Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Subsurface Investigation and Geotechnical Evaluation
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×

Introducing the official SlideShare app

Stunning, full-screen experience for iPhone and Android

Text the download link to your phone

Standard text messaging rates apply

Subsurface Investigation and Geotechnical Evaluation

515
views

Published on


0 Comments
1 Like
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
515
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
34
Comments
0
Likes
1
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Atlantic Testing Laboratories Subsurface Investigation and Geotechnical Evaluation NYSCHSA January 22, 2013
  • 2. Topics Designing a Subsurface Investigation Program Subsurface Investigation Methodologies Subsurface Investigation Log Review CPT Log Review Soil Classifications Engineering Properties of Soil Geotechnical Evaluation
  • 3. Designing a Subsurface Investigation Determining the Number of Soil Borings  Former NYS Building Code  The Building Code of NYS 2002 (based on IBC 2000)  As a Rule of Thumb – 1 Boring for every 2,500 to 5,000 s.f. of building footprint
  • 4. Seismic Site ClassificationDetermination Code does not require a 100 foot boring Calculate the average soil properties in the top 100 feet. (either soil shear wave velocity, Standard Penetration resistance, of soil undrained shear strength) Section 1615.1.1 allows the register design professional to assume based on knowledge of local geology
  • 5. Seismic Site ClassificationDetermination Use table 1615.1.1 to determine Seismic Site Classification (class A, B, C, D, E, or F) Obtain the maximum considered earthquake ground motion of 0.2 sec spectral response (Ss) Obtain the maximum considered earthquake ground motion of 1 sec spectral response (S1)
  • 6. Seismic Site ClassificationDetermination Can be obtained from the maps in the code, the CD prepared by ICC, or USGS web page Adjust Ss and S1 based on coefficients presented in Tables 1615.1.2(1) and 1615.1.2(2)
  • 7. Seismic Site ClassificationDetermination Central New York sites typically fall into site class B, C, or D Glacial till and/or bedrock is often found at shallow depths. Exception is Onondaga Lake area, bedrock and/or glacial till in excess of 300 feet
  • 8. Subsurface InvestigationMethodologies ConventionalSoil Borings Cone Penetration Testing (CPT) Geoprobe Test Pits
  • 9. Conventional Drilling Hollow Stem Augers Flush Joint Casing Split Spoon Sampling Undisturbed Samples Bedrock Coring
  • 10. Hollow Stem Augers Auger Flights around a center sampling tube Size refers to diameter of sampling tube Advantages  Quick  More Economical  Water not necessary  Ability to collect bulk samples
  • 11. Flush Joint Casing Can be Driven or Spun-in the ground Advantages  Can be advanced through cobbles and boulder  Can be advanced to depths of around 300 feet  Provides a stable hole for special testing such as permeability testing
  • 12. Split Spoon Sampling In accordance with ASTM D 1586 Sample for soil classification and future laboratory testing Retained in sealed glass jars
  • 13. Undisturbed Samples In accordance with ASTM D 1587 Obtained from cohesive soils Returned to the laboratory for multiple analyses Provides accurate representation of in-situ conditions
  • 14. Bedrock Coring In accordance with ASTM D 2113 Double tubed core barrel with a diamond cutting shoe Samples are returned for classification, RQD determination, and laboratory analysis
  • 15. Cone Penetration Testing Pushes a “cone” with electronic sensors In accordance with ASTM D 3441 Determines:  Tip resistance  Side friction  Pore water pressure  Seismic shear wave velocity
  • 16. Cone Penetration Testing Advantages  Rapid: Can advance 200 to 400 feet per day  Accurately determines to Seismic Site Classification  Replicates pile driving  Useful in cohesive and sand soils
  • 17. Cone Penetration Testing Disadvantages  Not able to be pushed in dense soils or bedrock  No sample recovered, soil classifications relies on soil properties  Requires a large drill rig for reaction weight
  • 18. Typical CPT Log
  • 19. Cone Penetration Testing
  • 20. GeoprobeData: Environmental Sampling, Soil Classification, Bedrock Profile, and Groundwater Elevation
  • 21. Geoprobe
  • 22. Test Pits Advantages  Good for fill sites  Groundwater information  Collect bulk samples Disadvantages  Limited depth  Cannot determine Seismic Site Classification
  • 23. Subsurface Investigation LogReview Contain a wealth of information Soil types Soil consistency Groundwater information
  • 24. Soil Classification Several Systems Used Burmister Unified Soil Classification System NYSDOT USDA
  • 25. Burmister Soil Classification Visual-manual procedure Performed by the drillers in the field Soil classification verified in the laboratory
  • 26. Burmister Soil ClassificationBOULDERS: > 12” Particle SizeCOBBLES: 3” – 12” Particle SizeGRAVEL: Course: 3” - 1” Sieve Size Medium: 1” – ½” Sieve Size Fine: ½” - #4 Sieve SizeSAND: Course: #4 - #10 Sieve Size Medium: #10 - #40 Sieve Size Fine: #40 - #200 Sieve SizeSILT: #200 Sieve (0.074 mm) to 0.005 mmCLAY: <0.005 mm Particle Size
  • 27. Unified Soil Classification System In accordance with ASTM D 2487 and ASTM D 2488 ASTM D 2487 - laboratory analysis ASTM D 2488 - visual manual procedure performed in laboratory
  • 28. Unified Soil Classification
  • 29. Engineering Properties of Soil Natural Moisture Content Atterberg Limits  Liquid Limit  Plastic Limit  Plasticity Index Shear Strength Internal Friction Angle Consolidation Potential
  • 30. Soil Property Uses Bearing Capacity Lateral Earth Pressures Slope Stability Frost Heave Potential
  • 31. Geotechnical Evaluation Geotechnical Report Contents Optional Services Site Visit
  • 32. Thank You
  • 33. Question & Answer How deep can you drill with hollow stem augers?
  • 34. Question & Answer In what type of soil conditions is a Shelby Tube most conducive?
  • 35. Question & Answer Does a 100 foot boring need to be drilled to determine the seismic site classification?
  • 36. Question & Answer True or False: Determining the groundwater table is extremely important.
  • 37. Question & Answer What type of soil parameter does Cone Penetration Testing (CPT) determine that conventional soil borings can not?
  • 38. Thank You