• Like
  • Save
Acs0108 Preparation Of The Operating Room
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

Acs0108 Preparation Of The Operating Room



  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
  • Ican you send me the paper?

    Filomena Martins
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
  • pleas allow downloading, it is and important paper
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
No Downloads


Total Views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds



Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

    No notes for slide


  • 1. © 2008 BC Decker Inc ACS Surgery: Principles and Practice 1 BASIC SURGICAL AND PERIOPERATIVE CONSIDERATIONS 8 PREPARATION OF THE OPERATING ROOM — 1 8 PREPARATION OF THE OPERATING ROOM T. Forcht Dagi, MD, MPH, FACS, FCCM, and William Schecter, MD, FACS, FCCM This chapter concentrates on the general principles of operat- area of the cubital tunnel must be well padded to avoid injury ing room (OR) design and operation. The OR is designed to the ulnar nerve. The surgeon generally stands on the to permit sterile, safe, painless, and effective surgical inter- patient’s right and the assistant on the left. For pelvic proce- vention to improve the lives of patients. Advances in science dures, the right-handed surgeon may elect to stand on the and technology have significantly increased the complexity patient’s left. The scrub nurse stands next to the instrument of the OR environment. With further advances, the OR will tray placed on a Mayo stand over the patient’s legs. The back continue to evolve. table containing additional instruments is placed at the foot The basic aspects of OR design have not changed since the of the bed (Figure 1A). late 19th century, except for changes necessitated by the Two sets of ceiling lights are positioned over the field. In introduction of complex surgical imaging and monitoring many cases, a head light worn by the surgeon provides addi- equipment. Effective integration of this equipment into the tional focused illumination. For pelvic procedures, access to confined OR space is essential. This chapter focuses on the perineum is either helpful or essential. The patient should general principles of planning and operation rather than the be placed in the Lloyd-Davies position. The patient’s legs are specific requirements of individual surgical specialties. placed in well-padded leg holders attached to the side of the Efficient operation of the OR depends on many individu- OR table. The distal portion of the table is lowered to form als, some seldom seen, whose skills are essential. They are a right angle with the proximal table. The patient is moved rarely acknowledged and easily overlooked. Continuous, distally so that the sacrum is positioned adjacent to the table respectful communication is essential for safe and successful brake. Care is taken to protect the airway, arms, and legs outcomes. during repositioning. A foam pad is placed between the sacrum and the OR table. The leg holders are positioned to avoid abduction of the hips. Care is taken to ensure padding General Principles of OR Design and Construction in the area of the peroneal nerves, feet, and calves. Peroneal physical layout nerve palsy and compartment syndrome attributable to prolonged pressure are risks. Morbid obesity is a relative The basic physical design of the OR is determined first by contraindication to the Lloyd-Davies position because of the requirements for patient positioning, illumination, anesthesia, risk of a traction injury to the sciatic nerve. and instrumentation and second by considerations of storage, patient and staff movement, and communication. Basic OR Thoracotomy design has not changed substantially over the past century. The patient is placed in the full lateral position. A bean bag More recently, however, advances in minimally invasive is a useful device to hold the patient in position. It holds its surgery, intraoperative imaging, patient monitoring, surgical shape when a suction device is applied. An axillary roll, either navigation, surgical robotics, and data connectivity have a rolled sheet or an IV bag, is placed to protect the brachial stimulated surgeons and architects to rethink the layout of the plexus. Alternatively, a large pillow may be placed under the OR. axilla and chest. Pillows are useful for supporting the legs. The bottom leg should be slightly flexed and the top leg Positioning the Patient extended. The position should be secured by the application The anesthesia machine is positioned at the head of the of 2-inch tape to the area of the iliac crest. Care must be table so that the anesthesiologist has an unimpeded view of taken to protect the skin from the tape to avoid blister the machine, monitors, airway, and intravenous (IV) fluids. formation. The arms are extended in front of the patient. The suction tubing and electrocautery cords are usually They may rest on an arm board protected by pillows or brought off the field toward the feet. However, they may be sheets. Alternatively, the top arm may be supported by a brought off the side or head of the patient in selected cases well-placed “airplane splint.” As in laparotomy, the surgeon depending on equipment location and room orientation. and assistant stand on either side of the patient and the scrub nurse stands toward the feet. Two lights are positioned over Laparotomy the patient. The use of a head light by the operating surgeon The patient is positioned supine on the operating table. is routine in many situations (Figure 1B). The arms may be tucked in at the patient’s sides or placed on well-padded arm boards at 90° angles to the table. Care must Thyroidectomy and Parathyroidectomy be taken to avoid hyperextending the arms to avoid injury to Thyroidectomy and parathyroidectomy are the most the brachial plexus. If the arms are tucked in at the side, the common neck procedures performed by general surgeons. DOI 10.2310/7800.S01C08 10/08
  • 2. © 2008 BC Decker Inc ACS Surgery: Principles and Practice 1 BASIC SURGICAL AND PERIOPERATIVE CONSIDERATIONS 8 PREPARATION OF THE OPERATING ROOM — 2 a b c Figure 1 Patient positioning: (a) laparotomy, (b) thoracotomy, and (c) thyroidectomy. Preoperative evaluation should include assessment of cervical such as the Occupational Safety and Health Administration spine mobility. The patient is positioned supine on the OR (OSHA) and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.2–5 table. After endotracheal intubation, a sheet roll is placed Numerous articles and books discuss the various aspects posterior to the scapula. The head is extended and placed on of OR design.6–10 The American Institute of Architects has a foam “donut” pad, avoiding excess tension on the cervical published a comprehensive set of guidelines for health care spine. Extension of the head should be avoided in the pres- facility design that includes a detailed discussion of OR ence of limited cervical spine mobility. The head of the table design.11 Along with such guidelines and recommendations is elevated to reduce venous pressure. Two ceiling lights are obtained from specialty surgical, anesthesiology, biomedical positioned over the neck. Most surgeons use a head light to engineering and nursing associations, the design of new ORs provide additional focused illumination. The scrub nurse must consider local needs and perspectives. The design of a stands next to the Mayo stand holding the instrument tray new OR should be a collaborative effort reflecting the efforts over the patient’s feet (Figure 1C). of clinical services, support services, and administration. A similar position is employed for neck explorations. For unilateral neck exploration, the patient‘s head is turned away design process and considerations from the side of the planned incision. Designs must accommodate work flow and patient move- ment. Important considerations include the mix of inpatient design standards and outpatient surgery, the design of the hospital or institu- Standards for new construction and major remodeling of tion (including proximity to clinical services such as radiology ORs in the United States generally fall under the jurisdiction and pathology), the surgical specialties to be served, accessi- of state and local agencies. These agencies, in turn, often bility to perioperative care units, accessibility of supplies, incorporate guidelines published by the Department of Health and removal of waste materials. The need for intraoperative and Human Services,1 as well as other groups and agencies, fluoroscopy and sectional imaging, shielding, ceiling-mounted 10/08
  • 3. © 2008 BC Decker Inc ACS Surgery: Principles and Practice 1 BASIC SURGICAL AND PERIOPERATIVE CONSIDERATIONS 8 PREPARATION OF THE OPERATING ROOM — 3 microscopes, and surgical robotics and similar advanced including nuclear, biological, chemical, and radiation technologies will be influential. It is important to allow for incidents, are not addressed in this chapter. flexibility and to anticipate the introduction of new technologies over the life of the design. Time motion studies, physical requirements simulations, and models may prove helpful and contribute to The fundamental model for OR design is a quadrangular OR efficiency long term. Balancing flexibility and cost is a room with minimum dimensions of 20 × 20 ft or 7 × 7 m. continuing challenge.12 More often, the dimensions are closer to 30 × 30 ft or The geography and physical relationship of clean and less 10 × 10 m, so as to accommodate more specialized cardiac, clean areas in the operating suite determine many other neurosurgical, minimally invasive, orthopedic, and multiteam aspects of the OR suite. There are two designs in common procedures. Smaller rooms are generally adequate for minor use. The first involves one or more clean hubs. The ORs are surgery and for procedures such as cystoscopy and eye situated centrifugally in spokelike fashion. Clean and sterile surgery. equipment and supplies that must be on hand for immediate Ceiling height should be at least 10 ft or 3.5 m to allow use are stored in the hub. A peripheral corridor typically ceiling mounting of operating lights, microscopes, robots, affords access to perioperative care units, instrument and navigational systems, and other equipment. An additional 1 anesthesia workrooms, clean storage, staff lounges, and other to 2 ft or 0.5 to 0.75 m of ceiling height may be advisable if facilities. Entry and egress from the suite and access to the x-ray or other boom equipment is to be permanently mounted. OR front desk and reception area also involve the peripheral In ORs designed to accept intraoperative sectional imaging corridor. In the simplest embodiment, four ORs surround a devices (computed tomography [CT] and magnetic reso- hub. The number can be greater or smaller. Controlled nance imaging [MRI]), the floors may be elevated to accom- movement through the hub or hubs drives this design. modate cabling and wiring for power and data connections. The second model uses corridors rather than hubs and When floors are elevated, the overall height of the OR has to spokes. Supply rooms are typically situated between adjacent be increased. rooms. A less common variation builds a separate supply Some institutions design or redesign the entire OR suite with the potential to accommodate oversized equipment as room next to each individual OR. Older ORs were designed well as conduits and cables in both the ceiling and floor. with one door only. Current design favors two, one connect- Others prefer to customize individual rooms. ing to the more sterile area and the other to the less sterile OR and perioperative facilities may be specially constructed area. to withstand environmental hazards such as earthquakes, The OR must balance the restrictions on access needed for tornadoes, and floods or hardened to contend with hostile safety and efficiency with freedom of movement for personnel military or terrorist attack. Standards and specifications and patients. This balance is equally important in emergency for this type of construction fall outside the scope of this situations and during complex and lengthy operations. chapter. Should ORs be dedicated to specific surgical specialties? There are practical and logistical advantages to dedicated computerization, communication, and data rooms, especially in cardiac surgery, neurosurgery, trauma, exchange: voice, video, and data and ophthalmology. However, specialty-specific rooms can Computers, telephones, imaging, and other systems for limit scheduling flexibility. Although it is hard to imagine data capture, analysis, and exchange should be integrated justifying a room so narrowly designed that it absolutely into the OR design. The ubiquitous deployment of radiology cannot be used for more than one specialty, dedicated rooms Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) and might be emphasized in one institution and versatility in the potential of digital pathology to improve surgical pathol- another. Each approach has its advocates. Design and ogy services mandate the installation of high-speed broad- equipment should ultimately reflect expected and projected band connections. Two-way audio with teleconferencing case mix. capabilities enables teleconsultation and teaching from and Finally, the design of the OR suite must facilitate cleaning, in the OR. disinfection and efficient turnover, and the installation and Effective communication systems capable of connecting maintenance of installed equipment. the OR team, the OR front desk, and the rest of the hospital storage must be accessible. Emergency communication channels must be tested at regular intervals. Most importantly, systems The OR design must provide adequate storage space for for communication, data exchange, and data storage retrieval urgently required supplies. Storage in hallways and inside the must be available, preferably off-site. Off-site data storage OR can create obstructions and hazards. backup is essential for hospitals likely to respond to mass casualty events or subject to environmental hazards. critical devices and emergency equipment Critical devices, as well as emergency supplies and instru- assimilating new technologies ments, must be prepared and positioned for immediate Advances in the medical device and information technol- deployment. Accessories should be stored next to the ogy (IT) sectors stimulate a constant stream of innovation. instruments that need them. Nevertheless, the undisciplined introduction of new technol- Some hospitals have mass casualty response as part of their ogies can be distracting, contraproductive, and expensive. mission. These institutions will have special requirements for ORs should be focused on measurable benefit and integration versatility, equipment, storage, and supplies. The specific rather than novelty. The introduction of new technologies design requirements for response to mass casualty events, should reduce complexity and tangibly increase therapeutic 10/08
  • 4. © 2008 BC Decker Inc ACS Surgery: Principles and Practice 1 BASIC SURGICAL AND PERIOPERATIVE CONSIDERATIONS 8 PREPARATION OF THE OPERATING ROOM — 4 benefits and options for patients in ways that have been The risks associated with malpositioning deserve further recognized for more than a decade.13 comment. Any bony prominence is subject to injury from The OR of the future will be characterized by increasing excessive pressure. The fragile skin of infants and older dependence on technology. Although it is essential to track patients may be injured by dragging rather than lifting into new technologies, they should be assessed and introduced position. The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) in a disciplined manner. Technology acquisition should be practice advisory on the prevention of perioperative periph- strategic. A full discussion of technology assessment in eral neuropathies recommends that when practical, patients surgery is outside the purview of this chapter, but the central should be placed in the intended position before induction of principles are straightforward. First, the magnitude of unmet anesthesia to test for comfort.25 Uncomfortable positions needs should be detailed and quantified. Second, the should be modified. This is especially important with older cost-effectiveness of a new technology should be assessed. patients or patients with degenerative spine and joint disease Next, competitive solutions, including substitutes for the or skeletal instability. candidate technology acquisition, should be considered. Two major preventable consequences of malpositioning Last, the marginal benefits and burdens of new technology are neuropathy or plexopathy and skin burns or ulceration. introduction should be quantified. Approximately 80% of surgical procedures are performed with patients in the supine position. Ulnar neuropathy and brachial plexopathy are the two most common complications Patient Safety, OR Efficiency, and Quality in this position and constitute 28% and 20% of claims, Improvement respectively, in recent closed claims studies.26–31 Padding of The OR is a high-stress environment with inherent risk in the precondylar groove of the humerus and tucking of the arms or, at the least, restriction of abduction to less than 90° which members of multiple disciplines temporarily congre- help prevent this problem.25 gate to treat surgical patients. The potential for error and The lithotomy position is used in approximately 9% of inefficiency is great. Conversion of this group of individuals cases and is the next most commonly used position.27,29 from disciplines with differing professional cultures and skill Damage to the obturator, sciatic, lateral femoral cutaneous, sets into a smoothly functioning surgical team is the key and peroneal nerves has been observed. These injuries to increasing patient safety and efficiency.14 Surgical team account for 5% of claims for nerve damage in the Closed training is an effective method to achieve a “team culture” Claims Data Base. They represent a small but not insignifi- resulting in improved communication and decreased risk cant risk.26 Other patient positions have also been associated of error.15 The use of perioperative care protocols reduces with malpositioning injuries. failures of communication.16 The Joint Commission Universal Protocol became effective occupational injury to the health care team on July 1, 2004. The key principles of the Universal Protocol Professionals engaged in perioperative and surgical care are (1) the preoperative verification process, (2) marking the are exposed to biologic, ergonomic, chemical, physical, and correct surgical site, (3) taking a “time-out” prior to surgery, psychosocial occupational risks. and (4) adapting the requirements to non-OR settings. The elements of the time-out concept are evolving and may Biologic Risks include introduction of team members; patient identification; These risks include (1) parenteral and mucocutaneous review of the patient’s history, risk factors, medications, and exposure to pathogens, (2) respiratory tract exposure to allergies; availability of appropriate images and equipment; pathogens, (3) exposure to the biologic components of surgi- goals of surgery; and potential intra- and postoperative cal smoke, and (4) exposure to allergens in latex gloves.32 problems. The role of a discussion of planned postoperative Strategies to reduce mucocutaneous exposure to pathogens care at the completion of the surgical procedure prior to the include double-gloving, blunt suture needles, a neutral zone emergence from anesthesia is not clear at the present time.17 for passage of sharps, and engineered sharps injury preven- The use of a protocol during the hand-over of surgical tion devices.33 The use of N-95 respirator masks reduces the patients to intensive care results in improved care.18 Extend- risk of occupational exposure to aerosolized Mycobacterium tuberculosis and particulate matter greater than 1 micron in ing the team concept to postanesthesia care has resulted in size.34 Health care workers with allergies to latex should avoid improved quality of care as measured by intubation times and contact with latex gloves and tubing. hospital stay following cardiac surgery.19 The use of specialty teams during surgery to improve communication and effi- Ergonomic Risks ciency is logical, but at present, there is a paucity of studies Health problems related to ergonomics, especially back documenting its efficacy. Continuous monitoring is essential pain, are common. These problems are associated with to maintain quality.20 awkward posture at the operating table, standing for long Patient safety21 begins with protection of patients from periods of time, and back injury incurred by lifting patients. misidentification, physical and chemical hazards, medication The OR table, monitors, imaging screens, and equipment error, operative error, and improper positioning.22 The sur- should be positioned so that the OR team’s posture and posi- geon is responsible for positioning the patient and preventing tion are as comfortable as possible within the limits of patient positioning injury.23 The OR team is responsible for procur- safety. Lifting injury can be minimized by using proper patient ing and maintaining the equipment for proper positioning transfer techniques and obtaining additional assistance when and monitoring the patient intraoperatively. The entire team moving patients in the OR. Repetitive motion injury is a less is responsible for preventing falls.24 common but not insignificant risk.32 10/08
  • 5. © 2008 BC Decker Inc ACS Surgery: Principles and Practice 1 BASIC SURGICAL AND PERIOPERATIVE CONSIDERATIONS 8 PREPARATION OF THE OPERATING ROOM — 5 Chemical Risks Another study considered risks to the fetus of the pregnant Health care workers are exposed to numerous potentially surgeon. This risk is of particular importance early in gesta- hazardous chemicals in the OR, including anesthetic gases, tion, before the pregnancy is recognized. In this study, the disinfecting and sterilizing chemicals, specimen preservatives, calculated accumulative dose received intraoperatively and chemotherapeutic drugs.32 Scavenger systems are exceeded the threshold dose for the induction of radiation deployed broadly and have significantly reduced exposure to injury by at least two orders of magnitude. Approximately anesthetic gases.35 Protective gowns and gloves prevent 2100 hours of fluoroscopy are required to reach this exposure to other chemicals in the OR. threshold. Childhood cancer is another documented risk of low-dose Physical Risks fetal radiation exposure. The extent of this risk remains Physical risks to patients and the OR team include controversial. Nevertheless, the ICRP has recommended a fire, electrocution, radiation exposure, and laser energy maximum dose of 2 mSv and preferably less than 1 mSv exposure.32 during the declared pregnancy. With the protection afforded by a 0.5 mm lead-equivalent apron, however, the calculated Fire The first principle of fire prevention is control of expected cumulative fetal dose is less than 0.37 mSv, a the three elements of the fire triangle: oxygen, fuel, and an figure that extrapolates to a significantly lower dose, and ignition source.36 Air/oxygen mixtures should be adjusted to consequently a lower risk, than that derived from natural reduce the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) to the lowest background radiation. level consistent with patient safety and satisfactory hemoglo- Surgeons exposed to intraoperative ionizing radiation may bin oxygen saturation.36 Light, heat, and electrical sources of avail themselves of several protective strategies. A 1 mm lead- ignition should be carefully monitored and kept away from equivalent whole-body shield or apron provides 99% protec- paper drapes. The use of alcohol-based skin preparation tion. A 0.5 mm lead-equivalent free-standing shield reduces solutions should be minimized if possible.37 The use of the exposure by 90%. A neck (thyroid) shield with 0.25 mm lead electrocautery or laser energy in the airway or in the unpre- equivalence reduces exposure by 60%. Radiation-protective pared intestinal lumen in the presence of high concentrations gloves reduce dosage to the hand by up to 40%.37,41 of oxygen increases the risk of fire. Maintaining distance is also protective. Radiation attenu- ates with the square of the distance. For any given distance Radiation exposure Exposure to ionizing radiation is from the source of radiation, if the intensity of the radiation inherently dangerous. For this reason, the extent of exposure at a distance of d = 1, the intensity at any other distance is must be minimized through the use of all protective means equal to 1/d2. Intensity diminishes as a function of the square available. Although the hazards of radiation were witnessed of distance. early in the 20th century, how exposure was to be calculated The effects of distance are manifested quickly. Staff and what acute and cumulative doses were dangerous could exposure at 1 m distance from a C arm is 1/1000th that of not be determined until later. In 1928, the International the patient, even without shielding. In a model of femoral Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) was formed fracture, moving from the treated hip side of a patient to the to study and set standards for radiation protection. The contralateral side reduces exposure by a factor of 57 for National Council on Radiation Protection (NCRP) was estab- the surgeon, 13 for the nurse, and 21 for the anesthetist. If lished in the United States to help set US policy on radiation the surgeon remains ipsilateral to the operative site but moves protection.37 Until recently, guidelines for radiation exposure as little as 0.5 m away (cephalad) from the beam, the dose is have been based on annual exposure limits (maximal permis- sible yearly dose). The historical means of dosimetry under- reduced by a factor of 13, and at 1.5 m away, by a factor of estimated exposure because of technical limitations and 26. At 2 m from the source of radiation, the scattered radia- sampling error. For this reason, guidelines now focus on life- tion received by staff is very small.42 Nevertheless, because of time accumulated exposure as a more useful surrogate for the the problem of accumulated lifetime exposure, no degree of real risks in those with chronic or prolonged exposure. exposure is ever deemed truly innocuous. Concessions to higher annual dose limits were made Image-guided surgery now plays a major role in many sur- for workers allowed higher radiation exposure because of gical disciplines, including orthopedics, vascular surgery, and occupational responsibilities. These were called “classified” urology. The cumulative radiation exposure associated with workers, and they were subjected to strict monitoring and image guidance may be hazardous. The use of radionuclides regular examination. Radiologists have been considered for identification of sentinel nodes and intraoperative brachy- classified workers, but not surgeons. Classified workers were therapy for the treatment of certain malignancies also creates permitted more than three times the annual dose than the potential for radiation exposure.43 nonclassified.38 Exposure to radiation comes from background radioactiv- Empirical data suggest that the typical spinal surgeon per- ity and from radiation sources in the workplace. The ICRP forming fluoroscopically guided procedures may receive as has established recommended yearly limits of radiation expo- much as 1.3-fold the annual whole-body radiation dose allow- sure for these two categories [see Table 1].44 Recent studies of able for radiologists, although the level of thyroid exposure is OR staff indicate that radiation exposure during surgical less than 10% of the applicable limit specified by the NCRP.39 procedures employing radiation imaging techniques are well A study of endovascular surgeons, in contrast, showed that within the ICRP limits.45–47 their radiation exposure fell well within these limits, as well All OR personnel should wear radiation safety badges to as the limits established by the ICRP.40 allow monitoring of radiation exposure on a monthly basis. 10/08
  • 6. © 2008 BC Decker Inc ACS Surgery: Principles and Practice 1 BASIC SURGICAL AND PERIOPERATIVE CONSIDERATIONS 8 PREPARATION OF THE OPERATING ROOM — 6 Table 1 ICRP-Recommended Radiation Dose Limits44 OR Design Advances in videoendoscopic surgery and endoluminal Dose Limit vascular surgery since 1990 have led to the introduction of Occupational Public many complex electronic devices into an OR environment Effective dose 20 mSv/yr averaged over 1 mSv/yr designed at the end of the 19th century. The promise of defined periods of 5 yr widespread robotics use in the future may further complicate Annual equivalent dose in equipment and use of space within the OR. At the same time, Lens of the eye 150 mSv 15 mSv the importance of IT in both the performance of surgery Skin 500 mSv 50 mSv and its documentation will only increase. These changes Hands and feet 500 mSv — will inevitably require design adaptations in the OR to ICRP = International Commission on Radiological Protection; mSv = ensure adequate power and communication infrastructure millisievert. support.56 The ideal OR of the future will have videoendoscopic monitors, light sources, and CO2 insufflators mounted on OR personnel should wear protective lead aprons (0.25– booms that can be introduced or withdrawn from patient care 0.5 mm in thickness) with thyroid shields during procedures without moving heavy carts or reconnecting cables and power in which fluoroscopy is used. Personnel frequently exposed to sources. ORs with ceiling- or floor-mounted fluoroscopy radiation should wear lead-containing lenses for eye protec- permit efficient use of catheter-based endoluminal and intra- tion. A mobile shield is useful for additional protection during vascular techniques during surgical care. Boom-mounted cine runs. equipment can be easily moved, permitting more rapid room OR personnel should stand as far away from the x-ray turnover between cases. beam as possible to limit exposure. Even a distance of several Designing rooms with the flexibility for multidisciplinary feet can significantly reduce exposure. Equipment emitting use may be more cost effective for many hospitals. In the long ionizing radiation should be maintained and monitored to run, however, team training for subspecialty fields employing ensure proper function.48 The use of pulsed fluoroscopy and complex imaging equipment and catheter-based therapy may prove to be a more important factor for patient safety and effective collimation of images will help minimize the dose efficiency than any particular OR design.57 This is a key of radiation. Excessive and unnecessary imaging should be element in program development. Hospital administration eliminated. must also commit the capital necessary to complete such a project before proceeding with program development. Laser exposure Surgical lasers are class 4 lasers that Balancing OR efficiency, new technology, and cost is a have the potential to irreparably damage the eye and burn the continuous challenge. skin. A class 4 laser beam is 1 billion times brighter than a 100 W light bulb.49 All OR personnel must wear protective glasses with lenses designed specifically for the wavelength of Environmental Issues in the OR the specific laser being used. Glasses should be inspected temperature and humidity prior to use to ensure that there are no scratches on the lens that could render the wearer vulnerable to an eye injury. The In Europe and North America, the OR is typically main- windows of the room should be shielded to protect individu- tained at 18° to 26°C (64.4° to 78.8°F). A higher tempera- als passing by. The number of personnel in a laser therapy ture is necessary during operations on infants and burn room should be kept to a minimum. patients to conserve body heat. Fully gowned surgeons prefer the lower temperature of 18°C (64.4°F), but anesthesiologists Noise and light exposure General environmental prefer 21.5°C (70.7°F).58 The optimum ambient temperature in the OR reflects a compromise between the comfort of hazards include high levels of noise and intense levels of gowned and ungowned staff. The ubiquitous deployment of light.50–52 These hazards are of equal significance to patients patient warming devices has all but eliminated the problem and to staff. One early study has indicated that elevated noise of hypothermia in the adult during elective surgery. levels during orthopedic procedures (above the recommended Recent publications have indicated neurologic benefits limits of 110 dBA) were associated with significant hearing from controlled hypothermia in the region of 34°C (93.2°F) loss in orthopedic surgeons.51 Noise, excessive chatter, in certain cases of asystole, cardiopulmonary arrest, and and even music can also pose a hazard to the patient by resuscitation.59–61 The equipment required for therapeutic distracting the attention of OR personnel. hypothermia can be cumbersome. Humidity in the OR is generally maintained between 50 Psychosocial risks Perhaps the most underappreciated and 60%. Humidity greater than 60% may cause condensa- risks to the perioperative professional are psychosocial. Long tion on cool surfaces. Humidity less than 50% may not hours and nighttime emergencies lead to fatigue. The high suppress static electricity. Static electricity can adversely level of responsibility, the consequences of error, and the affect the function of modern computers and smart medical level of oversight have led to high levels of stress and burn- devices. out.53 Unfortunately, violence in the health care workplace, both verbal and physical, is common.54 Stress reduction can lighting be achieved by team training.15 Hospitals should have zero ORs are no longer provided with skylights and northern tolerance for workplace violence.55 exposure to maximize the benefit of natural illumination. 10/08
  • 7. © 2008 BC Decker Inc ACS Surgery: Principles and Practice 1 BASIC SURGICAL AND PERIOPERATIVE CONSIDERATIONS 8 PREPARATION OF THE OPERATING ROOM — 7 Nevertheless, effective lighting remains an important factor in interface as a function of resistance to the flow of current. reducing stress by providing clear views of the operative field, The vaporization of intracellular water content leads to disin- the anesthesia and monitoring systems, and the nursing tegration of the cell. Heat leads to the coagulation of proteins area. and hemostasis. Cellular debris is aerosolized. The smoke The standards for OR illumination were outlined by Dr. that is generated is comparable to that accompanying laser William Beck and the Illuminating Engineering Society.62,63 A use. The smoke and its particulate content may be carcino- general illumination brightness of up to 200 footcandles (ft-c) genic, allergenic, inflammatory, and infectious. There is little is desirable in new construction. The lighting sources should difference between laser plume and electrosurgical smoke.65 be free of glare and nonreflective.64 The electrosurgical instrument requires close supervision.66 The amount of light required during an operation varies It is very easy to become complacent in its use. The unit with the surgeon and the operative site. Quantities of light generates an electrical arc. In the past, these have been asso- can be measured as a function of the amount beamed on a ciated with explosions. This risk has been lessened because subject (incident light) or the amount reflected (reflected explosive anesthetic agents are no longer used. Nevertheless, light). In one study, general surgeons operating on the explosion of hydrogen and methane gases in the large bowel common bile duct found 300 ft-c sufficient because the remains a threat, especially when surgery must be performed reflectance of this tissue area is 15%. The corresponding inci- on an unprepared bowel.67 Because the unit and its arc dent light level would be 2,000 ft-c.21 Surgeons performing generate a broad and unfiltered band of radiofrequencies, coronary bypass operations require an incident level of electrosurgical units may interfere with monitoring devices, 3,500 ft-c.21 Whether changes in the color of light can improve most notably the electrocardiographic (ECG) monitor. discrimination of different tissues is unknown. Interference with cardiac pacemaker activity may occur.68 The powerful lights installed for surgery generate heat Skin burns are the most frequently reported complication through the projection of infrared energy. This is an in use. Rarely are they fatal, but they are painful and may inefficient but inevitable byproduct of most forms of light require skin grafts, raising the possibility of litigation. The appropriate for the OR. Much of the infrared energy can burn site can be at the dispersive electrode, ECG monitoring be eliminated by filtration or by heat-diverting dichroic leads, esophageal or rectal temperature probes, or areas of reflectors. body contact with grounded objects. The dispersive electrode There are several types of overhead lighting designs. For should be firmly attached to a broad area of dry, hairless skin, preferably over a large muscle mass.67,68 small ORs, a single large overhead light with one or two small Alcohol-based hair care products should be avoided during satellites may suffice. Larger ORs may benefit more from head and neck surgery because the risk of combustion during several large lights with broader orbits. The larger the OR, the use of electrocautery. the more important the installation of multiple light sources Preparation of the OR should include verification of the that can concentrate light in different areas of the operating proper function and grounding of the unit and proper place- field. This consideration is of particular importance where ment of the dispersive electrode. Smoke evacuators are highly large body areas are exposed or where multiple sites are recommended. The National Institute for Occupational accessed simultaneously. Safety and Health (NIOSH) recommends a system that can The illumination provided by overhead lighting can be pull 50 cubic feet per minute with a capture velocity of 100 usefully amplified and improved with headlights. Headlights to 150 feet per minute at the inlet nozzle and positioned have substituted for mobile lights in many OR suites, but within 2 inches of the surgical site.69 Filters should be installed both have their place. When headlights are used, spare bulbs to capture the contents of the smoke. Used filters are deemed must be kept on hand and cabling examined for damage and biohazardous. Routine, unfiltered suction is not adequate for properly stored after each use. this purpose.69 During microsurgical and laparoscopic procedures, the surgical field is illuminated primarily by dint of the instru- lasers and laser safety ments used for visualization. The importance of ambient Lasers generate focused energy. They have been implicated lighting for the remainder of the OR must not be forgotten. in skin burns, retinal injuries, endotracheal tube fires, All ORs should be equipped with battery-powered backup pneumothorax, and damage to viscera and the vasculature.70 illumination and flashlights for emergency use. Both patients and staff have suffered injuries. or equipment The laser-safe OR requires specific modifications. The OR should not have windows. Walls, ceilings, and equipment The modern OR is replete with medical devices designed should be nonreflective. Equipment used in the operative to facilitate the work of the surgical team and to support, field should be nonreflective and nonflammable. A sign position, and protect the patient [see Table 2]. The equipment warning personnel that a laser is in use should be posted. in the OR must be chosen and maintained with three Anesthetic technique should also take the use of lasers into concerns in mind: patient safety, surgical efficiency, and consideration. When lasers are used in the vicinity of the face, reduction of occupational hazards. airway, or chest cavity, the concentration of O2 and N2O in the inhaled gases should be reduced to decrease the possibil- electrosurgical devices ity of fire. Personnel should wear appropriate eye protection. The common electrosurgical device is a 500 W radiofre- A smoke evacuator will improve visualization, reduce objec- quency generator used to cut and coagulate tissue. A current tionable odor, and decrease the potential for papillomavirus passes from the cutting or coagulating surgical instrument infection or ingestion of toxic fumes from the laser smoke to a dispersion electrode. Heat is generated at the tissue plume.65,71–74 10/08
  • 8. © 2008 BC Decker Inc ACS Surgery: Principles and Practice 1 BASIC SURGICAL AND PERIOPERATIVE CONSIDERATIONS 8 PREPARATION OF THE OPERATING ROOM — 8 Table 2 Devices Used in the Operating Room Function Device Support of patient Anesthesia delivery devices Ventilator Physiologic monitoring devices Warming devices IV fluid warmers and infusers Support of surgeon Sources of mechanical, electrical, and internal power, including power tools and electrocautery, as well as laser and ultrasound instruments Mechanical retractors Lights mounted in various locations Suction devices and smoke evacuators Electromechanical and computerized assistive devices, such as robotic assistants Visualization equipment, including microscopes, endoscopic video cameras, and display devices such as video monitors, projection equipment, and head-mounted displays Data, sound, and video storage and transmission equipment Diagnostic imaging devices (e.g., for fluoroscopy, ultrasonography, MRI, and CT) Support of OR team Surgical instruments, usually packaged in case carts before each operation but occasionally stored in nearby fixed or mobile modules Tables for display of primary and secondary surgical instruments Containers for disposal of single-use equipment, gowns, drapes, etc. Workplace for charting and record keeping Communication equipment CT = computed tomography; IV = intravenous; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; OR = operating room. powered devices Improperly balanced instruments have been known to twist The surgical table must be properly positioned and adjusted or fall, causing injury to patients and staff. to ensure the safety of the patient and the efficient work of Many commercial microscope drapes are available. Where the surgical team. Manually adjustable tables are simple, but the laser is mounted to the microscope, it is essential to those with electrical controls are easier to manage. OR table confirm that the drape is out of the line of fire to avoid attachments, such as the arm boards and leg stirrups used to contamination, melting, or kindling. position patients, must be properly maintained and secured intraoperative imaging and navigation to prevent injuries to patients or staff. During transfer to and from the OR table, care must be taken to ensure that the The advent of less invasive surgery requires accurate intra- patient is not injured and that life support, monitoring, and operative confirmation of surgical anatomy through the use intravenous (IV) systems remain connected. Proper transfer of x-ray, CT, MRI, and ultrasonography. These modalities technique, adequate staff, and the use of assistive devices are increasingly accompanied by and aligned with the use of such as rollers will help prevent musculoskeletal injuries to surgical navigation systems. Intraoperative ultrasonography the OR staff during this maneuver. Patients with fragile skin, requires a high-quality portable ultrasound unit and special- including infants, small children, the ill, and the elderly, ized probes. Depending on the procedure and the training of should be lifted and not dragged into position. the surgeon, the presence of a radiologist and an ultrasound Other powered surgical instruments common in the OR technician may be requested. include those used to obtain skin grafts, open the sternum The ultrasound unit should be positioned near the patient, and the cranium, and perform orthopedic procedures. and the surgical team must be able to view the image Powered saws and drills can aerosolize body fluids, thereby comfortably. In some cases, the image may be displayed on creating a potential infection and contamination hazard for OR monitors by means of a video mixing device. Ultrasound OR personnel.75 units may also be used to modify the reference image in real time in surgical navigation systems.76 operating microscope Fluoroscopic and x-ray units may be portable or dedicated. Microsurgery is a routine part of many surgical specialties, Open radiologic units are usually installed either in the OR including neurosurgery, plastic surgery, hand surgery, gyne- proper or immediately adjacent to the OR to permit intraop- cologic surgery, and ophthalmology. Microscopes may be erative imaging of the selected body area. Intraoperative angi- moved into the OR on wheeled stands or mounted on the ography and MRI devices are typically installed in dedicated ceiling, wall, or floor. Built-in microscopes are best employed ORs.77 Intraoperative CT for neurosurgery, for example, may in dedicated ORs.46 All controls and displays must be involve either portable or fixed devices.78 properly positioned at or below the user’s line of sight to The use of sequential compression stockings has become allow comfortable and unobstructed viewing. the standard of care for the prevention of venous thrombo- Modern operating microscopes are servo controlled and embolism in the majority of operations for which direct access counterbalanced. The sequence for properly balancing a to the lower extremities is not required [see 6:6 Venous microscope should be carefully followed prior to every Thromboembolism].79 The air pump often must be placed near procedure and each time accessories are added or removed. the patient on the floor or on a nearby cart. The pressure 10/08
  • 9. © 2008 BC Decker Inc ACS Surgery: Principles and Practice 1 BASIC SURGICAL AND PERIOPERATIVE CONSIDERATIONS 8 PREPARATION OF THE OPERATING ROOM — 9 tubing from the stockings to the pump must be carefully use a foot pedal to select various imaging and recording routed so as not to interfere with surgical access. modes and to play back selected images and sequences. Suction devices are ubiquitous in the OR. A typical suction Unlike fixed systems, which require patients to be moved apparatus consists of a set of canisters on a wheeled base on a floating table to change the field of view, C-arm systems receiving suction from a wall- or ceiling-mounted source. The require the image intensifier to be moved from station to surgeon’s aspirating cannula is connected sterilely to these station over a fixed patient. Although more cumbersome than canisters. Suction tubing is a common tripping hazard in the fixed systems, the newest C-arms have increased mobility OR. In some procedures, the suction canisters may require and maneuverability. Patients must be placed on a special repeated changing. nonmetallic carbon fiber table. To provide a sufficient field of view and permit panning from head to toe, the tables must equipment be supported at one end and completely clear beneath. Although these tables do not flex, they are sufficient for most Imaging Equipment operations. Furthermore, they are mobile and may be replaced Imaging equipment for endovascular surgery can be fixed with conventional operating tables when the endovascular to the ceiling or portable. The fixed system is also employed suite is being used for standard open surgical procedures. in catheterization laboratories and dedicated interventional radiology suites. Portable systems use C-arms with dedicated Interventional Equipment vascular software packages designed for optimal endovascular The performance of endovascular procedures in the OR imaging. Each of these systems has advantages and disadvan- requires familiarity with a wide range of devices that may tages. be unfamiliar to OR personnel. These include guidewires, Fixed ceiling-mounted systems have higher power output sheaths, specialized catheters, angioplasty balloons, stents, and smaller focal spot size and provide the highest-quality and stent grafts [see Table 3]. In a busy endovascular OR, images. Larger image intensifiers (up to 16 in.) make possible much of this equipment must be stocked for everyday use, larger visual fields for diagnostic arteriograms. Fewer runs are with the remainder ordered on a case-by-case basis. The necessary, with the advantage of reducing the quantity of expense of establishing the necessary inventory of equipment contrast injected and radiation exposure. can be substantial and can place a considerable burden on Fixed systems are accompanied by floating angiography smaller hospitals that are already spending sizable amounts tables, which allow the surgeon to move the patient easily on stocking similar devices for their catheterization laborato- beneath the fixed image intensifier. The variable distance ries and interventional suites. Fortunately, many companies between the x-ray tube and the image intensifier allows the are willing to supply equipment on a consignment and case basis, allowing hospitals to pay for devices as they are used intensifier to be placed close to the patient if desired, thereby and reducing the volume of devices stocked. improving image quality and decreasing radiation scatter. It is generally accepted that such systems afford the surgeon ORs in Other Specialties the most control and permit the most effective imaging of Specialty equipment is generally available for permanent patients. installation in ophthalmologic, orthopedic, trauma, neurosur- Fixed ceiling-mounted systems are quite expensive (typi- gical, and urologic ORs. The observations offered regarding cally $1 to $1.5 million), and major structural renovations are microscopes, imaging devices and lasers, storage, and physi- often required for installation in a typical OR. These systems cal layout are broadly applicable. The cardiovascular OR and are not particularly flexible. The floating angiography tables the neurosurgical OR often have complex needs that are more and the immobility of the image intensifiers render the rooms difficult to fill simply by equipping a general-purpose OR. unsuitable for most conventional open surgical procedures. Thus, a neurosurgical OR may need to be equipped for As a result, fixed imaging systems are generally restricted to neuronavigation, laser and microsurgery, intraoperative angi- high-volume centers where use rates justify the construction ography, neurointerventional surgery, and pediatric surgery. of dedicated endovascular ORs. In addition, it may need shielding for neurophysiologic The imaging capability and versatility of portable digital recordings necessary for cranial electrostimulation. The pres- C-arms have increased dramatically. State-of-the-art portable ence of fixed or mounted instrumentation per se rarely poses C-arms are considerably less expensive than fixed systems an insurmountable difficulty in adapting a general-purpose ($175,000 to $225,000) while retaining many of their advan- OR to specialty use, but the reverse is not the case. tages. The variable image intensifier size (from 6 to 12 in.) offers valuable flexibility, with excellent resolution at the Surgeon’s Control of Equipment: Touch Panels, Voice smaller end and an adequate field of view at the larger end. Activation, and Robotics With some portable C-arm systems, it is possible to vary the Inherent shortcomings in the design of OR equipment have distance between the image intensifier and the x-ray tube, as been exacerbated by the spread of minimally invasive proce- with a fixed system (see above). Pulsed fluoroscopy, image dures. Because most of the equipment needed for minimally collimation, and filtration are standard features for improving invasive surgery resides outside the sterile field, the circulat- imaging and decreasing radiation exposure. Sophisticated ing nurse becomes the point person for critical control. Often software packages allow high-resolution digital subtraction the circulating nurse is out of the room at the precise moment angiography, variable magnification, road mapping (i.e., the important equipment adjustments must be made. superimposition of live fluoroscopy over a saved digital Surgeons grow frustrated at the inevitable delays that arteriogram), image fusion, and a number of other useful follow, and nurses often weary of these additional and some- features. Improvements in C-arm design allow the surgeon to times distracting responsibilities. As a result, there is great 10/08
  • 10. © 2008 BC Decker Inc ACS Surgery: Principles and Practice 1 BASIC SURGICAL AND PERIOPERATIVE CONSIDERATIONS 8 PREPARATION OF THE OPERATING ROOM — 10 Table 3 Standard Equipment for Endovascular Operating Rooms Diagnostic arteriography Entry needle (16-gauge beveled) Entry wire (J wire or floppy-tip wire) Arterial sheath (5 Fr) Catheters Multipurpose nonselective (pigtail, tennis racquet, straight, etc.) Selective (cobra head, shepherd’s crook, etc.) Guidewires (floppy, steerable, angled, hydrophilic, etc.) Contrast agent (nonionic preferred) Power injector Balloon stent angioplasty Sheaths (various lengths and diameters) Guide catheters Balloons (various lengths and diameters) Stents Balloon expandable (various lengths and diameters) Self-expanding (various lengths and diameters) Inflation device Endovascular aneurysm repair Large-caliber sheaths (12–24 Fr) Super-stiff guidewires Endovascular stent grafts Main body and contralateral iliac limb Aortic and iliac extension grafts Endovascular arterial coils interest in improving the interface of surgical devices with the provides the OR team with critical information about the pro- surgeon. Sterile touchscreens offered the first solution, but gress of the operation. To operate a device, the surgeon must many two-handed surgical procedures still make it difficult take approximately 20 minutes to train the recognition system for a surgeon to control ancillary equipment manually. Voice to his or her voice patterns and must wear an audio headset activation technology offers a potential solution. to relay commands. The learning curve for voice control is Development of voice activation began in the late 1960s. minimal (two or three cases, on average). Devices that can The goal was a simple, safe, and universally acceptable voice now be controlled by voice activation software include recognition system that flawlessly carried out the verbal cameras, light sources, digital image capture and documenta- requests of the user. However, attempts to construct a system tion devices, printers, insufflators, OR ambient and surgical capable of accurately recognizing a wide array of speech lighting systems, operating tables, and electrocauteries. patterns faced formidable technological hurdles that are only now beginning to be overcome. Infection Control in the OR In 1998, the first Food and Drug Administration (FDA)- Infection control is a major concern in health care in approved voice activation system, Hermes (Computer general, but it is a particularly important issue in the sterile Motion, Santa Barbara, CA), was introduced into the OR. environment of the OR, where patients undergo surgical Designed to provide surgeons with direct access and control procedures and are at significant risk for perioperative of surgical devices, Hermes is operated via either a handheld nosocomial infection. Even the best OR design will not pendant or voice commands from the surgeon. The chal- compensate for improper surgical technique or failure to pay lenges of advanced laparoscopic surgery provide a fertile attention to infection prevention. ground for demonstrating the benefits of voice activation [see Surgical site infection (SSI) is a major cause of patient Table 4]. morbidity, mortality, and health care costs. In the United Voice activation offers surgeons immediate access to States, according to the Centers for Disease Control and and direct control of surgical devices. At the same time, it Prevention (CDC), approximately 2.9% of nearly 30 million Table 4 Benefits of Voice Activation Technology in the Laparoscopic Operating Room Benefits to surgical team Gives surgeons direct and immediate control of devices Frees nursing staff from dull, repetitive tasks Reduces miscommunication and frustration between surgeons and staff Increases OR efficiency Alerts staff when device is malfunctioning or setting off alarm Benefits to hospital Saves money, allowing shorter, more efficient operations Contributes to better OR use and, potentially, performance of more surgical procedures Lays foundation for expanded use of voice activation in ORs Allows seamless working environment Benefit to patient Reduces operating time, which—coupled with improved optics, ergonomics, and efficiency—leads to better surgical outcome OR = operating room. 10/08
  • 11. © 2008 BC Decker Inc ACS Surgery: Principles and Practice 1 BASIC SURGICAL AND PERIOPERATIVE CONSIDERATIONS 8 PREPARATION OF THE OPERATING ROOM — 11 operations are complicated by SSIs each year. This percent- of surgical gloves rather than a single pair provides an addi- age may, in fact, be an underestimate, given the known tional barrier and further reduces the risk of contamination. inherent problems with surgeons’ voluntary self-reporting of A 2002 Cochrane Review concluded that wearing two pairs infections occurring in the ambulatory surgical setting.80 Each of latex gloves significantly reduced the risk of hand exposure. infection is estimated to increase total hospital stay by several The rate of single-glove perforations is approximately 15%. days and add materially to costs and charges. The rate of inner glove perforation when two pairs of gloves SSIs pose an increasingly difficult problem for institutions are worn is approximately 5%.86 with a large Medicare population. Recently, the Centers OSHA requires that personal protective equipment be for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) published the available in the health care setting, and these requirements Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS) FY 2009 final are specified in the OSHA standard on occupational exposure rule expanding the list of hospital-acquired conditions (HACs) to bloodborne pathogens, which went into effect in 1992. that will reduce Medicare payments. A number of SSIs figure Among the requirements is the implementation of the CDC’s prominently on this list.81 State Medicaid directors have also universal precautions, designed to prevent transmission of been authorized to deny payment for certain HACs. HIV, hepatitis B virus, and other bloodborne pathogens.87 The epidemiology and management of SSIs in older adults These precautions dictate the use of protective barriers (e.g., are receiving increasing attention.82 SSIs have been divided gloves, gowns, aprons, masks, and protective eyewear) to by the CDC into three broad categories: superficial incisional reduce the risk that the health care worker’s skin or mucous SSI, deep incisional SSI, and organ or space SSI [see Table 5 membranes will be exposed to potentially infectious and 1:1 Prevention of Postoperative Infection].83 materials. Factors that contribute to the development of SSI include Performance standards for protective barriers are the responsibility of the FDA’s Center for Devices and (1) the patient’s health status, (2) the physical environment Radiological Health. FDA standards define the performance where surgical care is provided, and (3) clinical interventions properties that these products must exhibit, including mini- that increase the patient’s inherent risk. Careful patient mum strength, barrier protection, and fluid resistance. The selection and preparation, including judicious use of antibi- current CDC recommendation is to use surgical gowns otic prophylaxis, can decrease the overall risk of infection, and drapes that resist liquid penetration and remain effective especially after clean-contaminated and contaminated barriers when wet. operations. These standards are intuitively appealing, but few studies hand hygiene address the comparative benefits of specific types of drapes. A meta-analysis of over 5,000 surgical cases indicated that Hand antisepsis plays a significant role in preventing noso- adhesive drapes increase the risk of SSI (relative risk = 1.23; comial infections. When outbreaks of infection occur in the p = .03) and iodine-impregnated drapes had no effect.88 perioperative period, careful assessment of the adequacy of Compliance with universal precautions and barrier hand hygiene among OR personnel is important. Agents protection is a challenge. Educational efforts aimed at OR used for surgical hand scrubs should substantially reduce personnel improved compliance significantly, particularly microorganisms on intact skin, contain a nonirritating antimi- with regard to the use of protective eyewear and double- crobial preparation, possess broad-spectrum activity, and be gloving. These efforts were associated with a reduced fast-acting and persistent.84 The CDC offers the following incidence of blood and body fluid exposure.89 guidelines85: antimicrobial prophylaxis • Surgical hand antisepsis using either an antimicrobial SSIs are established several hours after contamination.90 soap or an alcohol-based hand rub with persistent activity There is a well-recognized “golden period” during which is recommended before donning sterile gloves when prophylactic antibiotics can be effective. Administration of performing surgical procedures (evidence level IB). antibiotics before contamination reduces the risk of infection • When performing surgical hand antisepsis using an antimi- but is subsequently of little value.91 Selective use of short- crobial soap, scrub hands and forearms for the length of duration, narrow-spectrum antibiotic agents should be con- time recommended by the manufacturer, usually 2 to 6 sidered for appropriate patients to cover the usual pathogens minutes. Long scrub times (e.g., 10 minutes) are not isolated from SSIs [see Table 6].92 necessary (evidence level IB). Recommendations for antibiotic prophylaxis are addressed • When using an alcohol-based surgical hand-scrub product in more detail elsewhere [see 1:1 Prevention of Postoperative with persistent activity, follow the manufacturer’s instruc- Infection]. In brief, the principles of optimal surgical tions. Before applying the alcohol solution, prewash hands antimicrobial prophylaxis include (1) appropriate choice of and forearms with a nonantimicrobial soap and dry hands an antimicrobial agent, (2) proper timing of antibiotic admin- and forearms completely. After application of the alcohol- istration before incision, and (3) limited duration of antibiotic based product, allow hands and forearms to dry thoroughly administration after operation. before donning sterile gloves. When a preoperative antibiotic is indicated, a single dose of therapeutic strength, administered shortly before incision, gloves and protective barriers usually suffices.93 The dose may have to be increased if the There is a high risk of pathogen transfer during surgery. patient is morbidly obese.94 A second dose is indicated if the This is a risk from which both the patient and the surgical procedure is longer than two half-lives of the drug or if exten- team must be protected. The risk can be reduced by using sive blood loss occurs. Continuation of prophylaxis beyond protective barriers, such as surgical gloves. Wearing two pairs 24 hours is not recommended. 10/08
  • 12. © 2008 BC Decker Inc ACS Surgery: Principles and Practice 1 BASIC SURGICAL AND PERIOPERATIVE CONSIDERATIONS 8 PREPARATION OF THE OPERATING ROOM — 12 Table 5 Criteria for Defining a Surgical Site Infection83 Superficial incisional SSI Infection occurs within 30 days after the operation, and infection involves only skin or subcutaneous tissue of the incisions, and at least one of the following: 1. Purulent drainage, with or without laboratory confirmation, from the superficial incision 2. Organisms isolated from an aseptically obtained culture of fluid or tissue from the superficial incision 3. At least one of the following signs or symptoms of infection: pain or tenderness, localized swelling, redness, or heat; and superficial incision is deliberately opened by surgeon, unless incision is culture negative 4. Diagnosis of superficial incisional SSI by the surgeon or attending physician Do not report the following conditions as SSI: 1. Stitch abscess (minimal inflammation and discharge confined to the points of suture penetration) 2. Infection of an episiotomy or newborn circumcision site 3. Infected burn wound 4. Incisional SSI that extends into the fascial and muscle layers (see deep incisional SSI) Note: Specific criteria are used for identifying infected episiotomy and circumcision sites and burn wounds. Deep incisional SSI Infection occurs within 30 days after the operation if no implant* is left in place or within 1 yr if an implant is in place and the infection appears to be related to the operation, and infection involves deep soft tissues (e.g., fascial and muscle layers) on the incision, and at least one of the following: 1. Purulent drainage from the deep incision but not from the organ/space component of the surgical site 2. A deep incision spontaneously dehisces or is deliberately opened by a surgeon when the patient has at least one of the following signs or symptoms: fever (> 38°C [100.4°F]), localized pain, or tenderness, unless the site is culture negative 3. An abscess or other evidence of infection involving the deep incision is found on direct examination, during reoperation, or by histopathologic or radiologic examination 4. Diagnosis of a deep incisional SSI by a surgeon or attending physician Notes 1. Report infection that involves both superficial and deep incision sites as deep incisional SSI 2. Report an organ/space SSI that drains through the incision as a deep incisional SSI Organ/space SSI Infection occurs within 30 days after the operation if no implant* is left in place or within 1 yr if an implant is in place and the infection appears to be related to the operation, and infection involves any part of the anatomy (e.g., organs or spaces), other than the incision, which was opened or manipulated during an operation, and at least one of the following: 1. Purulent drainage from a drain that is placed through a stab wound† into the organ/space 2. Organisms isolated from an aseptically obtained culture of fluid or tissue in the organ/space 3. An abscess or other evidence of infection involving the organ/space that is found on direct examination, during reoperation, or by histopathologic or radiologic examination 4. Diagnosis of an organ/space SSI by a surgeon or attending physician SSI = surgical site infection. *National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance definition; a non–human-derived implantable foreign body (e.g., prosthetic heart valve, nonhuman vascular graft, mechanical heart, or hip prosthesis) that is permanantly placed in a patient during surgery. † If the area around a stab wound becomes infected, it is not an SSI. It is considered a skin or soft tissue infection, depending on its depth. The provision of prophylactic antibiotics, where indicated, published in 2001, determined that warming patients before has been accepted as a measure of surgical quality aimed at short-duration clean procedures (breast, varicose vein, or a reduction in SSIs.95,96 A strong economic case has been hernia) reduced infection (p = .001) and reduced wound made for infection control, including prophylactic antibiotics, scores (p = .007) in this setting as well.104 benefiting the hospital as well as the patient.97 The perio- The safest and most effective way of protecting patients perative nursing team has a central role, together with the from hypothermia is to use forced-air warmers with special- anesthesiologist, in monitoring the administration of ized blankets placed over the upper or lower body. Alterna- preoperative prophylactic antibiotics.98–100 tives include placing a warming water mattress under the patient and draping the patient with an aluminized blanket. nonpharmacologic preventive measures Second-line therapy involves warming all IV fluids. Any Several studies have confirmed that certain nonpharmaco- irrigation fluids used in a surgical procedure should be at or logic measures, including maintenance of perioperative slightly above body temperature before use. Radiant heating normothermia and provision of supplemental perioperative devices placed above the operative field may be especially oxygen, are efficacious in preventing SSIs.101 useful during operations on infants. Use of a warmer on the inhalation side of the anesthetic gas circuit can also Perioperative Normothermia help maintain the patient’s body temperature during an A 1996 study showed that warming patients during colorec- operation. tal surgery reduced infection rates.102 This finding was confirmed in a subsequent observational cohort study that Supplemental Perioperative Oxygen reported a significantly increased incidence of SSI with Destruction by oxidation, or oxidative killing, is the body’s hypothermia.103 A randomized, controlled trial of 421 patients, most important defense against surgical pathogens. This 10/08
  • 13. © 2008 BC Decker Inc ACS Surgery: Principles and Practice 1 BASIC SURGICAL AND PERIOPERATIVE CONSIDERATIONS 8 PREPARATION OF THE OPERATING ROOM — 13 Table 6 Distribution of Pathogens Isolated from Surgical Site Infections: National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System, 1986–199683 Pathogen Percentage of Isolates* 1986–1989 (N = 16,727) 1990–1996 (N = 17,671) Staphylococcus aureus 17 20 Coagulase-negative staphylococci 12 14 Enterococcus species 13 12 Escherichia coli 10 8 Pseudomonas aeruginosa 8 8 Enterobacter species 8 7 Proteus mirabilis 4 3 Klebsiella pneumoniae 3 3 Other Streptococcus species 3 3 Candida albicans 2 3 Group D streptococci (nonenterococci) — 2 Other gram-positive aerobes — 2 Bacteroides fragilis — 2 *Pathogens representing less than 2% of isolates are excluded. defensive response depends on oxygen tension in contami- decrease in mortality rate generally in critically ill patients.111,112 nated tissue. An easy method of improving oxygen tension in The effects are not restricted to diabetics. In fact, there is adequately perfused tissue is to increase the FiO2. Supple- evidence to conclude that nondiabetics enjoy more protection mental perioperative oxygen (i.e., an FiO2 of 80% instead of than diabetics.113 30%) significantly overcomes the decrease in phagocytosis Some questions remain about just how tight control must and bacterial killing usually associated with anesthesia and be to have an effect. There is a small but measurable risk surgery (and significantly reduces postoperative nausea and of hypoglycemia with intensive IV insulin therapy, but this vomiting). Oxygen tension in wound tissue has been found to risk can be mitigated with continuous or near-continuous be a good predictor of SSI risk.105 glucometry or dynamic scale nomograms.114 Avoidance of Blood Transfusion Housekeeping Procedures The association between blood transfusion and increased perioperative infection rates is well documented. In a 1997 floors and walls study, geriatric hip fracture patients undergoing surgical Despite detailed recommendations for cleaning the OR [see repair who received blood transfusion had significantly higher Table 7], the procedures that are optimal to provide a clean rates of perioperative infection than those who did not (27% environment while still being cost-effective have not been versus 15%), and this effect was confirmed on multivariate critically analyzed.115 analysis.106 Another study yielded similar findings in colorec- Only a few studies have attempted to correlate surface tal cancer: the relative risk of infection was 1.6 for transfusion contamination of the OR with SSI risk. In one randomized, of one to three units of blood and 3.6 for transfusion of more controlled study, for example, the control rooms were cleaned than three units.107 with a germicidal agent and wet-vacuumed before the first A large prospective cohort study published in 2003 evalu- case of the day and between cases, whereas in the experimen- ated the association between anemia, blood transfusion, and tal rooms, cleaning consisted only of wiping up grossly visible perioperative infection.108 Regression analysis confirmed that contamination after clean and clean-contaminated cases.116 intraoperative transfusion of packed red blood cells was an Both rooms had complete floor cleanup after contaminated independent risk factor for perioperative infection (odds ratio 1.06; confidence interval 1.01 to 1.11; p > .0001). Further- or dirty and infected cases. Bacterial colony counts obtained more, transfusion of more than four units of packed red blood directly from the floors were lower in the control rooms, but cells was associated with a ninefold increased risk of infection counts obtained from other horizontal surfaces did not differ (confidence interval 5.74 to 15.00; p < .0001). between the two OR groups. Wound infection rates were the same in the control rooms and the experimental rooms and Tight Glycemic Control were comparable with rates reported in other series. Hyperglycemia is common under conditions of physiologic Another study found that floor disinfectants decreased stress, in the intensive care unit (ICU) and in the OR. Tight bacterial concentration on the floor for 2 hours only. Colony glycemic control using intensive insulin therapy and continu- counts return to pretreatment levels as personnel walked ous glucose monitoring has been shown to reduce infection about.117 in the ICU and is emerging as a standard in surgical critical Even when an OR floor is contaminated, the rate of redis- care and intraoperatively.109,110 It has been associated with a persal of bacteria into the air is low, and the clearance rate is 10/08
  • 14. © 2008 BC Decker Inc ACS Surgery: Principles and Practice 1 BASIC SURGICAL AND PERIOPERATIVE CONSIDERATIONS 8 PREPARATION OF THE OPERATING ROOM — 14 Table 7 Operating Room Cleaning Schedules Areas requiring daily cleaning Surgical lights and tracks Fixed ceiling-mounted equipment Furniture and mobile equipment, including wheels OR and hall floors Cabinet and push-plate handles Ventilation grills All horizontal surfaces Substerile areas Scrub and utility areas Scrub sinks Areas requiring routinely scheduled cleaning Ventilation ducts and filters Recessed tracks Cabinets and shelves Walls and ceilings Sterilizers, warming cabinets, refrigerators, and ice machines OR = operating room. high. It seems unlikely, therefore, that bacteria from the floor development of numerous and costly rituals of OR cleanup. contribute to SSI. Consequently, routine disinfection of the However, there are no prospective studies and no large body OR floor between clean or clean-contaminated cases appears of relevant data to support the usefulness of such rituals. to be unnecessary. In fact, one study found no significant difference in environ- According to CDC guidelines for the prevention of SSI, mental bacterial counts after clean cases than after dirty when visible soiling of surfaces or equipment occurs during ones.119 Numerous authorities have recommended that there an operation, an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)- be only one standard of cleaning the OR after either clean or approved hospital disinfectant should be used to decontami- dirty cases.115,119,120 This recommendation is reasonable nate the affected areas before the next operation.83 This because of two important considerations: statement is in keeping with the OSHA requirement that all equipment and environmental surfaces be cleaned and • Any patient may be a source of contamination caused by decontaminated after contact with blood or other potentially unrecognized bacterial or viral infection. infectious materials. • The second major source of OR contamination is the Disinfection after a contaminated or dirty case and after personnel who work there. the last case of the day is probably a reasonable practice, Rituals applied to dirty cases include placing a germicide- although it is not supported by directly pertinent data. Wet- soaked mat outside the OR door, allowing the OR to stand vacuuming of the floor with an EPA-approved hospital disin- idle for an arbitrary period after cleanup of a dirty procedure, fectant should be performed routinely after the last operation and using two circulating nurses, one inside the room and of the day or night. one outside. None of these practices has a sound theoretical dirty cases or factual basis. By tradition, dirty cases are scheduled after all of the Operations are classified or stratified into four groups in clean cases of the day have been completed. This restriction, relation to the epidemiology of SSIs [see 1:1 Prevention of however, reduces the efficiency with which operations can be Postoperative Infection]118: scheduled and may unnecessarily delay emergency cases. • Clean operations are those elective cases in which the gas- There are no data to support special cleaning procedures or trointestinal (GI) tract or the respiratory tract is not entered the closing of an OR after a contaminated or dirty operation and there are no major breaks in technique. The infection has been performed.121 Mats placed outside the entrance to rate in this group should be less than 3%. the OR suite show neither a reduction in the number of • Clean-contaminated operations are those elective cases in organisms on shoes and stretcher wheels nor a reduction in which the respiratory or the GI tract is entered or during SSI risk.122 which a break in aseptic technique has occurred. The infection rate in such cases should be less than 10%. Data Management in the OR • Contaminated operations are those cases in which a fresh traumatic wound is present or gross spillage of GI contents Regular analysis of OR data is essential to monitor effi- occurs. ciency and correct deficiency.123 OR efficiency is maximized • Dirty or infected operations include those in which bacte- by adherence to several basic principles: rial inflammation occurs or in which pus is present. The 1. The number of ORs available should be matched to the infection rate may be as high as 40% in a contaminated or number required to achieve good use. dirty operation. 2. Nurses and anesthesiologists rather than attending Fear that bacteria from dirty or heavily contaminated cases surgeons should control access to the surgical schedule. could be transmitted to subsequent cases has resulted in the 3. Surgeons should be allowed to follow themselves. 10/08
  • 15. © 2008 BC Decker Inc ACS Surgery: Principles and Practice 1 BASIC SURGICAL AND PERIOPERATIVE CONSIDERATIONS 8 PREPARATION OF THE OPERATING ROOM — 15 4. Block time should be provided to surgeons. industries. In the future, such technology may be a useful 5. Systems should be established to enable and enforce adjunct to computerized OR scheduling.127 efficient turnover between cases.124 quality improvement The distinction between efficiency and effectiveness is The key to increased OR efficiency is increased productiv- important. Measures of effectiveness relate achievements to ity. Standardization of internal procedures reduces bottle- goals. Measures of efficiency relate achievements to cost. The OR must be both efficient and effective. necks. Computerization speeds the flow of information Data must be both available and rapidly accessible. so that continuous improvement of the system becomes Automation of OR data is critical and must integrate with the possible. Before a desired improvement can be implemented, institutional health information system (HIS).125 Hospital- the proposed change must be tested quickly so that its effect wide data regarding work flow, staffing, referral patterns, and can be determined, ideally through a small-scale pilot imple- even parking may yield useful information for improvements mentation. This requires a collaborative effort, in which the in OR efficacy and efficiency.126 group involved in the change learns how to “plan, do, check, and act.” These are the elements of the so-called “PDCA or scheduling cycle,” a classic quality initiative method. During the PDCA OR scheduling systems should be designed to track all cycle, teams are encouraged to strategize and communicate of the operational aspects of the OR, including patients, about various solutions and look for changes that can be resources, rooms, and staff. They should be fully integrated made. A change is tested, quickly evaluated, and adopted into the institutional HIS while also interfacing with key if efficacious. The PDCA cycle depends on integrated surgi- elements located in other parts of the hospital (or ambulatory cal teams with open communication and mutual respect. center), including finance, materials management, electronic Such teams remain the key to a safe, efficient, and effective medical records, radiology, pathology, nursing, the emer- OR.89 gency room, labor and delivery, the blood bank, and the pharmacy. One of the most important purposes of a good OR schedul- Dr. Dagi is a director for Acela, Inc. and IntelliDx, Inc. His ing system is to allow informed case substitution. Informed personal investment portfolio includes pharmaceutical and medical case substitution is critical because surgical scheduling must device companies, none of whose products have been mentioned in contend with frequent last-minute case cancellations.127 Dif- this chapter. He chairs the Scientific Advisory Board for Dupont ferent specialties differ widely in their scheduling practices. life sciences. He has received neither financial nor research support An understanding of these practices allows the OR to use from any of these entities. resources to maximum efficiency.128 Dr Schecter has no significant financial or other relationships Information systems that predict and fill unexpected open- with pharmaceutical, medical device, or biologics companies ings already exist in the transportation and manufacturing relevant to this chapter. References 1. Guidelines for construction and equipment 8. Smith W. Planning the surgical suite. New 15. Awad SS, Fagan SP, Bellows C, et al. Bridg- of hospital and medical facilities. Bethesda York: FW Dodge Corp; 1960. ing the communication gap in the operating (MD): US Department of Health and Hu- 9. Putsep E. Planning of surgical centres. room with medical team training. Am J Surg man Services; 1984. DHHS Publication London: Lloyd-Luke Ltd; 1973. 2005;190:770. No.: (HRS-M-HF) 84-1. 10. A bibliography of the operating room 16. Lingard L, Regehr G, Orser B, et al. Evalu- 2. Maloney ME. The dermatological surgical environment. Chicago: American College of ation of a pre-operative check list and suite—design and materials. In: Grekin M, Surgeons; 1995. team briefing among surgeons, nurses editor. Practical manuals in dermatologic 11. The American Institute of Architects. and anesthesiologists to reduce failures in surgery. New York: Churchill Livingstone; Guidelines for construction and equipment communication. Arch Surg 2008;143:12. 1991. of hospital and health care facilities. 17. The Joint Commission. Universal Protocol. 3. Jolesz FA, Shtern F. The operating room of Washington (DC): The American Institute Available at: http://www.jointcommission. the future. Report of the National Cancer of Architects Press; 2001. org/PatientSafety/UniversalProtocol/up_ Institute Workshop “Imaging-Guided Ste- 12. Heslin MJ, Doster BE, Daily SL, et al. facts.htm (accessed July 29, 2008). reotactic Tumor Diagnosis and Treatment.” Durable improvements in efficiency, safety 18. Catchpole KR, de Leval MR, McEwan A, Invest Radiol 1992;27:326. and satisfaction in the operating room. J Am et al. Patient handover from surgery to 4. Green FL, Taylor NC. Operating room Coll Surg 2008;206:1083–9, discussion intensive care: using Formula 1 pit-stop configuration. In: Ballantyne G, Leahy PF, 1089–90. and aviation models to improve safety and Modlin IR, editors. Laparoscopic surgery. 13. Mathius JM. OR of the future to be less quality. Paediatr Anaesth 2007;17:470. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1994. p. 34. complicated, more efficient. OR Manager 19. Ender J, Borger MA, Scholz M, et al. 5. Laufman H. Surgical hazard control: effect 1995;11:7. Cardiac surgery fast-track treatment in a of architecture and engineering. Arch Surg 14. Davenport DL, Henderson WG, Mosca postanesthetic care unit: six-month results 1973;107:552. CL, et al. Risk-adjusted morbidity in teach- of the Leipzig fast-track concept. Anesthesi- 6. Johnston D, Hunter A, editors. The design ing hospitals correlates with reported levels ology 2008;109:61. and utilization of operating theatres. of communication and collaboration on sur- 20. Zohar E, Noga Y, Davidson E, et al. London: Edward Arnold; 1984. gical teams but not with scale measures of Peri-operative patient safety: correct patient, 7. Klebanoff G. Operating-room design: an teamwork climate, safety climate, or work- correct surgery, correct side—a multifaceted, introduction. Bull Am Coll Surg 1979; ing conditions. J Am Coll Surg 2007;205: cross-organizational, interventional study. 64(11):6. 778. Anesth Analg 2007;105:443. 10/08
  • 16. © 2008 BC Decker Inc ACS Surgery: Principles and Practice 1 BASIC SURGICAL AND PERIOPERATIVE CONSIDERATIONS 8 PREPARATION OF THE OPERATING ROOM — 16 21. Kern KA. The National Patient Safety 44. Radiological protection and safety in medi- 68. Bochenko WJ. A review of electrosurgical Foundation: what it offers surgeons. Bull cine: a report of the International Commis- units in the operating room. J Clin Eng Am Coll Surg 1998;83:24. sion of Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP 1977;2:313. 22. Egan MT, Sandberg WS. Auto identifica- 1996;26:1. 69. AORN Recommended Practices Commit- tion technology and its impact on patient 45. Lipsitz EC, Veith FJ, Ohki T, et al. Does tee: Recommended practices for electro- safety in the operating room of the future. endovascular repair of aortoiliac aneurysms surgery. AORN J 2005;81:616–8, 621–6, Surg Innov 2007;14:41–50, discussion 51. pose a radiation safety hazard to vascular 629–32. 23. Christian CK, Gustafson ML, Roth EM, surgeons? J Vasc Surg 2000;32:702. 70. Lobraico RB. Laser safety in health care et al. A prospective study of patient safety 46. Singh PJ, Perera NS, Dega R. Measurement facilities: an overview. Bull Am Coll Surg in the operating room. Surgery 2006;139: of the dose of radiation to the surgeon dur- 1991;76(8):16. 159–73. ing foot and ankle surgery. J Bone Joint Surg 71. Gloster HM Jr, Roenigk RK. Risk of acquir- 24. Practice advisory for the prevention of Br 2007;89:1060. ing human papillomavirus from the plume perioperative peripheral neuropathies. 47. National Institute for Occupational Safety produced by the carbon dioxide laser in the Anesthesiology 2000;92:1168. and Health. Guidelines for protecting the treatment of warts. J Am Acad Dermatol 25. Cheney FW, Domino KB, Caplan RA, et al. safety and health of healthcare workers. 1995;32:436. Nerve injury associated with anesthesia. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ 72. Wisniewski PM, Warhol MJ, Rando RF, Anesthesia 1999;90:1062. hcwold5d.html (accessed July 31, 2008). et al. Studies on the transmission of viral 26. Warner ME, LaMaster LM, Thoening AK, 48. Andersen K. Safe use of lasers in the operat- disease via the CO2 laser plume and ejecta. et al. Compartment syndrome in surgical ing room: what perioperative nurses should J Reprod Med 1990;35:1117. patients. Anesthesiology 2001;94:705 know. AORN J 2004;79:171–88. 73. King B, McCullough J. Health hazard 27. Barash PG, Cullen BF, Stoelting RK. Clini- 49. Mehlman CT, DiPasquale TG. Radiaiton evaluation report 2001-0030-3020. NIOSH; cal anesthesia. 5th edition. Philadelphia: exposure to the orthopaedic surgical team 2006. Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2005. during fluoroscopy: how far away is far 74. Jewett DL, Heinsohn P, Bennett C, et al. p. 639–66. enough? J Orthop Trauma 11:392–8, 1997. Blood-containing aerosols generated by 28. Cucciara RF, Faust RJ. Patient positioning. 50. Ray CD, Levinson R. Noise pollution in the surgical techniques: a possible infectious In: Miller RD, editor. Anesthesia. 5th ed. operating room: a hazard to surgeons, per- hazard. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1992;53:228. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2000. sonnel, and patients. J Spinal Disord 1992; 75. Patkin M. Ergonomics and the operating 29. West JB. Respiratory physiology. 2nd ed. 5:485. microscope. Adv Ophthalmol 1978;37:53. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1979. 51. Willett KM. Noise-induced hearing loss in 76. Bates LM, Robb RA. Investigation of ultra- 30. Benumof JL. Respiratory physiology and orthopaedic staff. J Bone Joint Surg Br sound image based correction of intraopera- respiratory function during anesthesia. 1991;73:113–5. tive brain shift. In: Proceedings of the IEEE In: Miller RD, editor. Anesthesia. 5th ed. 52. Cowan C Jr. Light hazards in the operating 2nd International Symposium on Bioinfor- Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2000. room. J Natl Med Assoc 1992;84:425. matics and Bioengineering Conference. 31. AORN. Position statement on workplace 53. Marine A. Rutschlainen J, Serra C, Verbeek 2001. p. 254–61. safety. Available at: http://www.aorn.org/ J. Preventing occupational stress in health- 77. Ntoukas V, Krishnan R, Seifert V. The new PracticeResources/AORNPositionState- generation polestar n20 for conventional care workers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev ments/Position_WorkplaceSafety (accessed neurosurgical operating rooms: a prelimi- 2006;(18):CD002892. July 29, 2008). nary report. Neurosurgery 2008;63(3 Suppl 54. Lanza ML, Zeiss RA, Rierdan J. Non- 32. American College of Surgeons. Statement 1):82–9; discussion 89–90. physical violence: a risk factor for physical on sharps safety. Bull Am Coll Surg 78. Jacob AL, Regazzoni P, Bilecen D, et al. violence in health care settings. AAOHN J 2007;92:34–7. Medical technology integration: CT, angi- 2006;54:397–402. 33. Panni MK, Corn SB. Scavenging in the ography, imaging-capable OR-table, naviga- 55. Council on Surgical and Perioperative operating room. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol tion and robotics in a multifunctional sterile Safety. Statement on workplace violence. 2003;16:611. suite. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol Available at: http://www.cspsteam.org 34. Daane SP, Toth BA. Fire in the operating 2007;16:2005–11. (accessed July 31, 2008). room: principles and prevention. Plast 79. Walenga JM, Fareed J. Current status on 56. Staylor A. Robotics. Moving surgery into Reconstr Surg 2005;115:73e. new anticoagulant and antithrombotic drugs the information age. Windhover Medtech 35. Meneghetti SC, Morgan MM, Fritz J, et al. and devices. Curr Opin Pulmon Med 1997; Insight 2007;(October):1–8. 3:291. Operating room fires: optimizing safety. 57. Fernsebner B. Building a staffing plan based 80. Barie PS. Surgical site infections: epidemiol- Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;120:1701. on OR’s needs. OR Manager 1996;12(2):7. ogy and prevention. Surg Infect 2002;3 36. Batra S, Gupta R. Alcohol based surgical 58. Chinyanga HM. Temperature regulation (Suppl 1):S9. prep solution and the risk of fire in the oper- and anesthesia. Pharmacol Ther 1984;26: 81. CMS Office of Public Affairs: CMS ating room: a case report. Patient Saf Surg 147. improves patient safety for Medicare and 2008;2:10. 59. The Hypothermia after Cardiac Arrest Medicaid by addressing never events. 37. Statkiewicz-Sherer MA, Visconti PJ, Study Group: Mild therapeutic hypother- Available at: http://www.cms/hhs.gov/apps/ Ritenour ER, et al. Radiation protection in mia to improve the neurologic outcome after media/press/factsheet.asp (accessed August medical radiography. St. Louis: Mosby; cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med 2001;346: 10, 2008). 1998. 549–56. 82. Young M, Washer L, Malani P. Surgical site 38. Hafez MA, Smith RM, Matthews SJ, et al. 60. Nolan JP, Morley PT, Vanden Hoek TL, infections in older adults: epidemiology and Radiation exposure to the hands of ortho- Hickey RW. Therapeutic hypothermia after management strategies. Drugs Aging 2008; paedic surgeons: Are we underestimating cardiac arrest. An advisory statement by 25:399–414. the risk? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2005; the Advanced Life Support Task Force of 83. Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, 125:330–5. the International Liaison Committee on et al. The Hospital Infection Control Prac- 39. Ul Haque M, Shufflebarger HL, O’Brien M, Resuscitation. Circulation 2003;108: tices Advisory Committee. Guideline for Macagno A. Radiation exposure during 118–21. prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. pedicle screw placement in adolescent idio- 61. Polderman, KH. Induced hypothermia and Am J Infect Control 1999;27:98. pathic scoliosis: Is fluoroscopy safe? Spine fever control for prevention and treatment 84. AORN. Standards and recommended 2006;31:2516–20. of neurological injuries. Lancet 2008;371: practices. Denver (CO):AORN; 2008. 40. Ho P, Cheng SW, Wu PM, et al. Ionizing 1955–61. p. 337–406. radiation absorption of vascular surgeons 62. Beck WC. Choosing surgical illumination. 85. Boyce JM, Pittet D, Healthcare Infection during endovascular procedures. J Vasc Am J Surg 1980;140:327. Control Practices Advisory Committee, Surg 2007;46:455–9. 63. Beck WC. Operating room illumination: the HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand 41. Shapiro J. Radiation protection: A guide for current state of the art. Bull Am Coll Surg Hygiene Task Force. Guideline for hand scientists, physicians and regulators. 4th ed. 1981;66(5):10. hygiene in health-care settings. Recommen- Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press; 64. Verrinder J. Use of right lighting levels dations of the Healthcare Infection Control 2002. essential. Health Estate 2007;61(6):31–2. Practices Advisory Committee and the 42. Theocharopoulos N, Damilakis J, Perisina- 65. McCormick PW. Bovie smoke. A perilous HICPA/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene kis K, et al. Image-guided reconstruction of plume. AANS Neurosurg 2008;17:10–2. Task Force. MMWR Recomm Rep 2002; femoral fractures: is the staff progeny safe? 66. AORN Recommended Practices Subcom- 51(RR-16):1. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005;430:182–8. mittee: Recommended practices: electro- 86. Tanner J, Parkinson H. Double-gloving to 43. Fuchs M, Schmid A, Eiteljorge T, et al. surgery. AORN J 1985;41:633. reduce surgical cross-infection (Cochrane Exposure of the surgeon to radiation during 67. Pearce J. Current electrosurgical practice: Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002; surgery. Int Orthop 1998;22:153. hazards. J Med Eng Technol 9:107, 1985 (3):CD003087. 10/08
  • 17. © 2008 BC Decker Inc ACS Surgery: Principles and Practice 1 BASIC SURGICAL AND PERIOPERATIVE CONSIDERATIONS 8 PREPARATION OF THE OPERATING ROOM — 17 87. Universal precautions for prevention of of surgical wound infection and shorten 118. Report of an Ad-Hoc Committee of the transmission of human immunodeficiency hospitalization. Study of Wound Infection Committee of Trauma, Division of Medical virus, hepatitis B virus, and other blood- and Temperature Group. N Engl J Med Sciences, National Academy of Sciences- borne pathogens in health-care settings. 1996;358:876. National Research Council. Postoperative MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1988;37: 103. Flores-Maldonado A, Medine-Escobedo wound infections: the influence of ultravio- 377. CE, Rios-Rodriguez HM, et al. Mild perio- let irradiation of the operating room and of 88. Webster J, Alghamdi AA. Use of plastic perative hypothermia and the risk of wound various other factors. Ann Surg 1964;160 adhesive drapes during surgery for pre- infection. Arch Med Res 2001;32:227. Suppl:1. venting surgical site infection. Cochrane 104. Melling AC, Ali B, Scott EM, et al. Effects 119. Hambraeus A, Bengtsson S, Laurell G. Database Syst Rev 2007;(4):CD006353. of preoperative warming on the incidence Bacterial contamination in a modern operat- 89. Kim LE, Jeffe DB, Evanoff BA, et al. of wound infection after clean surgery: a ing suite: II. Effect of a zoning system on Improved compliance with universal pre- randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2001; contamination of floors and other surfaces. cautions in the operating room following 358:876. J Hyg (Lond) 1978;80:57. an educational intervention. Infect Control 105. Hopf HW, Hunt TK, West JM. Wound 120. McWilliams RM. There should be only one Hosp Epidemiol 2001;22:522. tissue oxygen tension predicts the risk of way to clean up between all surgical proce- 90. Burke JF. The effective period of preventive wound infection in surgical patients. Arch dures. J Hosp Infect Control 1976;3:64. antibiotic action in experimental incisions Surg 1997;132:997. 121. Nichols RL. The operating room. In: and dermal lesions. Surgery 1961;50:161. 106. Koval KJ, Rosenberg AD, Zuckerman JD, Bennett JV, Brachman PS, editors. Hospital 91. Classen DC, Evans RS, Pestotnik SL, et al. et al. Does blood transfusion increase risk infections. 3rd ed. Boston: Little, Brown & The timing of prophylactic administration of infection after hip fracture? J Orthop Co; 1992. p. 461. of antibiotics and the risk of surgical-wound Trauma 1997;11:260. 122. Ayliffe GA. Role of the environment of the infection. N Engl J Med 1992;326:281. 107. Houbiers JG, van de Velder CJ, van de operating suite in surgical wound infection. 92. Stewart AH, Eyers PS, Earnshaw JJ. Watering LM, et al. Transfusion of red cells Rev Infect Dis 1991;13(Suppl 10):S800. Prevention of infection in peripheral arterial is associated with increased incidence of 123. Overdyck FJ, Harvey SC, Fishman RL, reconstruction: a systematic review and bacterial infection after colorectal surgery: et al. Successful strategies for improving meta-analysis. J Vasc Surg 2007;46: a prospective study. Transfusion 1997;37: operating room efficiency at academic 148–55. 126. institutions. Anesth Analg 1998;86:896. 93. Antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Med 108. Dunne J, Malone D, Genuit T, et al. Periop- 124. Patterson P. Is an 80% to 85% utilization a Lett Drugs Ther 2001;43:92. erative anemia: an independent risk factor realistic target for ORs? OR Manager 94. Forse RA, Karam B, MacLean LD, et al. for infection and resource utilization in 1997;13(5):1. Antibiotic prophylaxis for surgery in surgery. J Surg Res 2002;102:237. 125. Mueller J, Marinari B, Kunkel S. Flipping morbidly obese patients. Surgery 1989;106: 109. Berkers J, Guns J, Vanhorebeek J, Van den assumptions and revisioning perioperative 750. Berghe G. Glycaemic control and periopera- services. J Nurs Admin 1995;25:22. 95. Bhattacharyya T, Hooper D. Antibiotic tive organ protection. Best practice and 126. Epstein RH, Dexter F. Statistical power dosing before primary hip and knee replace- research. Clin Anaesthesiol 2008;22: analysis to estimate how many months of ment as a pay-for-performance measure. 135–49. data are required to identify operating room J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007;89:287–91. 110. Velmahos GC, Alam HB. Advances in sur- staffing solutions to reduce labor costs and 96. Schoen D. Antibiotic dosing before primary gical critical care. Curr Probl Surg 2008;45: increase productivity. Anesth Analg 2002; hip and knee replacement as a pay-for- 453–516. 94:640. performance measure. Orthopaed Nurs 111. Langley J, Adams G. Insulin-based regimens 127. Surgery teams make strides on OR delays. 2007;26:257–8. decrease mortality rates in criticall ill OR Manager 1998;14(1):1. 97. Perencevich E, Stone P, Wright S, et al. patients: a systematic review. Diabetes 128. Dexter F, Traub RD. How to schedule elec- Raising standards while watching the Metab Res Rev 2007;23:184–92. tive surgical cases into specific operating bottom line: making a buisness case for 112. Vanhorebeek I, Langouche L, Van den rooms to maximize the efficiency of use of infection control. Infect Control Hosp Berghe G. Tight blood glucose control: operating room time. Anesth Analg 2002; Epidemiol 2007;28:1121–33. what is the evidence? Crit Care Med 2007; 94:933. 98. Brendle, T. Surgical care improvement pro- 35(9 Suppl):5496–502. ject and the perioperative nurse’s role. 113. Van den Berghe G, Wilmer A, Hermans G, AORN J 2007;86:94–5, 97–101. et al. Intensive insulin therapy in the medical 99. The role of anesthesiologist in the selection ICU. N Engl J Med 2006;354:449–61. Acknowledgment and administration of perioperative antibiot- 114. Meijering S, Corstjens AM, Tulleken JE, ics: a survey of the American Association of et al. Towards a feasible algorithm for tight The authors wish to acknowledge Rene Lafrenière, Clinical Directors. Surv Anesthesiol 2007; glycaemic control in critically ill patients: a MD, CM, FACS, Ramon Berguer, MD, FACS, 51:218. systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Patricia C. Seifert, RN, Michael Belkin, MD, 100. Wiener-Kronish JP. Infection control for 2006;10(1):R19. FACS, Stuart Roth, MD, PhD, Karen S. the anesthesiologist: is there more than 115. Peers JG. Cleanup techniques in the Williams, MD, Eric J. De Maria, MD, FACS, handwashing? ASA Referesher Courses in operating room. Arch Surg 1973;107:596. and Lena M. Napolitano, MD, FACS, FCCM, Anesthesiology. 2007;35:219–25. 116. Weber DO, Gooch JJ, Wood WR, et al. who wrote and edited this chapter for the previ- 101. Sessler DI, Akca O. Nonpharmacological Influence of operating room surface ous version of ACS Surgery. This chapter has prevention of surgical wound infections. contamination on surgical wounds: a pro- drawn heavily on their work and generally follows Clin Infect Dis 2002;35:1397. spective study. Arch Surg 1976;111:484. their outline and concept of the subject discussed. 102. Kurz A, Sessler DI, Lenhardt R. Periopera- 117. Daschner F. Patient-oriented hospital Russell Stewart contributed to the research and tive normothermia to reduce the incidence hygiene. Infection 1980;39 Suppl:243. bibliography. 10/08