 1991 tases. Am J Surg 178:275, 1999 120:34, 1996 93. Maeda T, Shimada M, Shirabe K, et al: Strategies 114. Muratore A, Polastri R, Bouzari H, et al: Repeat 74. Noun R, Jagot P, Farges O, et al: High preoperative for intractable ascites after hepatic resection: analy- hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases: a serum alanine transferase levels: effect on the risk sis of two cases. Br J Clin Pract 49:149, 1995 worthwhile operation? J Surg Oncol 76:127, 2001
    • © 2007 WebMD, Inc. All rights reserved. ACS Surgery: Principles and Practice 5 GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT AND ABDOMEN 23 Hepatic Resection — 21 115. Suzuki S, Sakaguchi T, Yokoi Y, et al: Impact of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatobi- scopy-assisted hepatectomy for a large tumor of repeat hepatectomy on recurrent colorectal liver liary Pancreat Surg 8:410, 2001 the liver. Hiroshima J Med Sci 47:163, 1998 metastases. Surgery 129:421, 2001 127. Elias D, Lasser P, Hoang JM, et al: Repeat hepate- 139. Huscher CGS, Lirici MM, Chiodini S: 116. Riesener K-P, Kasperk R, Winkeltau G, et al: ctomy for cancer. Br J Surg 80:1557, 1993 Laparoscopic liver resections. Semin Laparosc Repeat resection of recurrent hepatic metastases: 128. Hemming AW, Langer B: Repeat resection of Surg 5:204, 1998 improvement in prognosis? Eur J Surg 162:709, recurrent hepatic colorectal metastases. Br J Surg 140. Kaneko H,Takagi S, Shiba T: Laparoscopic partial 1996 81:1553, 1994 hepatectomy and left lateral segmentectomy: tech- 117. Kin T, Nakajima Y, Kanehiro H, et al: Repeat 129. Blumgart LH, Baer HU: Hilar and intrahepatic nique and results of a clinical series. Surgery hepatectomy for recurrent colorectal metastases. biliary-enteric anastomosis. Surgery of the Liver 120:468, 1996 World J Surg 22:1087, 1998 and Biliary Tract. Blumgart LH, Ed. Churchill 141. Rau HG, Meyer G, Cohnert TU, et al: Laparo- 118. Farges O, Regimbeau JM, Belghiti J: Aggressive Livingstone, London, 1994, p 1051 scopic liver resection with the water-jet dissector. management of recurrence following surgical 130. Polk W, Fong Y, Karpeh M, et al: A technique for Surg Endosc 9:1009, 1995 resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepato- the use of cryosurgery to assist hepatectomy. J Am 142. Yamanaka N, Tanaka T, Tanaka W, et al: Lap- gastroenterology 45(suppl 3):1275, 1998 Coll Surg 180:171, 1995 aroscopic partial hepatectomy. Hepatogastroen- 119. Nagasue N, Kohno H, Hayashi T, et al: Repeat 131. Chu QD, Vezeridis MP, Avradopoulos KA, et al: terology 45:29, 1998 hepatectomy for recurrent hepatocellular carcino- Repeat hepatic resection for recurrent colorectal 143. Fong Y, Blumgart LH: Useful stapling techniques ma. Br J Surg 83:127, 1996 cancer. World J Surg 21:292, 1997 in liver surgery. J Am Coll Surg 185:93, 1997 120. Neeleman N, Andersson R: Repeated liver resec- 132. The Southern Surgeons Club: A prospective 144. Jackman SV, Cadeddu JA, Chen RN, et al: Utility tion for recurrent liver cancer. Br J Surg 83:893, analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. of the harmonic scalpel for laparoscopic partial 1996 N Engl J Med 324:1073, 1991 nephrectomy. J Endourol 12:441, 1998 121. Lee PH, Lin WJ,Tsang YM, et al: Clinical manage- 133. Katkhouda N, Hurwitz M, Gugenheim J, et al: 145. Wolf JSJ, Moon TD, Nakada SY: Hand assisted ment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Laparoscopic management of benign solid and laparoscopic nephrectomy: comparison to stan- Surg 222:670, 1995 cycstic lesions of the liver. Ann Surg 229:460, dard laparoscopic nephrectomy. J Urol 160:22, 122. Hu RH, Lee PH, Yu SC, et al: Surgical resection 1999 1998 for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: prognosis 134. Jeng KS,Yang FS, Kao CR, et al: Management of 146. Klingler PJ, Hinder RA, Menke DM, et al: Hand- and analysis of risk factors. Surgery 120:23, 1996 symptomatic polycystic liver disease: laparoscopy assisted laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for 123. Shimada M, Takenaka K, Gion T, et al: Prognosis adjuvant with alcohol sclerotherapy. J Gastro- pancreatic cystadenoma. Surg Laparosc Endosc of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: a 10-year enterol Hepatol 10:359, 1995 8:180, 1998 surgical experience in Japan. Gastroenterology 135. Cuesta MA, Meijer S, Borgstein PJ, et al: 147. Nakada SY, Moon TD, Gist M, et al: Use of the 111:720, 1996 Laparoscopic ultrasonography for hepatobiliary pneumo sleeve as an adjunct in laparoscopic 124. Shuto T, Kinoshita H, Hirohashi K, et al: and pancreatic malignancy. Br J Surg 80:1571, nephrectomy. Urology 49:612, 1997 Indications for, and effectiveness of, a second 1993 148. Are C, Fong Y, Geller DA: Laparoscopic liver hepatic resection for recurrent hepatocellular car- 136. Ravikumar TS: Laparoscopic staging and intraop- resections. Adv Surg 39:57, 2005 cinoma. Hepatogastroenterology 43:932, 1996 erative ultrasonography for liver tumor manage- 125. Shimada M, Takenaka K, Taguchi K, et al: ment. Surg Oncol Clin North Am 5:271, 1996 Prognostic factors after repeat hepatectomy for 137. Grobmyer SR, Fong Y, D’Angelica M, et al: recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg Diagnostic laparoscopy prior to planned hepatic Acknowledgment 227:80, 1998 resection for colorectal metastases. Arch Surg 126. Sugimachi K, Maehara S, Tanaka S, et al: Repeat 139:1326, 2004 Figures 1, 3 through 15, 18, 19 Tom Moore. hepatectomy is the most useful treatment for 138. Asahara T, Dohi K, Nakahara H, et al: Laparo- Figure 16 Thom Graves, CMI.